Intergenerational inequality growing on incomes, housing costs and inflation

Numerous reports are showing how generation X and baby boomers have it much better than millennials.
A number of reports this week have highlighted how much better the nation’s older generations have it when compared with millennials (born between 1981 and 2000).
Generation X (born between 1966 and 1980) and baby boomers (born between 1946 and 1965) have enjoyed bigger incomes when they were working, cheaper housing, and lower inflation, according to the research.
All this means that intergenerational inequality is growing at an astonishing rate.
Income gap
Millennials risk becoming the first ever generation to earn less than their predecessors over the course of their working lives, research by the Resolution Foundation has found.
People aged 15-30 have been hit hardest by the recent pay squeeze. As a result, a typical millennial has earned £8,000 less during their 20s than someone from the previous generation – generation X.
“Generational inequality risks becoming a new inequality for our times, and nowhere is that clearer than on pay,” says Torsten Bell, director of the Resolution Foundation.
“We’ve taken it for granted that each generation will do much better than the last – earning more and enjoying a higher standard of living. But that approach risks looking complacent given the realities of recent years and prospects for the future.”
Baby boomers are expected to have earned £740,000 between the ages of 16 and 64. Generation X is expected to earn 21% more at £835,000 but millennials could earn as little as £825,000 making them the first generation to earn less.
“Far from earning more, millennials earn £8,000 less during their 20s than the generation before them,” says Bell.
“The financial crisis has played a role in holding millennials back, but the problem goes deeper than that. Even on optimistic scenarios they look likely to see much lower generational pay progress than we have become used to, and there is even the risk that they earn less over their lifetimes than older generations, putting generational pay progress in reverse.”
The report reveals that people aged 65-74 hold more wealth than the entire population aged under 45 – a group that is more than twice the size.
Find a more rewarding current account
Living costs
To add to the disparity in wealth between the generations, younger people face higher living costs.
The combination of falling home ownership and the rising cost of renting means millennials will have spent £44,000 more on rent by the time they reach 30 compared to the baby boomers.
Baby boomers were the “main beneficiaries of the growth in home ownership over the 20th century”, according to the report, with 63% of baby boomers owning their own home by the age of 30. In contrast only 42% of millennials will own their home by the time they are 30.
“The nation’s housing crisis is perhaps the most visible example of growing inequality between generations,” says Laura Gardiner, senior policy analyst at the Resolution Foundation. “Young people today are paying a heavy price for decades of falling home ownership. Britain’s continuing failure to build enough homes means that unless we change course the struggle of young people to own their own home is only going to get worse.”
The number of baby boomers who own buy-to-let property is also adding to the wealth inequality. The older generation earn 50% of the nation’s rental income.
|
Mean annual rental income |
Mean annual rental income among landlords |
Number of landlords |
Share of all landlords by generation |
Total rental income |
Share of all rental income |
Earlier generations |
£180 |
£7,200 |
220,000 |
23% |
£1.6 billion |
20% |
Baby boomers |
£240 |
£5,700 |
670,000 |
39% |
£3.8 billion |
50% |
Generation X |
£150 |
£4,500 |
440,000 |
31% |
£1.9 billion |
26% |
Millennials |
£30 |
£3,600 |
100,000 |
7% |
£339 million |
4% |
Inflation
To add to their woes, the under 30s face far higher inflation than any other generation. This is due to the fact the younger generation spend more of their money on high inflation items such as alcohol.
The real inflation level for millennials is 0.9%, according to the research by Fidelity International. In contrast it's just 0.3% for over 65s and 0.4% for both generation X (defined as 30-49 year olds in the study) and baby boomers (50-64 year olds).
The lower levels of inflation for over 65s is down to the group spending more on groceries and non-alcoholic drinks, which allows them to benefit from deflation driven by the ongoing supermarket price war.
“Supermarket price wars are keeping the cost of living down for the over 65s who ring up a bigger portion of their income at the tills,” says Richard Parkin, head of retirement at Fidelity International. “The over 65s are seeing their spending power reducing at a slower rate than other age groups.”
Find a more rewarding current account
Don’t miss these:
Amazon accused of using exaggerated RRP savings
Parents charged £12.5 million in school holiday term-time fines since rule change
Brexit investment opportunities: shares I’m buying after the referendum
Most Recent
Comments
-
Crikey, there's some citationless rubbish being sprouted. "Millennials struggle to buy a home as they spend £53k on rent by the time they hit 30 - £44k more than their parents' generation" Source: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mortgageshome/article-3693284/Millennials-struggle-buy-home-spend-44k-rent-parents-generation-time-hit-30.html "Each generation should be better off than their parents? Think again" Source: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/14/economics-viewpoint-baby-boomers-generation-x-generation-rent-gig-economy "The over-65s should be richer than the rest of us — but not this much richer." Source: http://moneyweek.com/why-the-old-are-so-wealthy-and-its-not-just-because-of-hard-work/ I think those sources just about covers the mainstream political right-left spectrum.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Once again it is time to set the younger generation against the older generation (divide and rule still exists then). No matter what generation you are from life is very difficult for most of us (very few silver spoons going around). Many pensioners still find themselves working at 70 plus regardless of whether they want to or not. They were mainly born during or after the war (food rationing etc) and very few inherited a house so they had to start from nothing in a time when inflation was sky high (12 to 15 %). When we die we will pass on the homes that we have worked hard to get to the next generation (not all of whom will appreciate it). My mother when elderly was in a home (much against my wishes) after suffering a Cardiac Arrest/Alzheimers and when I visited (as much as I could) I saw patients who never had any visitors at all until they died then the relatives came out of the woodwork and couldn't wait to get their hands on what was left. Then yes this present generation are having to wait such a long time to get on the housing ladder (although many of them stand to inherit properties which is something the older generation never had) but worse still they are having to face the appalling prospect of living in a dog eat dog world where serious violence and atrocities are on the increase on an almost daily basis and where people will get to the stage when they are afraid to go out of their homes. Don't point the finger at each other - let's use our influence to sort out the problems together.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
If the older generation has the bulk of the wealth (surely this has always been the case) and therefore the bulk of the consumer spending power which keeps the economy going and provides jobs for everyone, then it is essential that they be allowed to pass that wealth on through inheritance. That way, the Millenials will receive wealth and will be able to power the economy when they are older. The alternative is for the government to take it all away in Inheritance Tax thereby ensuring that the Millenials remain poor and there is no group with the wealth to power the economy. Thus, the whole country will slide into poverty.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
29 July 2016