Top

‘Rip-off’ hospital charges: premium phone numbers, TV charges and parking costs

Patients and their families are being charged millions of pounds to speak to loved ones, watch telly or simply park.

Patients and their families are being treated as “cash cows” in hospital as they are forced to pay a host of “rip-off” fees, critics claims.

People are being charged up to 50p a minute to speak to loved ones in hospital, while patients have to fork out up to £20 a day to watch TV.

Hospedia – the private company that supplies and maintains TV and bedside phones for NHS hospitals – earned more than £21 million last year.

Tim Farron, leader of the Liberal Democrats, has described the TV and phone charges as a “total rip off”.

He added: “When channels are free at home and people have already paid for their TV licence, it is unfair for them to need to pay it again.

“Hospitals and these businesses are treating the sick as cash cows.”

How to get cheap life insurance

How the costs add up

When you ring a patient in hospital on their bedside phone, you’ll need to dial an ‘070’ number.

The cost varies from one hospital to the next, but there have been reports of callers being charged 50p per minute.

The costs can quickly mount up – not least because you’re forced to listen to a 70-second pre-recorded message at the start of the call.

As for watching TV, the costs there are also staggering. Last year, Hospedia doubled its minimum price for a TV package from £2.50 to £5.

What’s more, patients could have to pay up to £20 a day if they want access to premium channels like Sky Sports.

There’s not a hell of a lot you can do to avoid these charges beyond ensuring you have a mobile phone and/or tablet with you.

What does the regulator say?

 An Ofcom spokesperson told the Guardian that the regulator was “concerned” about the use of 070 numbers in hospital.

They added: “We want to ensure adequate safeguards for consumers so we are examining the use of 070 number ranges, amid concerns that the cost of calling these numbers can be confusing.

“We welcome evidence of any harm so we can further protect consumers.”

How to get cheap life insurance

Other hospital costs to watch out for

Another area where families of the sick are being penalised is in the parking lot (although not in Scotland and Wales).

A report from the Press Association earlier this year found that hospitals in England collected more than £120 million last year in parking fees, up 5% on 2015.

Katherine Murphy, chief executive of health charity Patients Association, claims the research highlights how hospitals are “taking money from the sick and vulnerable to top up NHS coffers”.

She added: “This is not what car parking charges should be used for... we take a very clear line that car parking fees need to be scrapped or strictly capped.”

Win £100 today! Sign up to the daily loveMONEY newsletter to enter the prize draw

Read more on loveMONEY:

Life cover: how much do you really need?

How to protect your income

Insurance you need in your 20s

Keep Your Money Safe
Get paid up to £150 to switch current accounts. Better customer service, high-interest savings accounts and interest-free overdrafts are all on offer..
Your credit card provider must protect purchases over £100 for free. So make sure you use plastic to be extra safe when you buy pricey items.

Most Recent


Comments



  • 03 May 2017

    A lot of people seem to think that a "one size fits all" commercialization of patient communication, food and parking facilities is the answer. Conflicts of interest and monopoly arrangements seem to be casually ignored. Private provision of services, unless set up to avoid the money grabbing managements paying themselves bonuses for implementing income generating schemes, will generally be unfair and bad value. Why Wifi or cable facilities are not made available at fixed cost rates, to enable those who want them to connect their own equipment. When inside hospital last year I could not get a signal for my smart phone which allows me secure internet access for mail, news papers and some tv. Parking, creation and maintenance, for most hospitals was already paid for from government funds. Now the Treasury has taken "efficiency savings" cuts, the facilities are mostly unfunded except by Private Finance Initiative monies. Catering has always been difficult but judging by the shopping mall in the local major hospital, there are plenty of expensive as well as unhealthy food outlets. Not rocket science to solve. Successive governments just want to be keeping the tax income for such worthies as banks, tax avoiders and of course themselves.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    2

  • 03 May 2017

    A lot of people seem to think that a "one size fits all" commercialization of patient communication, food and parking facilities is the answer. Conflicts of interest and monopoly arrangements seem to be casually ignored. Private provision of services, unless set up to avoid the money grabbing managements paying themselves bonuses for implementing income generating schemes, will generally be unfair and bad value. Why Wifi or cable facilities are not made available at fixed cost rates, to enable those who want them to connect their own equipment. When inside hospital last year I could not get a signal for my smart phone which allows me secure internet access for mail, news papers and some tv. Parking, creation and maintenance, for most hospitals was already paid for from government funds. Now the Treasury has taken "efficiency savings" cuts, the facilities are mostly unfunded except by Private Finance Initiative monies. Catering has always been difficult but

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 03 May 2017

    I would not be against the NHS running these services at a profit and using the profit towards the NHS. But I would question the desirability of that, it could divert resources from essentials to these items and in general a private company specialising in items such as entertainment and parking can possibly do it more economically than the NHS could do it themselves. As for profiteering from these exercises, surely it is up to the Government who presumably put these activities out to tender, select the best company and decide what the contract will be, should be held to account to ensure they get the best value. But I still say, as hard as it may seem, the NHS is there to provide medical support and not to entertain or feed patients to 5 star standards. If food that is nutritionally adequate is provided that is all that is needed, if you happen to not like what is provided then it is up to you to make alternative arrangements. Unfortunately people are demanding more from the Government than is reasonable. If you want 5 star service then fine, but be willing to pay for it by way of hugely increased taxes.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Most Popular

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.


loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom.


loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited.


We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly.


Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards.


While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.