Love to be the one to Make good property decisions?

Then register for free and get exclusive, personalised benefits that will help you achieve all your money goals.

Join the lovemoney.com experience

Register Now

Confused?

Why Register?

Repossessions up 51% - but borrowers are fighting back

Published 15 May 2009 in Make good property decisions

Repossessions are on the up, but data suggests that struggling homeowners and landlords are being treated better than in the past.

Measures to curb unnecessary repossessions appear to be having a good effect. Although repossessions are rising, the number of repossession claims being submitted to court are down. Also down are the number of possession orders granted. Here are the figures.

Mortgage repossession court claims and orders granted

 

Jan-Mar 2008

Oct-Dec 2008

Jan- Mar 2009

Change on one year earlier

Mortgage possession claims

36,700

26,000

22,600

-14,100(-38%)

Mortgage possession orders

27,500

29,100

17,100

-10,500 (-38%)

Figures taken from Ministry of Justice and are seasonally adjusted. Figures are rounded to nearest 100, which explains small differences in the calculations.

These figures are for all possessions in just England and Wales, but it still indicates that many lenders are being a lot less aggressive, with court claims down almost 40% and orders granted matching that.

Repossessions may be up, but that's only natural during a recession. The good news is that the massive reduction in claims is a strong indicator that repossessions are happening more often as a last resort. Put another way, if the borrower shouldn't have received a possession order, then it's less likely he or she actually did.

How has this happened?

The cause is likely to be changes to the guidelines that lenders must follow before making a claim. There's no need for me to get into the technical details, but the Government made the changes in order to reduce unnecessary claims and ensure that lenders try all other solutions first. I've looked at several more quarterly reports from the Ministry of Justice, and the timing and extent of these reductions matches exactly with the date the new guidelines were introduced. (19 November 2008).

There are other measures that have been introduced, such as Support for Mortgage Interest and a Mortgage Rescue Scheme, but I doubt these will have a massive impact on repossession figures, as they're very limited. A new scheme that started in April, the Mortgage Support Scheme, may have more of an impact as it could potentially help more people. We'll see how the banks choose to handle the scheme when the next repossession data comes out in three months.

Repossessions up more than 50%. But how much more?

Repossessions might on average be more reasonable now, but that doesn't mean everyone's happy. As I said: repossessions are still up.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) publishes numbers on repossessions. Unlike the data above from the Ministry of Justice, the CML's figures cover the whole UK. (Well, 98% of the market anyway.) On the downside, it covers just first-charge lenders. Second-charge lenders - which grant you an extra home-loan on top of your existing mortgage - are not included.

From January to March this year, such repossessions totalled 12,800. In the same time last year it was 8,500, meaning first-charge repossessions are up 51%.

It's a shame second-charge lending isn't included in the figures. Citizens Advice and Shelter believe second-charge lenders are being less responsible on average than first-charge lenders and that would certainly make sense. They can get away with more aggressive behaviour because there is simply no solid data available on them, which could anger the public. What's more, they have likely been hit harder by arrears as more of them will have borrowers who were stretched even before the recession occurred.

As a result, it's likely that the real number of repossessions is not only a fair bit higher than 12,800, but also rising faster than 51% per year.

Buy-to-let repossessions doubled

Let's move on to landlords' properties being repossessed. Of the 12,800 repossessions last quarter reported by the CML, 1,700 of them are buy-to-let. The same time last year it was just 900, so more landlords are running out of cash, and the banks out of goodwill towards them.

There's nothing startling about that increase. However, this is just a tiny proportion of the entire buy-to-let market, less than half a percent, so it's probably not as difficult for landlords right now as most people think.

Some tenants face the fear of eviction within just a few weeks of repossession, say a few charities. However, groups representing lenders claim that the tenant usually gets to continue to stay provided they keep paying the rent. I think this is probably true, as it would suit all parties concerned.

Possession orders on tenants

Tenants who miss rent payments face a harsher time from their landlords than property-owners do from their banks when they miss mortgage payments. Here are figures showing the rate at which landlords are getting rid of tenants that they consider nuisances:

.

Jan-Mar 2008

Oct-Dec 2008

Jan- Mar 2009

Change on one year earlier

Landlord possession claims

37,200

36,100

35,700

1,500 (-4%)

Mortgage possession orders

28,500

27,700

27,500

-700 (-2%)

As you can see, these numbers are a lot higher than my first table. There's been no pressure for landlords to find alternatives to kicking out tenants, hence the negligible change over the past year. Bear in mind though that possession orders are not just used by landlords on tenants who fall into arrears. They're also used to remove squatters, for example.

What should you do?

It's very simple. If you're having any trouble with cashflow or paying your bills, no matter how serious, it is always worth getting free debt advice from quality, impartial sources that have huge experience improving people's finances. They could even help save you from repossession.

My favourite two such debt resources for Britain are The Motley Fool's Dealing with Debt board and National Debtline. Debt help for Northern Ireland is more limited. If you know of a good not-for-profit organisation that helps there, please post a recommendation below.

> Read 125 tips for dealing with debt.

> Read Buy-to-let investors are getting what they deserve.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Share this lovemoney.com content on any of the social networks and utilities below by simply clicking the site of your choice.

  • You can subscribe to all lovemoney.com articles via our RSS feed.

Comments

  • 0 recommendations

First as far as buy to let landlords are concerned, any that have houses repossessed are the ones that have not managed their own finances properly, probably not paying extra off the loan amount preffering to reap the profits immediately, so I have no compassion for those people.

As far as home owner repossessions, a lot of these are probably from people that have had little help from any quarter or indeed been bullied by their mortgage lender bt way of charges levied on the mortgage account, due to the FSA dragging its feet as usual, over charges from such companies.

Example I was sent a letter, presumably from a solicitor and charged an appropriate solicitors fee. a simple letter from my own solicitor to the lender and I had the charge removed. The letter, sent to me, was a computer generated letter that had never been seen by any solicitor , therefore highly dubious, and one by which a court would have taken action against the lender had they been informed. The reason, 2 late payments made to the lender.

Now as you can imagine, anyone having difficulties with their lender would get a string of letters from their lender with all sorts of charges levied on them. This is just bullying tactics by lenders during this period, and most people, do not know their rights regarding charges and still more just think these lenders have to do everything within the law, however most lenders do stretch the bounds of the law as far as they can, and most borrowers never see a solicitor in the early stages if at all.

The law, although improved, is still far too weak regarding lenders, and the FSA an inafectual body, until pressed by public opinion into doing something.

XrayEye said

  • 0 recommendations

Re: LateDeveloper-"As far as home owner repossessions, a lot of these are probably from people that have had little help from any quarter "

Erm, I think you'll find that thanks to us savers being punished again and again many mortgage-holders have been gifted thousands of pounds at our expense, so this statement infuriates me.

About 4 years ago I decided not to get a mortgage as I'd seen the signs of a bubbling housng market and although property prices were rocketing faster than I could save I decided to wait for the bubble to burst and regain my losses then. Unfortunately, thanks to government and BoE meddling I was punished again for my financial 'prudence' as they decided to take my expected interest gain and give it away to the property gamblers.

A lot of these people will just use the windfall to jut pay off their maxed-out credit cards at our expense. And they still moan! "Negative equity", tough, you gambled, I didn't. Take your pill and swallow it, cos I'm being forced to swallow your pills!

My savings interest rates have been slashed by over 70% and given (like a bankers bonus) to mortgage-holders with no obvious reason as to why. Weren't they only expected to carry on paying what they decided they could afford? What was the reason behind this financial gift to property owners at the expense of us saving for a mortgages?

So, I don't have sympathy for those who gambled on property or overstretched themselves (and the property market). I've been suffering for these people for long enough and the sooner the property market comes down to reaslitic levels the sooner the country can move forward (hopefully with a bit of sense this time).

This country is fortunate people like me haven't just taken our money and gone elsewhere (I'm still half-tempted). Then you'd all be up the Swanee, so stop moaning and be grateful for ALL the help you've had.

I'll just sit and wait it out with you at a time when my capital should actually be catching up in leaps and bounds on it's years of negative growth compared to property prices.

Here's hoping the government will reward us savers' loyalty in the future!

sodit said

  • 0 recommendations

XrayEye, 

I fear that you will be sadly disappointed. Those crooks in Westminster can most easily thieve money from those who've got it. As a saver, you've got money so you're going to get robbed. Not just through higher taxes to come, but as the government debases our currency you'll find what little you've managed to scrape together becomes worth less and less.

The most nausiating thing about the current administration is that those persons who behave prudently (or is it morally?) are being punished, whereas those who behave recklessly are rewarded.

  • 0 recommendations

Re XrayEye,: Sorry I have no idea what your talking about

A lot of these people will just use the windfall to jut pay off their maxed-out credit cards at our expense

What windfall?

That makes no sense, the majority of people buy a house for a home, and not as an investment, I agree that if they did buy one to make quick money then they deserve everything they get if repossessed, just like the landlords.

As far as this Government is concerned, they may have hit savers, but then again, it is the banks that are at fault, amazing how they are the ones reaping all the benefits during this recession with low interest rates set by the Government with loans and credit card interest rates still high, whilst everyone else has to suffer.

It is your choice as to where you save money, after all it is an investment and you take the risk just like any other form of investment. It is the banks that lower the interest rates on savings, not the government.You are being duped yet again by the banks The only people that have benefitted with Goverment help is the Banks, the ones responsible for the recession in the first place.

Repossessed mortgage borrowers are not restricted by length of loan to the underhand tactics these banks use to recoup losses these lenders were responsible for in the first place.

lawole4 said

  • 0 recommendations

Too right Latedeveloper! All i do is hearing savers drone on about how woefully they are being treated by the BoE and the govt. At least they have savings they can stare at and if truth be told, people in debt with cards and mortgages etc generate the momentum of the circle of finance including savers ofcourse. it is one big circle dude. The so called prudence of savers will only go sofar regarding recovery and in anycase the facts are that the bouyancy of the economy depends on good quality of credit all round and some savings if you can afford it.

i personally know why i can't save regularly, my season ticket alone costs over £3200, two lovely children and a victorian house that is pynning for new carpets and a new bathroom. so there.

Iniq said

  • 0 recommendations

One simple reform would be to make it just as hard for a mortgage lender to evict tenants as it is for the borrower/landlord himself.  If a landord falls into arrears, why should the tenant suffer, if he's been paying his due rent?

This would not only provide fair and necessary protection for the tenants, it would also encorage less reckless lending to landlords, thus taking some of the heat out of the house price bubble.

And it is a bubble even now, because it is propped up by borrowed money.  After all, "Buy to Let" is a complete misnomer - if that was all it was, buying residential property would be just an ordinary invesment, like buying shares.  But it is not; it is "Borrow to Let" even though naive people try to ignore this simple fact.  And because it is a speculation based on borrowed money it remains a dangerously fragile, highly inflationary pastime.

I speak as a landlord who, when I did have a mortgage on my investment property a long time ago, had to pay a much higher rate of interest and borrow a much smaller prportion of the property's value than an owner-occupier, and quite rightly so.  We need a return to such policies.

Join the conversation

Please sign in or register to add a comment or recommend.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Typical
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard Platinum with 16 Month BT Visa

0% for 16 months
(2.9% fee)
Typical 16.9% APR (variable) Apply

Virgin Money Credit Card MasterCard

0% for 14 months
(2.98% fee)
Typical 16.6% APR (variable) Apply

Egg Visa

0% until 1st Oct 2011
(3% fee)
Typical 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
W3C  Thank you for using One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest