Q&A

Answer a question


Do you want to follow this topic? You need to be signed in for this feature
Do you want to save this article to read later? You need to be signed in for this feature


Tracking FTSE 100, 250 & All-Share Indexes

HSBC has index funds tracking the FTSE 100, 250 & All-Share Indexes all with total expense ratios of about 0.25%. Is it a good idea to track all these indexes or only one or two - what are the pros and cons of tracking them all.

1
Answers


Do you want to answer this question? You need to be signed in for this feature

Answers




The 100 is the top 100 companies. The 250 is the next 250 companies. Any references to 350 is combination of the 100 & 250. The All-share naturally covers the whole market. The proportions are all based on the market capitalisations of the companies. Having all 3 would see substantial overlap because the top 350 are much bigger than the rest The problem with the 100 & 250 trackers is that every 3 months there is a movement of the constituents. This results in forced selling (at a discount) of companies leaving the index and forced buying (at a premium) of those joining. The discount & premium are because all those trackers are doing it at the same time. Some saving can result where investment houses have both 100 & 250 trackers and can transfer some shares between trackers. With the All-share index trackers, there is no forced sale or purchase. The top 350 companies would be most of the index anyway, so I would go for the All-share on its own. Mike