Want a mortgage? You'll have to pass this exam!

One charity has said it is too easy for first-time buyers to arrange a mortgage without understanding the potential debt they could fall into -- and reckons they should have to pass exams first!
Do you think that first-time buyers should have to sit an exam to be able to get a mortgage? One leading debt charity has presented the idea as a possible solution to stopping people becoming over-indebted.
Malcolm Hurlston, chairman of national debt charity, the Consumer Credit Counselling Service (CCCS) spoke out at a conference last week to call for supervision of all first-time buyer mortgages by the financial regulator. And he suggested the issuing of homeownership certificates for anybody buying their first home.
He also called on all political parties to introduce training and counselling for those looking to buy their own homes, citing a practice already adopted in some parts of the US. He insisted: “First-time mortgages should be sold not with pretty ribbons and tax breaks but with health warnings. They should be sold like driving licences, after study and an exam.”
Is this going too far?
Over-indebted
Hurlston argues that those most likely to have a debt problem in Britain are those on low incomes who embarked on homeownership too soon, or when they can’t really afford it. He reckons first-time buyers should be educated before being allowed to buy.
I think the CCCS chairman has lost the plot here. I mean, I’m all for financial education -- in fact I think it should be made compulsory in schools to give kids an overall grounding of the financial basics. But getting first-time buyers to be counselled before they can get onto the property ladder is ludicrous.
After all, where do you draw the line?
Is it only essential that those who need a mortgage pass the exam -- are multi-millionaire cash buyers exempt, or those with rich parents who could bail them out if things got hairy?
What about the fact that most borrowers who fall into arrears do so because of an unforeseen life-changing experience, such as death, divorce or unemployment? That’s something that no amount of financial theory can truly prepare you for.
But most importantly, first-time buyers have another option already available if they don’t know enough about mortgages to make an informed decision. They can go to an independent qualified mortgage broker who will advise them on the best course of action.
Why should they be forced to learn about mortgages if they don’t want to know? They can get onto the property ladder with the help of an authorised expert, who knows oodles about mortgages, in theory and in practice.
For example, lovemoney.com's mortgage service is completely free of charge and all our brokers have passed professional mortgage exams, plus they are fully regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
They also do the legwork for you -- a whole lot easier than trying to get your head around the mortgage market yourself if you don’t feel confident about your financial acumen.
But whether you are a first-time buyer who wants someone to hold your hand throughout the process, or a savvy financial whiz who doesn’t want advice, are there any decent first-time buyer deals out there?
Push into FTB market
There are certainly more and more lenders looking to enter the small deposit market (dominated by first-time buyers). This is because business has become too competitive at the lower risk, large deposit end of the lending spectrum and lenders are starting to look for profit in the 90% loan-to-value (LTV) arena. The good news is that the more lenders that come into this market, the more mortgage rates will be pushed down -- great for those who can only scrape together a small deposit.
Only last week sister lenders The Cooperative Bank and Britannia Building Society launched a new range of deals up to 90% LTV (their previous maximum was 85%), showing an increased appetite for higher risk lending.
The new range includes a two-year fixed rate at 5.49%, a five-year fix at 6.09% and a three-year tracker at 4.49%, all with a £999 fee, although some fee-free options are also available. The rates are keen and up there with the best buys at this level (see table below). The deals are only available to house purchase customers (not remortgagors), on a capital repayment basis only (not interest-only) and the maximum property value is £350k (min £75k).
But it isn’t the only lender to have decent deals aimed squarely at first-time buyers. Below are some of the best mortgages for those with a 10% or 15% deposit:
20 fabulous FTB deals
Lender |
Type of deal |
Rate |
Fee |
Max LTV |
3-year tracker |
3.19% (Base + 2.69) |
£999 |
85% |
|
2-year tracker |
3.59% (Base + 3.09) |
£995 |
85% |
|
Term tracker |
3.99% (Base + 3.49) |
£499 |
85% |
|
Term tracker |
4.49% (Base + 3.99%) |
£499 |
90% |
|
3-year tracker |
4.49% (Base + 3.99%) |
£999 |
90% |
|
2-year fix |
4.49% |
£995 |
85% |
|
2-year fix |
4.49% |
£999 |
85% |
|
2-year tracker |
4.60% (Base + 4.10) |
£694 |
90% |
|
2-year tracker |
4.69% (Base + 4.19) |
Fee-free |
90% |
|
2-year fix |
4.89% |
Fee-free |
85% |
|
3-year fix |
5.24% |
£999 |
85% |
|
2-year fix |
5.49% |
£999 |
90% |
|
3-year fix with £500 cashback |
5.59% |
Fee-free |
85% |
|
5-year fix |
5.64% |
£999 |
85% |
|
5-year fix with £500 cashback |
5.89% |
Fee-free |
85% |
|
3-year fix |
5.99% |
£495 |
90% |
|
2-year fix |
5.99% |
Fee-free |
90% |
|
5-year fix |
6.09% |
£999 |
90% |
|
5-year fix |
6.39% |
Fee-free |
90% |
|
5-year fix |
6.39% |
Fee-free |
90% |
More: Get ready for Base Rate rises | Crisis hits rental market
Most Recent
Comments
-
I'm in favour of the proposal. Mortgages are important and complex, and buying a house is one of the biggest decisions that most people make. First-time buyers should understand what they're getting into before they sign on the bottom line. The personal consequences of defaulting on a mortgage are potentially terrible: stress, illness, marriage breakdown, repossession, heavy drinking or drug-abuse, and the temptation to commit property crime. To see the consequences for society as a whole, just look at the whole sub-prime crisis we've seen over the last few years. Christina wonders whether there should be an exemption for people "with rich parents who could bail them out if things got hairy". I say there shouldn't. People with rich parents will be happier if they learn to manage money, just like the rest of us. The parents will be happier and family relationships will be stronger, too. Christina also asks: "What about the fact that most borrowers who fall into arrears do so because of an unforeseen life-changing experience ...?" That should be covered in the counselling. Building up a contingency fund or buying good-value insurance to protect against unmanageable risks is part of good money-management. Not everyone does it. Everyone should. Finally: "buyers .... can go to an independent qualified mortgage broker who will advise them on the best course of action." Well, no. First, the broker is too busy. Second, he has powerful incentives to sell as many mortgages as possible, rather than to sell the most appropriate mortgages and turn away customers who can't afford them. Third, a typical first-time buyer already struggles to absorb and remember everything that's said in a mortgage consultation; if you added advice on money-management, it would be overwhelming. The counselling I'd like to see would be light on financial jargon. Sure, it would have to explain the difference between the most common products and variations on the market. But that could be done at a very simple level -- for example: if you choose an interest-only mortgage, you must find some other way to pay for the house (such asn an endowment) at the end of the term, and you take the risk that the investment will fall short and you'll be repossessed. If you take a mortgage with a low rate in the early years, you'll pay for it later on, either by paying off the capital more slowly or in high exit fees. If you take out a mortgage when interest rates are low, you must work out whether you can afford the payments when rates rise. And so on. Borrowers should be taught how to make a budget. Some people need to be told that lliving off credit is expensive: that they'll have more goodies if they save up for things, rather than borrowing for them. And we've already mentioned the need for savings and insurance to protect against the unexpected. You can't expect a mortgage broker to explain all this. You can't expect buyers to learn it from a Web site (no matter how good!) while they're going through the stress of buying their first house. And people don't seem to be learning it from their family and friends. So I say some counselling and an exam would be a force for good. They might just start to unwind this country's reckless addiction to debt.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
The money markets who lent and the home owners who were happy to take out additional loans based on the inflated equity value of their property are all culpable for the housing gridlock. It's all been said before, but the abandonment of responsible lending and borrowing based on real ability to repay in bad times as well as in good has played its part. 3 x one income. 2 and a half x joint worked. It kept house prices affordable at all levels of the market. I hope first time buyers revolt and refuse to buy into the market. Just because someone tells you a house is worth X, doesn't mean it is...unless you buy it at that price.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
As someone with a perfect payment history, credit reference, good salary, remortgaging to raise £48K to give a max of £97K on a £200K plus house, with investment, endowment, pension etc with the woolwich, beleive me first time buyers will need more than an exam!!!. The housing market will never move until the banks wake up and start lending - I'm just waiting now to be asked to donate a pint of blood, which is all that hasn't be asked for so far to support the application. Absolute overkill isn't the half of it - if only theyt'd been so damn careful with all our money which they were happy to gamble with which caused the financial crash, which has affected so many. Whoever wins the election sorting these bankers out should be an early priority!
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
09 May 2010