Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Landline phones

Directory enquiries: the true cost of calling 118 numbers

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 02 October 2012  |  Comments 22 comments

We look at how much it really costs you if you call a 118 directory enquiry number.

Directory enquiries: the true cost of calling 118 numbers

From 1957 to 2003, British landline callers wanting directory enquiries could dial only one number: 192.

Ten years ago, in 2002, this all changed when telecom regulator Oftel (now Ofcom) opened up the directory-enquiries market to competition. Very soon, more than 200 different providers were competing to capture callers seeking numbers.

In theory, ended 192's monopoly by opening up its closed shop to competition should have brought down prices and improved customer service. In fact, a decade later, the cost of dialling directory enquiries is a growing national scandal.

Let's take a look at the true cost of calling a 188 directory enquiries number.

The great 118 rip-off

Thanks to their multi-million-pound advertising budgets, two companies now control almost the entire market for 118 calls. These are The Number (118 118) and BT (118 500). The clear market leader is 118 118, best known for its awful adverts featuring two moustachioed athletes, who are clearly lookalikes of long-distance runner David Bedford.

Quite frankly, the charges levied by these companies and almost all other 118 providers are outrageous, thanks to these four rip-offs:

  1. Connection charge: Just being connected to a 118 service could cost you roughly 50p.
  2. Per-minute fee: For every minute or part-minute you spend finding a number, you'll pay upwards of £1.
  3. Call connection: If you agree to allow the 118 operator to connect your call, then you'll continue to pay sky-high per-minute charges until your call ends. Three years ago, one customer complained to Ofcom after paying over £350 for a single 118-connected call.
  4. Calling from mobiles: 118 calls from landlines are expensive, but from mobiles, they are astronomically overpriced. In fact, it would probably be cheaper to call the Curiosity rover currently exploring Mars than to call a 118 number from your mobile!

118 calls compared

Here's a head-to-head comparison of the two leading 118 services, The Number and BT:

Provider

Connection

charge

Per-minute

fee

Cost of

first minute

 

118 118

The Number

38p

£1.59

£1.97

118 500

BT

62p

£1.69

£2.31

As you can see, calling these two services for up to a minute costs between £1.97 and £2.31. Any extra minutes are then billed at £1.59 or £1.69, making these calls extortionately high-priced.

Note that on 24 August 2003, the day it was abolished, the 192 service charged 40p to find a number. Now, rival 118 services cost upwards of £2 for a one-minute call -- and far more if calls are dragged out, connected onwards or not made from landlines.

Once again, deregulation has utterly failed the British public, as Oftel and its successor Ofcom have presided over a five-fold increase in the cost of calling directory enquiries. Well done, regulators!

Always use a free alternative

I reckon that, with up to 200 million yearly calls to 118 providers, we Brits waste as much as £400 million a year on this calling con. How can we stamp out this scam?

The simple answer is to boycott these services completely. Instead, try dialling 0800 118 FREE (0800 118 3733). This is a free, ad-based service for landline users provided by The Number (also the operator of 118 118).

Even better, if you have an Internet-connected device (such as a PC, Mac, laptop, smartphone or tablet PC), then use Google or similar search engines to find missing numbers

By working together to shun 118 calls, we Brits can stamp out this rip-off for good.

More on phones:

Post Office freezes broadband and home phone prices until October 2013

Orange announces landline telephone price rises

BT to raise prices by up to 5.9%

How to call 0845 and 0870 numbers for free!

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (22)

  • PoohBah
    Love rating 19
    PoohBah said

    We used to dial DIR for directory enquiries; I can't find when it changed to 192. I understand the rot set in when cold-calling salesmen found it quicker to phone 192 than look up long lists of numbers in the paper directories, and BT (as Post Office Telephones had then become) decided that something had to be done to prevent the service being inundated. Now it's just a rip-off.

    It's easy to knock the telephone service of 40 years ago and more, but technology has moved on a lot: the systems are inherently more robust than they were, and capacity has increased enormously - when did you last hear the "equipment engaged" tone (alternate long and short beeps)?

    Never forget that it was the Post Office Research boys at Dollis Hill who built Colossus, the first fully programmable computer.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    Thanks to Cliff D'Arcy for writing such an angry and campaigning article, with which I agree entirely. The telecoms industry and the regulators in particular should be ashamed of themselves.

    As regards people's comments, I'm sorry but Saynoto0870 is *not* a panacea: it can help, but frequently the numbers listed are out of date. Some firms like Birmingham Midshires are very diligent about cancelling all their landlines and forcing you to use 0845. Fortunately my TalkTalk landline gives me 0845 and 0870 numbers for free, but calling from my mobile or a Virgin Media landline is utterly extortionate.

    I also find it can be hard finding a good proportion of numbers on the internet - businesses move and don't update their websites, and listing websites are frequently out of date. Even the Yellow Pages is not what it was, whilst Thomson is hopeless. I absolutely hate the new small-format phone books from BT and Yell - they are tiny compared to the old large books, and to my tired 50-year-old eyes, virtually illegible. I tried complaining to Yell and was told "we've had no complaints", with the implication that I'm some sort of weirdo because I can't read their products . . .

    Report on 05 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4