regular investment stock an shares isa total yearly costs-commision/stamp duty/admin fees 8.5% is this bad?

compound200
by compound200 30 November 2009  |  Comments 11 comments  |  Love Love  0 loves

Report

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (11)

  • manzanilla
    Love rating 410
    manzanilla posted

    It's dreadful.

    who is it with? how does the cost break down between commmission and admin fees?

    are you buying every month? you could presumably halve the commission costs by only buying every other month, or even once a quarter. If you are paying say £12 commission, I wouldn't want buy in chunks of less than £1200, ie 1% commission rate.

    manzanilla

    Posted on 30 November 2009 | Love Love  1 love Report
  • compound200
    Love rating 7
    compound200 posted

    not sure if i got % right

    eg.-£50 a month(regular saver share isa)

    £1.50 commision+ stamp duty .25 x 12=£21

    admin

    0.05% of valuation x 12(low £2.16--max £8.33)(£2.16 x 12=£25.92+£3.88vat vat)=£29.80

    £29.80 + £21=£50.80

    £600 invested minus costs = £549.20

    about 8.5%

    do you know a cheaper way to buy shares

    this was sold as low cost--i guess you have to invest larger sums for cost ratio to come down

     

    Posted on 30 November 2009 | Love Love  0 loves Report
  • manzanilla
    Love rating 410
    manzanilla posted

    Sorry, but yes, you are simply investing too little for it too be economic.

    i think you should stop buying shares each month and buy just twice a year. And therefore go for some sort of colective vehicle, rather than a single share. An Investment Trust or an ETF or a tracker fund.

    Your next years figures wont be nearly so gloomy, as the adn=min costs will stay the same but your fund will be twice as large.

    Any chance of increasing the £50 a month to a £100??? Just asking :)

    manzanilla

    Posted on 30 November 2009 | Love Love  0 loves Report
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 804
    MikeGG1 posted

    If you are subscribing that sort of amount, you shouldn't be using them, or buying shares for that matter.

    Much better to go for a low-cost All-Share Tracker, such as Legal & General or Fidelity, or an ETF.

    If you are investing long-term (over 10 years), go Global instead.

    Once you have built up a big enough holding then you can branch out into share buying, but not in chunks of £50. Put the £50 into a 12-month Fixed-rate Monthly Saver. At the end of the year, buy 1 company and start a new Monthly Saver. Keep doing that and you will build up a portfolio with much lower expenses.

    Mike

    Posted on 01 December 2009 | Love Love  1 love Report
  • compound200
    Love rating 7
    compound200 posted

    thx

    Posted on 01 December 2009 | Love Love  0 loves Report
  • compound200
    Love rating 7
    compound200 posted

    what amount monthly would i have to put in to make this account value for money?

    thx

    Posted on 01 December 2009 | Love Love  0 loves Report
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 804
    MikeGG1 posted

    Realistically, you probably won't be able to beat a Low-cost Tracker.

    First of all you will need at least £500 per trade and then you will have to be able to beat the market which many professionals don't.

    Mike

    Posted on 01 December 2009 | Love Love  0 loves Report
  • manzanilla
    Love rating 410
    manzanilla posted

    Compound200 is only paying £1.50 per trade, that is very cheap! So a trade value of £250 rather than £500 is fine. The admin fees only look high because this is the first year - next year they will be better and the year after better again.

    Of course this was probably not a sensible account to open. But having paid this years fees, it will get better.

    manzanilla

    Posted on 02 December 2009 | Love Love  0 loves Report
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 804
    MikeGG1 posted

    The cheap trading cost is the one good thing here. Stamp duty is 0.5%, so converting the £1.50 into another 0.5% gives £300 per trade to get a 1% initial cost.

    Admin fees would shift this up considerably but, as Manzanilla has said, the higher the total pot, the lower the unit admin cost, especially until you reach the minimumlevel. Even at £500 per trade, the overall cost will still be greater than 1% until you are well over the maximum admin fee.

    Posted on 02 December 2009 | Love Love  0 loves Report
  • compound200
    Love rating 7
    compound200 posted

    admin fee is valuation of account at rate of 0.05%

     £4000 valuation matches min fee £2.16

    £16000 valuation matches max fee £8.33

    theres a cap at £8.33

    so anything above that will bring down costs considerably

    Posted on 02 December 2009 | Love Love  0 loves Report
  • compound200
    Love rating 7
    compound200 posted

    it is a investment trust

    fcs-global smaller companies

    Posted on 02 December 2009 | Love Love  0 loves Report

Post an answer

Sign in or register to post an answer.

Something you're dying to ask... or answer?

Register with lovemoney.com to start asking and answering questions on Q&A.

Get started now

Sign in for a better Q&A

Registered already? Great! You can just sign in to ask and answer questions.

Sign in
W3C  Thank you for using The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse