Love to be the one to Make good property decisions?

Then register for free and get exclusive, personalised benefits that will help you achieve all your money goals.

Join the lovemoney.com experience

Register Now

Confused?

Why Register?

Great news for homebuyers

Published 6 November 2009 in Make good property decisions

At last, housing bear Cliff D'Arcy has something positive to say about the property market....

Frequent readers of lovemoney.com will know that I'm something of a housing 'bear'. For several years, I've been very pessimistic about the outlook for residential property. Indeed, 4½ years ago, I sold my family home in order to sit out the inevitable housing crash.

In my first two years as a tenant, UK house prices continued their relentless climb, peaking in August 2007. Two now-familiar words explain why house prices started to fall steeply after the summer of 2007: credit crunch.

When credit collapsed

The seeds of the credit crunch were sown in the US housing boom that began in the second half of the Nineties. As US house prices reached their peak towards the end of 2006, more and more American homeowners began defaulting on their mortgages. These bad debts, combined with huge leverage and derivatives which magnified losses, began producing hefty write-downs for US lenders.

Even worse, these lenders had packaged up their home loans into bundles of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). These bonds -- plus other loan derivatives such as CDOs (collateralized debt obligations) -- were chopped up and sold to investors across the world. Thus, as the US housing market started to crash, the effects were felt around the globe.

In early 2007, hedge funds and big US banks started to report losses on RMBS and other securities linked to US home loans. As the underlying loans turned bad in their millions, financial firms all over the world stopped buying mortgage-backed bonds.

Eventually, in early August 2007, the cost of borrowing became so high -- and banks became so frightened and risk-averse -- that credit markets around the world effectively shut down. Of course, this delivered a massive blow to the UK housing market, sending prices into a 1½-year slump.

No RMBS = No Northern Rock

The first UK victim of the credit crunch was Northern Rock. In the first half of 2007, Northern Rock lent almost a fifth of all the money advanced to homebuyers. Alas, three-quarters of its mortgage funding came from loans raised in the wholesale money markets.

Hence, when the credit markets shut up shop, the Rock sought emergency funding from the Bank of England. This news caused a run on the Newcastle-based bank in mid-September 2007 and, eventually, Northern Rock was nationalised in February 2008.

Just over a year ago, credit markets suffered another serious setback when US investment bank Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. This caused banks to cut back even more sharply on their lending, which sent credit spreads soaring once again.

From big freeze to thaw

In short, the period from 2007 to 2009 saw the worst crisis in financial markets since the Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the Great Depression which followed it in the Thirties. However, since this spring, things have started to improve. Stock markets have soared, the Bank of England slashed its base rate to an all-time low of 0.5% a year, and the cost of credit has tumbled.

Of course, after The Rock became The Wreck, UK lenders found it impossible to sell mortgage bonds, as there were no buyers. Then again, it looks as if the UK market for residential mortgage-backed securities is starting to re-open, albeit cautiously.

In September, Lloyds Banking Group sold £4 billion of bonds created from a bundle of Halifax mortgages. These came with the top credit rating of AAA, and demand from investors was so high that Lloyds was able to expand this offer while securing an attractive price.

Lloyds' deal was the first RMBS transaction since the summer of 2007. However, last month, Nationwide BS followed suit, selling £3.5 billion of mortgage-backed bonds to investors. What's more, as financial markets return to normal, bankers expect more and more RMBS deals to hit the market.

Cheaper, easier credit

Just as one swallow doesn't make a summer, two RMBS trades doesn't make a market. Nevertheless, the residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) market is showing the first signs of life since its collapse in summer 2007. Although this may seem a bit esoteric, it has major implications for lenders' ability to lend.

At their peak, RMBS and other mortgage securitisations were a key source of funding for UK banks. Indeed, before the credit crunch, the UK accounted for around half of the entire European market for RMBS. At the peak in 2006, UK lenders issued almost £90 billion of mortgage-backed securities.

If this market does gather momentum, then it will ease access to credit, enabling lenders to lend to a broader range of homebuyers. In addition, more RMBS transactions could mean a reduction in mortgage rates as healthy competition returns to the UK mortgage market.

While the rebirth of RMBS is good news for homebuyers and homeowners, I don't expect it to fuel another housing boom. Although the RMBS market should eventually gather pace, it will never again see its previous heights. In future, RMBS must become just another fund-raising tool for lenders -- and not a bubble made of mortgage bonds!

Get help from lovemoney.com

If you need advice on mortgages, we can help.

First, adopt this goal: Cut the cost of your mortgage and pay it off early

Next, watch this video: Get through the mortgage maze

And finally, why not have a wander over to Q&A and ask other lovemoney.com members for hints and tips about what worked best for them?

More: Find a low-rate mortgage | Why first-time buyers should think twice | Get ready for the housing crash part II

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Share this lovemoney.com content on any of the social networks and utilities below by simply clicking the site of your choice.

  • You can subscribe to all lovemoney.com articles via our RSS feed.

Comments

bimber said

  • 0 recommendations

This is bound to confuse the readers who think you write whatever it takes to lead the market in the direction you need it to go, instead of analysing facts, deciding what will happen, positioning yourself to take advantage and then writing about it.

But what we all want to know is...have you bought a house yet (or do you plan to when your tenancy agreement runs out)?

  • 0 recommendations

I couldn't disagree more with Bimber ! Up until now Cliff has been writing about all the negatives to do with Uk property and totally ignoring any positives. Methinks this latest positive has made him face reality and that reality is he is not going to get the "place of his dreams" at the expense of someone else's misery anytime soon.

Bimber is right to ask whether Cliff has or is lining himself up to be an owner/occupier in the near future as this "nugget of information" will indicate how he really views the situation.

I now fully expect the likes of Nick Pike to log on and try and talk Cliff out of it because houses will be soon as "cheap as chips" according to Nick !

I think Cliff is going to position himself ready to enter the property market but hold back until he is sure his "hoped for future crash" isn't going to happen and then bite the bullet !

MrRee said

  • 0 recommendations

Cliff will climb aboard the Housing train, trouble is - it has already left the station with the best buys in housing.

Jump out of housing too early and then jump back in too late - unless you have now bought, Cliff?

eLJay said

  • 1 recommendation

I think Cliff needs to either clarify his current position and declare his interests or pull this article, in the interests of not creating another conspiracy theory.

The housing train has left the station and is about to come off the rails and crash into a ditch if the global economy shifts against it once more. Quantative easing will probably put us where Japan was 10 years ago, I myself am ready to emigrate if it does.

SiGl26 said

  • 1 recommendation

Actually, I'm more interested in the content...  So the RMBS market is reopening, with Lloyds offering given a AAA rating?  So that's alright then...  Unless its just like the packages bought by Bradford & Bingley that were rated AAA but actually 75% US sub-prime.  Until the rating sytem is reformed and made independent, AAA continues to mean little if anything.  How much did Lehman's pay S&P to rate its products?  If it was buyer-funded rather than seller-funded there would be far fewer AAA products out there! 

  • 1 recommendation

House prices here in the UK still appear to be staggeringly high.  If only the government and central bank weren't so committed to propping them up with artificially low interest rates.  At least then I could get a decent house for my money.

House prices going up is definitely not good news in my mind (unlike it appears the majority of readers).

The other problem in the housing market it seems is that the houses at the bottom end just aren't selling (like the one I own).  The bottom end of the market looks like it was being propped up by investors.  Around here, prices of the lowest priced houses seem to still be falling, unlike the ones nearer the top.

My assumption is that low earners can't currently raise a deposit for houses at the bottom of the market, while medium earners are utilising the low interest rates to purchase medium-priced homes.

All in all, I wish that Cliff's predictions had been more accurate.

  • 1 recommendation

Sorry, my last statement is ambiguous - I intended to infer that my firm preference would have been for the housing market to have experienced the slump that Cliff had predicted.

  • 0 recommendations

Thing is " lttle to say"  your preference is wishful thinking. You make the same mistake as Cliff, both of you want a decent house just like the rest of us Englanders, that makes it a commodity in demand. You just want a bear market price for an asset that generally is a bullish investment . Doesn't work that way...if a share is a 100 pounds and  andou want to buy but only want to pay 50p you don't buy it. if others including fund managers reckon it's a good investment it sustains or increases it's price and you are left behind.

I want doesn't get it's way and has no place when making investment decisions ! Does it look like a sensible investment is the key, Bimber and NickPike will tell you it's not...but they may well be wrong...underestimate the british love for property at your peril...

nickpike said

  • 1 recommendation

When Brown has finished waisting our money, propping up houses we can't afford, the market will go to hell in a handcart. In fact. the whole economy will collapse. The banks and country are are still bust. How anyone can say things are getting back to normal when we are printing money must need help.

Arthurian said

  • 0 recommendations

Beware of the 'Big W'!! [Lift & then FURTHER Falls.]

1'] Election.

2.] Payback [For both Past Errors & EXCESSIVE Quantitive Easing.]

3.] Chronic problems due to 'Crooked' Bill CASH Flow.[The Eurozone Phobic M.P. who fiddles London accomodation for his relatives on the Taxpayer. [What is his REAL Reason for keeping us out of the Euro??] Whatever this is you can bet it will cost us DEARLY, [Not Just Wine, Holidays & Spanish villas]

4.] Declared 'Cuts' in the Public sector' Means less spending in the Private Sector. Prepare for 'Thatcher Mark Two'

[Not to be confused with Thatcher Mark Two - get you locked in an African Jail!!]

Ten Years of Austerity are coming [Whoever wins,] then a period of Impoverished  Pension Problems.

Main Hopes? [Not Housing - Maybe  Medical, Health Sector, Some Banks and Green Companies, Especially Electricity Generation Sector and it's Allied Sectors, Science will begin to 'Pay Off' in some areas.

Arthurian

  • 0 recommendations

Thing is NickPike, while they are printing money and you are renting and if our currency turns into that of a banana republic, you will get truly stuffed because houses will always reset to a future higher value as a valuable asset. Mickey Mouse money in the bank won't, it's a legalised way for governments to steal their citizens cash without touching it by devaluing it and evaporating govt debt.

bimber said

  • 0 recommendations

Advice for anyone who thinks the UK might turn into a banana republic: don't pay First World prices for Third World assets, don't tether your wealth to the fortunes of a nation in decline.

Inflation makes assets go up in price, not in value. Inflation wipes out debt only when wages rise faster than prices and interest rates.

  • 0 recommendations

Bimber is correct assets will go up in price but not value, I couldn't agree more however your house will be a better hedge than cash in the bank !

By having currency of the realm or investments such as cash or LSE quoted UK companies in your portfolio you are tethered to the fortunes of this nation like it or not. The only alternative is to cash in your chips in Casino UK and clear off out of this once proud nation which Blair and Brown have brought to it's knees and encumbered with debt without even having to finance a major war such as WW2.

Vote for me and they'll both never leave the tower of London, I hear Sir Walter Raleighs abode there is still availble !

bimber said

  • 0 recommendations

It is not necessary to move yourself to a country in order to profit from its growth. Many companies choose the LSE to raise money because it is a major financial centre, yet have their operations and customers all around the world. If that's not enough opportunity for diversification then there are many funds to choose from as well, including leveraged property funds! Then there is gold. Houses and cash are not the only assets.

Mick James said

  • 0 recommendations

Interesting piece:  the credit crunch may have ended the housing bubble but it left unanswered the major pre-crunch bone of contention which was whether house prices would correct themselves and revert to historic ratios--all it needed was the right "trigger" to casue a correction.  But the current position is almost entirely explainable in terms of restricted credit and job uncertainty--the ratio has yet to assert itself.

Join the conversation

Please sign in or register to add a comment or recommend.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Typical
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard Platinum with 16 Month BT Visa

0% for 16 months
(2.9% fee)
Typical 16.9% APR (variable) Apply

Virgin Money Credit Card MasterCard

0% for 14 months
(2.98% fee)
Typical 16.6% APR (variable) Apply

Egg Visa

0% until 1st Oct 2011
(3% fee)
Typical 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
W3C  Thank you for using Three Kings