Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Buying and selling property

The best and worst properties to own

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 08 December 2009  |  Comments 16 comments

We've crunched the numbers to find you the properties that increase in value fastest...

In February 2008, I analysed data from the Halifax House Price Index (HHPI) in order to find out which properties increase in value the most and which homes lag behind.

Of course, a lot has happened in the past 22 months. After peaking in August 2007, house prices slumped by more than a fifth (21%) before bottoming out this spring. Since then, they've bounced back, but I expect them to start falling again soon.

Halifax HPI data for UK (1983-2009)

As I explained in my previous analysis, the HHPI doesn't separate out its data based on property types, so I can't individually analyse flats, terraced, semi-detached and detached homes. However, we will review the five datasets which the Halifax does produce, as follows:

1.    All properties

Quarter

Price

Q1 1983

£29,638

Q3 2009

£162,689

Change (£)

£133,051

Change (%)

449%

Yearly change (%)

6.6%

(It's amazing to think that, in early 1983, the typical home sold for under £30,000. Today, that wouldn't even be a decent deposit for a family home!)

As you can see, over the past 26½ years, the value of a typical property has risen by 449%. In other words, the average value is almost 5½ times what it was in 1983. This works out at a compound annual growth rate of 6.6%, which is a lot lower than the 10%+ yearly rises of the recent housing boom.

However, as I often remark, "Averages invite comparisons", so let's take a look at how property prices have varied based on property and buyer types:

2.    New properties

Quarter

Price

Q1 1983

£33,585

Q3 2009

£169,899

Change (£)

£136,314

Change (%)

406%

Yearly change (%)

6.3%

As you can see, new properties have risen in value more slowly than average, rising at only 6.3% a year over the past 26½ years.

One possible reason for this is that building booms during periods of high house prices can flood the market with new properties and push down prices. For example, new-build flats in city centres have suffered from severe price falls over the past two years.

Of course, all new properties move into our next category once they are sold on:

3.    Existing properties

Quarter

Price

Q1 1983

29,136

Q3 2009

163,189

Change (£)

134,053

Change (%)

460%

Yearly change (%)

6.7%

As you can see, the price of existing properties has remained lower than those for new properties in our 26½-year survey. However, far more existing properties are sold each year than new properties. What's more, the yearly increase in the price of existing properties is 6.7%, which is 0.4% a year higher than that for new properties.

This improved growth could be because new properties come with a 'new-build premium' which evaporates when they are sold on. Also, new-build properties tend to come with upfront incentives such as cashback which artificially inflates their first-sale price.

Thus, if you want to maximise your capital growth, it could be better to go for existing, rather than new, properties. Over long periods, the extra gain of 0.4% a year could boost your profits.

4.    First-time buyers

Quarter

Price

Q1 1983

21,468

Q3 2009

121,437

Change (£)

99,969

Change (%)

466%

Yearly change (%)

6.8%

As you'd expect, first-time buyer (FTB) homes are cheaper than those bought by buyers reaching up for the next rung of the ladder. Of course, FTBs generally have lower wages and smaller deposits and, therefore, cannot stretch to the higher prices which home movers pay.

Nevertheless, the yearly rate of growth for FTB homes is 6.8% a year, which is higher than that for home-mover properties. However, absolute returns in pound terms are lower for FTBs, because they buy cheaper properties when they start out.

Now let's see how prices have fared for home movers:

5.    Home movers

Quarter

Price

Q1 1983

34,705

Q3 2009

187,174

Change (£)

152,469

Change (%)

439%

Yearly change (%)

6.6%

As you can see, home movers have always paid higher prices than FTBs, which reflects their higher incomes and existing housing gains. Then again, there are far more home movers than FTBs, so their yearly gain of 6.6% is very close to the average for all properties of 6.6% (see 1 above).

Home, sweet home?

In summary, it could be said that the biggest gains from the housing market accrue to home movers who avoid buying new properties. Also, sticking with the same house for decades could, in some cases, be the wrong sftrategy. Then again, it's clear that being a first-time buyer can be highly profitable, but it's obviously best to avoid entering the market near the top (for example, by overpaying for a new-build flat).

Lastly, since I wrote my original article 22 months ago, the average yearly increase in property prices has slumped from 8% to 6.6%. This is largely due to prices going south from mid-2007 onwards. Therefore, when doing the sums on investment properties, I'd recommend you factor in at least one housing crash per decade. Otherwise, your capital gains could be far less than you'd hoped for!

More: Find your ideal mortgage | Why first-time buyers should think twice | 21 ways to storm-proof your home

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (16)

  • jackonory
    Love rating 0
    jackonory said

    Re BASSCHASER - Tradesmen.

    I have been a plumbing and heating engineer for 10 yrs now and a i cant agree more with Basschaser.   I do expect to earn a decent living - dont we all.  I try not to cost the country money and just want to pay my way.

    I too have to comply to different registeres that then allow me to do my job, all of which command a fee. This is always going to have to be met by my customers.

    The health and saftey executive is now getting involved too, placing even more unrealistic demands and costs on us. If your a big business then fair enough they have the money to layout and employee's to protect, but as for small sole traders it really pushes them to the brink and worse still underground.

    Customers dont help either they want top quality workmanship and all the certificates but want to pay peanuts and we all know what we get when we pay peanuts. Monkeys.

    I know this is off subject but just needed to say. I really do wish the best of luck to everyone in this country under governments like this. Were going to need it.

    P.s oh and remember you can earn a £1000 pound a week but if you spend £1001 - your SKINT.

    Report on 28 December 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Tamz
    Love rating 0
    Tamz said

    RE basschaser, auntflo and jackanory

    Totally agree with the above comments. Plumber heating engineer for 33 years self employed for the past 14 yrs. Can't think of any other job you have to pay to do. Costs me £28000 every 5 years for all the tickets for the lads and i (which my 13year old daughter could EASILY and i do mean EASILY pass but i wouldn't let her touch a boiler!)

    Labour costs (and building reg compliance) for new builds are rising so obviously the new houses will cost more in the future. This will have a knock on effect on existing housing too. The foreign labour that are still here no longer work for £5/hr and there are not so many of them so builders (the ones still building) are having to go back to the natives and pay more.

    As far as Cliff's numbers go they are just a flat picture and do not take into account interest payments or the cost of moving. A home is not an investment it is a place to live. Unless you plan on buying a tent from the profits it is meaningless how much it is worth or has increased in value. If the value of your house is up the new one you want is also up.

    billyboy121 wise up. No racism. The same applies to the laid off guy who has worked in an office for 20 years and decides to be a 4 week trained "tradesman" for the nominal sum of £3000 or more. It's not just the 3-4 year apprenticeship that makes the difference it is the experience gained from that time.

    Report on 29 December 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 22Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 22 months (2.9% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable). Refund offer reduces handling fee from 2.9% to equivalent 1.7% (Ts&Cs apply)

Virgin Money MasterCard

0% for 20 months (2.99% fee) Representative 16.8% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 16.8% APR (variable). Purchase rate 16.8% PA (variable).

Barclaycard Low Fee Platinum Visa

0% for 17 months (1.6% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels