Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » The economy

Base Rate Slashed To 2%

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 04 December 2008  |  Comments 46 comments

The Bank of England has slashed its base rate to 2%, matching the lowest level in its 314-year history. This is good news for borrowers, but bad for savers.

At noon today, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Bank of England slashed the Bank's base rate by a full percentage point to 2% a year. The MPC has cut the base rate three times this quarter, as the following table shows:

Date

Rate

cut (%)

4 December

1.0

6 November

1.5

8 October

0.5

Total

3.0

An historic low

As you can see, the base rate has fallen by three percentage points in three months, falling from 5% to 2%. The last time the base rate was this low was in 1951, when Sir Winston Churchill was prime minister. Indeed, the Bank's base rate has never gone below 2% since it was founded in 1694, during the reign of William and Mary. (For the record, the first-ever Bank rate was set at 6% a year.)

Clearly, the MPC believes that only dramatic -- even desperate -- rate cuts can save the UK from a prolonged and deep recession.

The pound takes a pounding

However, lower interest rates make the pound less attractive to foreign investors, which is why it fell to a record low against the euro -- and a seven-year low against the US dollar -- this morning. Although this is good news for British exporters, it's bad for importers, as the cost of goods coming into the UK will climb.

Good news for half of all mortgage borrowers

Around half (50%) of all mortgage borrowers have a fixed-rate loan, so they will not benefit from reductions in the base rate. Borrowers that do benefit include those with tracker mortgages (which track the base rate up and down) and variable-rate mortgages, most of which are linked to banks' standard variable rates.

Borrowers with a £100,000 interest-only home loan will see their yearly mortgage bill drop by £1,000, or over £83 a month. For repayment mortgages, the calculation is more complicated, because the saving depends on the starting rate and the length of the loan. For example, a rate cut from 4% to 3% on a £100,000 mortgage will save £658 a year (almost £55 a month) on a 25-year repayment mortgage. Use our mortgage calculator to work out how much you could save.

Then again, these calculations assume that mortgage lenders will pass on the full percentage-point cut. Given the horrendous state of our banks, I expect several to boost their profits by only passing on a proportion of the fall. In particular, I'll be watching big banks Barclays and HSBC, both of which have avoided state bailouts and failed to pass on the previous 1.5% cut in full.

On the other hand, I expect the nationalised and part-nationalised banks (Bradford & Bingley, HBOS/Lloyds TSB, Northern Rock and Royal Bank of Scotland) to pass on the rate cut in full. After all, having had tens of billions of taxpayers' cash, they now have the Government as a major or 100% shareholder!

Some relief for businesses and other borrowers

Businesses will also benefit from lower rates, in part thanks to a warning from the Treasury to the banks to treat businesses fairly.

Alas, a lower base rate is unlikely to have much effect on the interest charged by credit cards, store cards and current-account overdrafts. Indeed, these forms of unsecured (non-mortgage) borrowing are barely affected by general interest rates elsewhere. For example, a typical credit card charges an annual percentage rate (APR) of 17.2%, as I warned in The Curse Of The Credit-Card Crunch!

Bad news for savers and pensioners

Sadly, another base-rate cut means more misery for pensioners and other people who rely on savings interest to supplement their income. The downside of these recessionary rate cuts is that the most prudent people -- British savers -- are being hit hard by lower returns. In effect, thrifty and sensible savers are being punished by reckless lenders, borrowers and over-spenders.

Hence, my advice would be to find a table-topping savings account now -- and lock in your money before savings rates fall even further...

More cuts to come?

Finally, if economic conditions continue to worsen, then the MPC will go even further, perhaps even cutting the base rate to zero or just above it. However, this would poleaxe the pound, send the cost of imports soaring, and cause inflation to begin rising again. Clearly, the MPC -- and the UK economy itself -- is caught between a rock and a hard place.

PS: Unfortunately, homeowners' worries are far from over. Halifax reported that its House Price Index fell another 2.6% in November. It is now down a whopping 16.1% in the past twelve months. Also, the Council of Mortgage Lenders has predicted that there will be 75,000 home repossessions next year -- close to the record of 75,540 set in the dark days of 1991. Ouch.

More: Find first-rate savings accounts and magnificent mortgages | Savings Providers Slash Rates | Beware Of This Tracker Mortgage Trick

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (46)

  • carefulsaver
    Love rating 4
    carefulsaver said

    With the latest cut it will interesting to see which mortgage providers pass on the full cut. Especially, since some, such as Natiowide guarantee for their SVR mortgage to be no more than 2% above the BOE base rate.

    Also, with the ECB rate likely to come down too, possibly to the BOE's level and the pound to Euro exchange rate is heading towards parity. Then, is this the prelude to the UK joining the Euro?

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ofolaller
    Love rating 0
    Ofolaller said

    .
    .
    Only bad news for those savers who have had their heads buried in the sand for the past few months.
    .
    There have been umpteen dozen articles here, on similar web sites and in the print and broadcast media, comparing and advocating this or that high-interest savings and investment option.
    .
    (Sure some of them were the "failures" - Icelandic banks and so on, but even with those there has been plenty of time to take corrective measures.)
    .
    Only two weeks ago there were still reasonably good offers available - easy access around 6.5%, for example. Okay, not fantastic, but starting to look highly burnished in the circumstances.
    .
    .

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bobfruit
    Love rating 0
    bobfruit said

    Equally, it's only good for (mortgage) borrowers who are on variable or tracker rate mortgages. The majority on fixed mortgages won't see any difference until they switch/exit them.

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • m00kster
    Love rating 0
    m00kster said

    I, like reportedly (ITV Lunchtime News today) 600,00 other borrowers, will not be benefiting from this latest rate cut due to the "collar" Yorkshire Building Society have on our BOE tracker. Our rate will not allow for any cuts below a BOE rate of 3%. Is there anything we can be doing to put pressure on these banks to pass on the latest rate cut?

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Chorlton1
    Love rating 61
    Chorlton1 said

    Mookster that all depends on whether the FSA decide the "collars" set on our tracker mortgages are enforceable which has recently been called into question. Personally mine is set at 2% so this latest cut should be passed on without any problems but I think I am unlikely to see any further reductions. Still who would have thought they would reach this level anyway? I wasn't struggling when the base rate was 5%. I have been listening to people on the radio who fixed at 5% and now they are moaning tough I bet the same people wouldn't be complaining if it had gone up.

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • DynamoHill
    Love rating 1
    DynamoHill said

    Mookster:

    The problem that mutual building societies have (like the Yorkshire) is that they have to attract savers in order to lend. If they passed on the full cuts to borrowers the savers would also suffer a rate cut and there would be a likelihood that they would remove their money to find better rates.

    As stated in the article - only half the mortgages in the country are tracker/SVR - a loan value of about 600 billion. As savings deposits are higher than this these cuts are actually taking money OUT of the economy.

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • investsbest
    Love rating 0
    investsbest said

    The Banks that are providing the mortgages have a little detail contained in the small print which will prevent borrowers from seeing the full potential gains of a tracker.
    known as a "collar", which stops the rate borrowers pay on a tracker from falling below a certain level.
    For example, Nationwide has a collar of 2.75 per cent, while Halifax does not have to pass on the cut if the base rate goes below 3 per cent.
    Surly this frustrate people further!

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • peepobaby
    Love rating 49
    peepobaby said

    The last sentence of this article is right. Inflation will rise next year. The party line will be that inflation is better than deflation.

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • thirty06
    Love rating 0
    thirty06 said

    Have they announced plans to redeem Consols ?

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LastChip
    Love rating 92
    LastChip said

    This is actually quite fascinating to watch. Make the most of it, you'll probably never see a scenario like this again in your lifetime.

    That said: it's almost like a ship without a rudder. A financial path, that is impossible to steer.

    There are so many conflicting sides to the problem, that the whole population is caught in a trap with no way out.

    To me, it seems this cut is an act of desperation. Our ship is turning in circles and going nowhere near the intended port. Looking at the FTSE100 end of day result, suggests the market may see it in a similar vein.

    As I've said many times before, all these pointless measures will fail. The crux of the problem is debt and until that is removed from the system, the crisis will continue. All it is doing, is slowing down the recovery process.

    Look at it realistically. You have people awakened to the fact, they are drastically overspent. You have people that are living on their nerves as to whether they will have a job next week. Is that a combination conductive to spending? No! It's a combination that says; remove as much of that debt as I can, as soon as I can. Hence, any surplus funds will be directed towards debt reduction. Not at all what Gordon (prudence) Brown wants.

    On the other side of the coin, we have reducing property prices, but no buyers! Not only can they not get a mortgage without a substantial deposit, but now, as interest rates hit rock bottom, they are going to struggle to get that elusive deposit at all.

    Then we have the pensioners, many of whom rely on topping up their meagre pensions from savings interest. They wont be spending either.

    The problem with the politicians and the MPC, is they are completely out of touch with reality. When you're earning substantial salaries, you cannot comprehend how many (most) people live. People at the lower end of earnings are barely surviving, have no savings and most of all, no spending power. Many in the middle income brackets have overspent and are now worrying about their future. Their spending power has ceased. The bubble on which this has all been created has burst and the murky contents are there for all to see.

    The old saying you can't get blood out if a stone has never been truer.

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • churchill123
    Love rating 0
    churchill123 said

    This won't help anybody, it's window dressing. It will devalue the pund against the Euro further allowing Guurrrdun to slip nicely into the Euro, as they promised they wouldn't.

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • carefulsaver
    Love rating 4
    carefulsaver said

    Nationwide isn't playing fair to all it's SVR customers by only passing on a 0.69% reduction following Decembers 1% base rate cut.

    At the same time they decided to ignore the collar on their tracker deals, there by penalising their SVR customers to subsidise their tracker deals it appears!

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Noodzy
    Love rating 0
    Noodzy said

    I just withdrew all my (£650 worth) savings to spend in the high street. What’s the point starting to save with 2% interest rates, 5% inflation and a fire-sale on the high street?

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Noodzy
    Love rating 0
    Noodzy said

    Spend all those £ before their worthless…

    Working abroad never looked like such a good proposition.

    Perhaps we should all emigrate and then send money home to England for our families in the UK to heat their homes and pay off debts.

    Lets hope their as welcoming of us? (ooh!)

    Report on 04 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ged2004
    Love rating 0
    Ged2004 said

    If the base rate does drop to say 0% and my collar free tracker at base plus 0.48% gives me a mortgage rate of 0.48% how will my particular bank actually make any money rom lending to me as they still have to pay savers something to attract them? I'm obviously not concerned that the banks will not make any mone just interested in how it would work in practice!

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Dhahran2001
    Love rating 0
    Dhahran2001 said

    The case for the UK entering the EMU has little or nothing to do with the £ / € exchange rate hitting one to one. They are just a pretty pair of figures.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • barryrog
    Love rating 0
    barryrog said

    i am lucky enough to have a lifetime 0.50% BOE tracker with Halifax and so will again get the full benefit as the collar is to be ignored.
    so my mortgage will be 2.5% a rate at which the Bank can make no profit and will be paid for by those on fixed rates and (as an earlier poster said) by the mortgage payers linked to SVR which Halifax will only be dropping 0.25%.
    however, far from gloating ( i would have accepted the 3% collar - that's what i signed up for) i am far more concerned with the state of our economy and what's happening elsewhere.
    the big focus is on mortgage rates. however,mortgage availability,credit card rates,personal loan rates,saving rates,council taxes, fuel bills, insurance premiums, house prices, government spending,the falling pound,rising unemployment,the demise of small businesses in fact everything is making life really tough for everyone but the very wealthy.
    in 2 years Gordon Brown has let this country go completely to the dogs, in fact fo the last 10 years the tail has been allowed to wag the dog and totally weak govt has now bought us to the very edge of bankruptcy.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • parity1
    Love rating 0
    parity1 said

    Carefulsaver.

    When did Nationwide announce that they will ignore the "collar?" My last communication with them dated 14th.November told me that my collar was 3.38%

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • barryrog
    Love rating 0
    barryrog said

    Nationwide Collar is now 1%.
    read the press.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Swill453
    Love rating 0
    Swill453 said

    Nationwide Collar is now 1%.
    read the press.


    No, old trackers have a 2.75% (BoE) collar, new trackers have a 1% collar.

    What happened last night was that Nationwide announced they were ignoring the 2.75% collar.

    Scott.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mike4toys
    Love rating 6
    mike4toys said

    Just one point Barclays have certainly via their subsidiary "The Woolwich" passed on both the 0.5% and the 1.5% previous cuts in full to my tracker mortgage. I can find no reference to a collar at all though I'm sure there probably is one so I await with interest what they will do with the latest 1.0% cut.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • seagull104
    Love rating 2
    seagull104 said

    So now Gordon's pouring petrol on the fire in the hope of extinguishing the flames. Should our government be allowed to experiment with our lives in this manner? Or is socialist doctrine really taking power and ruling all our lives to the smallest detail? I am amazed at how many people still blame Maggie even though we've now had eleven years of socialists. Will they ever accept the responsibility for their own incompetence?

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • OlisaD25
    Love rating 0
    OlisaD25 said

    Noodzy, we should be praying that other countries are more welcoming than the Brits have been to economic immigrants if Chris Moyle's statement is anything to go by in that respect.

    The way I see it, Britons have overspent and overborrowed and its time to pay for it. Big shame that savers are going to get punished for the reckless financial behaviour of government, financial institutions and borrowers.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mark0768
    Love rating 0
    Mark0768 said

    **************************************************

    There are many people with fixed rate mortgages, I fixed my rate for the longest period possible around two years ago, I predicted this looming crisis many years ago, as I'm sure many others also did.

    So, as the base rate falls all those long term fixed rate mortgages are now paying the banks more money, which is an asset to which ever bank or building society hold them.

    I'm with Nationwide and I would imagine I'm a very typical customer, and because Building Societies normally stick to tradition mortgage lending it has put then in a much stronger position than the banks at the moment, even now when interest rates are falling.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • temax61
    Love rating 0
    temax61 said

    Over 50s should try the Coventry Building society.
    I opened a 50+ esavings account in July and I can continue to add to it and still get 6.25%!

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • RizFTD
    Love rating 0
    RizFTD said

    I have always found tracker mortgages quite attractive especially in this day and age! However, seen as the base rate has been cut again and is likely to be cut further, will the Bank of England not increase the base rate in the future when this is all over and to cover losses???

    What would you recommend is better tracker or fixed for the next 5 years?

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • GrahamMiller0
    Love rating 1
    GrahamMiller0 said

    When did the word "percent" turn into the words "percentage points"?

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Hardtruth
    Love rating 66
    Hardtruth said

    Is this good news? Of course not - a bit like trying to stop a runaway train with a feather duster.

    In any case it was reported yesterday that following last month's 1.5% rate cut 75% of banks did not pass it on to borrowers yet conversely (and perversely) 92% of banks did pass the cut on to savers.

    Says all you need to about these bankers.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • macca160670
    Love rating 0
    macca160670 said

    I'm just wondering why after a bail out Halifax are only reducing there rate by 0.25?

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • RobbesPierre
    Love rating 0
    RobbesPierre said

    Is it really beyound the realms of possibility that UK plc could go bankrupt?

    I notice we hardly ever talk about GDP anymore. Which industries are our saving garce? Please tell me.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    This interest rate cut is great news for me personally as all my buy-to-let mortgages are trackers and my rental properties are suddenly very profitable in income terms, for the first time since at least 2002. Of course I'm taking a hammering on capital values as house prices decline, but I only invest in properties with renovation or development potential so I'm hoping to recoup some losses there with new-build or upgrading.

    However, the mortgage market remains a disaster: once you get above 60-70% LTV, the best interest rate offers, even on normal residential mortgages, are around 6.5-7%, which is a huge premium over base rates. Last night I tried doing a notional purchase of a £450K property at 90% LTV at John Charcol's website, and the interest rates were pathetic. Great to be a bank if you can borrow at very low rates from the Bank of England and lend to a mortgage borrower at 7%! Buy-to-let and development mortgages are even better from a lender's perspective: 65-70% LTV and interest rates at 3% above base are typical, which is a pretty low-risk and profitable business model in any normal time. However these rates are so profitable for the banks, it shows they don't really want to lend at all.

    One reason remains LIBOR, which lenders use to borrow money off each other to create mortgage funds, if they can't raise enough from their own savers. LIBOR has improved its premium over base rates, but was still at 3.72% on 3 December, i.e. a 0.72% premium. My mortgage broker comments "Yesterday's cut in the bank rate from 3% to 2% will probably not see a full response in Libor for at least a couple of weeks. If it follows last month's pattern, Libor will fall 0.6 or 0.7 points initially and then factor in smaller daily decreases throughout the rest of the month."

    Nevertheless, even if you borrow at 3.72%, a lender is still making good money if they lend at 6-7%. The fact they won't give good rates to high LTV or buy-to-let customers shows they lack confidence in the housing market, and don't actually want to lend money at all unless the customer is providing 30-40% of the capital and taking almost all the risk of falling house prices. Even though affordability has improved dramatically with these interest rates cuts - anyone on a tracker with a secure job is doing very well at the moment - the problem is a lack of confidence amongst mortgage lenders, a perception that lots of people are going to lose their jobs next year, and a general aversion to risk.

    None of this is being helped by the authorities getting tougher with the banks worldwide and demanding higher capital ratios and huge interest rates lent by governments to banks. The UK charges banks 12%! It's obvious the banks are going to focus on paying down that debt first rather than indulge in mortgage lending.

    However, on the positive side, the banks are almost certainly hoarding cash at the moment because their financial results and capital ratios are calculated on 31 December. Therefore there's a good chance that mortgage lending will improve substantially from January 2009: LIBOR will be down to, say, 2.8% and if lenders feel under less capital pressure, they may well come back into the mortgage market with more attractive offers.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • colin106
    Love rating 0
    colin106 said

    LastChip - great to see the truth in print.
    And Churchill 123 is probably right too

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bimber
    Love rating 44
    bimber said

    @GrahamMiller0: "percent" has always been 2 words: Per Cent

    @seagull104: How can you describe Labour as socialists? They've been in thrall to the rich for the last decade, think that there is nothing wrong with the extremes of income and wealth inequality we've seen in that time and now the inequalities have broken the fragile system, they bail out the rich with future tax on the poor and middle class and with a devalued currency.

    People blame Thatcher because that is where much of the rot started. She destroyed the unions so the power shifted too far to the employers. Whilst some were earning record profits the rest of us saw none of it, having to work long hours or borrow in order to keep up a standard of living. If she hadn't destroyed our manufacturing industry we'd still have the engineering and design skills (Labour announced today an initiative to resolve the problem, which won't see results for a decade or so) to work our way out of this problem and our exporters would benefit from the current fall in sterling. Because we have no manufacturing industry to speak of we have too many media studies students and a shortage of engineers.

    Thatcher was a typical tory - she looked down on jobs where people got their hands dirty.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ladyrosemary
    Love rating 0
    ladyrosemary said

    Don't worry----BE HAPPY! Save not spend a lot and get out the whisky.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • integradc5
    Love rating 0
    integradc5 said

    Sheesh, this is depressing stuff and very annoying for me as I currently have £10.5k sitting in my bank account going nowhere until I have an ISA certificate from the FSCS post-Icesave debacle. So, by the time I can put the money into a cash ISA, the rates will be so pathetic that it will hardly be worth it.

    Meanwhile, because I and my fiancee are both self-employed, I took out a five-year fixed-rate mortgage in October at 6.55% - easily the best available because of the "risk" that we self-employed types pose.

    So, I take a hit on both counts because of the idiots who spent what they didn't have and the bigger idiots who gave them the credit to do it. Thanks. Don't be surprised at my lack of sympathy when you have to sell your aspirational Golf/Audi, 50" plasma and quite possibly 110%-mortgaged house that is 50% bigger than you actually need.

    Who's fault is all this? Thatcher and her cronies who liberalised the financial markets. Admittedly, Labour have had 10 years to reintroduce regulation, but as 9 of those were very healthy years (or seemed so at the time), how easy do you think that would have been? It would have been far better if the problem had never existed.

    As for the systematic destruction of manufacturing and heavy industry, that's another matter, but there is no question when that began and who's fault it is!

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nonstarter
    Love rating 0
    nonstarter said

    So the government has spent many years convincing the public to save with Tessa's and Isa's but it has only taken them two months to undo this. Am I the only person thinking of cashing in my ISA's that I have built up over the years as the interest rates are payable are now less than the inflation rate meaning my hard earned savings are going down in value?
    I'm going on a spending spree as that is what the government want us to do. Give it another year and they will be moaning again that no one is saving. A very short sighted move. Perhaps when I retire I will then be entitled to means tested benefits which with savings I won't be.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Delta112
    Love rating 0
    Delta112 said

    Hello, I am on a fixed rate mortgage so obviously it is not linked to the Bank of England interest rate. However, I do have a secured loan too and that is on a variable rate. In the past, they occasionally cut their rates a little when the base rate dropped (and of course they rose when the rates went up).
    But during the recent raft of B of E base rate cuts, my secured lender has not passed on *any*, let alone the full 1.5% rate from November, cut on its interest. Nor the previous month. Don't know whether it will pass on December's cut. I think this is disgusting, as the interest rate I'm paying is currently 11.2% so they are making a tidy profit! Don't know whether it's worth contacting them again?

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Delta112
    Love rating 0
    Delta112 said

    Sorry for the rant in my previous post. I don't think my secured lender is linked to any particular Tracker, but I do believe it should pass on at least some of the reduction in the base rate, at least as goodwill if not also according to the voluntary code which I think the Government has made banks/lenders sign.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ScotMum1965
    Love rating 0
    ScotMum1965 said

    When did the word "percent" turn into the words "percentage points"?

    The term "percentage points" is quite useful - it avoids the confusion.

    The original rate was 10%. Now it's 5%. It's a 50% cut or a cut of 5 percentage points.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LateDeveloper
    Love rating 22
    LateDeveloper said

    This will just lead to more repossessions of homes.
    Firstly the Government will act immediately and reduce the amount they pay to people for helping out with the mortgage (already lower than the standard rate charged by the lenders) and secondly you can certainly make a sure bet that the lenders will not pass on these cuts to customers, which means there will be a larger deficit in mortgage payments. Rather than just take a half assed approach to this, the Government needs to make sure that banks pass on these cuts to homeo wners immediately.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Swill453
    Love rating 0
    Swill453 said

    integradc5

    until I have an ISA certificate from the FSCS post-Icesave debacle.


    Icesave was a debacle, in my opinion the FSCS post-Icesave process has been a triumph.

    (OK, they might be a bit tardy with the ISA certificates but we can hardly complain.)

    Scott.

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • slikmik
    Love rating 0
    slikmik said

    It's good that the government are starting to put pressure on banks to be fairer and that they are going to protect hard working families from loosing their homes through repossession of which I am pleased to see
    but when so many homeowners are struggling in general through extortionately high interest rates on their mortgages, wouldn't it have been fairer to have put pressure on banks to lower their criteria to take on board "good paying" borrowers that are caught up with horrendous rates
    with bad lenders?

    Unfortunately banks criteria for good rates are only for those with lots of equity or generally well off homeowners so those with low equity will struggle and eventually die financially!

    Delaying paying off things only delays the inevitable i'm afraid so please, will someone listen to how it really is and help!

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bemused2dotcom
    Love rating 0
    bemused2dotcom said

    The BoE has cut the interest rates by 3% in the last 3 months but Alliance & Leicster have to date only passed on a miserly 0.25% to their SVR and constantly removed their tracker deals for re-pricing. A&L have still to make a decision on last months whopping 1.5% cut and have once again been very quiet in response to this months 1% cut! Although i appreciate that with the SVR its tha banks decision whether to pass on any interest rate cuts can someone please enlightne me whether A&L are likely to pass on any of the last 2 months 2.5% interest rate cut to their SVR?

    Report on 05 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • castath
    Love rating 0
    castath said

    Does anyone know whether the Nationwide decision to ignore their collar on trackers is legal?

    When I took out a fixed rate mortgage my decision was based upon this collar. Had I known they would ignore it my mortgage decision may have been different.

    If they can ignore this condition then maybe they can ignore my early redemption penalties.

    Report on 06 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • integradc5
    Love rating 0
    integradc5 said

    Swill453 - a grammatical issue there I think, I meant: FSCS post-"Icesave debacle", as in, the debacle was Icesave, not the FSCS compensation scheme, for which I am very grateful indeed! :)

    Report on 07 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Delta112
    Love rating 0
    Delta112 said

    Agree entirely with slikmik. As I have now had no missed mortgage payments in the last 18 months, and only 2 slightly late payments to my secured lender during the 20 months of my existing loan, I would have thought i would qualify for a loan with a more 'mainstream' lender. Currently my secured loan (2nd charge) runs at about 11%.

    Report on 10 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3