Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » The economy

Say no to the big banks with the Bank of Dave

Neil Faulkner
by Lovemoney Staff Neil Faulkner on 17 July 2012  |  Comments 30 comments

Dave Fishwick has set up his own Bank of Dave to rival the banks. We take a closer look.

Say no to the big banks with the Bank of Dave

Bank of Dave makes you think a lot about what's wrong with banks and society in general.

It's hard not to feel sick when you think of the banks, the financial regulator, the Bank of England and our elected representatives. No matter how much wrong a bank does, once it's in the City Club, it's safe.

Getting into the club is another story, as anyone who has been blitzed by Dave Fishwick's recent lightning strike into the public eye will know.

Bank of Dave has a mountain to climb

Dave Fishwick's local company, Burnley Savings & Loans, is doing all it can to get the notoriously ungettable full banking licence, and to obtain permission to officially change its name to Bank of Dave. But the barriers that the regulator has put up to joining its club are staggering.

Fishwick has said he has 8,000 forms to fill in and he must find £10 million to give to the regulator for permanent safekeeping, without receiving interest on it. Bank of Dave is only lending £25,000 per week.

In the meantime, he has to tread with excruciatingly exaggerated care to make sure he's not shut down before he even starts.

If only existing banks were half as scrutinised – or so lightly shut down – City bosses would never incentivise such terribly selfish internal cultures.

The regulator discourages competition

Banks aren't airport operators, who can never number more than the total number of airports. Airports is an industry where there's understandably little room for competition.

In comparison, all a budding bank needs is to convert an old flower shop, like Dave did. Yet just one new high-street bank has been granted a licence here in 100 years. A whole century!

“Regulations do not restrict competition...This policy of free, but orderly, entry underlies not only London's position as one of the world's leading financial centres, but also contributes to competition in retail banking.” Thomas Huertas, director, Financial Service Authority, June 2008.

Excuse me if I don't believe you, Mr Huertas.

What's to like about Dave and his bank?

In contrast to the City Club, Dave is forthright - he'll lend what the bank has got rather than conjure money into existence, there are no big bonuses, and all profits go to charity.

It's a short list of distinguishing qualities, but an incredible one when you remember we're talking about a bank here.

Bank of Dave can't yet accept deposits, but it does take savings and offer loans. In some ways it's like existing peer-to-peer lenders, and it operates in that way for legal reasons, but in other ways it's different.

Saving with Bank of Dave

Unlike other peer-to-peer services, savers don't get all the profits of the money they lend minus the costs of the service – which is the way peer-to-peer usually works.

Instead, they can expect to get a flat 5%, provided borrowers don't chip into that by defaulting. That said, it appears Dave really expects you to get 5% but can't guarantee it for legal reasons. However, he can and does personally guarantee your deposit - just not the interest.

Savers get great terms on access. Lend £1,000 or less and you need to give just 30 days' notice to withdraw your savings. Save £1,001 to £15,000 and you need to give one year.

In other words, you've got yourself an account paying 5% and yet it's accessible within a month or year. Most banks pay 4% or less – and only if you tie your money in for five years.

Borrowing from Bank of Dave

Unlike peer-to-peer services, borrowers don't get a market of individuals competing to lend to them and, therefore, pushing down the cost of borrowing.

Instead, they've typically got to pay 17.4% to 29% APR (not the 8.9% or 14.9% quoted in some media – that's the minimum “flat” rate). That's an expensive way to buy a vehicle.

However, you can get a loan through a face-to-face meeting rather than a credit check. We can be sure that Bank of Dave will more rigorously assess people's ability to repay than the banks have done in the past 20 years.

Furthermore, individuals can get loans under £500 at the same rates. This is far cheaper than payday loans or most overdrafts, with only special credit card deals being cheaper.

Room for improvement

Bank of Dave seems to be refreshingly simple and straight talking, much like Dave, who was reported to say of the banks: “All they have done is shit on people.”

However, it could provide a bit more detail. Just for example, if you save £1,000 today you need to give just 30 days' notice to withdraw your money, but, if you save another £1,000, do you then have to give one-year's notice on the whole lot?

It's unfortunate that the bank also encourages borrowing for things like your “dream motorbike”. Block your ears and call me a spoilsport, but we should never borrow for fun. Ever. This only leads to you being able to afford even less fun in the future, forever, regardless of when the debt is cleared.

Borrowing frivolously also puts yourself in an inordinately risky position; borrowers usually underestimate the cost and scale of the many emergencies and unforeseen expenses that life throws at us. You don't want to already be in debt for no good reason when that happens.

More on banking:

Alternatives to saving with the big banks

Alternatives to current accounts with the big banks

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (30)

  • Arblaster
    Love rating 41
    Arblaster said

    Good for Dave.

    Those who know their history will know all about the penny banks and building societies that were set up in Victorian times by workers for workers that have now grown into high street banks. It is only a matter of time before the pendulum starts to swing the other way, and we go back to doing business with smaller concerns.

    Report on 18 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • j mcallister
    Love rating 1
    j mcallister said

    Overuse of uppercase will be tamed (you can edit your comment to prevent this):

    if you are going to be taken seriously re giving facts about money---

    number one rule --- get your facts right!

    re the bank of dave

    the owners name is dave fishwick

    remember the name------ dave fishwick

    jim

    And now here are some pictures to help lighten the mood

    Report on 19 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • mrs weatherley
    Love rating 31
    mrs weatherley said

    The name is so important Fishwick because he is the sort of man we need t o lead us out of the old boys restrictions and back to some sort of sanity and justice

    Rock on Dave

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • jamiecfc1
    Love rating 39
    jamiecfc1 said

    Loved the show, loved his ethos and his personality - how could you not want to bank with him?? Hope he does well and his faith in the people he lends to isn't misplaced, good luck to anyone paying 5% on deposits (and no bonuses!)

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • Severian
    Love rating 6
    Severian said

    I have only one word to describe the Bank of Dave - Farepak! Love money will be the first organisation screaming foul play when his unauthorised savings scheme with no investor protection goes bust and his customers lose all their savings.

    Please don't confuse TV hype and Dave's enthusiasm with an approved and well funded bank.

    It's very easy to fire cheap shots at the other banks, but FSA and FSCS regulation is there for a very good reason.

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • raba9
    Love rating 16
    raba9 said

    Never borrow for fun? How wrong can you be. My bachelor pad was bought with a mortgage and opened the door (literally) to far more fun than I could ever have had still living with my parents! Every means of transport I have bought from my second motorbike onwards has been part funded with credit (even 1 case 15 years ago from the Bank of Mum & Dad [and I'm now 60!]). The rule I always worked on but never had to put into practice fortunately was that, if all else fails and I can't repay the loan, the asset that was funded by the loan gets sold.

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • yocoxy
    Love rating 132
    yocoxy said

    There was an article here the other day criticising an organisation that offered 5% on savings and wasn't regulated by the FSA.. " "the savings bond you should avoid"

    http://www.lovemoney.com/news/savings-investments-pensions/savings/16408/regive-5-savings-bond?source=1000564

    In the first show, Dave was complaining that he has to set aside cash for customer protection in the event that his bank collapses and he said "why do they need that? they have my guarantee!"

    Is his company now covered by the compensation scheme or is this different because he's a likeable guy playing to the gallery?

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • r
    Love rating 67
    r said

    @raba9

    Good thinking. If our banks had assets for which to secure most of their loans, they would not be in such trouble now.

    I like the concept of "Bank of Dave" but, if it does take off, there will need to be some protection because the unscrupulous will soon be in there.

    @Severian

    The FSA is now a massive organisation which has actually failed in its job. Certainly, we need an overseeing body but one that is fit for purpose and I suggest that it is no longer the FSA.

    r.

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Yashica
    Love rating 0
    Yashica said

    So the outcome of this program appears to be that banks should lend to anyone and everyone, and we should reduce the amount of regulation that they have to deal with. Isn't that the reason we are in the mess we are in?

    I agree with everything in principle about what this guy is saying, that banks and the banking system need to change but he is the last person I would leave any money with! (The key to the safe is behind the cherryade just in case you needed to know!)

    There are already plenty of alternatives if you don't want to leave your money with big banks, there are lots of small community orientated building societies that do lots for the local community, and depositors still enjoy the protection that the FSCS offers.

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • NatFeerick
    Love rating 16
    NatFeerick said

    I love Dave Fishwick! He's everything the people want from their local bank! Okay, its obvious that without his money and desire for publicity, this concept would never have got this far, but I'm glad it has and if he never gets the full banking licence he has already heaped more shame on the banking system.

    I think he's finding it hard to determine who to lend to and who not to though - and this is the difficulty of the personal touch - you feel involved. It's nice for us to think we can sweet talk and plead with an human being to lend us money, and not just get a letter that says 'Computer says NO!'.

    Good for you Dave Fishwick - I hope you go all the way! Dave Fishwick for Chancellor of the Exchequer!!! I'd Bank on Dave!

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    @Severian

    I accept the Farepak warning but the rest sounds like sour grapes.

    Are you a banker, work for the FSA or some other city type who feels threatened by the mood of public outrage at the financial sector as a whole and banks in particular?

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • DaveK1020
    Love rating 5
    DaveK1020 said

    The article mistakenly refers to Dave Fishwick's enterprise as Bank of Dave. Perhaps Neil Faulkner, who wrote this article, ought to watch the programme again as one of the major points that this was making was that Fishwick could not refer to it as a 'Bank' in it's title. He got the message over to the public by calling his outlet 'Bank on Dave' and the programme was making the point of how difficult it was to get the necessary authorisation to refer to it as a bank.

    What this programme did demonstrate is that banking is a closed shop, controlled by the rich, exactly as the Mafia operates in Italy. I brought up in an era whereby the established professions such as doctors, bankers, solicitors and politicians were trusted and respected. We now all know that the real criminals are not shoplifters and petty thieves but those that engage in defrauding the public purse with false expenses claims, immoral banking operations etc, etc.

    The politicians protect the bankers and so it goes on ensuring that those that the 1% of the country that own 99% of it's wealth are maintained. The very fact that Dave can give a return of 5% on savings and give away profits on top of that to charities demonstrates how corrupt they are.

    Nothing will ever change because the country is ruled by the rich criminal classes who have all the power.

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    You are just as likely to lose money as a result of poorly performing fund managers producing cr*p returns or the usurious annual “management” fees that you pay for most financial products as you are with Dave Fishwick.

    But of course, these products are FSA regulated and can therefore legitimately treat you as an ATM by taking your money for nothing or simply lose it.

    The whole financial sector is populated by thieves and spivs and is a cesspit as Vince Cable remarked recently.

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mandak13
    Love rating 2
    mandak13 said

    I love the concept - but doubt the reality. After all, those Payday loans are literally daylight robbery, so if they're allowed to trade, why can't Dave have a go? I do however doubt, especially in light of some of the public's financial difficulties nd their attitude to debt so easily written off with no responsibilty at all, that his approach to lending is wise and certainly doomed for failure. Credit checks may be impersonal and a somewhat cruel reality for many folk, but they do provide a valuable insight into how people choose to manage their finances, especially their lending. Without a lie detector or the powers of Mystic Meg, Dave wouldn't stand a chance against unscrupulous folk hell-bent on borrowing with no intention of repaying. The bank I will keep my eye on though is Virgin Money, Branson has demonstrated his customer orientated, forward thinking before, can he pull it off with a bank? It'll be interesting.....

    Report on 20 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Icelady
    Love rating 7
    Icelady said

    Having watched the 2 TV programmes made about Dave's almost impossible journey, I take my hat off to him for his dogged determination and speaking out about the disgraceful service we have all had during the past few years from the 'big boys'. Over 40 years ago I had to sit in front of bank manager just to open an account to put my wages in, and that was without asking or a loan. What Dave is doing is trying to help the smaller businesses in his area that are not helped by other banks, and some of those are already flourishing with loans from £500 to £1500. I fail to understand the logic of the FSA in not allowing someone to open a bank as long as they have met certain criteria. If they had been more rigorous in their dealing with the banks earlier on we wouldn't be in the mess we are now. If there was a Bank of Dave near me I'd sign up today and leave the bank I've been with for 41 years. I wish him all the best and hope more will follow suit.

    Report on 21 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • naednhoj
    Love rating 6
    naednhoj said

    Bank on Dave is a direct reaction to the bank "society", mainly based in London that is fire proof as is most of the employees at a certain level.

    How unjust is it that people are losing livelihoods as a direct result of irresponsible selfish bankers who bring the country to it's knees and then continue with bonuses.

    For those worried about Dave's guarantees, are these any worse than using peer to peer loans schemes?

    It is true that others will jump in Dave's minibus and some of them will be scammers seeking "money off other people's backs and sod honest dealing"... and could well be London bankers who can raise the £10m the FSA want from a years' bonus!

    More power to Dave who I think is trying to do a good deed and prove a point. I will be depositing a grand with him when I can

    Report on 22 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • FireBlade
    Love rating 25
    FireBlade said

    Very well done Dave!

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jegwe
    Love rating 20
    jegwe said

    Dave is to be conmended. I fully support him. However, he is not operating as a bank. He does not seem to be offering a cheque book or regular payment facilities or BACS transfers or foreign exchange or other banking services. He is not a credit union or a building society. He seems to be offering something new. He works as a lifeline to local businesses which is that the major banks have stopped doing.

    We need somebody like him on every high street but it will only work if he stays small. It has to be somebody different on every high streeet to continue to work. If he becomes big or develops into a chain or is allowed to take over competitors in other towns, then he will no longer be functioning as Bank of Dave.

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • julieboydell
    Love rating 1
    julieboydell said

    I for one will bank with him ! I think people should speak out by drawing out their wages etc on the same day they are paid in and resort to old fashioned methods for paying their bills etc. don't let the banks keep hold of our monies - they are disgraceful organisations and need boycotting - GO DAVE. !!!!!

    Report on 24 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • julieboydell
    Love rating 1
    julieboydell said

    oh - and I would have been more impressed with this article if you had researched properly and got his name right at the beginning.

    Report on 24 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • tonkinator
    Love rating 1
    tonkinator said

    Hmmm. Still unsure about Dave.

    WHat insurance do customers get on their funding?

    Not sure I agree with him donating his profits monthly, or however often he did in the last episode. Surely it would make sense to keep some kind of reserve?

    Report on 24 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • babyhk
    Love rating 7
    babyhk said

    Would be very careful about this. Scary if he can't get FSA backing . Think I will get my 5% by paying in to my Cheshire Plat. Saver and hold tight for about a year ... then if he can still payout after the initial investors cash in ... maybe I may invest in round 2

    Report on 28 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • OorWullie
    Love rating 38
    OorWullie said

    It not only takes courage to think 'outside of the box' but also the courage to carry out the idea and fight the establishment. This is the same fight that Dorothy had in the Wizard Of Oz. Dave comes across as a bit of a contradiction and I admire and cheer for him; he is a breath of fresh air into the stuffy world of finance. It is interesting the number of obstacles that are placed in his path; all opposed to progress and the Tories capitalist ideas. The only feature to which I am opposed is that of handing over profit to charity. When charities take in money without having to fully account for what is given and how it is spent then they are as evil-minded as the banks and attract the sticky-fingered types. Other than this one feature if I could do anything to further Dave's dream I would be glad to help him.

    Report on 28 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • OorWullie
    Love rating 38
    OorWullie said

    DaveK1020; an interesting point you raised about criminality and society so this statistic should interest you; over 80% of prisoners have an IQ lower than the average. If taking into consideration the 'bell' curve of statistics then logically there should be as many prisoners with IQs above the average so where are they? With a little thought it will be recognised that is a sad indictment on society yet we tolerate it.

    Report on 28 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • glads69
    Love rating 13
    glads69 said

    OorWullie, I suspect there are as many criminals with IQs above the average. They haven't been caught or they have really good defence teams that get them off. Hence they are not (as yet) prisoners.

    Report on 30 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • PensionPlan2
    Love rating 0
    PensionPlan2 said

    This is my question. Just say Dave's bank did fail, (His borrowers did a runner before paying the loans back, and the depositers then wanted their savings back) this is looking at the very negative and worse case scenario. Would the depositers be covered, for their savings? Investors compensation scheme, or is it a case that because Bank on Dave is not a bank then the scheme doesn't apply?

    I love the program, and think there is a bloke who deserves the luck he certainly looks like he works for it.

    Report on 30 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • yocoxy
    Love rating 132
    yocoxy said

    Good old Dave, lobbying for banks to have less regulation.. Just what we need.

    Report on 31 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Tamara
    Love rating 20
    Tamara said

    I have been working within Credit for over 12 years, both consumer and business.

    What Dave is doing is brilliant and I like to make a few points:

    -he does run credit reports but also uses his personal approach to offer loans. The program showed a chef in need of a 5k new cooker and after doing a credit check and Dave being notified by Dave (his trusted accountant) that it wasn't all hanky dory, he resorted to offer £2.5k only if he managed to get the rest from friends and family to support the business. A normal bank manager would have never considered that

    -on average, there is a 2-3% bad debt across the lending market and towards the end of the program, they stated that they were no different and had to write this amount off, but over the first 6 months, they still made about 9k profit

    -I suspect he will repay himself all of the money he advanced at the beginning, I think it was in the region of 250k+, which he partly used to buy a property (asset) like banks do. He had that renovated, increased in value and rented out (more money for the company)

    -if you give interest at 5% and lend at 17.9%, maths say that you will make a profit somewhere

    -a bit far for me to travel, but if he opened a branch down here, I would happily give him some of my savings, which he guarantees to be safe (he did after all have a credit insurance certificate on the wall, without he wouldn't be able to take any money!)

    Good on you Dave, love to meet him one day!

    Report on 07 August 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • babyhk
    Love rating 7
    babyhk said

    No current news on Dave. Would love an update from somebody on your team . Hope he is still in business but silence all round has prompted me to request your help.

    Report on 28 November 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Simon Ward
    Love rating 5
    Simon Ward said

    Hi babyhk,

    We'll try and find out what Dave's up to. Look out for an update in the coming weeks.

    Best wishes

    Simon

    News Editor

    Report on 29 November 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).

Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4