Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » The economy

European Commission: Taxpayers to avoid bailing out banks in future

John Fitzsimons
by Lovemoney Staff John Fitzsimons on 06 June 2012  |  Comments 14 comments

The European Commission has unveiled proposals to prevent taxpayers footing the bill when banks fail. But is it all too late?

European Commission: Taxpayers to avoid bailing out banks in future

The European Commission has come up with a series of proposals designed to prevent taxpayers footing the bill when banks fail in future.

Back in 2007, fears about the security of money kept within Northern Rock sparked a run on the bank, and its nationalisation. There are fears that similar runs will take place on other banks across the eurozone, particularly in Spain and Greece.

The nationalisation of Northern Rock cost UK taxpayers £1.4 billion. And while successive Governments argued that taxpayers would actually see a return on that cash, by the time the bank was sold to Virgin Money earlier this year, taxpayers were instead left looking at a bill of between £400 million and £650 million.

So what are the Commission’s bright ideas? They include:

  • Regulators should be given powers to force losses onto bondholders of a bank, rather than taxpayers.
  • Closer coordination between national back-up funds to make it easier to wind-up cross-border lenders. This is a step towards establishing a single resolution fund for closing or salvaging parts of struggling banks.
  • Nations should prepare for a bank collapse by charging banks an annual levy, which could be used to provide emergency loans or guarantees.
  • The introduction of an insolvency regime for banks in the EU.

These proposals are unlikely to become law before 2014, which leaves plenty of time for more banks, both here and abroad, to struggle. Indeed, today has seen six German and three Austrian banks downgraded by ratings agency Moody’s.

What do you think of the ideas? Are they sensible? Will they even make it into law? Should banks just be allowed to fail? Let us know your thoughts in the comment box below.

More on the economy:

Should we scrap the minimum wage?

Protect your cash and profit from the eurozone crisis

Who owns your bank or building society?

Are your savings safe with Santander?

How to survive the eurozone meltdown

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (14)

  • MikeB55
    Love rating 6
    MikeB55 said

    The taxpayer should not have to pay the gambling debts of reckless banks. Nor should it pay overblown bonuses to the chief gamblers under any circumstances. I notice that British banks are the least profitable - but are they - profits can be moved around to reduce taxes paid.

    Report on 09 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • eLJay
    Love rating 76
    eLJay said

    Most f the FTSE 100 companies (all but two) should be on charges for tax avoidance.

    No wonder the average person's taxes are so high.

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).

Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2