Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Politics and Finance

Stupid things Brown has done with our money

John Fitzsimons
by Lovemoney Staff John Fitzsimons on 27 January 2010  |  Comments 31 comments

As of last week, we all support Newcastle United - financially, at least. John Fitzsimons rounds up three other stupid ways the Government has wasted taxpayers' money.

I've always had a soft spot for Newcastle United. The people are great, they've always played decent football, generally they are a very likeable club.

However, I've never wanted to be involved financially with them. But now I am. And so you. No really, you are!

Last week, Newcastle United confirmed it had signed a contract extension with its current shirt sponsors - a certain state-owned bank called Northern Rock.

And it's not like the money involved is small fry - the contract comes into force from next season, when in all likelihood Newcastle will be back in the Premier League. So long as they stay there for the next four seasons, it will end up costing me and you £10m!

This bank is supposed to be paying us back the millions and millions of pounds that has been pumped in to keep it afloat. I appreciate that advertising helps, but does advertising on a football shirt really constitute good value? I highly doubt it - I've never been more likely to use a certain company just because they sponsor a football team. My own side, West Ham, are sponsored by an online gambling company - I have plenty of online gambling accounts, but I've no urge to open another one at SBOBET.

Sadly this frankly appalling waste of the money we shell out each month is just the tip of the iceberg. Here's three more examples of where your money has been blown lately.

1) The VAT cut

At the tail-end of 2008, the Chancellor Alistair Darling ordered for VAT to be cut by 2.5%, by 17.5% to 15%. The idea was that because products were cheaper, we'd all be falling over ourselves to buy them, thereby boosting the economy, and everything would be sunshine and light.

While the cut was only temporary (coming to an end on 1 January), it was hardly cheap, costing up to £12bn according to some experts.

In fairness to the Government, most economists agree that the cut helped in terms of retail figures and restricting rising unemployment, though there are wildly differing views on just how helpful it was, and whether it provided value for money.

The problem though is the temporary nature of the cut. Many economists, including the Centre for Economics and Business Research, have suggested that while the cut had only a small impact, seeing prices go up again may actually stall the recovery the economy is currently staging. So not only did the cut provide poor value for money, its reversal may now cause things to get even worse.

Brilliant.

2) Work for RBS? Have a bonus!

Royal Bank of Scotland, a bank so crippled it has relied on all of us to take a whopping 84% stake in it, is still paying bonuses to its staff. It's far from alone of course, but as the Treasury is in charge of the bonus payouts, you'd at least hope they are miniscule. Instead, reports suggest £1.5bn will be winging its way out in bonuses.

The bank's chief executive, Stephen Hester (who is on a £9.7m package by the way) says there is nothing he can do about the need to pay bonuses, blaming the good old marketplace.

Of course there's nothing wrong with rewarding good performance with a bonus, but when RBS is expected to report losses of billions I can't help but feel perhaps that money earmarked for bonuses might be better spent elsewhere.

3) The car scrappage scheme

This idea sounds like a great deal for us all, but I think it's a waste of money.

So long as your car is old enough, has a valid MOT and you've owned it for at least 12 months, you will qualify for £2,000 off the price of a new car if you trade your old car in.

But it's not all it's cracked up to be - we've written before about why the scheme means you'll actually end up shelling out more than you save, in our piece Car-scrappage scheme will cost you money!

Of course, the Government didn't launch the scheme to help us save money on a new car - it was trying to help the ailing motoring industry. The trouble is, the scheme didn't deliver in that respect either - according to the Society of Motoring Manufacturers, car production fell by 31% in 2009, even with the scrappage scheme (and lower VAT) in place.

Whoops.

Well, those are my three most hated cases of awful wasted money by the Government, but I'm sure you all have your own. Why not share them with your fellow lovemoney.com readers via the comment box below?

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (31)

  • SevenPillars
    Love rating 70
    SevenPillars said

    I think it shows how incompetent our current political leaders are in that in rescuing the banks with taxpayers money, they failed to impose punitive conditions on the banks in return for this support. For example, it could have been made clear to them that for as long as they were in receipt of taxpayers money they will not be allowed to pay any bonuses other than for staff at the bottom of the pay scale. The banks would complain loudly about this, that they would lose talent (the same talent that got them into the mess it would seem), but such punitive measures are necessary to ensure that the banks don't repeat the mistakes of the past. If they think that every time they get it wrong the taxpayer will rescue them and then they can carry on as before, they will never learn. It needs to be made clear to all banks that if they want to push the boat out on risk then there will be a huge penalty for them to pay for the moral and systemic risk that they subsequently cause. The fact that the bankers don't seem to want to share in the pain of recession and when it comes to bonuses it seems to be business as usual as far as they are concerned, tends to suggest that they have not learned any lessons.

    Unfortunately, it would seem that none of our present political leaders are up for such punitive measures which suggests that they have too cosy a relationship with banks, finance and the city.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • internettom
    Love rating 1
    internettom said

    My three for how the government has wasted tax payers money would be:

    1 - Selling off the UK gold reserves at rock bottom prices

    2 - The £500,000,000 annual advertising spend by the COI.

    3 - It's a tricky one, out of the public sector pensions defecit, MP's expenses, pointless public sector non-jobs, i'd probably have to go with "bureaucracy."

    That is the sheer volume of pointless red tape and over regulation that has led to so many enforcement officers, inspectors, quango's and a culture of always having someone to blame.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • rbgos
    Love rating 81
    rbgos said

    TV advertising telling us not to smoke (or take drugs, or drive to fast, or drink too much).

    We all know already that these things are bad for us. I don't want to spend my evenings watching TV adverts, that I've been obliged to pay for, telling me what to do. Sod off, Nanny.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • kevbee
    Love rating 1
    kevbee said

    Let's not forget the zillions this government has wasted on IT. There's the stupid NHS scheme which is still not working. Remember when they revised the passport applications? People couldn't get away on holiday because of the backlogs.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • dealtn
    Love rating 1
    dealtn said

    Can we get a modicum of professionalism in the journalism on this site or are we content to continue the sad slide to tabloidism? RBS will report its results to the market next month, market estimates are for a loss of £2-3bn. Hardly a great result but quite some way from the £500bn you are quoting. Another dig at Stephen Hester too - someone brought into the bank to clear up the "issues" of the Goodwin era, so hardly culpable, especially since he wasn't even a banker, let alone employed by RBS at the time of its near collapse. His "bonus" if it is paid in full occurs if he (approximately) doubles the share price. Now given it is owned 84% by "us" and currently worth in the region of £18.7bio, he will be paid his near £10mio remuneration if he makes "us" over £15bio. (no I don't nor ever have, indeed ever want to, work for rbs - or freelance as a tabloid journalist!)

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • msmoneywise
    Love rating 27
    msmoneywise said

    My 3 are:

    Tax Credits: These cost the taxpayers billions - in payouts and fraud. The major beneficiaries are scamsters in Lithuania, Portugal, Slovakia, etc. who are able to claim these credits for kids they don't even have, thanks to our generous Government saying that Euro nationals can claim tax credits even if the children live abroad.

    IT providers: The tenders for IT providers go out almost annually, and cost us billions again, each time. E.g. Just when the previous company (Capgemini) was able to fix the bugs in the above (Tax Credits) programme, the Government changed the IT provider to Fujitsu, and they undid all the work done, and the system crashed again. Ever wonder why your enquiries take so long to get dealt with, whether it is with the Passport Office, HMRC or any other department? The computer support is laughable, and will slow down or stop when there are too many users accessing the system, like when we are coming up to the 31st January online filing of tax returns deadline!

    The so-called PPP's Public/Private Partnerships: Companies that have bought the estates of public bodies like the NHS, HMRC, DSS, HMSO, HMPO for throw-away prices and then got contracts to maintain these for 30 years or more. No matter if the buildings are no longer in use, they have to be paid! BBC did a very interesting programme on these - showing how they made millions by just changing the loan interest terms just 2 years after they bought the estates. Also, almost all of them are off-shore corporations, so they don't even pay tax on their collossal profits!! A double whammy for the taxpayers. Makes the sell-off of the UK gold reserves look like a very good bargain for us!!! 

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • msmoneywise
    Love rating 27
    msmoneywise said

    My 3 are:

    Tax Credits: These cost the taxpayers billions - in payouts and fraud. The major beneficiaries are scamsters in Lithuania, Portugal, Slovakia, etc. who are able to claim these credits for kids they don't even have, thanks to our generous Government saying that Euro nationals can claim tax credits even if the children live abroad.

    IT providers: The tenders for IT providers go out almost annually, and cost us billions again, each time. E.g. Just when the previous company (Capgemini) was able to fix the bugs in the above (Tax Credits) programme, the Government changed the IT provider to Fujitsu, and they undid all the work done, and the system crashed again. Ever wonder why your enquiries take so long to get dealt with, whether it is with the Passport Office, HMRC or any other department? The computer support is laughable, and will slow down or stop when there are too many users accessing the system, like when we are coming up to the 31st January online filing of tax returns deadline!

    The so-called PPP's Public/Private Partnerships: Companies that have bought the estates of public bodies like the NHS, HMRC, DSS, HMSO, HMPO for throw-away prices and then got contracts to maintain these for 30 years or more. No matter if the buildings are no longer in use, they have to be paid! BBC did a very interesting programme on these - showing how they made millions by just changing the loan interest terms just 2 years after they bought the estates. Also, almost all of them are off-shore corporations, so they don't even pay tax on their collossal profits!! A double whammy for the taxpayers. Makes the sell-off of the UK gold reserves look like a very good bargain for us!!! 

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • wad68
    Love rating 1
    wad68 said

    Paying out billions each year to the unemployed who can't find a job whilst importing foreigners to work.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 64
    LandOfConfusion said

    "1) The VAT cut

    The idea was that because products were cheaper, we'd all be falling over ourselves to buy them"

    And we did - Q4 saw us allegedly come out of recession as lot of people rushed to the shops to make large capital purchases before the rate rise.

    "2) Work for RBS? Have a bonus!"

    I'm in two minds on this. On one hand, should an insolvent bank be paying out bonuses? But on the other, the people who caused the bank to go insolvent are (we're told) now looking for new jobs. Also, given that it's a taxpayer owned bank isn't it in our interests to attract and keep the best people so that we can eventually seel the bank off and hopefully at a profit?

    And in any case, senior HMRC staff recently received massive bonuses despite being branded as a failing department.

    "3) The car scrappage scheme"

    This was, without doubt a cynical attempt to win votes at taxpayer expense. The car industry is just too big and with too many players. They know it, Labour knows it and the workers probably at least suspect it. But still this government pumped millions of taxpayer money into a sector which is both bloated and dominated by foreign companies.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • sparkysparky
    Love rating 2
    sparkysparky said

    My three are:

    -Cutting taxes for the already super-rich

    -Hitting the poorest workers by scrapping the minimum wage

    -Slashing public services and doubling unemployment.

    ...Oh, sorry, that's what the Tories will do if they win the election...

    Tax credit fraud pales into insignificance against tax evasion by the wealthy.

    Sadly, IT fiascos seem to happen in every organisation whoever is in power. I've never worked in a company where the IT dept seemed to know what it was doing.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 64
    LandOfConfusion said

    A few more points (off the top of my head):

    1) Abandoning the old Tory system of supplying benefits via changes to the tax code. This alone keeps thousands of public sector employees in jobs.

    2) Constant attacks against human rights and civil liberties. By the time these get to the Euopean Court of Human Rights, many thousands if not hundreds of thousands of pounds have been wasted - for nothing.

    3) ID cards. These are totally unnecessary and subsidised by the tax payer.

    4) Giving council tennents the 'Right to Buy'. It was a stupid, stupid Tory idea and they've allowed it to blossom, along with the sell and rent back companies which follow them.

    (And now they're going to build more council houses. Briliant).

    6) The bailing out foreign car companies.

    7) Rejecting Open Source Software out of hand and going almost exclusively with Microsoft's software instead. If other developed, european countires can get along just fine with free software then why can't we?

    8) Failing to introduce land tax and land reforms, meaning that we still effectively pay people to hold onto land (also see next point).

    9) Failing to get us out of/reform the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). 

    10) And lastly all the other New Labour pet projects which cost hundreds of thousands each and yet do little or nothing (like the various schemes to help people onto the housing ladder).

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • blartbox
    Love rating 2
    blartbox said

    Here's 3 from healthcare. Almost £400m spent trying to increase the proportion of medical students from 'disadvantaged' backgrounds. Result - an increase of 1.5%. Bargain.

    PFI. Approx £8bn of new build. Total cost will be ~£54bn, all to keep the £8bn off the PSBR to make the govt look more competent at managing the public finances, & keep within EU fiscal rules about PSBR as a percentage of GDP.

    Primary Care Trusts. Tens of thousands of clipboard carriers paid to make the lives of front line NHS staff a misery. Cost, £5bn annually.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • alanhs
    Love rating 4
    alanhs said

    What do you expect from failed barrasters and

    lawyers who couldn't run a coner shop let alone a company or country - my biggest one

    is why do we have so many MP's they only seem to attend during PM (is

    that Peter Mandleson's) Question Time. Halve or bring them down to a

    third of the current number of MPs and we would save a fortune, and

    only MP's that have been in charge of a successful business need

    apply!! When will they go?

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    Unmarried mothers. There may be a small percentage of genuine cases but the vast majority brat-down to scrounge 180 quid a week and a free house. This has lead to a 40% illegitamate rate and is not good for a healthy society. Used to be 3%.

    This was costing us 15 billion 12 years ago and was mentioned in the House of Commons 2 or 3 times back then. Must be costing us 20 billion plus now.

    More importantly in my view is that this contribites to broken Britain. We need to reinstel some morals and standards.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • lurcherdog
    Love rating 0
    lurcherdog said

    What's new? Since the 2nd WW this once great untited country has systematicaly gone downhill. I'm 67 and the state we're in now makes me turn to history. As I believe in the old adage; what goes round, comes round, we will eventually end up a 2nd world country. Go back to the Roman times - it's all been done befor and little has changed. What is the answere? That is to be pondered but I cincerely believe, we will never be the country we once were so good luck to all you young folk with family's whatever. The clock is ticking for me!

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • glads69
    Love rating 13
    glads69 said

    It is time for this government to bow out, re-think and re-charge its batteries. Twelve plus years of "serving" the country have taken their toll. Do not kid yourselves; New Labour are less in touch now with the public than the Tories were in 1997. It is time for a change, even if we do not know whether the next lot will be any better. Most right minded people are heartily sick of New Labour's presidential politics, parliamentary dictatorship and dysfunctional micro-management.

    Those who are genetically programmed to vote Labour should read Daniel Craig's "Squandered". It sets out this government's real financial waste which will make your eyes water. If you know your political history, you will also know that any form of Labour government has and will always leave a financial mess in its wake.

    Money does not resolve all problems.  Money in Labour's hands actually creates problems.   

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • jockey
    Love rating 2
    jockey said

    I`m all for bonuses no matter who people are, if they`ve done a really good job, but certainly not until any debts they owe are repaid in full, i think you all know what i mean there, pay us back quickly and then give out bonuses.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • foolishsceptic
    Love rating 7
    foolishsceptic said

    My biggest gripe is that 30% of Council Tax goes straight towards the local authority pension deficit - and the employees can still retire on good pensions from age 50. Surely the Govt (Brown) needs to address this issue by putting up the minimum retirement age in the public sector to 60 and increasing the employee contribution rates! 

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • penelope jane
    Love rating 0
    penelope jane said

    To follow up on foolishsceptics's remarks - if the Public sector, particulalry MPs, were on the same pension arrangements as the majority in the private sector, Mr Brown would never have brought in the huge attack he makes annually on private pensions.

    In 1997 the UK was the envy of Europe for its pension savings. Not any more.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • natouille
    Love rating 3
    natouille said

    I fully support internettom ... Selling the gold, damaging the pensions is bigger worry than VAT.

    The ID cost is nothing as it is already paid through the new bio passport which is an international requirement coming up. I am French and I have an ID with finger prints and soon biometric, this is very practical to prove my age, my ID, travel in EU without the need of passport, this is no bigger than a credit card ... If they could do for kids, I would do it ....

    On the other hand in difficult time, one should help the most vulnerable people in our society.

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • liesarenocomfort
    Love rating 134
    liesarenocomfort said

    Somebody's going to post about immigrants taking our jobs in a minute, I just know they are...

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mechanix
    Love rating 1
    mechanix said

    All the posts above add up to one obvious thing....This country is gonna sink , its finished as we know it. Gordon brown ,Tony blair should be arrested and tried for treason. They are all corrupt along with 90 per cent of the other people running this outfit. All out for themselves and their dodgy mates in businness , all planning how they can make a buck out of the cash cow called the taxpayer... The stench of personal greed fills our financial system.  The rot in our system needs to be cleansed. turn that corrupt sewer of politics called the houses of parliament into a museum of rotteness. Build a modern place of government that can serve the interests of everyone. If only ...... Radical.... mmm .. maybe!!!

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • charles125
    Love rating 53
    charles125 said

    Most often its the way they've gone about things, abominable timings, giving contracts to concerns that couldn't (and most probably weren't likely to) deliver and often stupid silly detail.

    Take statutory off road notification (SORN) for vehicles off the public road. Nothing wrong with that at all, BUT I don't even have to notify the DVLC WHERE the vehicle is stored off-road, so no checks are possible if I don't use motorways or other places where there might be traffic cameras. There was one mobile licensing camera on a busy urban main road ONCE in five years. If people live in the country and rarely or never park where traffic wardens patrol, and don't park outside their own house (or keep the vehicle in a garage instead!), and don't speed they probably won't ever get caught for declaring a vehicle off-road. Must cost the treasury MILLIONS each year in lost tax revenue.

    Just simply asking WHERE a vehicle is kept off-road, one simple question, could make the whole SORN system more viable. And employ a handful of inspectors to check on these details for a sample of SORN declarers!

    Report on 27 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • liesarenocomfort
    Love rating 134
    liesarenocomfort said

    John,

    I presume this is the first of a trilogy and we're looking forward to the next one. Is it sex, or religion next?

    Report on 28 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LateDeveloper
    Love rating 22
    LateDeveloper said

    TV licence fees that are just a tax on every member of the public now, since it has been changed to include any device which can get reception over the internet.

    As for the 3 above:

    1/ VAT Cut was useless and just encouraged companies to increase prices while the VAT was lower.

    2/RBS should not be allowed to pay any bonuses out of Government funding, but if they must pay it out, they must only do it based on their own shares in the company. In other words, deduct any monetary input by the Government then see what they have left to pay out as bunuses.

    3/Car scrappage scheme just encouraged foreign manufacturers to withdraw the offers they already had on car sales. This would have been far better for UK customers if the money was not given to the manufacturer, but to the person scrapping the car. A simple clause that the person must have owned the car prior to the scheme coming in, would have negated a lot of swindles on the system. No wonder France and Germany have better figures for productivity than the UK, we have been giving them the money.

    Report on 28 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 64
    LandOfConfusion said

    natouille said

    "The ID cost is nothing as it is already paid through the new bio passport"

    ID cards and biometric passports are two completely different things. I'm not sure about France but in this country the government is trying to ceneralise all the data it can about it's citizens and then make that data availiable to anyone with a shred of public authority.

    In fact, we've already had our first major security breach from it - a local council has sacked a load of staff for misusing the data when offically they didn't have access to it.

    ID cards are just the visible edge. There's a lot more going on than people realise.

     "[biometric passport] which is an international requirement coming up."

    Care to supply a source for this? Because as far as I'm aware only the UK and US (sort of) intend to require them. And even then it isn't a problem if you haven't got one.

    And I haven't even mentioned all the security problems which are currently surfacing.

    "this is very practical to prove my age, my ID, travel in EU without the need of passport"

    In other words it's an expensive, redundant second passport?

    "On the other hand in difficult time, one should help the most vulnerable people in our society."

    In other words, you believe that as a productive, hardworking individual I should pay for someone who is, shall I say, 'unproductive' to have a free and completely unnesessary form of additional ID?

    Report on 28 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • oldhenry
    Love rating 265
    oldhenry said

    Local government employee pension scheme has been amended , you cannot retire before 55! - for a while some will but this id fast running out. . But in local government there are no bonuses, no nice free cars, expense allowances for officers etc. So the pension scheme is what attract staff into the job. Without that , I reckon the salaries would have to rise- if you want good officers who run a quality service. Council Tax increases are mainly the result of more laws imposed on teh Council from the Government without proper funding- just look at the free bus fares for pensioners.

    But the main gripe against Labour is that they consistently spend our money without any really caring whether we can afford it or not. Britain is not wealthy, we are slipping down the national scales and cannot afford the high benefit payouts that the government gives, Or the health service which wastes millions on overprescribed drugs, and treating any body that turns up at hospital. try that in the USA!

    Report on 28 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ITexpert77
    Love rating 4
    ITexpert77 said

    > oldhenry

    How about the job for life and long annual holidays for local government employees? Aren't these attractive?

    So someone can start working at 25 (or later!) and after 30 years retire at 55, and then for another 30 (or 40 in some cases) get paid to sit at home? Who will pay for that? I guess us the council tax victims.

    Why not retirement age at 65 for everyone?

    Report on 28 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 64
    LandOfConfusion said

    oldhenry said

    "So the pension scheme is what attract staff into the job. Without that , I reckon the salaries would have to rise"

    After the next general election, that will probably be the case - it definitely won't be job security that's for sure (and that's even if Labour get in!).

    At the moment public sector pensions are unfunded, that is to say there is currently no money is being put aside to fund them for when when they retire. It's going to come directly from future taxation. Given how generous such schemes are I can see some real problems lying ahead.

    "But the main gripe against Labour is that they consistently spend our money without any really caring whether we can afford it or not."

    I've looked at Labour's record going back until WW2. Three things seem to re-occour every time they're in power: Corruption, attacks against civil liberties (incl. dubious social engineering) and a major tax and spend attitude, even if you can't afford it.

    Report on 28 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ticktock
    Love rating 34
    ticktock said

    We all have our own pet hates. Mine is, what the heck has the present government done for ME? Can I come back next week on that?

    I'm retired. I pay tax on my pensions that I saved for, Oh why did I save? The bloke next door don't work and has more income than me.

    The last time Labour were in power, words I heard were, 'The working man's life will improve'. That's a laugh, my tax bill increased then just like it has this time. The Labour party drone on about how working class they are, now that is a joke. If they were working class, they would do the job for less pay AND not claim all the expenses they do. They take the mick the same as some others, yet they have the cheek to say they are better. Can someone tell me; How many true working class labour MPs there are? You know those that actually HAD to work for a living, along with their parents. Not many I bet.

    I worked for 51 years. Saved for my pensions. paid my taxes & NI. So the big and only question I have is; What has the labour party done for ME? Answer; NOTHING.

    Report on 30 January 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • AuntFlo
    Love rating 24
    AuntFlo said

    Why have my posts been removed?

    Report on 02 February 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2