Wronged by a rip-off trader

Rosalind Kent
by Lovemoney Staff Rosalind Kent on 14 November 2010  |  Comments 12 comments

Been ripped off by a tradesman and don't know how to fight back? Rosalind Kent has all the answers.

There is nothing worse than feeling that your complaint is not being taken seriously. When you have been wronged by a tradesman, business or shopkeeper and want action taken against them, you might contact a body like Trading Standards or the Office of Fair Trading who, you hope, will step in and resolve the problem.

I have worked for both of these organisations, as an Enforcement Officer for Trading Standards and a case officer for the Office of Fair Trading, and this article will explain how these organisations work, and what they do.

The Office of Fair Trading

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) does not offer individual advice to members of the public. The sheer volume of complaints about traders and scams, originating both from the UK and abroad, makes it impossible to offer a personal advice service.

The purpose of the OFT is make sure that the economic market works in favour of the consumer by gathering information and conducting investigations into problem traders.

I worked on timeshare scams, which sadly an enormous amount of people fall victim to every year, and took many an irate call from people who couldn’t understand why we were not fighting to get them their personal losses back.

Trading Standards

When I worked at Trading Standards we used to tackle enormous volumes of consumer complaints. Now, a government funded organisation called Consumer Direct takes these calls and provides individual tailored advice.

Your case will only be passed on to Trading Standards if it meets certain criteria, usually that it a criminal matter or that it is in the public interest that action be taken.

A simple way of determining whether Trading Standards will be able to take action on your behalf is to look at whether your complaint involves civil or criminal law. If you are pursuing a trader or company to claim unpaid money, or for breach of contract, you will have civil legal remedies, which Consumer Direct can inform you about.

So, if you have bought a faulty TV, and you want a Trading Standards officer to go round to the shop and get your money back, you will be disappointed.

This can be frustrating for people who call expecting immediate action, but there is a good reason that this system is in place.

Trading Standards were inundated with consumer complaints, like the TV example above, and spent a lot of time on the phone with clients explaining their rights, and deflecting their anger that we couldn’t intervene for them. This meant that we had less time to deal with the criminal matters, like underage sales of alcohol, knives or fireworks, counterfeit goods, unsafe goods, misleading advertising, food safety, contraventions of the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 and offences against the Weights and Measures Act 1985 (this involved checking things like spirit measures in pubs – we didn’t drink the shots afterwards, that was frowned upon!)

Trading Standards have statutory powers to inspect premises, seize and detain goods, perform test purchases, issue suspension or fixed penalty notices and conduct interviews under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. To have all these officers preoccupied by giving civil consumer advice is simply not a good use of their time, or taxpayers’ money.

What Trading Standards can help you with

Some less well-known criminal offences that Trading Standards can help you with include:

 misleading prices, or not having the price displayed clearly with the goods;

selling food past its Use By date (although not its Best Before date) and

having a No Refund sign up next to the till.

Don’t expect police cars to shoot round if you report some of these, but Trading Standards will go and explain the legislation to the trader, and may take further action against repeat offenders.

What you need to know

To sum up, neither Trading Standards nor Consumer Direct can demand a refund from a trader for you.

Nor can they take action on your behalf if you want the case to go to court (you must do this yourself, see my previous article Win in the Small Claims Court).

Similarly, they cannot recommend traders - although some are part of the Local Authority Assured Trader Scheme Network. If your area does not provide this service then have a look at Trustmark instead.

Finally, unfortunately, they cannot help you pay for any specialist evidence that you might need to pursue your claim (i.e. expert report on a faulty computer).

But they can provide you with all the support and assistance possible to pursue valid claims yourself, whilst they go out and tackle dangerous, illegal or criminal companies who are putting the public at risk.

Share your own experiences

Have you ever been wronged by a rip-off trader? If so, did you fight back - and did you win? Please share your own experiences using the comments box below so other lovemoney.com readers can benefit!

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (12)

  • tilburyre
    Love rating 0
    tilburyre said

    We reported a cowboy builder to Trading Standards. They seemed to take it seriously and arranged a meeting with him at which they were present. What a waste of time! Their only concern was that the cowboy got paid. I said the work was not up to standard. They said "there's only one person here qualified to given an opinion and he says it is".I said, "to quote Mandy Rice-Davies, "Well he would wouldn't he?" They couldn't see it and strongly advised me to pay immediately. I did but I blasted him on every site he was on with a -10 recommendation

    Report on 14 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • socko
    Love rating 0
    socko said

    Overuse of uppercase will be tamed (you can edit your comment to prevent this):

    have you heard of the age uk business directory? it's an on line directory of reliable & honest traders. if you have a probelm with any of the traders you can get peace of mind & help by calling them back to let them know & they take you seriously & investigate the complaint. i have used workemen from their directory a couple of times & not had any problems. i can really recommend the directory when looking for a trusted trader. you don't need a computer you can call them for free.

    And now here are some pictures to help lighten the mood

    Report on 14 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Satish Saxena
    Love rating 0
    Satish Saxena said

    My bad experience with SunLife of Canada.

    Have a Policy with them. Now want to cash it. They do not take Telephone/Email or Faxed instructions. Also they do not accept the closing price of the Units of the previous day. They say, they would only accept instructions by post. A letter received on Monday would only be dealt with the Published price of Wednesday for execution.

    It is anybody's guess what would be the price in future in these days of uncertain and volatile Stock Market.

    Any suggestions to deal with this uncooperative and callous attitude of Sun Life of Canada ?  

    Report on 14 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Meanmachine2
    Love rating 37
    Meanmachine2 said

    I have found that Trading Standards are now pretty useless.

    A while back we had a frozen Turkey Breast from Tescos that was strangley all black in the middle. Instead of taking it back to Tescos where I knew they would just give me a refund I marched it round to Trading Standards.

    All they did was notify Tescos on the grounds that it was not their problem and it was the supermarkets responsibility to investigate.

     After many weeks had gone by I chased trading standards and after they phoned Tescos I was told that Tescos had lost the complaint.

    That seemed convenient so I kept on pestering trading standards who obviously chased Tesco's. In the end the official reply from Tescos was that it was a normal occurance of blood in the meat.

     So Trading Standards obviously accepted that lumps of meat are normally black and weird in the middle and I never did get a refund.  

    Compare that with the old days when Trading Standards would have been jumping up and down and the shop offering the customer all sorts of goodies as compensation.

    Report on 14 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LovelyLeeloo
    Love rating 10
    LovelyLeeloo said

    Hmmm... You got a couple of quids' worth of meat with a blood clot in, you didn't take it back to the shop where you would have got a full refund, but you went off to pester Trading Standards in the hope that this would persuade the shop to give you "all sorts of goodies" as "compensation" for the terrible trauma and injury of being sold a bit of dead animal that still had some blood in it?? Jeez, no wonder Trading Standards complain they don't have the time to catch importers of faulty toys that kill children anymore!

    Report on 14 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • MK22
    Love rating 140
    MK22 said

    Not sure about the Age UK Business Directory, it isn't mentioned on their web site and additonal searching shows it only appears to be active in Oxfordshire, Nottinghamshire, Leicestershire and Derbyshire.

    Report on 14 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • environmentaljan
    Love rating 8
    environmentaljan said

     I doubt Trading Standards officers do Food hygiene - they are not qualified inspectors, they do Food Standards. To prevent this confusion and to assist business and consumers alike many EH departments in unitary authorities now cover both parts of food law. It makes sense to have a one stop shop and all EHOs are qualified in food standards as well as hygiene.

    The complaint with the turkey breasts could have been taken to the local EH team.

    Generally these days the consumer is encouraged to return items , espically to large retailers. However if the matter is dangerous ie glass or a risk to publlic health - contaminated food the compalint will be taken.

    The government cuts are biting deep into these services in order to protect social service and education budgets. The result will be that many food premises won't be inspected and even fewer food complaints will be accepted for investigation.

    Report on 14 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 362
    CuNNaXXa said

    If you have an issue with a purchase, your first port of call should always be with the retailer who sold it to you.

    Remember, regardless of what you buy, your contract is with retailer, and no one else. Therefore, you should always try to resolve it with the retailer first. Also remember that if you bought something that was substandard, or faulty, their limitation is to replace like for like, or something superior, or a financial refund, depending on negotiations.

    Too many people go running to Trading Standards in the first instance. My own aunt bought a freezer, then decided to sue the manufacturer because it wasn't freezing down properly, instead of complaining to the retailer. Some people want hand outs and compensation for any small slight or faulty goods. It is acceptable that not all the high street consumables will be perfect. We have to accept that sometimes things do get through the strenuous screening that manufacturers and producers have.

    Of course, when a retailer doesn't want to know, or when they fob you off by telling you to take the matter up with the manufacturer, then Trading Standards can get involved.

    @ tilburyre...

    Trading Standards cannot force you to pay for a service if you think that the service was substandard. The only person who can force you to pay is the judge at a county court circuit. If you are unhappy about the quality of workmanship, ask another tradesman, or two, to comment on the work done. If they agree that the work is substandard, ask then to confirm in writing why it is substandard so that you have documentary evidence for when the original tradesman takes you to the county court for non payment.

    Remember, though, that Trading Standards is not a 'get out of paying' clause, and if you have been supplied a service or goods in good faith, you are obliged to pay for these services or goods, as part of a mutual contract between the retailer/tradesman and yourself. Failure is considered a breach of contract.

    Report on 14 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • robdt76
    Love rating 0
    robdt76 said

    I've been ripped off recently by the collapse of the foreign money exchange company Crown Currency Exchange ran by the disgraced Mr Peter Benstead (also major shareholder in currency exchange company Torfx - just a warning for anyone thinking of using them). Just hope trading standards and OFT are more effective than the FSA who did absolutely nothing to protect the public from loosing around £20m even though the FSA had been made aware of peoples concerns about how the company was run. Although in an ideal world it shouldn't be necessary it could well be worth carrying out background checks on a company before using them especially when large sums of money are involved. Not sure if doing this would have saved me losing my £4.5k but buyer beware springs to mind. Did I mention the FSA suck!!

    Report on 14 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • eLJay
    Love rating 76
    eLJay said

    Buyer Beware - that's why you don't hire trades people without reliable references. Often you will need a good lawyer.

    Report on 15 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Wellsprungalice
    Love rating 20
    Wellsprungalice said

    CuNNaXXa it's a nice thought, but first you have to find a builder who will comment on another builder's work. Iin a lot of years of doing up property I've never met a single tradesperson who will comment on another's work unless it's to try to divert blame for their own inabilities or shoddy workmanship. Even if you could get them to comment, if you then asked them to put that comment in writing you wouldn't see them for dust. 

    If you want a professional opinion, a surveyor is probably the only person who'd be willing to put an opinion in writing - and they would charge handsomely to do so.

    Report on 15 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • wotasillyboy
    Love rating 0
    wotasillyboy said

    I feel very sorry for people who lose out when dealing with dodgy businesses, but often the reason they go to such companies is one of greed!

    In my experience there are always those who prefer to deal with someone who apparently offers a slightly better return or cheaper deal than a good reputable company.

    I think back many years to when a firm I'd not heard of had eyecatching advertisements for a high return on investing with them placed in all the carriages on London's Underground railway. Their return was about 1% higher than could be obtained safely with Building Societies. Subsequently I met someone who was bewailing the loss of their life savings after this company had gone bankrupt. I asked why they had put their faith in an unknown organisation and the reply was that they offered a better return than a Building Society etc. So they were seduced by greed!!

    I fell for this emotion of greed myself when I wanted Central Heating installed in my first house. Being newly married and short of money I opted to deal with a firm who were based some distance away, and who's paperwork was minimal to say the least. This was in preference to a local firm with a superb reputation and a guarantee of completing the work within 5 days, but their quote was about 15% higher. The "dodgy" firm would come and do some work when I phoned to ask why their fitters had disappeared for 3 days. I had water leaking from the loft into the bedrooms. The work took about 1 MONTH and I had to fix leaking radiators myself because I was reluctant to invite those cowboys back to rectify their shoddy work!!! Greed was my downfall - NEVER AGAIN!!!!

    Report on 07 December 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable)

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4