Cookie policy
Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Consumer rights

How bank transfers go wrong

Neil Faulkner
by Lovemoney Staff Neil Faulkner on 12 May 2012  |  Comments 3 comments

Learn when you can get your money back from bad money transfers - and when you simply have to be more careful.

How bank transfers go wrong

When we try to transfer money to UK or foreign accounts it doesn't always go smoothly. We may enter incorrect details, experience delays, or send our money to scammers. Sometimes, thousands of pounds is at stake.

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has released some case studies that help us to see when we can blame our bank and get our money back. It also shows when we only have ourselves to blame, and so need to take extra care.

Let's learn from the mistakes of others with bank transfers, as well as the successes they've had at getting their money back after a bank error.

Customer enters wrong details for money transfer

Mr P attempted to transfer £1,000 to his daughter's account, but a week later it was revealed the money went to a different account. Mr P had entered an incorrect digit.

Although on this occasion the bank was able to recall the money, Mr P complained to the bank and then the Ombudsman that the bank should have checked that the account number and name matched.

The Ombudsman ruled against Mr P, saying that the bank's online transfer screen makes it clear that the account name would not used to process the payment.

Bank delays cause customer to lose out on overseas transfer

Mrs F tried to transfer £90,000 to France through her bank. The bank couldn't carry out the transaction without speaking to Mrs F for security reasons so, over several days, Mrs F tried calling them without success. Eventually she made the one-hour round trip to a branch, which completed the transaction for her.

In this time, the exchange rate moved against her and she lost out.

The bank refused to reimburse her. She complained to the Ombudsman who thought the bank hadn't done everything it could have to ensure the transfer took place in a reasonable time. It ordered the bank to make up the difference, plus £150 compensation for the inconvenience caused.

Customer complains transfer was too fast!

Mr G sent £1,000 overseas but realised he'd been scammed the next day. His bank told him it had tried its best to recall the money. However, the transfer had already taken place and there was nothing it could do.

Mr G complained that the bank had not told him the transfer would go through instantly and he wouldn't have done it if he had known. The Ombudsman sympathised with Mr G for being the victim of a scam, but not enough to side with his arguments. The Ombudsman was also satisfied the bank had done more than enough to try to help its customer.

Make sure there's enough money in the account

Miss D asked her bank how much money was in her account to ensure she had enough before making a transfer. She was told she had £1,500 based on the balance at close of business the day before, so Miss D proceeded with a £500 transfer. Unfortunately, there wasn't enough money in her account at the time of the transfer, so it was not completed at the expected time.

She complained to the Ombudsman that the bank had not been clear enough. The Ombudsman listened to the recording of Miss D's telephone conversation with her bank, and was satisfied that the bank had explained the situation to her. It rejected Miss D's complaint.

Customer given no opportunity to confirm payment details

Mr B transferred £150 online but sent it to the wrong recipient. He contacted his bank immediately to try to correct it and waited for a call back, which didn't come. He tried calling three more times. The bank eventually told him it was his fault and there was probably nothing they could have done to stop it.

He complained to the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman found that the bank didn't give Mr B sufficient opportunity to check the details he entered were correct, in particular offering no “final confirmation” page. It also established there was a good chance the bank could have stopped the transaction if it had acted promptly.

It ordered the bank to reimburse Mr B, plus £75 for the inconvenience it had caused.

More on consumer rights:

How to get your money back after a scam

Overpay your loan without penalty

Tenants: Know your rights

My Dell hell

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (3)

  • PDB11
    Love rating 73
    PDB11 said

    With these online transfers, it is we who make the mistakes not the banks!

    All account numbers should have a redundant digit so that getting one digit wrong is never a valid account number. If possible, swapping two adjacent digits should also not be a valid account number.

    There are such checks in place - when I moved my bank account last year, I told my employer the wrong sort code, with one wrong digit. My employer failed to transfer my salary to me as a result, which was probably just as well!

    On the other hand, some years ago, my father was administering his uncle's will. He asked for details so that he could transfer money directly to me. But the bank, entering the details from the paper transfer slip, entered the estate account for both sender and recipient. I knew nothing until the end of the quarter, when I got the statement on my savings account and it showed no money from Uncle R. I complained, the bank promised to sort it out and adjust the interest. But, as I discovered at the end of the following quarter, they adjusted the interest on my savings account the wrong way - as though it had several thousand less in it for the period of the error. Unauthorised overdraft with over a hundred quid in charges and interest. They did sort it out in the end, but I was really annoyed by that one! Papa said that they had done that to another family member a couple of years previously. I don't know if all banks were like that, or random branches, or just NatWest, but give me online banking any day!

    Report on 14 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 881
    MikeGG1 said

    I am with PDB11 on the use of check-digits. They would cut down on the number of errors that get through, very significantly. However, he was just lucky on his salary transfer - there wasn't a check-digit it would have been just to a non-existent combination. Unless it was a (former or current) Building Society account, that is. The traditional banks don't use check-digits, so far as I am aware.

    Any time that a human being is putting data into a computer, there is liable to be a mistake. Anyone who thinks that they will do it perfectly every time is mistaken. On-line banking is helpful in that existing payees have already had their details confirmed. It is then only the amount that can be typed incorrectly.

    Mike

    Report on 28 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Related content

Our top deals

Credit card
company 		Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR 		Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels