Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Consumer rights

How to make a Super Complaint

Rosalind Kent
by Lovemoney Staff Rosalind Kent on 06 April 2011  |  Comments 7 comments

What's a Super Complaint and how do you make one? Rosalind Kent finds out.

How to make a Super Complaint

There’s nothing like a bit of ‘consumer power’ to take a stand against the evils of big business, but do the public have any clout at all when it comes to complaining about unscrupulous companies?

Most of you will be shouting ‘No!’, but there is a value to complaining, and when it is done properly it can achieve the desired results.

What is a Super Complaint?

Super Complaints were created under the Enterprise Act 2002, and allow for serious complaints that ‘significantly harm the interests of consumers’ to be investigated by a regulator, such as the Office of Fair Trading (OFT).  It is a ‘fast track’ system, and the OFT has to publicly respond within 90 days.

Who Can Make Them?

You can’t just pop along to the OFT offices and ask to make a Super Complaint. The complaint has to come from a ‘designated consumer body’. The Secretary of State decides who will become a designated body, and the strict criteria in this PDF must be satisfied.  There are currently 8 confirmed consumer groups.

Super Complaints in the News

The Citizens Advice Bureau submitted a Super Complaint in March 2011 regarding scam loans and cold-calling debt management firms. This is currently being investigated by the OFT who will be meeting with a range of consumer organisations, industry trade associations and government bodies to gather information. You can email the OFT if you have a comment about this complaint.

Which? also brought a Super Complaint in March 2011 regarding the unreasonable surcharges imposed when paying by debit or credit card.  They are asking the OFT to look at two particular areas: the transparency of the charges – whether customers aware of them before they decide to make the purchase; and the actual cost of the charge – is it proportionate to the costs incurred by the business when processing the payment?   

A current list of Super Complaints being dealt with by the OFT can be seen on their website.

What can the OFT do?

When a complaint is received, the OFT have to determine whether the practice is significantly harming the consumer’s interests, and if it is, what steps can be taken to redress the balance.  Unfortunately, even if the investigations find that a practice is harmful, the OFT cannot just shut down the problem there and then (that would be far too sensible and useful!) The following options are available:

  • making recommendations to the government to change laws and regulations
  • referring the matter to the Competition Commission
  • encouraging businesses to self-regulate
  • running campaigns to raise public awareness.

Unless the OFT decides to lobby for a change to legislation to address the problem, the other options can seem a bit toothless. However, even if the only outcome is that public awareness has been raised, this is still an important part of the consumer protection process.

The Importance of Individual Complaints

People often believe that there is no point in complaining, that they are just one voice and they will not be heard.  Here at lovemoney.com, we recently published an article, The Sneaky Online Ticket Rip-Off, that underlines this problem. Trading Standards and the OFT said that, although there is clearly a great deal of public annoyance about online ticket-selling practices, they are actually receiving very few complaints.

 It is largely due to people thinking that they just have to accept the situation, but if we do not complain then consumer bodies will not be able to gather enough data to raise any kind of complaint, never mind a Super Complaint!

Success Stories

There is no doubt that Super Complaints can benefit the public, as the recent lengthy court wrangle about unfair bank charges illustrates.

Millions of customers were being charged up to £40 for unauthorised overdrafts, bounced cheques, or failed direct debits, but rose up to complain.

In 2006 the OFT recommended that such charges be set at a maximum of £12.Despite the unfortunate Supreme Court decision in 2009 that the OFT did not have the right to make this decision, people have still been able to make a stand.

Many claimed back thousands as the case was going through the courts, and the banks paid out as they were uncertain about their legal chances of success. There has also been a downshift in the amount that banks can charge when you get into the red, and many do now charge the suggested £12 per transgression. Not a perfect result, but better than a kick in the teeth!

Whether a Super Complaint brings about a change or not, it sheds light on dodgy practices, brings them into the public eye, and educates people on how to avoid them. So, long live the Super Complaint!

More: Give your child £95,000 tax-free with a Junior ISA | Five frequently asked money questions 

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (7)

  • Spikus
    Love rating 24
    Spikus said

    The link to the 8 confirmed consumer groups is broken. You might want to look at this. Otherwise interesting article about something most people know little if anything about.

    Report on 10 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • dinosaur1981
    Love rating 0
    dinosaur1981 said

    I wonder if anyone can tell me if I would be able to lodge a super complaint? I have been having some big problems with Natwest. I took out a student account with a student overdraft in 2003, once I graduated in 2007 (it was a five year degree programme) I spent several years on a low income and largely used a different current account for my banking. Eventually I decided to return to full time education in 2009, but by that time the student account had been changed into a regular current account and the interest ammounted to £36 per month, which I have not been able to afford to keep up with. Several times this interest and charges has put me over the overdraft limit and that lead to even higher charges of around £58 per month. I approached them several times to try to get the charges frozen so that I might have a chance of reducing the balance somewhat, but they refused and so the debt just got bigger and bigger. It got to its worst point this month when the charges pushed me over my overdraft limit by more than £100 and from this point on they began charging me £6 per day, but did not tell me they were going to do this, the just did it, and sent me a letter with my bank statement saying that this is what they had charged me and that it would be taken out on the 15th April, and that charges were now accruing to be taken out in May.

    I feel pretty sore about all of this, as I am living on around £620 per month, and I ran through my income and expenditure with them but they pretty much told me that it was my problem, they were not prepared to accept reduced payments of freeze interest and charges, and that the best they could do is make it a loan, I was forced to accept this option as I knew that the alternative would be to face being taken to court or to declare myself bankrupt.

    I have not actually withdrawn any money from the account myself since around June 2007, but I have paid in around £3000 to cover charges over the years since the account opened (mostly since 2007), which is more money than I have ever borrowed from them. The balence has only been going up and up further into the red because their own interest and charges which have accrued.

    I really feel that they have been unfair in that the charges are very high and I cant see how this could possibly comare to the administration fees, particuarly as they are all internal, there are no bounced direct debits or anything, all money coming out of my Natwest account goes into Natwest's pocket.

    I also feel that they should have pre notified me of the £6 per day charges.

    And I feel that they were unfair and frankly irresponsible in their refusal to freeze the charges and make reduced payments, when shown my financial circumstances.

    It seems to me that this terrible bank is attempting to rip off the poorest and most venerable people. As soon as I have paid off this loan (and its going to be hard as the monthly payments are still really high) then I will close that account and would in the meantime warn anybody considering Natwest for banking that they should really not risk it.

    They were unable to change my account back to a student account as I have a CCJ from 2010 because there was one month when I could not afford to pay my council tax. The council tax people were equally insensitive to my financial situation.

    Report on 10 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • naednhoj
    Love rating 6
    naednhoj said

    Sorry Dinosaur1981,

    You have found out the hard way that banks are arrogant ba****ds with the money and drive the likes of you into the ground. Alright, you owe money but they act like loan sharks. Aren't Natwest the listenening bank and you are supposed to meet them to hammer out a solution?... oh sorry that's TV advert land.

    The old backup of parents taking on the loan with more favourable terms, after all the best they are getting on deposit is in the region of 3-4%fixed with an ISA

    It all depends how far you are down the tubes.

    Go to Citizen's advice or a debt bureau recommended by them. They are supposed to try to negotiate with banks

    I am not able to help on bankruptcy but if you go that way credit in the future is a problem.

    Report on 10 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • philgsmith
    Love rating 2
    philgsmith said

    Does the concept of super complaints go as far as your local council?

    We have recently been trying to stop or change planning applications that will affect local residents greatly. Having made objections to this, we have seen that the decision was a done deal before the planning meeting and that the council live in the pockets of the building companies and in fear of any group who seriously threaten them with the cost of an appeal.

    Is there any duty of care that a council have for their local residents and tax payers?

    Report on 11 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Severian
    Love rating 6
    Severian said

    Dinosaur 1981 - it sounds to me like you need to stop being a student and get out into the real world and get a job like the rest of us. A 5 year degree course, and you've gone back for further study? And you want a bank which is largely owned by the taxpayer to waive the interest on the debt you owe (i.e. you want ME to pay YOUR interest?)

    It's a bit rich to describe a bank as "irresponsible" because it won't freeze your debt interest.

    You might also have more sympathy if your 6+ years of study had taught you grammar and spelling too (although if you are studying RE you might be described as "venerable" - I wouldn't know).

    Report on 11 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Dweller
    Love rating 1
    Dweller said

    Philgsmith - I don't think a complaint about a planning decision would qualify as a super complaint.

    Before the consultation on an application goes public there has been a long process of consultation with the local authority to ensure that the proposal meets all current policy. this is why it can appear to be a "done deal" by the time it goes public.

    The threat of appeal is not a real threat and has no bearing on decisions. Applications are not approved because local authorities are scared of appeals.

    Objectors rarely make an objection that is valid under planning policy, they are almost always based on personal opinion and so are somewhat pointles unless enough objections are raised to get it to comittee when it can be overturned by the committee members.

    A lot of rubbish does get through the planning process, but this is because planning is all policy based (with very vague policies) and planners have no design training. If a developer is helping a local authority hit their housing targets, providing affordable housing and paying out huge sums of money for improvements to roads, sewers, play areas etc under a 106 agreement (i.e. hitting all the right policies), then a few people saying 'we don't like it' carries no weight.

    The assumption that the big bad developers turn up and the council collapses in fear is wrong. I know we all hate developers (and I'm not one in case you were wondering) but developers run a business, and they need to build to stay in business. Local authorities know this and exploit the situation.

    All this is done under valid current policy, and this would be the council's defence. They are blind policy interpreters, and that is it. The complaint would need to be against the policies that result in the type development you are trying to stop. Not just against the council for making a decision you don't agree with.

    Report on 11 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • onthecomputer
    Love rating 79
    onthecomputer said

    Dinosaur1981 you really need to stop being a student, it is not working out for you and all that education is going to waste, get a job in Mcdonalds or Morrisons and pay some taxes please. It is because of fools like you the uni fees have now risen to 9000 - you have abused the system. My daughter did 4 years at uni(she changed her course after the 1st year) and has now been accepted on a Deng and will receive a stipend - and fees paid for by the uni - her degree has been worthwhile. If you were a student you would have been exempt from council tax - get a job you are a waste of space and as for the interest - YOU DESERVE IT :) ENJOY IT haha

    Report on 17 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4