Love to be the one to Grow your wealth?

Then register for free and get exclusive, personalised benefits that will help you achieve all your money goals.

Join the lovemoney.com experience

Register Now

Confused?

Why Register?

Building societies still make sense

Published 17 April 2009 in Grow your wealth

It’s been a mixed week for building societies; credit ratings for several societies have been cut, but the mutuals are still an attractive option for many savers.

Building society bosses will have been fed up this week when they discovered that ratings agency, Moody's, was downgrading the credit rating of nine building societies. The societies include Nationwide, Chelsea, Britannia and Yorkshire.

The cuts mean that Moody's now thinks that the building societies are more likely to go bust than it had previously thought. Moody's performed a 'stress test' on the societies in which UK house prices fell 40% from their peak. If that scenario came true, Moody's believes that several societies would struggle.

So should building society customers worry?

No.

Although I think house prices have further to fall, the peak-to-trough fall may not be as large as 40%. And even if we do see a 40% fall, Moody's hasn't downgraded the building societies to 'junk bond' status. The mutuals are still 'investment grade.' In other words, Moody's thinks the likelihood of default has increased significantly, but it doesn't think the chances of default are high.

There's also a credibility issue here. It's now obvious that the rating agencies were far too relaxed about banks' riskier activities during the boom.  In fact, I suspect the agencies didn't really understand what the banks were doing back then. No doubt Moody's is now determined to restore its reputation for prudence and may be too pessimistic as a result.

What's more, all UK building societies are protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. So if a building society went bust, you'd still receive compensation for your lost savings up to a value of £50,000.

In fact, even if you had more than £50,000 in a savings account, you'd probably still be fine. After all, the government fully compensated all savers with UK accounts when Northern Rock, Kaupthing and others went to the wall. The government also took control of those banks' mortgage books, so mortgage borrowers didn't suffer either.

And when some building societies have hit financial difficulties over the last year, the government has facilitated rescues by rival mutuals.

Good news

So that's the bad news out of the way. We've also seen some good news for building societies this week. lovemoney.com partner, Moneyfacts, published some data on the consistency of savings accounts and the majority of the top performers were building societies.

For many of us, consistency is a crucial factor when it comes to picking a savings account. If you're the type of person who is happy to scan the best buy tables every six months and move your money to the top account, then you don't need to worry about consistency.

But if you don't have the time or the inclination to do that, then it makes sense to go for an account that has consistently paid out a decent rate in recent times.

Here are some figures:

Most consistent no-notice internet savings accounts over the last 18 months (without bonus)

Company

Account

Min Deposit

Total interest

(Gross)

Gross % (AER)

As at 6.4.09

ICICI Bank UK

HiSAVE Savings

£1

£84.94

2.43% (2.46%)

Yorkshire BS

Internet Saver

£1

£80.68

2.10% (2.10%)

Principality BS

e-SAVER

£1

£80.36

1.65% (1.65%)

Birmingham Midshires

Direct Internet Savings

£1

£72.65

1.40% (1.40%)

Sainsbury's Finance

Internet Saver

£1

£71.50

0.75% (0.75%)

Saffron BS

e-saver Issue 2

£1000

£69.02

0.60% (0.60%)

Based on interest earned on £1000 in 18 months to 6 April 2009

Most consistent no-notice internet savings accounts over the last 36 month

Company

Account

Min Deposit

Total Interest

(Gross)

Gross % (AER)
as at 6.4.09

Sainsbury's Finance

Internet Saver

£1

£158.01

0.75% (0.75%)

Nationwide BS

e-Savings

£1

£149.88

0.45% (0.45%)

Coventry BS

NetSave Instant

III

£1

£142.08

0.5% (0.5%)

Norwich & Peterborough BS

NetmasterGold
Save II

£1

£139.59

0.5% (0.5%)

Halifax

Web Saver

£5000

£134.38

0.15% (0.15%)

Halifax

Web Saver

Cash Card

£10

£132.82

0.25% (0.25%)

 

Based on interest earned on £1000 in 36 months to 6 April 2009

Although the top account in each table is not from a building society, overall the mutuals are well placed on the leader boards.

And if you move away from the online world, the building societies are even more dominant. The most consistent no-notice savings account (without bonus) over the last 18 months has been Beverly Building Society's Postal Account. When it comes to notice accounts Chesham Building Society is No.1 over the same period.

So, in my view, building societies have a lot going for them. If you like the look of a particular financial product from a building society, then take it. If a rival product from a bank better suits your needs, then go for that instead. It's a question of horses for courses.

The crucial point though is on risk. Yes, a small regional building society may be at greater risk of defaulting than HSBC. But the government will always find a way to rescue a small mutual, so, in reality, I don't think your money is at any greater risk.

More:  The steadiest savings accounts

Compare savings accounts with lovemoney.com

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Share this lovemoney.com content on any of the social networks and utilities below by simply clicking the site of your choice.

  • You can subscribe to all lovemoney.com articles via our RSS feed.

Comments

Johnny5 said

  • 0 recommendations

If you know anything about Moody's and ratings agencies in general you'll know that the economic crisis happened whilst they were fast asleep. Now they are going too far the other way. Downgrading Nationwide just shows what an idiotic organisation they are. S&P are as stiff as an old codger, the only one i would trust is Fitch. If you haven't heard of Fitch you don't know about ratings agencies.

However Moody's and S&P have been living off their laurels for years. Now watch S&P follow Moody's action, they really are pathetic especially Moody's.

Johnny5 said

  • 0 recommendations

Actually I'm going to go one step further. The credit ratings business of these agencies(including Fitch) are massive cash generators for these companies especially Moody's and S&P(althought S&P have their Indices(also massive cash cows).

Just like the banks their primary goal is short term cash generation in fact in my experience they are just like the banks. The fact that they have these decades old rating businesses (in effect monopolies) has allowed them to become dinosaurs.

The fact Moody's is now trying to act in a wise way is just a joke.They are all sales and cash focused and selling and drawing attention to their ratings is their main goal.

Do not be fooled they are as bad as RBS before the bust. It's just they inhabit a world where culpability doesn't apply. In fact as part of the investigation in to the economic crisis both Moodys and S&P were consulted ! They were the ones that were supposed to be rating risk but they were too busy looking at the cash coming in !

debtwagon said

  • 0 recommendations

Nicely put, Johnny5, it's nothing but an attention-grabbing stunt.  Ironically, from what I've heard, the housing market has already turned - it's bulging with first-time buyers desperate to get in and valuations are in overdrive.  The stats may be inconclusive for a few months but that demand is not going to hold back for much longer.

Ed Bowsher said

  • 0 recommendations

Thanks for your comments, guys.

Just to stress, I did express scepticism about credit rating agencies in my article.

'There's also a credibility issue here. It's now obvious that the rating agencies were far too relaxed about banks' riskier activities during the boom.  In fact, I suspect the agencies didn't really understand what the banks were doing back then. No doubt Moody's is now determined to restore its reputation for prudence and may be too pessimistic as a result.'

And I have heard of Fitch. :)

Ed

gardener said

  • 1 recommendation

Why does the Ecology Building Society never get covered in these articles? They are sound, ethical, lend on projects most banks wouldn't touch, but which are good projects (restoring old houses, eco-friendly houses etc). I have been with them for over 10 years and never a problem. They are very transparent in their actions and have sound investment strategies. It would be nice to see them mentioned sometimes as they are financially very sound!

Join the conversation

Please sign in or register to add a comment or recommend.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

ING Direct (UK)
Savings Account

2.75% /
2.72%
Monthly Apply

Post Office®
Online Saver

2.75% /
2.75%
Yearly Apply

Santander
eSaver Issue 2

2.75% /
2.75%
Anniversary Apply
W3C  Thank you for using One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest