Earn A Colossal 8% On Your Cash

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 05 January 2009  |  Comments 22 comments

With the base rate at a record low of 2%, inflation is eating away at our savings. Fortunately, this account pays a fantastic fixed rate of 8% for a year!

Happy New Year to all Fool readers! To get this year off to an easy start, here's my short and simple suggestion to kick off 2009:

Start saving steadily

If you are in stable employment and spend less than you earn, then you're in an ideal position to squirrel away some of your disposable income. On the other hand, if your job is anything but stable or you have an irregular income, then you have an even greater need for a comfortable cash cushion to fall back on.

Your returns on cash depend on three things:

1. The interest rate paid (the higher, the better);

2. Your personal tax rate (because you can lose up to 40% of your savings interest to the taxman); and

3. The prevailing rate of inflation (that is, rising prices, because these undermine the future buying power, or `real' value, of your money).

Of course, there's not much you can do about the future cost of goods and services, so inflation is largely out of your control. However, you can improve the interest rate which your savings earn, plus avoid paying tax on this interest. If you dislike paying tax, then try the most popular tax-free savings account -- a cash ISA (Individual Savings Account).

Earn four times the base rate

The big headache for today's savers is that the Bank of England has cut its base rate to just 2% a year, its lowest level since 1951. Hence, earning a decent return on your savings in this ultra-low-rate environment is a serious challenge. Nevertheless, if you're serious about saving, then one of the best ways to salt away your spare cash is to make monthly contributions to a regular-savings account

In return for agreeing to make twelve monthly payments in a row, you can earn market-beating rates of interest on your contributions. Indeed, according to Fool.co.uk's independent, unbiased savings search engine, you can choose from 97 different regular-savings accounts. The yearly rates paid by these accounts vary from a pitiful 0.1% to a magnificent 10%.

Unfortunately, many of these accounts come with strings attached. Many smaller building societies now accept only savers from their local area. Other accounts (such as the table-topping HSBC Preferential Regular Saver account paying 10% fixed for a year) insist that you open a `premium' current account to qualify. I'm no fan of these expensive packaged current accounts, so I tend to steer clear of such conditional offers.

Even safer than houses!

Then again, I am very keen on the HSBC Regular Saver account, which is open to new or existing HSBC current-account customers. There must be millions of savers who could open one of these beauties and earn a handsome rate of 8%, fixed for a year. In order to earn four times the base rate, you must deposit £25 to £250 a month by standing order. However, any withdrawal will close the account and slash the interest rate, so leave this money well alone.

For example, if you deposit the maximum £250 a month for a year, then you will receive roughly £120 in before-tax interest. Of course, this is less than £240 (8% of £3,000) simply because you don't pay in the full £3,000 at the start. Instead, your balance rises steadily from zero to £3,000 over twelve months, so your interest is based on this growing pot and not on a level balance of £3,000.

Finally, HSBC is one of the world's largest and strongest banks. Indeed, following the near-collapse of the rest of the banking sector, HSBC is now worth more than all of the UK's remaining banks put together. Hence, I consider it a super-safe home for my savings -- and certainly safer than houses!

More: Find a splendid savings account | Get Free Travel Insurance and £100 | Six Money Must-Haves For 2009

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (22)

  • RDawkins
    Love rating 0
    RDawkins said

    What an awful article. You start with the title:

    'Fortunately, this account pays a fantastic fixed rate of 8% for a year!'

    Although you later acknowledge: 'Of course, this is less than £240 (8% of £3,000) simply because you don’t pay in the full £3,000 at the start'.

    So, it's never going to be 8% per year is it?

    Why didn't the author of this article, just say look I recommend HSBC because blah blah and blah, don't be put off by the misleading and inaccurate head line marketing ploy which is a lie, but look at the account on it merits.

    Report on 05 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rober09
    Love rating 0
    rober09 said

    To go to all the trouble of opening a current A/c (Assuming you do not already have one) for this return is carzy in my view. To little return for to much effort I would say!!!

    Report on 05 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LoongGoh
    Love rating 0
    LoongGoh said

    I'm not surprised by the poor quality of articles in recent years. There are advertisers interests to look after no doubt. But I'm disappointed the article contributors are not doing more to make themselves stand out from all the other useless financial websites, the credit crisis and economy woes means financially naive readers will need your advice more in the current climate.

    Report on 05 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Clitheroekid
    Love rating 1
    Clitheroekid said

    I'm afraid I also have to agree that this is an extremely misleading headline.

    Most people who would have been attracted by the headline would conclude that the actual the return is crap, and for a measly £120 what person in their right mind is going to go through the tedious rigmarole of setting it all up?

    Report on 05 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • IANBURDON
    Love rating 0
    IANBURDON said

    Great!! another bank rip off. Savers should be investing in a calulator. HSBC is just following the crowd and spinning a poor yearly rate.

    So were is Cliff D'Arcy putting his money. ?

    Report on 05 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • emptybarrel
    Love rating 0
    emptybarrel said

    So essentially you can earn 8% on £250 and then it deteriorates with every extra £250.

    It's still a fair idea for those just starting to save like school kids and students.

    Report on 05 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • TrustyBadger
    Love rating 0
    TrustyBadger said

    Agreed, what a waste of time.

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • compound200
    Love rating 7
    compound200 said

    madoff couldnt of done better

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • IMHO55
    Love rating 0
    IMHO55 said

    Perhaps the author (or someone with a calculator) could quote the AER for these types of accounts?

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • SannaLar
    Love rating 1
    SannaLar said

    What's with all the gloomy comments? Yes, the headline is misleading, but it's still a good regular saver (the best?).

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • clintaughjl
    Love rating 0
    clintaughjl said

    Nothing wrong with article or heading. Good rate, clear conditions. Not particularly hard to open a bank account and £120.00 is a lot better than nothing.

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • killickbecki
    Love rating 0
    killickbecki said

    the regular saving account are for people who want to put money into an account on a regular basis, i.e. encouraging people to save money.

    Surely if people had the whole £3,000 at the start they wouldn't be opening a regular savings account (or would but be feeding the money in slowly from a 5% savings account). At the end of the day, the 8% interest advertised is better than most of the savings accounts around and so is the better choice for the people who do want to save regularly.

    Think about the purpose of these accounts before slating them.

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Cliff D'Arcy
    Love rating 26
    Cliff D'Arcy said

    Clearly, many respondents fail to understand how savings interest works.

    It's off to the back of the class for RDawkins, Clitheroekid (CK, how could you?), IANBURDON, compound200 and SannaLar. Shame on you for failing this maths test! ;0)

    This account does indeed pay an annual interest rate of 8%. However, as with all regular-savings accounts, it starts off with a zero balance which then increases every month until it reaches the maximum balance (in this case, £3,000) in the final month.

    Hence, the AVERAGE balance over the year is roughly half of the final balance, which comes to £1,500 in this case. Thus, 8% of £1,500 is £120, which is slightly less than you would receive from this account, thanks to the joys of compounding.

    There, that wasn't too hard to grasp, was it?

    For the record, I am a big fan of regular-savings accounts and use them myself to take advantage of the best savings interest rates, and to turn income into lump sums.

    All the best for 2009,

    Cliff

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Cliff D'Arcy
    Love rating 26
    Cliff D'Arcy said

    PS: Thanks to clintaughjl and killickbecki for understanding and explaining the difference between regular-savings accounts and savings accounts into which you can deposit one-off lump sums. :0)

    Cliff

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • hsb79
    Love rating 0
    hsb79 said

    What happens to the interest rate after 12 months of deposits? Will a home have to be found for the resulting lump sum?

    And as this cash is effectively untouchable to get the rate, how does it compare to year long bonds that are currently available? (for those with a lump sum to invest?)

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sparkyscientist
    Love rating 0
    sparkyscientist said

    Sounded great first time around! - but one thing I had missed on first read-through of this article, since it is pretty much glossed over, is the big downside that you must open an HSBC current account to qualify for this savings account. Then obviously there are catches to the current account as well - low rate of interest and need to deposit your main salary. No, I don't think this one is for me, but it's reminded me yet again to read the small print before you buy!

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • andfaraway
    Love rating 0
    andfaraway said

    Sorry, but having been a member of the Motley Fool since it started, I must say that, of late, articles on the UK banking services have been somewhat less than inspirational, or even very informative.

    A case in point, - other than this miserable offeing, - the article on the 'Ugly side of Nationwide', which seems to be more a puff piece for a failed government scheme to 'save' the 'reckless and feckless', at the expense of those more prudent and intelligent.

    I would have thought that readers of Motley Fool would fall more into the latter category and would appreciate a more proactive article on the plight of savers, - and perhaps some condenmnation of current government idiocy, would not be amiss!

    The article above does nothing more than give a precis of the brochures available from any bank's website. Come on Motley Fool, time to do that which made you originally famous, - informed and intelligent comment, not this consumer advice pap...

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Cliff D'Arcy
    Love rating 26
    Cliff D'Arcy said

    Hi andfaraway,

    I disagree with your comment that articles of late have been below previous standards.

    I offer the following evidence: Fool.co.uk and its writers (including me) were nominated for a record number of awards last year *by their peers*. I think that carries more weight than your ill-founded criticism.

    Cliff

    Fool freelancer and shareholder

    PS: I do agree with your comments on the reckless and feckless, however! ;0)

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • FooQueen
    Love rating 0
    FooQueen said

    I had an account like this years ago (with the Halifax). I had spare money each month, so I put £250 into an account which paid, I think, 7% at the time - a great rate then. Otherwise I would have put £250 ech month into an account paying about 3%. If someone could explain how the 3% account could be better in the circumstances of saving a regular amount each month; please explain!

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • andfaraway
    Love rating 0
    andfaraway said

    Hi Cunning Cliff,

    Well, I was speaking 'as I find', and can understand your somewhat defensive reply, - 'well, you would say that wouldn't you!'.

    However, re all those 'peers', I would suggest some circumspection on the merit of flattery, financial prudence is for a lifetime, not a lunchtime!..

    However I meant no offence with my critcism, and I apolgise if I did.

    Report on 07 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Cliff D'Arcy
    Love rating 26
    Cliff D'Arcy said

    Hi andfaraway,

    No offence taken. If anything, I'm guilty of being a bit over-sensitive in my replies to this thread. However, I stand by my assertion that, for regular savers, this is a cracking account.

    By the way, the Financial Times group also endorsed my writing last year; my FT book came out in December, see:

    http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000269894

    As a fan of the FT for many years, I could ask for no better endorsement of my writing talent. :0)

    All the best,

    Cliff

    Report on 07 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • JonLoose
    Love rating 0
    JonLoose said

    I have to support both sides here. Cliff is absolutely correct BUT the title doesn't make clear how limited this is. For someone with little money this could be very interesting. For many if not most of us it isn't.

    Report on 10 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4