Treasury orders banks to offer simple savings accounts

John Fitzsimons
by Lovemoney Staff John Fitzsimons on 02 August 2012  |  Comments 7 comments

The Treasury wants to see banks and building societies introduce a range of simple savings accounts with no bonus rates.

Treasury orders banks to offer simple savings accounts

The Treasury has called for a significant overhaul of financial products, ordering banks and building societies to offer a range of simple, ‘vanilla’ deals, with savings accounts first in line.

The move follows a review of simple financial products, led by Mark Hoban MP, Financial Secretary to the Treasury.

The first products that should have a simple range, according to the Treasury, are easy access savings accounts, 30-day notice accounts and life insurance. It wants providers to offer some savings accounts that don't offer bonus rates and give all savers the same interest rate, irrespective of how long they’ve had the account.

The Treasury reckons that it is the complexity of existing deals that holds people back from switching to better deals. Many savers are also apparently unaware that the juicy rates they get at the outset are only temporary and the interest rate will decrease significantly after a period of time.

There will now be a consultation on the plans, and if they get through, the new deals will be available from the start of next year.

A noble idea

The idea of all savings products being completely simple and easy to understand is obviously a noble one.

But I fear it misses the point.

Banks and building societies will offer these deals, but they won’t be any good. Or at least, they’ll never be any better than average.

To get a decent rate on your cash, you’ll need to shop around every year or so, move your cash around, take advantage of the deals that still do offer bonuses. All of the top savings accounts at the moment offer introductory bonuses. That won't change just because banks are ordered to offer accounts without them as well.

By pushing savers towards vanilla deals, all that we are doing is condemning them to enduring mediocre deals. In my view what actually needs to happen is to get people to engage with the savings market and to actually take notice of the rate they are getting on their cash.

And if they decide the rate they are receiving is naff, it needs to be made clear to them just how to go about moving their cash, ensuring that it really is a simple process.

By all means make savings deals easier to understand. But by pushing accounts that are simple and middle-of-the-road, all we are doing is ensuring that the savers that use them end up worse off than they could be.

What do you think? Will simple, vanilla products make things better for the nation’s savers? Let me know your thoughts in the Comment box below.

More on savings

Premium Bonds winners

Islamic Bank of Britain launches savings bond paying 4%

11 instant access accounts that beat inflation

Top instant access savings accounts for small deposits

NS&I is failing savers

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (7)

  • JRAY100
    Love rating 50
    JRAY100 said

    The essence of the problem:

    In theory there is some (daily) market rate to be earned for lending cash - in the same way that there is a market rate for Glaxo or Shell, or a Gilt, or a property or for gold, &c.

    THERE IS NOT SO VIA THE BANKS!

    A market rate would be inflation + a percentage and rather that being shielded in a smoke-screen at the will of the banks, it should be set by (dare I say it) the government or an arms length agency - the Bank of England?

    If a bank needed to increase investment, then it could always offer a premium!

    There is a consequence to this: lending rates would have to increase accordingly and therfore mortgages too; house prices would tend to be lower.

    Gainers: savers, (especially cash) house buyers; Losers: bankers, bankers' bonuses.

    The shareholders in banks would be little affected, because in many cases the directors have operated with scant regard to shareholders for many years - that's another problem - should a PLC be allowed to raise capital on the stock market with no one responsible for such irresponsibility? Now what did my old HBOS shares cost?... £10+... what are they now under Lloyds group? 30 pence! Is this one large scam!

    Report on 03 August 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • nickthecrip2
    Love rating 17
    nickthecrip2 said

    JRAY100: In my opinion, the whole of the banking and investment industry is one BIG scam. Pensions, Endowments, Savings & other investment types are being used solely for the benefit of the managers & directors. Shareholders get a bit but the actual investor’s receive the least possible that the company can legally get away with.

    To the majority of people, pensions are one of the biggest scams & con tricks in recent years with annuities relying on the generosity of the selling company-a generosity that which doesn't exist! They are making absolute fortunes from these things but paying out relatively little. In a few years time, I can see another debacle like the Norwich Union reattribution, which overnight seemed to 'loose' about £15BILLIONS & most of the rest retained by the company for its own use. That money belonged to the policyholders not to be used to pay shareholders income tax!

    Report on 03 August 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3