Give your child £151,000 - for free!

Jane Baker
by Lovemoney Staff Jane Baker on 31 July 2009  |  Comments 14 comments

It's now possible to build a £151,000 nest egg for your child - using only Government money and legal tax breaks!

There's no question the government is very keen to free itself from its colossal pension responsibilities. That's why new measures brought in over the last few years are supposed to make pensions a lot more accessible and encourage us all to save.

That's also why children are now allowed a pension all of their very own.

Kids and stakeholder pensions

So, did you know you can now set up a stakeholder pension for your kids? In the old days, a pension saver needed to have earnings before they could open a pension, but this is no longer the case. This means you now can save on behalf of your children pretty much from the day they're born.

How much can you save for your kids?

You can save up to £3,600 gross each tax year into your child's pension. But this amount includes the tax relief they'll get back from the government.

What's tax relief? When anyone (not just children) pays money into a pension scheme, they will get some tax back from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), which will then be popped into the pension pot alongside their own contributions.

If you're a non taxpayer (as children usually are) or a basic rate pay taxpayer, you'll enjoy 20% tax relief based on current rates. This means for every £100 you pay into the pension, HMRC will add a further £25. So, a total of £125 will be invested in the pension even though it has only cost you £100. (Higher rate taxpayers get 40% tax relief.)

I mentioned that the £3,600 maximum gross annual contribution included 20% tax relief. In other words, the maximum net contribution (i.e. before tax relief has been added) you can pay into your kid's pension out of your own pocket is £2,880 a year (£3,600 minus 20%) or £240 a month.

So, for that £2,880 investment, your child gets £3,600 put in their pension pot. It's simple, really....

Is it really necessary to start your child's pension this early?

No, it's not necessary... but the sooner you start, the better. Pensions love nothing more than decades and decades in which to grow. If you open a stakeholder pension before your child's 1st birthday, it could stay invested in the stock market for 65, or even 70 years, before they reach retirement. State retirement age will be pushed back to 68 from 2044, so it's entirely feasible that children born now may not retire until they reach 70.

This kind of timescale can work wonders for the value of a pension pot because your child can take advantage of compound growth over many years, turning their contributions into a fortune.

For instance, if a contribution of £240 was paid into the pension every month from birth right up until your child's 70th birthday, the pension pot could potentially be worth £954,000. That's almost £1 million!

Sounds crazy I know.

But still, that's a lot of money. Here are the assumptions this calculation is based on:

  • Contributions increase by national average earnings which is assumed to be 2.5% a year,
  • The pension pot grows at 7% a year,
  • 20% tax relief is added to each monthly contribution,
  • Maximum stakeholder pension charges of 1.5% for the first 10 years, and 1% every year after that, are deducted,
  • The value is shown in today's prices which takes inflation into account at a rate of 2.5% a year.

Of course, I hardly need point out that if the pension fund falls short of the 7% annual return, it could be worth considerably less than a million pounds at retirement. And £240 a month may not be an affordable contribution level. But, nevertheless, you can easily see the benefits of compound growth over multiple decades.

Can I save for my kids without spending any money myself?

Yes. Simply invest your Child Benefit in a pension for your child.

In the current tax year, Child Benefit is paid at a rate of £20 a week for your eldest or only child, and then at a rate £13.20 a week for each of your other children. The payments, which are usually paid every four weeks, are tax-free but they aren't means-tested.

Perhaps £20 a week doesn't sound like much to you, but this could be turned into a monthly pension contribution of £108.33 once 20% tax relief has been added. If you saved this amount every month from birth until your child is 16, this could generate a pension pot worth £151,000 by the time he or she retires at 70.

(This calculation is based on the same assumptions shown above. It's also assumed that Child Benefit increases at a rate of 2.5% a year.)

That's a pretty decent pension pot, given that you haven't shelled out any extra money yourself, and contributions stop entirely when your child is 16. In an ideal world, your kids would continue to pay into the pension themselves once they start earning to give them an even better standard of living once they retire.

I think this is a great way of giving your children a financial head start without breaking the bank.

But, on a final note, we've been so busy thinking about pensions for the kids, make sure you don't forget about your own! Find out how to pick your first pension.

All pension fund values are provided by Legal & General's stakeholder pension calculator.

More: How to pick your first pension | Give your kids a £10,000 nest egg

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (14)

  • SuziQ
    Love rating 2
    SuziQ said

    I cant help but be a sceptic, but I hate the idea of pensions as you dont have any control over your pot when you need a monthly income, what with annuities and tax rates. If our kids are going to be paying for the current deficit in years to come just how much of this £151,000 pot will go to the governement when they need it to retire on.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Gilbert
    Love rating 2
    Gilbert said

    There is good and bad in your article. Firstly it is a great idea to open a pension for your kids and let is grow over 60 years plus. My kids are under 5 but I have opened a SIPP for them both with £1000 each and thats it. It isnt going to be a fortune but it will encourage them to add to it when they start working and gives them a small head start. Surely it would be more prudent to buy a buy to let or 2 so they have somewhere to live. When they move in they save money on rent/mortgage, after 25 years, and can contribute more to their SIPP.

    The problem is with SIPP's is most good providers demand you pay in a minimum of £1000 single contribution or £100 per month. If you have 3 kids thats a fair wack

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jolizmul
    Love rating 1
    jolizmul said

    Can I buy such a pension for my partner or does it only apply to children - obviously I want to use my 40% tax rate.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • cynic-al
    Love rating 0
    cynic-al said

    come on be real. whats the use of having no money to spend for 70 years by putting all your spare cash into a pension that will probably be worth nothing when you get it in 70 years time. most people only live for a few years after reaching 70 and are usually too frail to make use of any savings to enjoy life. why not enjoy life now and forget about wasting money on a more than useless pension pot whic only helps to pay those financial people lots of money and who have no concern for anyone but themselves, as proved but the current credit crunch.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • gardener
    Love rating 25
    gardener said

    Nice idea, but some people actually need the child benefit to provide their child/ren with food and clothing.

    I invested my daughter's savings into a stake holders pension last year. To date it has halved in value, thanks to recession.

    Investing in other ways may be more prudent, though it is hard to see beyond the 25% top-up from the government. 

    Think hard before you leap!

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • westwinds3
    Love rating 10
    westwinds3 said

    Setting up a pension for a child is insanity. The one reasonably confident prediction you can make is that if you put money where you can't touch it for 50 years, in 50 years time it will not be there.

    How often have the tax rules changed in the last 50 years?

    Is there zero chance of hyperinflation over the next 50 years?

    Will an investment manager remain honest and competent over 50 years?

    What is the chance of a natural catstrophe? A pandemic? Global warming? Overpopulation? Famine? Not zero.

    What is the chance of a man-made catastrophe? War? Nuclear attack? Terrorism? A lot higher than we think.

    Whatever the world is like in 50 years it won't be a smooth continuation of today.

    When my father started work in the 1920s, he carefully put money aside into an endowment life insurance policy while his friends enjoyed themselves. When he retired in the 60s, the enjoyment he had lost was real, but the payout was trivial. He was lucky, he had a decent job and pension. I was lucky. In the 70s, the house I live in was virtually given to me for free by inflation, at the expense of savers.

    Setting up pensions for children is an example of the same mentality that led idiots like myself to invest in bank shares. Because it looks sober and prudent doesn't mean it is a good idea. Things frequently change and are seldom what they seem.

    Prudence is only a virtue when it is combined with realism.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • billyboy121
    Love rating 18
    billyboy121 said

    This article basically concerns three of the issues that get mentioned a lot on financial sites – compound interest, pound cost averaging and pensions (ie good thing/bad thing). Compound interest is good but as mhlgreen mentions, inflation is bad. Pound cost averaging, or drip feeding funds in over time to even out the changes in value, is generally a sensible way to approach investments in funds (as most pensions do), and I think the path of least resistance for a pension for your children is probably going to be a tracker fund, on the basis that over a period of decades the overall market tends to outperform inflation.

    My main thought here, aside from wishing that I had three and a half grand to put into my child’s pension fund each year, is that I want my child to have a good start in life – that’s my responsibility as a parent. So I am saving for him to have a good education and also a seed fund if he wants to buy a house or start up a business. I can just imagine what he’d say to me if as a young adult he came to me for start up or house deposit money and I proudly told him that by the time he was 70, he’d have a million pounds in his pension fund, something along the lines of ‘what b****y use is that to me now’.

    My parents, on the advice of some IFA and when they did not have a great deal of money themselves, bought me an endowment which will mature on my 65 birthday. Without meaning to sound ungrateful, utterly pointless. Just because some financial type recommends it, does not mean that it is actually any good! That said, if I were earning substantial amounts of cash, then I might consider this approach on top of any other investments I was making for my child, but only if that were the case, it would definitely not be a priority.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • will8224
    Love rating 0
    will8224 said

    £150K for my kids; so I looked and what a waste of time. I should have known better! Look at the stats and it is clear that this adice is pure right time, right place, right income. lovemoney does itself an ainjustice with this kind of article.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • McLeodC
    Love rating 13
    McLeodC said

    There are several major advantages to contributing to a pension fund for children, rather than other forms of saving for them.

    1) The money is safely locked away until retirement, unlike Child Trust Funds and other saving schemes. Hopefully the beneficiaries will be past the age when they're likely to blow it all on cars, drugs and parties.

    2) Money in pension funds doesn't count as 'savings or investments' from the viewpoint of the DSS. So if the holder is ever unemployed, the fund won't result in their state benefits being reduced (unlike other savings).

    3) Freed from worry about how to support themselves in their old age, the holder will be able to choose a career and lifestyle that they really want, rather than being tied to a pension scheme.

    That said, the sort of privileged young person who can afford to continue to contribute nearly £3K per year after cutting the parental apron strings, even through student days and first jobs, must be uncommonly well-cushioned from financial problems, and is unlikely to be spending their life volunteering in the Third World! 

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bungall
    Love rating 2
    bungall said

    Personally the best investment maybe to teach your kids the value of money then ask them at the age of 16 if you can put the money in their Isas, and you maintain the account until the age they want to buy a house, wedding, etc. At the age of 16 I wouldn't have thought many would have fully subscribed to their isas especially with the new maximum subscription in forthcoming April next year. Thus losing their subscription as they do not rollover.

    That way you can take advantage of tax free savings, have more control, possibly get access to the money if they want to buy house, and not have to stump out pension management fees. Inheritance tax can be avoided so long as you are alive for another 7 years. I know ISA interest rates aren't always at their best at the moment. You may even want to have a 3 year fix.

    Notice I put 'If they have been taught correctly the value of money'. Often they will go to university and blow the lot, may get into debt, etc., but if guided properly this is less likely happen. Even keep them interested by watching the money grow - it may give them an incentive to save elsewhere. Almost specify that it is your money and they will have to have a just enough reason as to gain access.

    Pensions can be complicated, have hoops and fees and minimum subscriptions, etc. why not cut all this mess out.

    Report on 04 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jonnie2thumbs
    Love rating 90
    jonnie2thumbs said

    Let us not forget where this FREE money comes from.......

    The government doesn't have any money of it's own - it is our money to start with - they take it - then give little bits back.........

    Report on 09 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ratchet
    Love rating 0
    ratchet said

    Mmmmmmmm. Food for thought. We have just recieved a reasonable assurance payout and want to put some away for the 4 kids. I was considering a one off payment (drip fed over one year) into a pension for them. My reasoning was:-

    1. They can't get at it until they are 55 (under present rules);

    2. With some of the burden lifted of having to provide for their own old age they can concentrate on paying back student loans, saving for a deposit on a house & living their lives;

    3. With such a long period for the investment to grow it should provide a reasonable sum (if you believe that over time the stockmarket usually beats a savings account).

    Having said that I'm none to impressed with the Child Trust Funds of the 3 kids that were eligible that have lost value. We have only invested the Governmant contribution for 2 reasons I wouldn't have trusted my self at 16/18 with a lump sum and the money is locked away. We use our child benenfit to live on so it's not available for saving. It just so happens we now have a lump sum, some of which can be put away for the kids benefit.

    Report on 13 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mick James
    Love rating 25
    Mick James said

    Lovemoney just gets wackier and wackier. Essentially what you're saying is take the money the government gives you to look after your child, and use it to support their retirement.

    Alternatively you might use it to give them a better start in life and a more secure childhood. Or to support their education, so they can get a better job and save for their own pension.

    Report on 27 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • lewi
    Love rating 0
    lewi said

    Overuse of uppercase will be tamed (you can edit your comment to prevent this):

    hi folks

    if you gift £3600 for grandchild at birth and compound it for 70 years @ 7%-the figure is near £400k which is a good return. if when they are a little older you explain the math then maybe you have indeed fulfilld an obigation of sorts.

    it seems a little simplistic but please explain if i have missed something,

    And now here are some pictures to help lighten the mood

    Report on 29 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV1