Ministers: elderly should downsize and save for care

Simon Ward
by Lovemoney Staff Simon Ward on 18 January 2012  |  Comments 44 comments

Government proposes scheme to help elderly people to downsize from larger homes and suggests we should be planning to pay for any care we receive in later life.

Ministers: elderly should downsize and save for care

The Government has proposed that elderly people in larger homes should be helped to downsize into smaller, rented properties to ease Britain’s housing crisis. It’s also suggested that care provision should be saved for in advance to avoid the prospect of people having to sell their homes to pay for the cost.

The rental scheme will allow people to rent their homes to local authorities, who in turn rent them out to young families.

The authorities would maintain the property and pass the income back to the homeowners or their estate.

Research says that 25 million bedrooms are empty in family homes in England. Housing Minister Grant Shapps says the scheme would help young families struggling to find a suitable home.

Saga called the idea “outrageous social engineering”.

Paying for the cost of care

The proposals came on the same day that another Government minister called for older people to either release equity from their homes or divert savings to a separate annuity or other product to pay for care.

Liberal Democrat Paul Burstow told the Health Committee that people currently see care as “a distress purchase”. He said that the Government wanted people “to futureproof” their potential care costs.

At the moment, anyone in England with assets worth more than £23,500 has to pay their own care costs in full. As a result, it’s estimated that 20,000 people each year have to sell their homes to raise the money.

The Dilnot commission, which was set up to examine the future of social care, recommended a cap of £35,000 on the cost of care, with the Government paying any excess. But it’s estimated that could cost the Government between £1.7 and £2 billion a year and it is reported to favour a cap of £60,000.

Cross-party talks on the issue are continuing this week and a White Paper on the future of social care is due to be published in April.

More: Eight ways to pay for social care | Why downsizing your home is a stupid thing to do

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (44)

  • worlduser
    Love rating 4
    worlduser said

    Escapeman, I couldn't agree with you more.

    I would usually have a lot to say on this topic, but I will digress and probably blow off huge amounts of steam. But here is a taster - Politicians and their expenses; second homes with duck houses! etc. etc. etc..... you get the gist!

    Report on 06 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rufus141
    Love rating 2
    rufus141 said

    We are living hand to mouth anyway. Don't they get it? Some people can't afford to live let alone save............

    Report on 12 August 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV1