The looming care crisis for the elderly

Mike Kielty
by Lovemoney Staff Mike Kielty on 17 November 2010  |  Comments 17 comments

Thanks to funding cuts from councils, many families face mounting bills for looking after their elderly relatives.

The looming care crisis for the elderly

It was widely acknowledged after George Osborne announced his spending review that pensioners had come out relatively well. The basic state pension was left intact, free from the cuts. Indeed, there have been suggestions that it could rise to £140 a week to all pensioners in the years ahead.

But the government cuts are far too wide-ranging to leave such a large group as pensioners unaffected, and now we know one area where they are going to be badly hit: their care when they are elderly and infirm.

In a BBC survey released last week, more than half of the English councils questioned said that they were concerned about how they would fund the service to care for elderly or vulnerable adults at home.

This came on the back of news that care home prices have risen by an average of 20% over the last four years.

A whole generation of pensioners could be left struggling to provide for their care as a result of both the government’s cuts and the rising cost of care. And it may well be their children – in their 40s or 50s – that have to take on the burden.

Care at home – preferable, but is it affordable?

There’s a lot to be said for helping pensioners to live in their own home for as long as possible.

Most importantly, pensioners themselves tend to prefer the independence of living at home.

Is it better to invest in property or a pension? Donna Werbner hits the streets of London to find out

If they begin to struggle mentally or physically, then they often feel safer in an environment that they know and recognise. Their friends are likely to be nearby. They retain a sense of responsibility, as they can keep doing easy household tasks (washing, cooking etc), even if they can’t manage to get out of the house.

On top of that, care at home is much more affordable than paying for an elderly person to go to a care home.

The average cost of a care home is £36,000 a year, with the most comfortable costing close to £50,000 a year. That’s substantially more than sending a child to even the most exclusive public schools.

Care-at-home services generally charge far less for daily visits to a home. Carewatch generally charges between £10 and £13 an hour for a carer to visit an adult in the morning or evening (although it can go higher than this, depending on the circumstances). Assuming two visits a day, this equates to a payment of between £7,300 and £9,490 a year.

Age UK estimates that there will be one million pensioners requiring care at home by 2012, yet the recent cuts make it highly uncertain whether all councils will be able to accommodate their needs. Pensioners may need to rely on their savings or their families in order to get their care service of choice, whether they are in their own home or in a care home.

So if it’s not care at home, what then?

Care homes are clearly a booming business. Their fees can be astronomical, and all pensioners (as well as their families) at least need to consider how they would finance a stay in one of these homes if it becomes necessary.

When looking at care homes, though, there are obviously more factors to bear in mind than price. What are your relative’s needs? Do you need lots of hands-on nursing care, or are you dealing with conditions like Alzheimer’s or dementia? Do you want the care home to be near your relative’s family, so you can visit them regularly?

You can survey the options out there with comparison sites like Compare Care Homes and Bestcarehome.co.uk.

What can the government do to help?

It’s unwise to rely on the government to cover all of your care costs. With increasing numbers of people requiring care facilities, the government is hard-pressed to take on fully the costs of only a small minority, and that will not be changing in the near future.

That said, there are lots of ways that the government does help people going into care.

Before your relative goes into any care home, there must be a needs and a financial assessment made by your local council.

Donna Werbner goes out to get your two pence on whether the State Pension is enough to live on.

If you live in England and own less than £23,000 in capital, the council will contribute to your care. This £23,000 can come from your savings, shares or property. If you boast in excess of £23,000 then you will have to meet the costs of your own care.

Essentially, if you own your house, then you will be put in this category, although this might not be the case if your partner still lives in this house. In that case, your savings and investments would have to get over the £23,000 benchmark for you to miss out on support from your council.

Bear in mind that while it is a £23,000 barrier in England and Northern Ireland, the equivalent level in Scotland is £22,500 and in Wales it is £22,000.

There are several forms of benefit that your relative could be eligible for if they receive care in a care home.

Attendance allowance is a tax-free benefit aimed at those 65 or over who need someone else to look after them. You can get one of two rates (£47.80 or £71.40) depending on the severity of your condition.

Registered nursing care contributions (RNCC) are provided by the NHS to people that need nursing care in care homes. This is also available to people with dementia. The current level is £108.70.

NHS Continuing Care is a programme where all of your care needs are covered by the NHS, but you will not be surprised to hear that it’s a minority (under 47,000 in March 2009) that are eligible.

The decision is made on the basis of the nature of your condition, as well as its complexity (in treatment), its intensity and its unpredictability. You have to apply for this scheme, and you can appeal if you’re not successful. For more information on NHS Continuing Care, see this leaflet from the Alzheimer's Society.

Facing the future

As someone whose grandparents have recently used both care-at-home and care homes, I know how difficult a process it can be. Working out how to care for elderly relatives is likely to become an increasingly pressing issue for more and more people in the coming years.

It’s crucial that at the very least families begin to consider how they will pay for the care of older relatives in the future. You simply can’t afford to rely on the government to pay for this.

Tell us what you think

Do you think that the government should be doing more to help people look after themselves in their dotage, or is it up to each of us as individuals to take this responsibility? Let us know via the comment box below!

More: Keeping Care Costs Under Control I Money saving tips for the over-60s

Compare life insurance deals on lovemoney.com

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (17)

  • Chorlton1
    Love rating 61
    Chorlton1 said

    If you pay tax and national insurance all of your working life you should expect a reasonable level of care in your old age. Employing service such as Homehelp can come with risks such as one employee who was supposed to be looking after my gran and helped themselves to items such jewelry and bottles of perfume.

    It is far from easy to look after elderly relatives despite all good intentions you could actually be putting your own health at risk. The other alternative is putting your trust in care services anfd doctors who often just see their elderly patients as a burden to society.

    Report on 17 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Quarket
    Love rating 25
    Quarket said

    The current system is wrong. 23K is not a lot especially when we are being told to hold upwards of 300K for our retirement pots so we can look after ourselves. The problem is that the responsible saver who does require care shortly after their retirement could see all of their pension savings wiped out in 6 years if they lasted that long. Worse still, a couple who have saved will be classed as having joint assets (apart from the family home) and so the ill partner can end up making the well partner destitute despite a lifetime of savings.

    Something has to change and though I don't like it, I think the insurance route suggested by some MP about paying around 20k on retirement as an insurance against infirmity is probably the best way around it. But even this may bring a further problem if it ever goes through as the goverment ratchets up the cost of the insurance, or the insurance company goes bust afer paying its directors big bonuses over a decade or so. Maybe that is where the next financial crisis will start.

    Report on 17 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Babsi1
    Love rating 2
    Babsi1 said

    I agrree with the first comment by Choriton1. The country needs the

    brightest policymakers for the future. I had a laugh the other day with

    my Dutch friend regarding the elderly. Being recently retired, even

    though in excellent healt and fit, the future is bleak. The days will

    come when the government will post you a nice little pink pill in

    deepest sympathy or the treat will be handed out by your local GP. RIP.

    Report on 17 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Aeia
    Love rating 0
    Aeia said

    My mother has moved into sheltered accomodation and is currently trying to sell her house. She intends to gift some of the proceeds of the sale to me. However I know that if she then has to go into care (I think within 7 years of the gift) this money would be taken into account so I will have to make sure its still available to be freed up if necessary.

    Report on 17 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • gola
    Love rating 5
    gola said

    And if you've got no money because you eat like a pig, drink like a fish, smoke like chimney and spend anything you have left at the end of the week in the bookies, the government ends up paying for everything !

    Report on 17 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Gerard2009
    Love rating 0
    Gerard2009 said

    Totally outrageous. I've already decided I'm going to be selling all my assests and keeping physical gold/cash and determined to get my monies worth out of the system!

    Report on 17 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Chorlton1
    Love rating 61
    Chorlton1 said

    Aeia sorry to disappoint you but you probably won't be able to do this as if your mother does require care the local authority may still chase you for the costs it is called "deprivation of assets" and they can go back further than 7 years.

    Please read the following link

    http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/FS40_deprivation_of_assets_in_the_means_test_for_care_home_provision_fcs.pdf?dtrk=true

    Report on 17 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • SamanthaStapley
    Love rating 0
    SamanthaStapley said

    Our company specialises in looking at retaining assets so that they are removed from local authority assessments for care home fee's. We also ensure families avoid Inheritance Tax Liabilities, and even the majority of the costs of obtaining probate when a loved one passes.

    We work with some of the best legal and tax brains in the country and all our Trusts etc have Queens Council opinion, and have been approved by the Inland Revenue.

    If you wish to have a conversation over whether we could assist you, or one of your family take a look at our website www.aptservicesltd.com and drop me an e-mail at samantha@aptservicesltd.com or call our offices quoting this site to receive a free consultation

    Report on 17 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    I agree with all the comments above.

    It's immoral that your assets can be literally stolen if you have been prudent yet if you p*ss it all against the wall (I'm not as polite as Gola) you get made out for.

    I speak from personal experience, my mother suffered from alzheimers and had to go into care after my father died. They had paid taxes and NI, claimed nothing and had been prudent and saved.

    Because of the savings and house, my mother had to pay for care. She lived for just over 3 years in care and, as I had power of attorney, I paid out £63000 to Kirklees council for a very basic standard of care.

    I name Kirklees council as I found their social services staff worse than useless and their financial people avaricious. Be warned these people will take everything!

    Councils could provide a far better standard of care at a much lower cost if they didn't waste money on politically correct nonsense and non jobs such as Street Football Co-ordinators (that's not a joke, this position was advertised by a council as recently as Autumn 2009)

    Add to that, the burden placed on council budgets through education and other services being swamped with immigrants (not racism, simple fact. Come to places like Dewsbury, Batley and Bradford if you want proof) and there is insufficient left to provide decent care for the elderly.

     

    Report on 17 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • glynis
    Love rating 0
    glynis said

    My mother in law has lived with us for nearly three years after contracting meningitus. when she came to live with us we moved house, she rented out her house and raise some money on it to contribute to our house. I n january this year she decided to take to her bed and has not walked since, she has seen 10 doctors who all say there is nothing wrong with her. The trouble being we have to move her with a hoist she is incontinent when she feels like it and she or (we) suffer from bad behaviour.

    My husband has hardly worked since february because of her and being self employed ther are no guarantees he will get work I have just read an article called become a carer and go bankrupt, this is true. What we now have to decide is do we put her in a home? We will then lose the carers allowance and my husband might not find any work , we would also have to sell our home to pay back the money she put into it. What we did was for all the right reasons and because of her behaviour has now turned into a nightmare.

    Report on 20 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • fed up
    Love rating 0
    fed up said

    I am fed up with people bleeting on about who or what should pay for the elderly care in this country. I know from experience that all elderly people are charged for their residential care some yes more than others. You tar all people without savings as people who have wasted their money this is not entirely true, some people had vey low paid jobs that did not see a pension at the end of it. Also most people that bleet about paying for care are people that are more concerned with losing their inheritance than caring for their parents but they would be very happy for others to pay for their parents while they reap the rewards (the money they have been gifted) well guess what I do not want to pay for your parents while you spend what money would have gone on their care.

    Report on 20 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    Fed Up

    I bet you'd think differently if a loved one had to go into care or your inheritance was stolen by the council.

    Get real, what do we pay taxes for?

    It certainly isn't to create jobs in councils or the public sector in general but for services such as care of the elderly.

    And guess what, I don't want my hard earned brass going to support you.

    Report on 21 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • AuntFlo
    Love rating 24
    AuntFlo said

    Fed up, the only people this affects have already paid for their care probably 10x over, the ones you should be complaining about are those who have not bothered to provide for themself.

    I do not want to pay for anyone else either however I certainly do not begrudge the tax and NI money already paid by those who contributed throughout their life being used to provide care after all that is not my money it is theirs.

    What I do have a problem with however is yet again paying for the lazy who may have never done a days work in their life.

    National Insurance is supposed to be as the name tells you an insurance, you make contributions throughout your life then there is a time to claim for most of us this will be in old age some may be unfortuneate and have to claim sooner but for a repulsive few it will be a lifetime of claim and never a contribution yes the better off will subsidise the poor but thats acceptable what is wrong is when those who work hard and contribute all their life can claim nothing and those who never pay in get the most.

    Report on 22 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    Spot on, Aunt Flo!

    Report on 22 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • fed up
    Love rating 0
    fed up said

    Yorkstyke

    How dare you tell me what and who I would pay for

    I have elderly parents one of which will be needing care in the next few weeks as I do not live near to them, to give that care I am grateful for the care they will receive. They have some money they saved and did not fritter away and I am happy for it to be spent on their care as I am unable to do it.

    and to be honest it is people like you who judge me I deal with this sort of thing everyday of my working life note, working life not lazy life as you have quoted and to be quite honest I would not want your hard earned cash as I have worked note worked for mine

    Report on 22 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    FedUp

    Who the h*ll do you think you are you pompous, self righteous individual?

    I make that statement based on your 2 comments:

    "How dare you tell me what and who I would pay for" and

    "well guess what I do not want to pay for your parents while you spend what money would have gone on their care."

    Well guess what, both my parents and myself have been prudent and saved.

    Both comments speak of a self centred person who will take everything for themselves, never mind others. I bet you'll be there waiting for your inheritance in due course.

    Report on 23 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • fed up
    Love rating 0
    fed up said

    Yorkstyke

    I see you have to resort to name calling because you cannot get your point across without. open your eyes and try reading what I said

    quote I would prefer that all of my parents savings( my possible inheritence) went on their care probably provided for by the said council you say steals from you. the tax payer. if you actually added up what you or anyone in this country pays in national insurance and tax over their working life has already been spent e.g State Pension, GP services and anything else you care to mention by the time you reach retirement age has all been spent. sorry to state the obvious but it is not kept in a little pot saying all this is for Yorkstyke's care because he/she paid into the tax system. No life is never that easy. sorry we all have to swallow the adult pill and pay for care. Also there is a benefit that is not means tested and even the rich can get to help toward care fees it is called Attendance Allowance.

    Report on 23 November 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply

ICICI Bank UK
HiSAVE SuperSavings Online Account

1.75% /
1.74%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse