Make this pension mistake and lose £18,415!

Jane Baker
by Lovemoney Staff Jane Baker on 02 February 2010  |  Comments 7 comments

Make this mistake with your pension and it could have a devastating effect on your income in retirement.

The earliest age we're allowed to take an income from a pension is 50. But from 6 April this year, the minimum age will be hiked up to 55.

I'll admit there probably aren't masses of you who are planning on hanging up your boots the second you reach your 50th birthday anyway. But there are still a significant number of people for whom the change in this rule is crucial.

For example, some pension savers have seen the value of their pension plummet, and are very keen to get their money out at the earliest available opportunity before matters get even worse. Others, who still have debts later in life, are relying on their pensions to supplement their finances sooner rather than later.

Meanwhile a lucky few are wealthy enough to justify retiring early, and may be alarmed at the prospect of waiting another five years.

Whatever the reason, hordes of pension savers in their early fifties are cashing in their pensions before it's too late. But, unless you can really afford it, here's why I think that cashing in is a very big mistake.

Why should you wait?

Stock market investing can be a very bumpy ride at times. I can understand why savers may think now is a good time to get out. After all, the UK stock market has been surprisingly strong over the last year despite the recession. The FTSE 100 index grew almost 30% during this period which has undoubtedly had a positive impact on pension fund values. Surely, it would be sensible to capitalise on these returns now?  

Having said that, there's no getting away from the fact that the earlier you start taking benefits from your pension, the lower your income will be. By starting at 50, rather than waiting until 55, your pension will have to pay out for five years longer, and that will push your yearly income down.

On top of that, by leaving your pension invested for longer, there's a greater opportunity for capital growth which could improve the final value of your pot, and ultimately provide you with a higher income in retirement.

How much could you lose out on?

Let's assume you're 50 and you have amassed a pension pot worth £50,000. Let's find out what would happen to your pension income if you took benefits now or waited five years until 55:

Your age

Further contributions made?

Value of your pension pot at 55

Pension income you receive each year

Total payout you receive by 80

50

None

£50,000

£2,792

£83,760

55

None

£60,708

£3,618

£90,450

55

£100 per month

£68,562

£4,087

£102,175

Income figures are based on a standard annuity for a male, non-smoker. The annuity is level in payment and provides no spouse's benefits or guarantees. For simplicity the figures also assume no tax-free cash is taken, and the entire pension fund is used to buy an income.

At the age of 50 your £50,000 pension pot would buy you an annual income of £2,792. Over the next 30 years until you reach 80, you would have received a total payout of £83,760 from your pension.

However, if you left your pension invested for another five years, you pension pot would have grown to £60,708 (assuming a growth rate of 7% a year). This time, you'll get a higher pension income of £3,618 and a total payout of £90,450 over the next 25 years.

That means you'll get an extra £826 a year - £6,690 over the next 30 years - just for leaving your pension alone until your 55th birthday. It's true you'll be benefitting from five years' worth of extra income by taking benefits at 50, rather than 55. But that's still not enough to provide you with a greater total payout by the time you reach 80.

Even better, if you leave your pension where it is until you're 55 and you continue to contribute say, £100 a month, your pension value would have stepped up to £68,562. A pension pot of this size could provide you with a yearly income of £4,087 and a total payout by the time you reach 80 of £102,175.

This time that's an extra £18,415 compared with taking your pension at 50, and means you'll have an extra £1,295 a year, every year, in income.

So you can see there's potential for a much healthier pension income if you leave your pension invested for another five years. And, of course, the longer you leave it the greater the benefits could be.

What if you really need some cash now?

If your finances really are getting overstretched, dipping into your pension early might seem like a good solution. But I think you should consider taking some of your pension now, and leaving the rest invested in the hope that it grows in value over time. Under current pension rules, you're entitled to take 25% of your pension pot as tax-free cash. You could use that lump sum to boost your finances now, while drawing an income from the remainder years later.  

But there are two things you should remember: first, by taking tax-free cash now, you'll reduce the value of your pension which means a smaller income later on. And second, while stock market performance has been strong over the last year, it may not do so well in the future which could force the value of your pension down.

If you have a question about your finances later in life, why not ask the lovmoney.com community for help at Q&A. And join our Get ready to retire goal where we guide you through all the decisions you'll need to make as your retirement approaches.

More: Top 25 ways to boost your pension | Top 10 pension tips for 2010

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (7)

  • liesarenocomfort
    Love rating 134
    liesarenocomfort said

    I appreciate you're having to make various assumptions, which is inevitable when projecting future income. However don't the following need to be factored in?:

    1. Annuity rates seem to be going down and down as years go by. Your projection of £3,618 pa if you leave the fund invested to 55 is presumably based on annuity rates in 2010. In 2015 you may not get as much as this.

    2. Inflation? Isn't the difference between £2,792 pa now and £3,618 pa in 5 years time rather less than £826pa "in real terms" once you've allowed for 5 years inflation

         

    Report on 02 February 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • iPension
    Love rating 21
    iPension said

    I think a lot of people are going to regret cashing in their pension early. Not only are they rushing into accepting the annuity being offered by their present pension company without shopping round (stats say 70% don't bother) once an annuity has been bought the money is spent. You can't change it to suit changes in future circumstances. Statistics also show the majority of men choose the highest pension figure and this normally excludes a widows pension.

    The above comments are made in addition to the strong argument that leaving funds invested for longer does make a considerable difference. Annuity rates may currently be lower than they have been for a long time but future inflation and therefore future interest rates (and thus annuity rates) are more likely to mean buying an annuity now is a bad idea and leaving it for the future, when an annuity is needed, is the best course to take. It is also worth bearing in mind that the best protection against higher inflation is a market based investment. If the value of the pound goes down then the shares held in a company don't mean the company is worth, the share price will rise to accommodate the change.

    Report on 02 February 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Diversgold
    Love rating 0
    Diversgold said

    I have two pension policies and have now frozen both of them at age 61. One was an early pre-1988 type that pays a guaranteen annuity rate. Recently I applied for medical enhancement. having had both cancer and heart disease, as there is no guarantee I will get to 80! Low and behold, the old style pension with the guaranteed rate offers more return per pound than the later one, even with the medical enhancement. The biggest problem with pensions is the monstrously large amount of commission that is paid to financial advisors when all they do is fill out a few forms! Although this is not seen as coming out of the pension pot, it has to come from somewhere and individuals should be able to receive this themselves if they wish to deal direct - that would bump up the pension size, but this is a hidden cost that most people are unaware of by the clever advertising.

    Report on 05 February 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • antonyob
    Love rating 5
    antonyob said

    As a journo i suppose its ok for you to tell people to leave their money in equities for the last 5 years before retirement but its terribly bad advice if you were paid to give advice for a living. People should be thinking about slow withdrawal from equities at least 7 years before retirement so they have reasonably favourable conditions under which they are "cashing in" their equities.

    The number of times the media interview some retired person who's lost all their savings in equities and its all this persons fault or usually Gordon Browns. It never seems to occur to journos to ask them "what were you doing in shares at your age?!"

    The only time you should be in equities at 55 is if your retiring at 65.

    Report on 05 February 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • alanmunro
    Love rating 0
    alanmunro said

    Retiring at 50, or even 55, seems a bit ambitious. Most folks will still be working well into their 60s and the official state pension retirement age will rise to 68 in the coming years.

    People need to be realistic about pension saving and be very clear on what they want from their retirement. If you want to have a decent income after you have stopped working, you have to put as much money as you can afford aside as early as you can in your working career. Pension saving makes sense for most people because of the tax benefits and also because the money isn't accessible until you need it.

    So yes, while you're right that taking it out too early can be a costly mistake, it can also be a mistake to ignore it while it's invested. High charges and poorly performing funds can have a dramatic impact on the value of your savings.

    Report on 05 February 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • dilbert999
    Love rating 8
    dilbert999 said

    Another point to consider is that if you also intend to carry on working, and your marginal tax rate is 40%, your pension income will be taxed at 40%. Better to wait until you've really retired - you'll get a much better annuity and only pay 20% tax on it. (Assuming basic rate is still 20% by then :-)

    Report on 05 February 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • TPMAC
    Love rating 0
    TPMAC said

    Is it possible retiring at 55, with a pensions pot of £68,562 to obtain an Annuity of £4067. I have no reason to dispute this figure, but it appears a generous figure to me.

    Am I wrong in my assumption?

    Report on 08 February 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2