The Price Of Your Pension Is Going Up

Harvey Jones
by Lovemoney Staff Harvey Jones on 29 December 2008  |  Comments 27 comments

From April 2009, the cost of buying extra years to qualify for the basic state pension will jump by more than £200.

Pensions seem to be all bad news these days, and recent weeks have produced two more dismal developments.

The first is the widely-reported scandal that 95,000 former public sector workers face pension cuts following a blunder in Whitehall. The second stems from a little-noticed piece of small print in the recent pre-Budget report. This merits further attention, because it will make boosting a shortfall in your state pension entitlement dramatically more expensive.

There is little you can do about civil service blunders, but if you act fast there is still time to top up your state pension on the cheap. Don't delay, because after April the cost will increase by around 50%.

The state will provide

The phrase 'basic state pension' is misleading. It suggests everybody gets that basic amount, but they don't.

The amount you actually get will depend on the National Insurance (NI) contributions you have made during your working life.

To get the full amount of £90.70 a week for a single person and £145.05 a week for a couple, you must have built up enough "qualifying years" before reaching state pension age (currently 65 for men and 60 for women, steadily rising to 65 for women between 2010 and 2020).

A qualifying year is a tax year where you have earned enough to pay NI contributions. This is currently at least £4,680 if you are employed, or £4,825 if self-employed.

Many people, mostly women, who have given up work to raise children or care for ill or elderly relatives, may also be treated as having paid or being credited with NI contributions.

Currently, men normally need 44 qualifying years and women 39 years to get the full basic state pension. So you have to put in the hours.

That will ease from 6 April 2010, when the number of qualifying years shrinks to a less daunting 30 years.

All change

If you fall shy of the maximum, you will only get a proportion of the basic state pension, depending on the number of years assembled, and whether you retire before 6 April 2010 or after. You can get further details from the Directgov.uk website.

To check if you are heading for a shortfall, order a state pension forecast from the Future Pension Centre on 0845 300 0168 or by writing to: Future Pension Centre, The Pension Service, Tyneview Park, Whitley Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE98 1BA. The Pension Service has further details.

I ordered my state pension forecast a few years ago, and unlike most pension documents, it was relatively clear and easy to understand. In fact, I recommend it to everybody.

Topping idea

If you're heading for a state pension shortfall, you can buy extra years in the scheme by making voluntary additional Class 3 NI contributions, as Donna Werbner explained in Boost Your Pension By £960 A Year.

Currently, qualifying year will cost you £421. In return, you get at least an extra £107 on your state pension, every year for the rest of your life, according to calculations by Laith Khalaf, pensions analyst at IFAs Hargreaves Lansdown. He also calculates that buying extra years pays off within just three or four years of retiring. You might even get more, depending on your sex and when you retire.

That is a pretty handy rate of return, provided you don't pop your clogs within a year or two of hanging up your boots.

Better still, you avoid the investment risk of putting money into stocks and shares, via a personal pension or an Isa. That's because the government, or rather the taxpayer, shoulders the risk.

January sales

If that sounds convincing, don't hang about. Your state pension forecast could take a month or two to arrive, so order it today.

Why the hurry? Because the Pre-Budget report revealed that, from April 2009, the cost of buying extra years will rise dramatically from £421 a year to £627 a year. This is designed to offset the cost of reducing the number of qualifying years to just 30 years.

Cynics might also say that the Ministers have realised that extra years have been a bit of a bargain, and raised prices accordingly.

Laith Khalaf says the new rate is still a good deal, but obviously, it is much better if you snap it up now. Think of it as picking up a bargain in the New Year sales.

You can pay voluntarily NI contributions to cover missing years all the way Back to 1996.

Not everybody should be buying extra years in the basic state pension. If you are retiring after 6 April 2010 with more than 30 qualifying years, you will get the full basic state pension anyway.

Women who have given up work to raise a family or care for a relative may be able to top up their state pension for free by claiming Home Responsibilities Protection instead.

And if you expect to claim means-tested benefits such as the pension credit in retirement, buying extra years will only lose you benefits.

You also have to buy enough extra years to exceed the minimum 10 years, otherwise you still won't get a penny in basic state pension.

Mix and match

With stock markets and property markets falling, and final salary pension schemes turning a deep shade of red, buying extra years in the basic state pension looks increasingly attractive.

It isn't without dangers. Many analysts fear the basic state pension is unaffordable, given the ageing population and the rapidly increasing government debt, and could be trimmed at some point.

That's why you should also be saving into an occupational, personal pension and Isas, and maybe property too. Because even if you qualify for the full amount, the basic state pension is, well, rather basic.

More: Boost Your Pension By £960 A Year | Pensions For Beginners: The Complete Guide

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (27)

  • Nilgai
    Love rating 0
    Nilgai said

    New Year Pension Resolutions – 2009

    Whenever you pop in and browse around a personal finance site – like Fool and all the others – there will always be the same old series of articles. One about pensions, another about credit cards, perhaps insurance this week, next week it might be mortgages and last week it was probably savings, or utilities. There is nothing wrong in this of course because people will always be in need of information about all these types of subject.

    My comments could apply to most of these articles but Pensions is perhaps the most important because generally, it is the subject mostly given the least attention (because it might be far away today) but actually, probably has the most relevance today because of the ever-aging and longer-living population and the apparent national inability to keep up with suitable pension provisions.

    There is one thing however that stands out for me about all these sorts of article! In order to make the best use of whatever is on offer, you really ought to know as much as possible about the state of your own finances – what do you actually spend and on what? Are you taking care of (putting money towards) all the things that you should be? Do you have a reasonable balance across your outgoings? What is a reasonable balance across your outgoings? How much should you be putting aside for emergencies, holidays, a future home, your retirement … ? How much can you put aside for each of these based on your own increases (income) and decreases (spending pattern) over any period? And what can you afford now? The fact is that an appropriate form of accounting can answer all of these questions.

    Many of you will have been sent the recent Fool letter by Rachel Robson about ‘Financial Resolutions 2008 – the Winners and Losers’. Quite a mixture of results but again, interesting to observe that nobody amongst the valiant candidates owned up to being really in control of their finances.

    What does it mean to control finances? Well business knows the way as it is legally required to use accounting to know all about its past and current financial situation, as well as to determine where it want to be in the future. The only trouble is that business accounting is quite difficult and if you try to use if for personal or home finances it is not actually much use, as I discovered a long time ago. This is because, understandable, its focus is all about maximising owners’ or shareholders’ value through cost savings and maximising profits. Hardly relevant to a home situation!

    However, accounting is now a real possibility for the management of home finances. Now well retired, I have developed a new accounting model called Domestic-Well-Being (DWB) accounting, focussed on the characteristics of domestic financial life and the structure of the day-to-day transactions that characterise it. The new focus is all about visibility and balance to ensure that all those responsibilities are exposed and that the details of the increases and decreases over any period can be easily compared as a basis for decisions on the changes needed to maximise domestic well-being.

    As a model, it consists of the new reports, the required accounts and techniques to make it all work. The model includes much simplification and the use of new terminology to make it easy to understand what is going on and to understand what you are doing. It is capable of being implemented on some off-the-shelf, personal finance accounting packages on a PC and depending on the inherent software architecture, can use either transaction categorisation or individual (nominal) accounts for each of the DWB structure sub-categories as a basis for storing the individual transactions.

    The overheads involve about one and half hours a month to enter transactions from bank and credit card statements which are trivial compared to the fantastic visibility and potential for gaining control of your finances on a permanent, lifetime basis. It will take a couple of months use before the real benefits become apparent but with an appropriate sense of responsibility towards yourself or your family situation, the world is your oyster.

    The benefits can be the knowledge that your financial responsibilities are being taken care of to the best of your ability according to your situation, including active debt management – and of course this will change as life progresses – so the model includes information on the stages of financial life and their impact on financial activity throughout a lifetime.

    Indeed, the visibility provided may well influence other related decisions about work, qualifications, changes in lifestyle, re-location, family and so on.

    The health warning reminds you that accounting in itself will not achieve improvements but the visibility it can provide can enable you to gain and exercise the control of your finances that you seek; and also that discipline may be required to see through the financial changes that you may decide upon and can plan and monitor by use of this new model for accounting.

    As the New Year arrives, maybe 2009 with the continuing ‘crunch’ is the time to make a decision to examine the feasibility of starting your own home or personal accounting and in particular, to find out more about Domestic Well-Being accounting – it may be a Life Changer, as someone has said.

    Happy New Year and a happy, eventual retirement (with an appropriate pension)!

    John M Passmore, Christchurch, Dorset UK

    Report on 30 December 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • WhitehallAdvisor
    Love rating 0
    WhitehallAdvisor said

    Why do Foolish people insist on going along with the spin that this is a "pensions CUT".

    This has been an OVERPAYMENT now being restored to the proper levels.

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • pdcovers
    Love rating 1
    pdcovers said

    For those without a full required NI contribution record the purchase of added years of contributions is one of the best investment decisions a person can take. That applies now and will still apply after April.

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sw19mike
    Love rating 0
    sw19mike said

    Nilgai, what on earth would you expect to see on a personal finance site??!!

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Wildot
    Love rating 0
    Wildot said

    What happens to all those female pensioners who retire(d) before 6 April 2010? Will those whose pensions are abated presently becasue they have between 30 and 38 years then receive the full pension from 6 April? If not does anyone know why not?

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Johntyf
    Love rating 0
    Johntyf said

    One thing has always puzzled me about pensions. Wonmen live longer than men yet men pay in longer and retire later. Why is this?

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • tartanmo
    Love rating 0
    tartanmo said

    I got a letter last week from DWP to inform that the forecast I was sent in 2004 may be wrong. On phoning I was told it was the S2P part and they would send out another forecast in ten days time. I asked if they could confirm the accuracy of the BSP only to be told that they destroy the information after 18 months.

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • AdAstra100
    Love rating 26
    AdAstra100 said

    Please let us NOT forget that one size does not fit all.

    If you have no expectations of a personal pension and you do not have enough qualifying years to get the full state pension, then you should not buy in additional years as you will have your years made up for you to match the state pension plus the minimum income guarantee under the present pensions credit scheme. Use the cash to take it outside the means test calculation - buy new furniture but avoid the debt etc.

    Similarly if you expect a private pension - at the miserable rates created by the Brown Terror - still look carefully at buying in as you may find that by taking extra state income you are means tested out of the higher personal allowances for the 65s and older. In this case, sheltering the income in an ISA would be better than buying in years to get a 'tax visible' income which will reduce your age related personal allowances. Allowances much heralded by Brown but very difficult to get/retain if you have taken a modicum of retirement planning

    The latter should also be factored in to the decision on whether to take a tax free lump sum on retirement and if possible secure the maximum personal allowance at the age of 85. You can then feel the satisfaction of beating the Brown Terror at its own game.

    Nilgai was right about the same articles coming around annually, but unfortunately they tend to be written by less 'senior' people who are not constantly exposed to Brown's ways of reducing the value of one's hard earned retirement provisions when you have retired. If more cover than the simplistic view was given then, the presently in work could prepare their finances to beat the tax man. I know it's said that we should not let the tax tail wag the dog, but this fundamental planning could affect your income for the rest of your, hopefully, long and Foolish life!

    Regards

    AdAstra

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • patsyannG
    Love rating 0
    patsyannG said

    Just wondering how this will affect my husband. He has been self-employed since the age of 19, some 36 years. He pays the self-employed NI and as recommended by the government, took out a personal pension years ago. Unfortunately, the pension will not be worth anything by the time he retires. (Another Government Con). I am pretty sure he will get a lower pension because he is self-employed. How will this affect the marriage pension? I am employed. Does this mean we will get a lower marriage pension?

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Nilgai
    Love rating 0
    Nilgai said

    In addition to information about those financial products, sw19mike, I believe people should be offered information about the fundamentals of managing and controlling their personal finances.

    With this, over a lifetime, people could eventually be in a better position to decide which financial products they may need (types and amounts), their affordability and the measures needed to make it all possible.

    Improved balance across the decreases should enable the earliest possible planning for pension provision and also hopefully, keep debt under proper control; and as a follow-on, perhaps reduce the need for advice on recovery from debt that is no longer under control.

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Pema50
    Love rating 0
    Pema50 said

    Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) only covers a full financial year and not parts. In addition, either sex can qualify if the qualifying benefit eg Child Benefit, is in their name.

    We put the CB into my partner's name when I got a job and he was out of work but not signing on because taking care of our toddler. He was also able to continue with this when he went onto a university degree course once our son reached school age. This meant that he did not have a gap in his pension record in the same way as pension is only protected via HRP or (in those days at least) if you were signing on and not if you were caring full time or in f/t education.

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • stephenoliver
    Love rating 0
    stephenoliver said

    I'm still looking for a straight answer about the case of people like me who have worked a significant part of their careers abroad and in difference countries within the EC, therefore will not have made sufficient contributions in any one state to qualify for a minimum state pension. In my case I may just reach 30 years in the UK but have a total of 15 years in Belgium and France. How long before EC states pool pension contribution information?

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • IMHO55
    Love rating 0
    IMHO55 said

    “Your state pension forecast could take a month or two to arrive, so order it today.”

    I hope this is a worst case scenario.

    I ordered mine by phone a week or so before Christmas and was told 10 working days – we agreed it would probably arrive in the New Year. However, it only took 5 working days turning up in the post a few days before Christmas.

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bfsbhd
    Love rating 0
    bfsbhd said

    I received a letter recently from HM Revenue & Customs stating that there was a gap in my contributions and offering the chance to pay.

    The letter said that only 30 qualifying years are required for full state pension, but what caught my attention is that the rules for bereavement benefits are different. You need up to 39 qualifying years for women and up to 44 for men. A person must have had qualifying years for about 90% of the years of their working life for their spouse to qualify for the full rate of bereavement benefit. The letter gave as an example someone who dies at age 50 would have a working life of 34 years and would therefore need to have 31 qualifying years for their spouse to get bereavement benefit.

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • TheDemocrat
    Love rating 0
    TheDemocrat said

    bfsbhd - well spotted. To say that the 30 year headline meant a better deal for everyone was one of the most disingenuous things to come out of the 2007 Pensions Act.

    In fact, it gets worse. What the IR won't tell you is that failure to pay Class I - even if you're over-subscribed could also mean that you won't be entitled (except on a means tested basis) for either JSA or the new ESA, if you subsequently need to claim.

    I think it's outrageous that the government are getting away with this, but, as ever, government departments don't talk to each other and joined up government a myth.

    For its part, the DWP are far more likely to be terrified of mis-direction, so the last thing the consumer will get is the facts.

    Rien ca change!

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • TheDemocrat
    Love rating 0
    TheDemocrat said

    Whilst Nilgai goes into lifestyle money management in some depth, I don't think most folk appreciate the current pension situation.

    (Means tested) Pension Credit will be around 130 pounds weekly next April and over 190 for a couple. Receipt of this, however small, will also passport to help with housing benefit and council tax assistance.

    So if you're pension planning and unlikely to exceed thee sums, additional voluntary contributions are a complete waste of money. If you factor in housing, maintenance and council tax, owning your own home may not be such a smart move unless you're investing for your children.

    The next thing to mention is tax allowances. If you're a couple, it is vital that, where possible, both allowances are fully used. It's pointless if one half of the partnership is a standard rate taxpayer and the other not fully using their allowance. So no one in a couple on 18K combined pensioner income should be paying a penny in tax!

    The next bear trap (or should I say Brown trap) is the fiscal drag from around 19K to 25K annual pensioner(65)income where the personal allowance drops to a working persons allowance.

    The same rules apply here - one income 24K and one 12K - very un-smart. 2 incomes 18K apiece - smart move.

    I agree that financial budgeting is just as important in retirement as when working, but the most vital thing to have is to know where you're headed and what that means. Hopefully TMF readers are already on that road.

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • roygreenslade
    Love rating 0
    roygreenslade said

    RE: "If you are retiring after 6 April 2010 with more than 30 qualifying years, you will get the full basic state pension anyway".

    What if you reach 65 before April 2010 and have 31 qualifying years at that point but choose to continue working until after April 2010? Do you qualify for a full pension on that basis, or is your retirement date still counted as being pre-2010... the date when you could have retired (at 65) but didn't?

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • francly
    Love rating 0
    francly said

    I am a woman currently receiving a reduced pension based on 10 qualifying years.At the moment this is based on a proportion of 39 years for a full pension,does this mean that when the qualifying years for a full pension goes down to 30 years my pension will increase,ie.currently get 1/4 of full pension,will it go up to a 1/3. If not why not.

    Report on 01 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • tonytone1
    Love rating 0
    tonytone1 said

    Forgive me for sounding a bit negative, but two things irriate me.

    First, does anyone have a rough idea of what sort of pension I would have, after 40 qualifying years, if my NI contributions had gone into a private pension and not the goverments coffers?

    Secondly, I do get angry when I see the terminally workshy (as opposed to people who have had genuine ill health or were bringing up a family etc) who have never done a days work get a pension not a lot short of someone who has paid into the system all their life.

    Glad I got that off my chest.

    Report on 02 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Arpora
    Love rating 0
    Arpora said

    I reached retirement age (60) in April 2006 but chose to keep on working to boost both my occupational pension and my state pension, which I have deferred. As a service wife I spent quite a lot of time abroad and bringing up children and my contribution record stands at 79% of what is required for a full basic state pension. As I don't pay NI any longer there is no way I can increase this percentage. I hoped that the opportunity to buy added years would help me but I don't appear to qualify because I reached retirement age before April 2008. Is there anything I can do beyond what I am already doing?

    Be grateful for any comments. Thanks, Arpora.

    Report on 02 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • fenemore
    Love rating 209
    fenemore said

    You are right tonytone1 - the State does not lift a finger to help those who help themselves.

    I know this is a bit off topic...

    ...my wife has MS, but because we own our house and have some modest savings plus an occupation pension, we are expected to pay for almost everything. The self-funded alterations to our house have enabled me to continue working up until very recently - yet if we had been living in a council house and I had given up work, everything would have been provided.

    My wife does receive a small disability pension, but this only covers a fraction of the care costs. My State pension due in a couple of years will be completely swallowed up.

    In the system you would think that there is SOME recognition of a life-time as a tax-payer.

    Report on 02 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • supersol42
    Love rating 0
    supersol42 said

    I heartily endorse the comments of AdAstra100 yesterday morning about means testing and the Pension Credit, but this cannot be emphasised enough. If you can arrange to be sufficiently poor when you retire, the state will give you a sum about £30 more than the basic pension every week. If you have little or no other pension arrangements and little or no savings THERE IS NO POINT IN BUYING ADDED YEARS.

    Report on 02 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • apexstar
    Love rating 0
    apexstar said

    Interested to read your post Democrat. I noted particularly your comments re tax allowances. I am 65 and my wife will be 65 in the next tax year. We will therefore each be entitled to a tax allowance of £9490 a total of £18980 from 6.4.2009. My income will be around £20,000 but my wife's will only be £7,000. Is there any way I can make sure my wife's allowance is fully used? Our income is made up of state and private pensions and interest on savings (all in my wife's name).

    Out of interest my wife recently bought 6 added years. She paid just over £2000 and in return received a cheque for £3000 from HMRC representing arrears of State Pension backdated to her 60th birthday

    Report on 02 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • merticem
    Love rating 0
    merticem said

    What happens if you are widowed after 2 years to a much older man. Then remarry - and divorced after 18 years? I am only 50 years old and was a full time mum. Do I get anything from the late husbands state pension (I did receive a widows pension for a few months) and now I have a pension fund as part of my settlement. Should I top up this private fund or leave it to the mercy of the Government to work it out for me!

    Having seen my first ever foray into the FT maxi isa dwindle from 7k to 3k I have lost the will to live!

    Report on 03 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • hungary
    Love rating 0
    hungary said

    If you work in countries within the EU, your contributions you made in those countries should count to your final entitlement. According to the pension people in 2008 you can either draw the pension from that country or have the years transferred to your English state pension. Which one is the better option will depend upon many individual factors, so best bet is to phone pension people and check it out with the authorities of the countries in question. Good luck!

    Report on 03 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • circularrobins
    Love rating 1
    circularrobins said

    I'm hoping to be able to benefit from this because I spent some time abroad and am short of the 39 years that I need. Consequently I've done a lot of reading of the official publications. As far as I can understand, although the law has now been passed it does not actually come into effect until the next tax year, so unless your missing years are post-1996, at the moment you have to wait until 6th April, when the new rate kicks in. Darling's justification of this is that you'll be getting better value because this represents a higher proportion of your pension, but that only applies if you are young enough to have to make only 30 years' worth of contributions. Until 6th April, you can only pay to be credited with the post-1996 years (I think a maximum of 6), and even this is an extension of the concession because when the Inland Revenue (now HMRC) took over the administration of NICS from the DWP, they forgot to advise employees of any missing contributions at the end of the tax years. After 6th April, the missing years up to a maximum of 12 can be bought for as far back as 1975, which is much better for those of us close to pension time.

    BTW, you can also 'buy' additional percentages at the moment, although I assume that this will be phased out, by deferring taking your State pension. For example, until this latest legislation my two missing years mean that I'm 5 percent short of a full basic pension, but for each 5 weeks I defer taking it, I would be 'buying' a single percentage extra; 25 weeks to make up the full percentage. The catch is how much this costs - instead of 3-4 years (see above) to earn back, it's more like 14-15. Also, I believe that that calculation is based on current bank rate of a couple of years ago, so probably by now you would need 10 weeks rather than 5, per percentage. If you defer for a whole year, you can have it paid as a lump sum and even have it rolled into the next tax year for tax calculation but it is taxed although I don't know if you also get the relevant personal allowance - if not, it seems very unFoolish, particularly as it does not increase the weekly rate as well.

    Also, if you are self-employed you should be aware that although your NICs contributions are put towards your 44/39/30 years as the case may be, they do not give you any SERPS/State second pension.

    As everyone has an individual work history, I do think it is worth persisting with the website to get a pension forecast, but would recommend phoning with any questions that arise from it. The forecasts are very clearly presented, and if your phone you do get instant answers from very patient and knowledgeable folk who try hard to help, in my experience. You only have a month in which to raise your questions, however.

    Good luck indeed to everyone wrestling with these complications, but IMHO it's worth assuming that in the years to come means-tested benefits such as the pension credit will evaporate, so I for one will buy my extra years if I can and hope to live long enough for it to be worthwhile, bearing in mind that future payments will be worth less year on year anyway because increases do not keep pace with inflation.

    Report on 04 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • AbbevilleBoy
    Love rating 0
    AbbevilleBoy said

    Nilgai - you've got my attention, where can I find out more?

    Report on 06 January 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply

ICICI Bank UK
HiSAVE SuperSavings Online Account

1.75% /
1.74%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4