Boost Your Pension By £960 A Year

Donna Ferguson
by Lovemoney Staff Donna Ferguson on 24 October 2008  |  Comments 49 comments

Finally, some good news for anyone approaching retirement in the next seven years...

There's been a lot of financial doom and gloom over the past few months. And with savings and investments thrown into jeopardy by the banking crisis, those nearing retirement have been among the worst hit by the downturn.

Luckily, there is some good news for many people who do not currently qualify for the basic state pension. The Government has announced new measures to allow people to buy up to six years of additional voluntary National Insurance contributions, over and above those currently permitted.

(You could already buy up to six additional years of contributions.  Now, you can buy another six.)

This is particularly good news for women, 65% of whom currently do not qualify for the full state pension when they reach retirement. However, it also applies to men.

Why is it good news?

Currently, women need 39 years of National Insurance contributions in order to qualify for the full state pension, while men need 44. (You get a year of National Insurance contributions for each year you work.)

Each year of contribution is currently worth £160 a year. This will increase by the rate of inflation each year.

So, if you bought an extra six years of National Insurance contributions under the Government's new proposal, you will boost your pension by £960 a year, in real terms, for the rest of your life.

 Be aware, however, that these extra years don't come free - you have to pay for them.

How much do they cost?

Each extra year of National Insurance contributions costs £400.

So if you wanted to top up your pension with the extra six years on offer, you would have to fork out £2,400.

This might not seem worth it, for a £960 annual return.

But remember, you only pay that £2,400 once - while you will receive the extra £960 a year (plus inflation) until your dying day.

So, for most people, it is a really worthwhile investment.

The trouble is, not everyone is eligible to top up their pension with the extra six years.

Who is eligible?

To be eligible to buy the extra years, you must fulfil certain criteria, namely:

1.  You did not reach State Retirement age before 6 April 2008. (State retirement age is 60 for women and 65 for men.)

2. You will not reach State Retirement age after 5 April 2015.

3. You already have 20 qualifying years on your National Insurance record, taking account of Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP).

What is Home Responsibilities Protection? This is where it gets complicated.  Basically, for each year you've claimed certain other benefits - such as Income Support, Disability Living Allowance and, most importantly, Child Benefit - you should automatically receive a year's National Insurance contribution. You can read more about HRP on the pension service website.

This is good news for anyone who took time off work to have children, and claimed Child Benefit while they were not working. For each year you claimed Child Benefit, you will receive a year of National Insurance contributions towards your pension.

So if you have never worked, but claimed Child Benefit for 20 years, you will qualify for this new scheme to top up your pension by an extra six years.

Similarly, if you're a woman who has worked for 19 years, and claimed Child Benefit for 20 years, you have no need to pay to top up your contributions. You will be eligible for the full state pension because you will have 39 years of National Insurance contributions.

If you are unsure whether you have enough years to qualify for the top-up scheme, or do not know whether you will have made enough contributions to be eligible for the full state pension, I recommend you get a free state pension forecast from The Pension Service. You can find out more about this here.

Warning to low income earners

If your income in retirement is less than £124.05, you have no need to buy any extra years. You will automatically qualify for the full basic pension - even if you do not have the right amount of qualifying years.

More changes

Other changes coming in include a reduction in the number of working years needed to qualify for a full State Pension.

From April 2010, both men and women will need just thirty years of National Insurance contributions to qualify for the full state pension - but the state pension age for women will also start rising from 2010. By 2020, the state pension age for both men and women will be 65.

To find out your state pension age, use this calculator on The Pension Service website.

Good on you, Gordon!

This is a long-awaited measure and one that the Government should be praised for, in my opinion.

It will make a huge difference to everyone who does not currently qualify for the full state pension.

And in these credit-crunched, penny-pinching times, it's not a minute too soon..

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (49)

  • NeilW
    Love rating 0
    NeilW said

    Of course for those in the know a hole in a contributions over the last twelve years can already be repaired - as long as you're quick.

    1996-1997 onwards can be bought back before April 2009.

    See http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/nimmanual/nim25043.htm

    So although the changes are no doubt welcome, you'd be better off using the current rules if you can rather than waiting for the new ones.

    Report on 24 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Relysis
    Love rating 0
    Relysis said

    From Above the Quote 'Warning to low income earners
    If your income in retirement is less than £124.05, you have no need to buy any extra years. You will automatically qualify for the full basic pension – even if you do not have the right amount of qualifying years.' Appears to SAY that those who have mad absolutely NO PROVISION for themselves will be 'Looked After' or have I got this wrong??

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • madmoggies
    Love rating 0
    madmoggies said

    Still no recompense for people like me, who, as recommended at the time (late 1990s) in order to have enough contributions for a full pension, paid voluntary contributions from savings when not working before the date when the change in qualifying years was announced (by which time I had started working again).

    I don't mind the extra I will have paid in from earnings but I do resent not being able to get back any of my hard earned savings that were supposedly being prudently invested for my future. I feel that this government, by moving the goalposts, has in effect 'stolen' in excess of £2000 from me.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • pdcovers
    Love rating 1
    pdcovers said

    You say this:-
    Warning to low income earners
    If your income in retirement is less than £124.05, you have no need to buy any extra years. You will automatically qualify for the full basic pension – even if you do not have the right amount of qualifying years.


    In my view this is completely the wrong message to give to people.
    1. IMV People have a duty to look after their financial future, even if it might cost them.
    2. The evidence is that many people do NOT like claiming means tested menefits, and the £124.05 is ONLY available if you claim the means tested benefit.
    3. What guarantee is there the the present, or any future, government would continue any means tested menefit. (bearing in mind that many right wing views on TMF are to abolish all means tested benefits.)

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • fooldiver1
    Love rating 0
    fooldiver1 said

    This might be good for myself as I am 60 and have not yet retired, but it in my view it is another example of the government attempting to claw back votes. My wife retired last January after spending all her life bringing up out children yet she will be excluded from adding this 6 years simply because she retired 9 months too soon. I think Gordon stinks as much as the rest of this rotton, greedy, self-centred government that wasted the tax-payers money continually. Tyhey are all rotton to the core.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Antonhu
    Love rating 0
    Antonhu said

    I suppose there's no guarantee that having paid all our voluntary contributions, the government won't turn around and tell us that we're too well-off to be entitled the state pension because, e.g. our private pension/savings are above a cetain threshold?

    Or is the government under a contractual obligation to pay us a state pension if we've paid a full set of contributions, whatever our financial situation?

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • neepdocker
    Love rating 0
    neepdocker said

    It seems very unfair to me that women like my wife who reached 60 2 years ago and took her small state pension cannot boost her pension with the extra years contributions.
    It also seems like pensions are becoming much more favourable to the person who does not plan and put away money to build a small extra pension. I believe it is something like £40,000 built up into a pension fund and the annuity will give you less than the extras the government will now disallow you from receiving. The whole system needs looking at - not just throwing out election favours.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • PunkFootball
    Love rating 0
    PunkFootball said

    That headline built up my badly damaged hopes. Having seen 25% wiped off my pension pot in the last few weeks I thought the Government were finally doing something for all pensioners. It is great for the people who qualify and I don't begrudge them a thing. However, I wouldn't trust any politician as they are all as dishonest as each other. I was part of a failed privatisation from the civil service in 1993. As a sweetner we were promised our terms would transfer under TUPE and a pension from the age of 60. Needless to say the TUPE promise proved to be hollow and the pension (finally wound up this year) is way short and I've now been told to wait until I'm 65. I'll just carry on working cash in hand and not declaring as they owe me a thousandfold.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • frogwatcher
    Love rating 0
    frogwatcher said

    I am a 63 year old woman who retired just over three years ago. I took a twelve year career break to raise my three children.
    Why should I be barred from increasing my lower state pension just because of my age?
    I gave up twelve working years to raise three citizens of this country - so much for the government valuing the contribution of child carers!
    It seems grossly unfair but typical of modern trends i.e. stuff the pensioners and lets look after ourselves!

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    Don't forget that married women who paid the reduced rate qualify for the difference between the married rate and their husband's rate as a right. Buying extra years could be wasted as it might not bring their own single rate up to this difference.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • soulsaver1
    Love rating 0
    soulsaver1 said

    TMF fails to draw out what appears to be an important benficial conclusion from this:
    If you have 30years NICs and have not reached retirement age by April 2010 there is no point buying additional years as you alrady qualify for full state pension. It seems to be a logical conclusion and if correct I am horrified that the TMF journalists have missed the biggest single short term advantage to the ordinary person in the changes and not pointed out the possibility of spending unnecessarily !!! Or is my interpretation incorrect?

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • djabbott
    Love rating 1
    djabbott said

    Nobody has mentioned the current hugely unfair anomaly between men & women which discriminates violently against men.
    Women get a State Pension at age 60, but men don't till 65. So assuming both are fully paid-up & survive beyond age 65, a woman on her own will get around £24000 EXTRA from the State than does a man. Also women statistically live longer than men, so they will typically draw a State Pension for longer (in addition to the first 5 years after 60 that men can’t ever benefit from). Furthermore the woman has probably paid significantly lesser NI contributions during her life! Seems like females in the UK are presently on a lucrative Win-Win trajectory as regards the State Pension!
    So probably view the likes of anti-men feminists like Harriet Harman with scepticism when they repeatedly tell us that women get a raw deal?

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    djabbott, your wish is being granted because any women born after 5 April 1950 will get their pension later than 60. By 2020 all will be on 65 and then from 2024 to 2046 they will all be moving gradually on to 68. See this link http://www.thepensionservice.gov.uk/state-pension/age-calculator.asp for a retirement date calculator,

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    Further to my previous post, anyone born after 5 April 1978 is already on a State Retirement Age of 68.

    And how long will it be before there is a movement to 70!!!!

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • davdug
    Love rating 0
    davdug said

    Another 6 years possible? I am 63 years. Does that mean that I can add the equivalent of another 12 years to my state pension at this point in time? If so when did the first 6 added years opportunity occur? Finally could I buy that 12 years of additional pension in the final WEEK of my working life?

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ginger125
    Love rating 0
    Ginger125 said

    My wife, who is the same age as me, was 60 in 1996 but as she only paid 9 years contributions before becoming a full time carer of our children, she did not qualify for a state pension in her own right. You needed 10 years to qualify for 25% of the basic rate. They did not inform her that she could buy extra years until it was too late, she was then over 60. Needless to say they did not return the 9 years she had paid?
    This is the first I have heard of HRP "Home Responsibilities Protection" which I understand is effective from April 1978. In which case she should qualify for at least one and possibly two years thereby taking her over the minimum 10 years to qualify. No doubt, as previous, they will say its too late to claim, we should have informed them before now. Its not their responsibility to inform us we have to make a claim for what is due and it is probably time limited. Reminds me of a notice on the highway in the States, "Do not steal, the government hates competition". The scumbags are at it everywhere.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • fufflevalve
    Love rating 0
    fufflevalve said

    No mention of a husbands NICs taken into account for a wifes state pension. Is this still valid or has our beloved Gordon and co quietly cancelled this option and not told anyone?

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • roland500
    Love rating 0
    roland500 said

    Looks interesting - So how does one apply to pay for these additional years - My wife retires next February - Roland

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Fiach
    Love rating 0
    Fiach said

    Hmm. I am 61 yrs, my wife is 59 yrs... we have both been self-employed all our lives and paid a small monthly sum to NHI (currently about £30 a month or so)since 1978 (we paid the equivalent in Ireland 1970 - 78). Are we eligible for a full state pension or should we buy this top-up? Pensions forecast is completely useless because they say that they cannot include the credits built up in Ireland until after we have actually reached 65yrs; can anybody say what the "full state pension" is supposed to amount to at present? Is it per person or per couple? If I knew that, I could get another forecast and see if there is still a shortfall. We have never had any state aid etc., but did receive Children's Allowance.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • macwolfelee
    Love rating 0
    macwolfelee said

    I'm short 0f 44 weeks contributions, but have more than 30. I reach 65 just a few days before the new requirements cut in. Can I qualify for the 30 weeks requirement by delaying taking my State Pension?

    Also, where do I get answers to questions like this? - no-one seems to be giving any answers here!

    Mac

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • EricGrobb
    Love rating 0
    EricGrobb said

    For some inexplicable reason it seems that one can only get a state pension forecast (even by mail) if you are currently living in the UK.
    Why would that be? I paid UK NICs for 30+ years but now live in the USA.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • macwolfelee
    Love rating 0
    macwolfelee said

    Sorry, I meant 44 years, etc

    Mac

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • saltyseaman
    Love rating 0
    saltyseaman said

    Has anyone tried to get an online pension forecast and succeeded? I have tried repeatably over the last two years and been told 'because of new legistration etc the site is being updated - try in 6 months'. Sent it in by mail 6 months ago and got same reply! Today i got as far 'retrieval in progress' and then 'timed out' Then finally Error try later. What is going on!!!

    I believe this is a publicity stunt / vote winner attempt and brought in at a time of the credit crunch i don't think HMG expect a lot of takers!

    Remember Gordon Brown was responsible for wrecking the private pension system with his early budgets.

    Can anyone tell me this. My wife at 60 has just received the full pension of £90.70. I will receive my full pension at 65 in 9 years time so I take it that our combined pension will be the sum of these two incomes and not the 'married couples allowance?'

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • soulsaver1
    Love rating 0
    soulsaver1 said

    "I'm short 0f 44 weeks contributions, but have more than 30. I reach 65 just a few days before the new requirements cut in. Can I qualify for the 30 weeks requirement by delaying taking my State Pension?

    Also, where do I get answers to questions like this? - no-one seems to be giving any answers here!"

    Mac

    Mac try the CAB or your loacal dept of works & pensions or your HR department (but double check their answers with dwp. And yr right - nobody seems to answer questions. Not great site as I inferred in my post... best luck.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    Davdug

    If you are 65 after 5/4/10, then you only need 30 years contributions or credits for a full pension otherwise you need 44. Credits would be given for periods of unemployment when benefit ws claimed.

    Only buy the minimum needed. The Pensions Service should be able to tell you how many years you have already.

    Most men have enough unless they have spent time abroad.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    Saltyseaman

    You are each entitled to your own pensions from your own State Pension Dates. Presumably the full single persons amount each.

    I am not sure whether or not the reverse applies but if a man reaches State Pension Age before his wife, then he is entitled to the married rate. It is paid to him and taxed as his income.

    When his wife subsequently reaches her State Pension Age, they pay her the amount that she is entitled to from her own record and it is taxed as her income. If the total of their single persons entitlement is more than the married couples amount then he will be reduced to his single persons amount. Otherwise her amount would be increased to the difference between the married and single amounts.

    She should try asking The Pensions Service whether she can have the married rate until you are 65.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    Ginger125

    Unless the regulations have changed recently, you have been misled by Donna in respect of HRP. She was right in respect of the other benefits which granted credits but my understanding was that HRP did not give credits. Instead, it reduced the number of years required to give full benefit. That would have cut her requirement down to 37 or 38 years so she would still have been under the 25% level. I am not sure but the 10 year rule might still have applied anyway.

    Even if she would have just got over that hurdle, the amount would be less than the difference between the married rate and the single rate so from your retirement date on, that difference would have been the amount payable.

    Hopefully, she has been receiving that since 2001.

    Report on 25 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • debtwagon
    Love rating 6
    debtwagon said

    I've just been to here:

    http://www.thepensionservice.gov.uk/resourcecentre/planningahead.asp

    That has a few links to various useful documents.

    I may be wrong but I don't think just anybody can buy an extra 6 years worth any time they like.

    BTW, it's up to YOU to find out what you're entitled to - and I'm just as bad, I've never heard of Home Responsibilities Protection either. It's impossible for government to continually remind the entire population about all the state schemes from which they might benefit. Just imagine the budget for that! And most of it would be irrelevant to most people.

    Report on 26 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • saltyseaman
    Love rating 0
    saltyseaman said

    MikeGG1

    Thanks for the help. I must admit that I had never looked at the possibility of my 'retired' wife claiming for me under the married couples allowance. We will pose the question to the Pensions service but I strongly suspect that there is provision somewhere for them refusing it if I am still working!

    Report on 26 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • saltyseaman
    Love rating 0
    saltyseaman said

    Macwolfee

    Spent a lot of time on pension sites yesterday and I would say that having a 65th birthday before 5th April 2010 puts you at a distinct disadvantage to celebrating it on the 6th April when you would certainly get the full pension.

    Only solution would be to buy up to 6 years. Best to get a forecast (if you can! - see my earlier post) and work out if it would be £2400 well invested.

    Report on 26 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    Macwolfelee

    Your solution is a bit too obvious to have slipped past the lawmakers.

    Have you obtained a forecast yet?

    The only reasons for being short of 44 should be if you have worked abroad for a lengthy period or were a student until after 21. Otherwise you should have credits to make up for unemployment or disability periods.

    Only buy the minimum necessary. They sometimes try to con you into covering for 16-65 which is a waste of 5 years.

    Report on 26 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • peterwhit
    Love rating 0
    peterwhit said

    not strictly true to say that if a person receives Disability Living Allowance that they will get HRP because according to the pension service website this is not the case.

    Report on 26 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mickgjames
    Love rating 0
    mickgjames said

    SO not exactly "good news for anyone approaching retirement" but good news for people who a: have a hole in their NI contributions and b:would not qualify for additional state pension (and I wonder how many won't realise this and will cough up anyway. Looking round the government site did uncover another stealthy little pensions grab which I hadn't seen reported--you used to be able to inherit 100% of your partners SERPS --that's been slashed to 50%. Ker-ching!

    Report on 26 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • roland500
    Love rating 0
    roland500 said

    I am very interested in this statement for my wife:

    (You could already buy up to six additional years of contributions. Now, you can buy another six.)

    I have not heard this before and debtwagon has cast doubt on it. Can anyone point me to where I can clarify this? Hopefully Donna will when she gets in to work tomorrow. Thanks. Roland

    Report on 26 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • UpHillAllTheWay
    Love rating 38
    UpHillAllTheWay said

    There could be a bigger picture to look at.

    This country came close to bankruptcy some years back. Remember the oft-quoted "Winter of discontent"? When Britain was known as "The sick man of Europe"?

    I don't know the ins and outs of it, but I believe that crisis was caused partly by the excessive power being exerted by the unions, and by a diminishing liquidity of UK Ltd. (I don't think there was any PLC at the time). We were bailed out by a large injection from the IMF, and were able to pay it out from funds generated in the North Sea (gas and oil). My children were little then, so I didn't have the experience of their generation, but I believe that the attitude of most people then was that the way to get things was to save for them first (with the possible exception of a car, and the definite exception of a house)

    We seem to be facing a similar scenario again now, following a run of high government borrowing, and having to bail out the banks - only this time, the government (AKA the country) doesn't have much funding to fall back on, and there will be no new oil finds. The attitude of my children's generation now seems to be that if you want something, you just go out and get it, and build a mountain of debt that you will pay for, for years and years. I have read recently that the total GDP would be incapable of paying for public debt in credit cards, overdrafts and the like.

    If we have to print more money to get us out of the hole Mr. Brown has dug us into, there will be more pounds in circulation to represent the net worth of the UK economy - so each pound will be worth less.
    So, getting back to the state pension discussion, you could find yourself, if you are eligible, paying £2,400 of today's pounds, and getting back £960 per year of tomorrow's pounds - and they could be worth a lot less.

    I'm not saying it's a bum deal - but it could be less attractive than at first appears. That said, I'll try to find out if I'm eligible. I'm still working at 62, and have only paid in for about 25 years.

    Report on 26 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • macwolfelee
    Love rating 0
    macwolfelee said

    Thanks to those who answered my query. I will be 65 on 23rd March 2010, so missing the reduction of contribution requirement by 13 unlucky days! (A bit late to blame my parents for not holding off for a bit). I haven't the 44 weeks because I was a student until 24 years old (postgraduate), then spent two years abroad. I'll get a forecast nearer the time, and buy extra if I have to.

    Mac

    Report on 27 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • roland500
    Love rating 0
    roland500 said Report on 27 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • saltyseaman
    Love rating 0
    saltyseaman said

    Disregard my comment that I was unable to get a forecast online. After a few attempts a notice came up saying site was being updated over weekend! Success this morning. As I am 65 in 2017 it says I have the full 30 years in and wil receive 30/30 of the pension i.e full. At present I believe 10 years is the minimum to get a minmum pension of £67 odd? Never been able to understand why HMG is reducing the years to qualify but making the assumption that 10 years will after 2010 only buy 10/30 of full pension i.e £30 - so thats £37 saved for the revenue.

    Report on 27 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • onlyroz
    Love rating 0
    onlyroz said

    Well I kept getting letters from the Inland revenue telling me there was a shortfall in my NIC contributions (because I'd been a full-time student for 8 years and at the time there was only 5 years leeway) and I needed to make top-up payments. At the time I didn't, because I didn't have the few thousand they were asking for. And now I'm very glad that I didn't because the new rules mean that I only have to work about 30 years to get the full pension.

    Report on 27 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    Don't forget that the concession only applies to men born from 6 April 1943 to 5 April 1950 and women born from 6 April 1948 to 5 October 1952.

    The principal beneficiaries of this concession will be men and single women who have worked abroad. They will be able to top up their contribution record to 44/39 years (65/60 before 6 April 2010) or 30 years (65/'see calculator' after 5 April 2010).

    Married women have a minimum of about 60% of their husband's single person rate via the married person top up. If they have Home Responsibilities Protection for, say, 10 years they would need 29/20 years for 100% benefit instead of 39/30. 60% of that would be 17/12 years for state pension age pre/post 2010. If they have anything less than 17/12 then the first part of any extra contribution would be wasted. Only contribution amounts over the 17/12 years would give any extra benefit.

    Report on 27 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Arpora
    Love rating 0
    Arpora said

    Hi, can anyone advise me?

    I am a woman aged 62 but am still working and have deferred taking my state pension. As of this year I have 31 qualifying years. My husband was in the army and we moved around a lot as well as taking some time off work to raise children.

    Is it possible for me to buy extra years in order to qualify for the whole basic state pension?

    Thanks

    Report on 27 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • feluna
    Love rating 0
    feluna said

    Interesting article and comments from fellow Fools.

    As a female I just qualify for a state pension at 60 in March 2010. However I have spent 14.5 years working in France and Germany where I paid contributions in each country. As they are part of the EU, does this mean there is a reciprocal agreement with the UK and these years working abroad will contribute to my 39 years of NI payments?

    If so, then I calculate 43 years of payments by the time I'm 60. If not, then I only have 28 years. Would I need to pay for those missing years?

    Can't find any information on the HR pension sites. Can anyone advise?

    Thanks

    Report on 27 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    Arpora

    If you had 8 years Home Responsibilities Protection post 6 April 1978 then 31 years accrual is all you need.

    If not, but you had some lesser amount then that cuts the amount that you will be short.

    However you cannot normally contribute after State Pension Age and any increments given are for deferment rather than additional accrual. It works out at more extra than you would have got for further accrual.

    Report on 27 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 879
    MikeGG1 said

    Feluna

    There is reciprocity within the EU but I am not sure of the basis. If it is only that they act as paying agent, then you may not have met minimum periods in each country. The minimum is 10 years here, for example.

    Get onto The Pension Service and tell them the circumstances and any info you have from France and Germany like their equivalent of NINo and they should be able to help.

    Report on 27 October 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • carrotgold_Release
    Love rating 0
    carrotgold_Release said

    The thing i find slightly confusing about this article is that Child Benefit is not something which you 'claim' but rather something that is paid to you for each child until the age of 16 or leaving full time education. Even millionaires are entitled to it! Does this mean that as I have been in receipt of it (without having to claim it) for the past 16 years I have accrued 16 years worth of state pension for myself - as will every other parent in the country?

    Report on 03 November 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Max878
    Love rating 37
    Max878 said

    Thanks for this very useful article. I think this is a really good move from the government (if a rather belated). Well done!
    Many people on this board are obviously, and understandably, a bit confused and not sure quite how they fit in. I can only say that about a year ago I tried to look all this up on the interweb, couldn't make heads or tails of it and rang the number given for NI enquiries. The lady I spoke to couldn't have been more patient and helpful.
    If you apply for a state pension forecast , my advice is to include a note stating anything unusual and anything that you need to clarify. Whoever processes those replies seems to have no imagination whatsoever and might otherwise only see what they expect to see on your form.
    Just my opinion!

    Report on 09 November 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ridiculous6115
    Love rating 0
    ridiculous6115 said

    This article is slightly misleading in that (a) the new six years purchase rule is not actually passed yet and (b) you can only currently purchase 6 years IF THE YEARS YOU ARE MISSING CONTRIBUTIONS FOR ARE SINCE 1996. If, like me, you are missing years from before 1996 you cannot purchase any years, never mind 12. If the proposed new regulations come into force then I will be able to purchase 12 years from 1975, but since I started working and have paid contributions from 1982 the maximum years I will be able to purchase will be 1975-1982 - 7 years not 12. This information was received from the contributions section of the Inland Revenue when I rang them to find out how I go about purchasing the extra 12 years pension.

    Report on 10 November 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ridiculous6115
    Love rating 0
    ridiculous6115 said

    Sorry, I just remembered, the guy I was speaking to in the Inland Revenue told me you can buy extra years, even when you are in receipt of a state pension. In other words, if these new regulations don't come into force until after your normal pension age, you can still buy the extra when they do come into force.

    Report on 10 November 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rabbituk
    Love rating 0
    rabbituk said

    Re: If your income in retirement is less than £124.05, you have no need to buy any extra years. You will automatically qualify for the full basic pension – even if you do not have the right amount of qualifying years.

    My wife has just reached retirement age and I have topped up all the years she could pay for now. I am still a working tax payer so she will get no more than what she has contributed to - far less than £124.05. (The returns seemed good so long as she lived but it was before the credit crunch devaluation of the pound).
    Unless I misunderstand, please be careful of this statement and consider your own circumstances - by all means correct me if I am wrong and wasted my money.

    Report on 15 November 2008  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV1