Workplace pensions: what it means for you

Neil Faulkner
by Lovemoney Staff Neil Faulkner on 01 October 2012  |  Comments 15 comments

With the NEST auto-enrolment workplace pensions kicking off, we look at exactly what it means for your retirement savings.

Workplace pensions: what it means for you

From today up to nine million employees will start being automatically enrolled into a pension scheme that will be linked to investments, such as shares, unless they choose to opt out. If you're one of them, your pay-packet will fall as you contribute to the pension, which is also paid into by your employer.

On top of that, the Government will add tax relief. When you start receiving an income from your pension at retirement you'll pay your taxes then, but you can expect to pay less in taxes overall this way.

Why is this happening?

The programme, called NEST (National Employment Savings Trust), is to get us to start taking more responsibility for saving for our retirement. The idea is to make 11 million future retirees, who aren't saving enough, less reliant on taxpayers and the largess of Government.

Taxpayers – especially future generations of taxpayers – gain by the same token, because they will need to pay less in benefits to retirees in decades to come, merely to give their parents and grandparents a basic standard of living.

Who will this affect?

You'll be automatically enrolled if you're at least 22 but under State Pension age and if you're earning more than £8,105.

When is this happening?

Employees will be auto-enrolled over the next few years, depending on the size of their employer.

The first wave of people will join schemes inside two weeks and the Government expects that 600,000 will be paying contributions into it by the end of the year. By 2015, it expects more than four million to be in the scheme, and the roll out will be finished by 2018.

The schedule is:

Number of employees

Date of enrolment

120,000 or more

01/10/12

50,000-119,999

01/11/12

30,000-49,999

01/01/13

20,000-29,999

01/02/13

10,000-19,999

01/03/13

6,000-9,999

01/04/13

4,100-5,999

01/05/13

4,000-4,099

01/06/13

3,000-3,999

01/07/13

2,000-2,999

01/08/13

1,250-1,999

01/09/13

800-1,249

01/10/13

500-799

01/11/13

350-499

01/01/14

250-349

01/02/14

160-249

01/04/14

90-159

01/05/14

62-89

01/07/14

61

01/08/14

60

01/10/14

59

01/11/14

58

01/01/15

54-57

01/03/15

50-53

01/04/15

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 92, A1-A9, B1-B9, AA-AZ, BA-BW, M1-M9, MA-MZ, Z1-Z9, ZA-ZZ , 0A-0Z, 1A-1Z or 2A-2Z

01/06/15

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference number BX

01/07/15

40-49

01/08/15

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference number BY

01/09/15

30-39

01/10/15

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference number BZ

01/11/15

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 02-04, C1-C9, D1-D9, CA-CZ or DA-DZ

01/01/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 00 05-07, E1-E9 or EA-EZ

01/02/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 01, 08-11, F1-F9, G1-G9, FA-FZ or GA-GZ

01/03/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 12-16, 3A-3Z, H1-H9 or HA-HZ

01/04/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers I1-I9 or IA-IZ

01/05/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 17-22, 4A-4Z, J1-J9 or JA-JZ

01/06/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 23-29, 5A-5Z, K1-K9 or KA-KZ

01/07/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 30-37, 6A-6Z, L1-L9 or LA-LZ

01/08/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers N1-N9 or NA-NZ

01/09/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 38-46, 7A-7Z, O1-O9 or OA-OZ

01/10/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 47-57, 8A-8Z, Q1-Q9, R1-R9, S1-S9, T1-T9, QA-QZ, RA-RZ, SA-SZ or TA-TZ

01/11/16

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 58-69, 9A-9Z, U1-U9, V1-V9, W1-W9, UA-UZ, VA-VZ or WA-WZ

01/01/17

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 70-83, X1-X9, Y1-Y9, XA-XZ or YA-YZ

01/02/17

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers P1-P9 or PA-PZ

01/03/17

Fewer than 30 with the last 2 characters in their PAYE reference numbers 84-91, 93-99

01/04/17

Fewer than 30 unless otherwise described

01/04/17

Employer who does not have a PAYE scheme

01/04/17

New employer (PAYE income first payable between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2013)

01/05/17

New employer (PAYE income first payable between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2014)

01/07/17

New employer (PAYE income first payable between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2015)

01/08/17

New employer (PAYE income first payable between 1 April 2015 and 31 December 2015)

01/10/17

New employer (PAYE income first payable between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2016)

01/11/17

New employer (PAYE income first payable between 1 October 2016 and 30 June 2017)

01/01/18

New employer (PAYE income first payable between 1 July 2017 and 30 September 2017)

01/02/18

Source: The Pensions Regulator

How much will my salary fall?

You can pay in extra in regular amounts or one-off contributions, but your employer will contribute out of its own pocket too.

Minimum contributions include payments from your employer, Government and yourself, and are based on your pre-tax earnings, excluding the first £5,564 and up to £42,475. These figures will be reviewed every year.

The minimum contributions will increase between now and 2018 as follows:

Date

Minimum contributions

Your contribution based on £15,000 salary

Your contribution based on £30,000 salary

Oct 2012-Sep 2017

2%

Of this, you must pay at least 1%

£7.90pm

£20.40pm

Oct 2017-Sep 2018

5%

Of this, you must pay at least: 2%

£15.70pm

£40.70pm

Oct 2018 onwards

8%

Of this, you must pay at least: 3%

£23.60pm

£61.10pm

What might I get in the end, in today's prices?

In today's prices – which means deducting inflation – here's what you might expect to get from your pot, but please bear in mind these are just rough estimates, since we can't predict the future of your investments:

How long you save for

£15,000 starting salary

£22,000 starting salary

£30,000 starting salary

25 years

£4,900 in up-front cash and £900 in private annual income

£8,500 in up-front cash and £1,550 in private annual income

£12,700 in up-front cash and £2,300 in private annual income

35 years

£8,000 in up-front cash and £1,450 in private annual income

£14,000 in up-front cash and £2,550 in private annual income

£20,900 in up-front cash and £3,750 in private annual income

You could perhaps get a lot more if your salary leaps much faster than inflation, e.g. because of a big promotion.

These aren't huge amounts, but you'd hope that they'll nicely supplement State Benefits, and will mean you're less reliant on them. You and your employer can also contribute extra. Doing so in the earlier years in particular is likely to make a massive difference. Retiring later can also hugely increase your up-front cash and annual income.

What should I watch out for?

Costs, diversity and investment choice are the three main things most people should consider when investing.

NEST will work out at an annual charge of around 0.5% for most people, which is pretty good. Add on trading costs and the overall total will hopefully be less than 1%, which is also quite good.

It is certainly diverse, since your money will probably be invested across a wide range of assets. This will help protect you from a massive disaster in on asset, such as a single company going bust and you have half your money in it.

What can I invest in?

However, investment choice is not so good, and this is the third thing to watch out for. With the default fund – which most people don't bother changing – NEST is looking to be very cautious and to smooth out your progress, meaning no big highs or lows. The problem with this approach is, while it's reassuring in the short-term, you should expect it to mean a worse performance in the long run.

I have tried to take that into account with my projections in the section above, but I might have underestimated the impact of this smoothing action, depending on how cautious NEST will be. Time will tell.

The closer you are to retirement, the more cautious NEST will be, which makes sense. You can choose a handful of other funds: ethical, Sharia-compliant, higher risk, lower growth and pre-retirement funds. You can swap between funds at no cost, but be wary of jumping ship after a big fall and hundreds of scary news stories. This is almost always the worst time to do so.

Read How NEST will invest your compulsory pension.

Can I move other pensions into it?

At present, you can't transfer pensions into or out of NEST.

When can I take cash out of the plan?

Your money is locked in until the agreed end date, which is usually around your expected retirement date. Under current rules, you can then take 25% of your pot as tax-free cash and normally you'll then get a monthly income from the rest, guaranteed for the rest of your life.

You can only normally get all your money back straight away if you have been auto-enrolled and you opt out within one month of this happening.

Should I opt out?

It's a good idea to take as much control of your financial future as possible and, the earlier you do this, the better.

That said, if you're struggling with debt, it can make sense to put more money to paying that off.

In addition, consider share ISAs instead, due to the risks of Government tinkering with pensions. Governments can tinker with share ISAs too, but it's probably going to be easier to get all your money out of an ISA, if trouble comes.

Lower earners in particular might find that their contributions come to nothing, because it just means your benefits are reduced in retirement. Therefore you might opt out – although this is hard to predict and could turn out to be just as risky as not saving in a pension. The choice is simply not easy.

Will I be opted in again later?

If you opt out, you'll be automatically enrolled every three years unless you opt out again.

More on pensions:

No, you can't retire on £50,000!

Government reconsidering £140 State Pension plan

Auto-enrolment: pensions are getting better, but nobody knows it

New way to make sense of pensions jargon

Pensions: trust or contract?

What is a pension trustee?

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (15)

  • Aitken B
    Love rating 113
    Aitken B said

    Following the set-up of the welfare state, in about 1948, that promised to look after us from "the cradle to the grave", I have paid National Insurance for all of my working life on the Government promise that I will receive a pension that will "look after" me in my retirement.

    Successive governments have stolen that money for their vanity projects and to pay public sector pensions to die for leaving me with a State Pension hardly worth the name.

    So now they want us all to pay into yet another government scheme to provide a pension for ourselves.

    Can anyone provide any reason that I should not assume that it will become just another revenue gathering scam for them to plunder to further enhance their already gold-plated pensions, vanity projects and "expenses" gravy train?

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mag52354
    Love rating 2
    mag52354 said

    I too, have paid into the system all my life;even accepting the change from paying married womans reduced contribution to the full contribution in order to receive a full pension in my own right at 60.A hefty sum of money over the years.

    But of course I won't get it...first my retirement age was raised to 64 and 1 month,now it has been further raised by another 18 month chunk .

    Who is to say it won't jump again ...or that I will live long enough to reap any benefit?

    Our government is the only body who seem permitted to change the goalposts without penalty....any other body such as the banks are forced to pay compensation if they tell lies or give misleading information.

    I would tell anyone who asked my opinion to opt OUT of auto enrollment...the "rules" will change again with sucessive governments, just as they have following the introduction of the graduated scheme and others.

    Enjoy your wages NOW ,you may not be around long enough to benefit later ... and even if you are, the government of the day may still not repay you in the way they promise today.

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • coloratura
    Love rating 61
    coloratura said

    So this nice little government pension will supplement our state pensions and we will be better off. NO - the Government will merely reduce the state pension. Less for you, more for them. Other than the required state pension I have never contributed to a pension and have not suffered at the hands of those many who would have raided it. I just continued working and put my own money aside and that now supplements my state pension....and I haven't been robbed. Just off to the sun for a well earned holiday (not really and I don't mean to be smarmy but just making a point).

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Aitken B
    Love rating 113
    Aitken B said

    Gosh we're a cyn . . perceptive bunch are we not?

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Talent
    Love rating 77
    Talent said

    Soylent Green, anyone?

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • muira
    Love rating 30
    muira said

    pensions??get out..stay out,do not call the fire brigade out..

    call at the building society or bank etc,,and keep your wedge where you can see it and have some control over it..

    well for now anyway,,until the revolution!!

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Singe57
    Love rating 8
    Singe57 said

    The Government keeps on about pensions thinking we have forgotten yesterday!!

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • nosbort
    Love rating 125
    nosbort said

    2 comments,:

    1) Gordon Brown stole all the pension funds and that's why no one saves in a pension any more.

    2) I see from the article that I as an employer am now being told that from the appropriate date, the government has dictated that I shall pay for something which only employees have the right to opt out of. Where is the fairness in that?

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Aitken B
    Love rating 113
    Aitken B said

    I entirely understand and concur with your sentiments nosbort but you mentioned "government" and "fairness" in the same sentence, well paragraph actually, as if you might think that the one should deliver the other.

    I'm not quite sure you have fully grasped this "government" concept although you are clearly begining to.

    The objective of a politician is the acquisition and retention of power. Everything else runs a very poor second to that. If we view everthing they do (ignore what they say) through that prism, we begin to understand much of the lunacy we observe.

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 362
    CuNNaXXa said

    Auto enrollment at £8,000, while minimum wage is just under £13,000 means that people struggling to survive on minimum wage will see some more of their precious money disappear. Will this mean that Wonga will see an increase in their customer base?

    Probably...

    How can you ask people who are in the poverty class to pay out even more. Most of them cannot afford to get a mortgage, so they must pay even more in rental. NEST is just another form of taxation. The fact that it is an Auto Opt In system means that many will not realise until it is too late.

    And as for the government publicising the fact on TV, we should remember that the poorest probably cannot afford to buy, let alone watch, TV.

    It is just another way for our government to fleece the poorest of our community, using their ignorance against them.

    As noted by a few here, pension pots have been repeatedly raped over the years. I spent around twenty years putting money aside for my old age, along with my previous employers, but those funds have dwindled to bugger all. Why should I pay into another fund that will probably be raped by a successive government?

    Always remember that investments can go down as well as up, so there is no guarantee that there will be anything left when you finally need it, if you even reach your retirement.

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • muira
    Love rating 30
    muira said

    until approx 20 years ago,you would leave school at 15,,

    get a job,pay in to a pension for 40 years,

    be able to retire at 55 with it,should you wish..but probably work till 65,

    and not draw it till then because you did not know better,or enjoyed working anyway,

    and if at home with the missus,one or both of you would be plotting murder...

    your life expectancy would be probably 70ish..

    never a cat in hells chance to get to see the full benefit

    and cannot bring yourself to spend it anyway,cost too dear to build it up!!

    now you leave school at 15,go back to school ( college/university etc)

    don't get a job until about 25 or so,may put in to pension then,,may not..

    draw pension at say 65,after it is as full as you think is surviveable

    and probably live to 95+..

    no wonder pensions are in trouble,

    they have gone into major loss makers

    no good at all for the men who wear suits to work

    and incidentally appear to have attended colleges and university's

    Report on 24 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Susanne
    Love rating 22
    Susanne said

    Two problems I have with this article: a. it doesn't tell you that NEST is being set up only for those who work for a company that doesn't already have an employee pension scheme, and b. it presents the fees charged for managing the funds as 'pretty good' and 'quite good.'

    The fees are, in fact, outrageous, and an early sign that all of you who said that the current or future governments will raid your NEST eggs are absolutely right. In fact, the fees show that the whole thing is set up to be raided from the start. There's no telling how well you will be off in retirement--depends on how your investments do--but two things are a dead cert: you will end up with a 5% paycut (depending on how much your employer puts in; they must put in 3 of the required 8%), and the government will make a mint. What they're charging in fees, 0.3% yearly plus a 1.8% contribution fee, is neither 'pretty' good or 'quite' good. In the US, nobody would dream of paying more than 0.1% for anyone to manage your fund; in the UK, 0.5% is about as much as any sane person would agree to pay. Remember Einstein saying that cumulative interest is the greatest financial power in the world? What this means is that the government will walk off with by far the largest part of your pension pot, just in fees. No pension manager on the free market would survive for a month if they charged fees like that.

    My advice: opt out, everyone, invest privately if you can and as soon as you can, and take a good, hard look at the fees if you do.

    Report on 30 September 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • wiliamson
    Love rating 4
    wiliamson said

    If the govt was serious about people saving for their pensions they could do two things.

    One, as a token of good faith, undo Gordon Browns raid on pensions, which has caused the pensions disaster in the first place.

    Two, provide some assurance that the money saved today (say a 20 year old retiring at the age of 70 = 50 years on), will not lose its value to the same extent that money has lost its value over the past 50 years.

    Report on 02 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • stuart b
    Love rating 0
    stuart b said

    As I see it...

    We must opt out if we don't want to participate but we must also continue to opt out every 3 years. Surely no means no?! I expect eventually the ability to opt out will be withdrawn and this scheme will replace the state pension. It looks as though they've invented a new tax...

    The annual charges are low...for the moment. Look what happened to tuition fees, they start you off slowly to minimise the objections then ramp up. Once they have your money you can't get it until you retire and they can charge what they like whether your pension fund is up or down.

    It's obvious they're banking on public apathy for this to work but it's the Big Brother way of doing it that I object to. Given the track record of pensions in this country I would advise anyone to run a mile from this and make their own provisions for old age.

    Report on 02 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • circularrobins
    Love rating 1
    circularrobins said

    This is by far the most detailed explanation I've read anywhere. I'm no longer employed, but pensions have changed beyond all recognition during my working life, and no doubt will continue to do so; a good thing too, but way to go yet. The main problem with both the State pension and the company/individual pension plans that I've had over the years is that in the early years, the contributions were far too small.

    The State graduated annuity benefit, which was compulsory, was supposedly a separate (graduated according to salary over the level for the NICs contribution) scheme which was supposed to add a bit extra to the basic State pension; later this morphed into Serps, and later still the State Second Pension, both of which could be opted-out from. With the first Serps, the Government/employer also contributed I think, and in the early days opting-out was certainly the best choice for younger people; later on the advantages were skewed more towards help for the lower-paid, and the rules were also changed so opting-in was a better choice for older people.

    Now we are all aware that we need to make better provision for ourselves, and have witnessed the various Government raids on the funds we thought we had built up, I think that Neil's suggestion of using an ISA investment vehicle is probably a better choice for most on low to average earnings. Not only can you access those funds in a real emergency if you have to, but I'm quite sure that when the flat-rate State pension in introduced, the existing benefits such as tax credits will be scrapped as a means of topping-up the State pension for the poorest; indeed, that must be why this new scheme is being introduced. Remember too that the extra tax allowance for pensioners is also being phased out, and ISA income is tax-free at the moment, whereas pensions are not.

    If the idea of a subsidy from other taxpayers on the way in to the pension fund appeals, you can always set up a low-cost SIPP via one of the providers of ISAs, using the same investments as in your ISA if you wish, and employers are allowed to contribute to these if you can persuade them to do so. At present, however, you need a fund of £100k in your pension pot to get around £5k out as an annuity if you use its flexibility to provide even quite modest add-ons, so unless you think you will have amassed considerably more than this when you qualify to take it, it may not be worth doing. However, if you have a really tiny fund, currently around £18k I think, you are allowed to take all of it at once; it may even be tax-free at present but do check because I'm not sure about that and even if it is, it's almost bound to change!

    Report on 02 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV1