Become a pensions expert in five days

Ed Bowsher
by Lovemoney Staff Ed Bowsher on 07 April 2011  |  Comments 11 comments

Here's the first part of my guide on how to become a pensions expert in five days.

Become a pensions expert in five days

Pensions are really important for all of us. Governments are struggling financially, so it's more important than ever that people think about supporting themselves in their twilight years.

Trouble is, many of us are put off by all the jargon and the fear factor.

But actually, pensions aren't as complicated or as scary as you might think.

So over the next week I'm writing a series called: "Become a pensions expert in five days." It's aimed at anyone and everyone who is under 65 and hasn’t retired yet. Hopefully, once you've read my series, you'll feel more confident about taking control of your pension. And you'll also realise that building a decent pension pot is an achievable goal for most of us.

Don't put your head in the sand. Don't be terrified.....  Instead read this guide and you could be on your way to a decent retirement.

What's your current pension situation?

The first step is to figure out what your pension situation is right now.

Let's start with the state pension.

Not everyone is entitled to the state pension. You normally need to have paid National Insurance for at least 30 years before you’re entitled to the full state pension.

If you think you won’t have worked the full 30 years by the time you retire, you may be able to pay extra cash to the taxman now and get a full pension in return. For the most part, you have to make these contributions within six years of the period when you weren’t working. Find out more here.

The current state pension for a single person is £102.15 a week. The government has announced proposals to boost the payout with a new universal pension in 2015/16. Latest reports suggest that this pension will be around £155 which is a very healthy rise. However, people who reach retirement age before then will be stuck on a lower rate. Poorer pensioners will then be able to top up the lower figure with various means-tested benefits.

Whether you retire before or after 2015, I think it’s a mistake to rely purely on the State Pension. The population is ageing and the government’s finances are going to remain stretched for many years to come. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if future governments hack back on government pensions in the 2020s and 30s.

It’s not just that the weekly payments may be lower - the age at which you’re entitled to receive the state pension will probably rise too. If you don’t want to keep working until you’re 70, it makes sense to build a pension nest egg to tide you over until you’re eligible to receive the State Pension.

Your employer

Next up, does your employer operate a pension scheme?

If you're lucky, your employer runs a final salary scheme. (These schemes are also known as defined contribution schemes.) The deal is simple: you get to retirement age and your employer pays you a percentage of your final salary until you die.

Many public sector employees are entitled to final salary pensions, and traditionally many UK companies have also offered final salary schemes.

Sadly, many of those companies no longer offer final salary pensions to new employees, and one or two companies are even breaking their promise to existing workers.

The government is also gearing up to change the rules for public sector final salary pensions. A report by Lord Hutton suggested that public sector pensions should be switched to a ‘career average’ basis. This is  where your pension is a percentage of your average salary over your career instead of a percentage of your salary in your final year of employment. (Or sometimes your final three years.)

So if you have a final salary scheme, should you worry?

Well, a bit, but there's no need to lose any sleep. For starters, even if your employer does amend the terms of your final salary scheme, you'll still get some form of occupational pension when you retire. You won't just be relying on the basic state pension. 

Then if you want to be prudent, you could always save some extra cash, perhaps in an ISA.

Overall, I think people with final salary pensions are still in a strong position. Enjoy your good fortune if you have one!

In my next article, I'll go on to look at some of the other types of pension schemes that are out there. Following on from that, I'll look at some practical steps that you can take to improve your pension provision.

More: State Pension to jump by £40 a week | Five steps to reduce your financial fear

This is an updated version of a series we first published in 2009.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (11)

  • maddogmack
    Love rating 3
    maddogmack said

    Your having a laugh aren't you? I have been studying pension law and legislation for 12 years, and I still don't know everything. I agree in principle that pensions are simply a way of saving for the future, but the intricasies and constant changes is legislation mean it is actually very difficult to become a pensions expert. This is evident when you look at the pass rate for the CII pension specialist exam J04 and J05, which is less than 50% overall (source www.cii.co.uk), and this is qualified IFA's who are taking this exam.

    Report on 07 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ovingite
    Love rating 0
    ovingite said

    I think Jim Slater said that time was more important than timing................ but if you happen to be turning 65 at the end of 2014 - just before the pensions increase - that is little comfort! Will it be possible to defer drawing state pension until the new rate is in force in order to qualify?

    Report on 07 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • lauren290
    Love rating 3
    lauren290 said

    can we please stop this silly reverse order. it makes no sense you read the answers before the questions. it is most infuriating and a total turnoff. You must have employed a new bright office junior with little commensense

    Report on 07 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Lovelyjoolz
    Love rating 7
    Lovelyjoolz said

    I agree with lauren290 - I hate the reverse ordering of comments too. It makes no sense to do this at all. Its annoying to have to scroll all the way to the bottom only to scroll back up to read the history. Rubbish idea - please put it back the other way!

    Report on 07 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • naednhoj
    Love rating 6
    naednhoj said

    I agree with maddogmack insomuch as the politicians keep meddling and only sometimes for the better and no-one's an expert, only a specialist who admits they know a bit.

    My current questions that the articles may help with are... Do Serps payments made over the past 30 years disappear in the new £155 a week as one article in the press suggested and am I being robbed again. Secondly if i go SIPPS, who can give general guidance as to what proportions I should allocate my pension pot between bonds, fixed interest. equities and how?. Pensions advisers want £500 to talk plus upto £2000 to tell me.

    My current "money purchase" pension with a well known pensions provider has swallowed my growth up by between 2 and 3% p.a. charges. The result being my other half was right... keep it under the mattress.... my blood pressure at least would remain stable. Perhaps like maddogmack i should work in the industry because someone's making lots of money and it's not me.

    Report on 07 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rlx
    Love rating 1
    rlx said

    This is getting ridiculous! One of the reasons I subscribe is to read the comments (since they are usually better then the articles) but this reverse-order nonsense is making me re-think.

    Report on 07 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MK22
    Love rating 140
    MK22 said

    The reverse sequence of posts is because the people who programmed it are either lazy or incompetent or probably both. It isn't necessary in order to achieve pagination, which is Lovemoney's alleged aim.

    In some respects maddogmack is right about the complexity of pensions law, but most pensions law is designed for and used for Defined Benefit pension schemes and frankly, once a scheme is properly set up, is largely irrelevant to most people. Defined Contribution pension schemes have far less legal baggage around them - but it probably won't last! I think there is a reason why an awful lot of IFAs don't pass the exams.

    If naednhoj is paying 2-3% pa of total fund value as fees it sounds like naednhoj is being ripped-off, an in-house DB pensions scheme all up costs would be around 5-10 basis points (1 BP = 1/100%). If it is 2-3% off payments into the fund that sounds more reasonable.

    Report on 08 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mbhknight
    Love rating 3
    mbhknight said

    I am getting slightly dismayed at the way Lovemoney seems to ignore us existing pensioners. As regards the state pension let's make it quite clear those of your readers who have contributed to the various additional pension schemes done by many UK governments since the 1960s are the ones who will be losing out on this "generous" increase in state pension. Many of these contributers will not have had the opportunity to make their own arrangements in the past because it is only in the past 30 years that many of the private schemes have become available. In addition the level at which the state pension is being set is already £15 per week below the official poverty level so with current inflation is going to be even worse by 2015. A further worry for future pensioners is that there is no guarantee that the private pension that they have paid into will perform satisfactorily. I have had two of my small private pension funds go into administration and convert from a guaranteed increase annually to no increase at all thus effectively decreasing yearly.

    Report on 08 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rioandthelma
    Love rating 29
    rioandthelma said

    It's so difficult to scroll to the bottom of the comments and then come back up again, I don't think.

    Report on 08 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Harajus
    Love rating 8
    Harajus said

    Can somebody at lovemoney tell us NOW how many contributors must complain that they DON'T want this reverse order of comments before they have the 'marbles' to admit they got it wrong? Seems to be more democracy in Libya.

    Report on 11 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MK22
    Love rating 140
    MK22 said

    I'm told by someone who programs this sort of thing, that the problem with ordering comments is that most off-the-shelf packages do it in this order. Also apparently it is us oldies who have the problems with the order of comments. Youngesters only look at the last 2 or 3 posts and comment on them not the article, so the rest of the comments are irrelevant to them. Only old people like me like to see how the "arguments" have developed and therefore how relevant they are to the article as a whole. So we need to swallow our logical minds and do things how the kids want us to (it'll apply to everything in our lives as we get older.....).

    Report on 17 April 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

Aldermore
1 Year Fixed Rate Account

1.85% /
1.85%
On Maturity Apply

Derbyshire BS
Derbyshire NetSaver Issue 11

1.70% /
1.70%
Yearly Apply

Nationwide BS
MySave Online Plus

1.70% /
1.69%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2