Panic about house prices!

Christina Jordan
by Lovemoney Staff Christina Jordan on 06 March 2010  |  Comments 16 comments

Mortgage lending slumped in January and there are signs the trend of rising house prices is over. Is there reason to panic?

January was a pretty dud month in terms of mortgage lending. That’s the conclusion reached now all the relevant bodies have released their lending figures for the period.

The latest was the Bank of England, which said that the number of loans approved for house purchase in January (48,198) was significantly lower than the 58,223 in December, and less than the previous six month average of 55,924.

Remortgaging didn’t fare much better at 23,611 deals approved in January, again lower than the December and six-month average figures.

In fact, the total number of mortgages approved was the lowest since last May.

The British Bankers’ Association also saw a sharp drop (24%) in mortgages approved for house purchase between December and January. Plus it said that total lending fell by 26% to its lowest level in eight years. And the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) recorded a large drop in gross mortgage lending -- 32% -- over the same period, the lowest level in 10 years.

Yep, January wasn’t great.

Chill out

However it’s not time to start panicking, or muttering the phrase ‘double dip’, just yet.

January’s lower lending figures were clearly caused by a combination of terrible weather forcing most of us to stay indoors, and the ending of the Stamp Duty holiday on New Year’s Eve. This had caused a spike in mortgage lending in November and December -- first-time buyer numbers hit a two-year high -- which was always going to be followed with a bump back down to earth.

A setback in the recovery is my verdict and nothing more. I am not suggesting February lending figures will necessarily bounce straight back but I think that the smoother indicators (annual and quarterly measures) will continue to show improvements.

A much more illuminating take on the mortgage market this week looks at long and short term trends in homeownership levels and predicts that more of us could choose to, or be forced to, rent in the future.

Affordability squeeze

This new research comes from the CML which points out that the huge affordability issues already in place before the credit crunch have been exacerbated by it. Prices may have dropped 20% from peak to trough since 2007 but tighter lending criteria means it is definitely harder to borrow now.

This could lead to more people having to rent, says the trade body, a trend supported by changing consumer preferences. In other words, it’s also no longer seen as peculiar if you don’t want to buy a property in your twenties.

For wannabe first-time buyers any ‘consumer preference’ is pretty much taken out of their hands, as it’s much harder to get onto the housing ladder now than it was before the crunch.

A typical first-time buyer needs to find around £34,000 as a deposit, which is more than their average total gross household income. Just three years ago the deposit required to enter the market was £12,700 and this accounted for 37% of household income -- a massive shift.

Unsurprisingly there is now a greatly increased reliance on financial support from parents. In 2006, a significant 38% of young first-time buyers in 2006 received help, and this had risen from just 10% a decade earlier. Now though it is estimated that 80% of first-time buyers under 30 years old receive financial help from their parents to buy their first home.

There has also been a huge fall in the proportion of young households with mortgages -- it’s estimated that for those in the ‘formerly typical’ first-time buyer age bracket of 25-34, the likelihood of buying at the moment is around half its level of a decade ago.

The CML suggests that the move away from homeownership that started before the crunch will continue, not least because of a constraint in housing supply as well as the obvious affordability challenges.

We need FTBs

But first-time buyers drive the housing market. Without them second-time buyers can’t sell and purchase chains fall apart.Lenders have a key role in helping the market, and by increasing the supply of mortgages to first-time buyers they will enable more to take that first step onto the ladder.

Arrange a mortgage over the internet.

Of course, this still needs to be done in the context of responsible lending, so there is unlikely to be a sweeping change in lending criteria.

But we have already seen lenders become more flexible in lending to those with a small deposit in the last few months, and competing in the first-time buyer market for the first time since the start of the credit crunch.

Lenders are introducing more mortgages to the market in 2010, that’s undeniable. Deals available topped 2,000 in February for the first time in over 12 months, according to financial information provider Moneyfacts, and 400 of those have been introduced since the New Year.

Plus more and more deals are being launched specifically for first-time buyers. There has been a 38% increase in the number of mortgages available to buyers with a deposit of just 10% since the beginning of the year, and a 28% rise in deals for those with 15% upfront.

For example, First Direct has just launched a best buy term tracker at 3.99% (Base +3.49%) for those with a 15% deposit, which comes with a modest £499 fee.

OK, finding 15% of a property’s value is still a lot for some first-time buyers, but last year you needed 25%, and sometimes 40%, to get anywhere near a competitive mortgage. Things are getting better.

If you can only scrape together 10% upfront, there are deals available. You will pay a bit more, but competition is slowly coming back to this sector of the market too.

Here are 10 of the best mortgages for first-time buyers with 10% upfront:

Five fab variables

Lender

Type of deal

Rate

Fee

Newcastle BS

2-year tracker

4.60% (Base + 4.10%)

£694

NatWest

2-year tracker

4.69% (Base + 4.19)

Fee-free

Furness BS

3-year discount

4.94%

£699

Santander

2-year tracker

4.99% (Base + 4.49%)

£995

HSBC

Term tracker

4.99% (Base + 4.49%)

Fee-free

Five fantastic fixes

Lender

Type of deal

Rate

Fee

Newcastle BS

2-year fix

5.95%

£694

HSBC

2-year fix

5.99%

£599

Santander

3-year fix

5.99%

Fee-free

NatWest

5-year fix

6.39%

Fee-free

Yorkshire Bank

5-year fix

6.69%

£999

More: The biggest house-price myth | The best landlord mortgages

At lovemoney.com, you can research all the best deals yourself using our online mortgage service, or speak directly to a whole-of-market, fee-free lovemoney.com broker. Call 0800 804 4045 or email mortgages@lovemoney.com for more help.

This article aims to give information, not advice. Always do your own research and/or seek out advice from an FSA-regulated broker (such as one of our brokers here at lovemoney.com), before acting on anything contained in this article. 

Finally, we tend to only give the initial rate of a deal in our articles, but any deal which lasts for a shorter period than your mortgage term will revert to the lender's standard variable rate when the deal ends. Before you take out a deal, you should always try to find out from your lender what its standard variable rate is and how it will be determined in the future. Make sure you take all this information into account when comparing different deals.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (16)

  • peepobaby
    Love rating 49
    peepobaby said

    Rhubarb

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • staintuneriderzwei
    Love rating 2
    staintuneriderzwei said

    Try riding a motorbike by watching the road in front too closely and not looking ahead, you;ll wobble all over the place and not steer a straight smooth path.

    I couldn't believe it when i saw these reports such as those issued by the "know nothing " Nationwide... It's 1 month and a cold, icy and snowy month, house hunting was likely not on the agenda for most of us. look at things over a quarter and not fixate on month to month activities. It is in my view pointless and misleading.

    Why am I denigrating Nationwide ? As a long time customer I recently moved my mortgage from them and only have an account and credit card that are barely used now. As a customer of more than 10 years and once very pleased with them I have watched them completely lose the plot. The cash machines are slow and ancient. Their staff contradict each other, they really don't offer anything of value to anyone other than a newbie house buyer who doesn't know better. They strike me as an organisation who are failing to compete because they won't invest in themselves or their staff. Sorry to say they have fallen well behind the pack.

    And they take 1 month#s activities and start preaching about the state of the market when they can;t even get their own house in order.

    My own view is we will see a healthy jolt in March onwards for Spring/ Summer, then post election anyone's guess, depending on the next govt, QE etc etc

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ken1961
    Love rating 22
    Ken1961 said

    Slump due to bad weather? Really, well I would never have guessed. Talk about statement of the bleeding obvious.

    Another bleeding obvious observation I would give is that there where also fewer houses completed in December and January, guess why? Go on I bet you get it right, well done, the weather was blinking awful. So no site work carried out, a rush to complete on those homes that where ready in December add to that fact that many builders shut for almost 3 weeks over Christmas therefore the simple equation becomes fewer houses ready for sale in January = fewer sales completed in January. I didn't even need Sherlock Homes to figure that one out.

    As I work for a builders merchants I can confirm that other than our Plumbing & Heating department (lots of new boilers and spare parts needed due to bad weather) sales where not great in January (rock salt & grit being the exception) however Feb sales made up for down turn in Jan finishing well ahead of targets. March so far is very busy and currently ahead of target.

    So from my point of view no double dip yet.

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Bola
    Love rating 3
    Bola said

    I know you are trying to sell your mortgage service but surely the best way to improve affordability for first time buyers is for prices to come down to an affordable level. Not borrow more money from parents or make lending more flexible.

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • Mark Harmer
    Love rating 31
    Mark Harmer said

    Bola, you are so right. I can't think of any other area where everyone seems to want prices to increase, and if they don't it's "a reason to panic". Surely the only people who benefit from increased house prices are mortgage lenders. And of course we all love those, right?!

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • kerryl
    Love rating 1
    kerryl said

    I agree with Bola too, in my opinion the main reason that house prices are staying too high for first time buyers to afford is that greedy house builders aren't reducing their prices and the rest of the market falls in line with them.

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • BritishEngineering
    Love rating 5
    BritishEngineering said

    If anything falling house prices should be a reason to rejoice rather than panic... At least for the generation who have been completely priced out of the market for the last few years. The main reason prices are so high is because of the rampant expansion of credit leading up to 2007/2008 and everyone knows how damaging this has been to the economy at large. The best thing that can happen now in my view is a rigid return by all lenders to the 3.5 times salary rule. This will get house prices back to an affordable level and get the market moving again in terms of volume. Yes the average price of a home would have to fall by a hefty chunk, but let's not kid ourselves that continually rising house prices actually create wealth. They don't!

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • MrRee
    Love rating 65
    MrRee said

    At the end of the day, if a buyer can, and wants to, buy a property for £x then they will. 

    We can shout that prices are too high until the pigs come home - it won't change what is happening on the street.

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    You don't mention interest rates. When these get back to normal, prices will drop significantly.

    We're the most indebted country, with the longest recession, yet prices stabalised here, having dropped 50% elsewhere. This cannot continue.

    When prices become sensible again, people will be able to buy houses.

    BTW, snow will not affect prices. I had a laugh over that one. The CML make it up as they go along.

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Yorkstyke
    Love rating 89
    Yorkstyke said

    Panic?

    You ain't seen nothing yet!

    Get the election out of the way, the government of whatever political persuasion, will have to face up to reality and accept that cuts and interest rate increases are a necessity.

    Those who have been foolish enough to be sucked in to the housing bubble or released equity to pay for the new car or foreign holiday really will be panicking.

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • bimber
    Love rating 44
    bimber said

    I heard a story this week about someone who has been unemployed for a year and had his £1000/month mortgage paid by the taxpayer, with some extra income from his lodger. This is why house prices haven't yet fallen as far as expected: the government taxes the lodger to pay the mortgage of the owner and sets interest rates artificially low to force the lodger to subsidise the owner. Some of us look down the road, past the billboard which reads "It's never a bad time to buy a house" and see a brick wall called Reality. There's no need to panic, just prepare and wait. On the other side of the wall the owner will move to something he can afford, and the lodger might find he can afford his own place too.

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • bengilda
    Love rating 77
    bengilda said

    There is a general reduction in liquidity due to the recession causing unemployment, devaluation (aka quantative easing) of the pound causing material costs to increase, general increases in the many forms of taxation and the gross overspending in the public sector.

    Add this depletion of the cash availability to the need for lenders to require greater surety to avoid another round of bad defaulting loans and it is so obvious that house ownership will drop.

    The government needs to increase the money flow in real terms - and just printing more in reality aggravates the problem - by cutting public expenditure, cutting taxes and upping the interest rate for depositors. This will give the opportunity and encouragement for young people to build up a deposit and learn the discipline of saving.

    Report on 06 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • unsworthsteve
    Love rating 22
    unsworthsteve said

    Why is their an unwritten assumption that rising house prices are good for the country? Get real, haven't we learnt anything from the last 20 greedy years?

    Report on 07 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • debtwagon
    Love rating 6
    debtwagon said

    Get real, who isn't greedy if they've got the chance? Surely, not many of us. Rising prices ARE good if you're already a houseowner because you feel better off and more secure. It will never change here because house prices are too integral to the UK economy. To adopt a continental-style low-cost housing model would require essentially a nationalisation of the housing stock, i.e. the govt writes off our mortgages. How would that ever happen?

    Report on 07 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    Kerryl - why are house builders "greedy"? Where's your evidence? In my experience housebuilders rarely make more than 5% after-tax profit, and returns on house constructions are notoriously some of the lowest of any kind of business in the UK. The people who make the real money are people who own land approved for construction - often suburban owner-occupiers and you don't see them complaining when houses are built on their large plots - and the government and its agencies, through taxes, S106 "contributions" and "affordable homes", where the builder has to sell between 1/3 and 50% of his site at a substantial loss to a housing association.

    Report on 08 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sadolegit
    Love rating 1
    sadolegit said

    Just seen this article, and there's the usual mixture of muddled thinking and vested interests in both the article itself and some of the comments. In reality, high house prices do not make rich people in most cases, because the "wealth" is tied up and generally inaccessible, thus it is only notional money. For most mortgage holders moving up the ladder, there is still more (real) debt to be taken on in order to attain the next step on the ladder. For potential FTB's (including my 2 offspring), the size of deposit required or terms imposed for a high percentage mortgage are both truly frightening, especially when you consider that these are the very people who now complete their education already owing thousands in Student Loans, etc. Although we are now fortunate enough to own our house outright, the only way we could raise enough to help our kids in any meaningful way would be by raising money against the house - i.e back on the debt treadmill again! It is only possible to realise the alleged wealth tied up in a house via equity release (rip-off by any other name, as far as I can see), selling up and going into rented accommodation (in our area, max 30 years before it starts costing more than you released from the sale - no good for a 30 year-old), moving to a significantly cheaper area (bye-bye, friends) or downsizing - the only viable way to do it, and of no practical use to any except those who have finished with both mortgage and family-raising. No, a fall in house prices is NOT a cause for panic - it is a social necessity and an excellent way to get money moving around again. Bring it on!

    Report on 08 March 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4