New build mortgage deals are still restricted

Christina Jordan
by Lovemoney Staff Christina Jordan on 16 February 2009  |  Comments 8 comments

There is a market for new build properties as prices fall, but can borrowers easily secure a mortgage?

New build properties offer many advantages over older homes. They come with solid new windows that are not drafty, the boiler and central heating should work a treat and they have clean neutral décor and sometimes integrated kitchen appliances.

In short they are nice and new and neat and tidy -- perfect for first-time buyers who don’t want to renovate their first home, or for buy-to-let landlords who want to rent out the place as soon as possible without having the delay of decorating. In addition the building work is also covered for up to 10 years under the National Housebuilding Council warranty (most new properties are covered under this scheme, and certainly those built by major developers).

Clearly, new build properties suit a large number of homebuyers and buy-to-let investors, but mortgage lenders have concerns about lending on the properties and are tightening up their lending criteria.

Right to be cautious

Over two years ago some specialist lenders started to restrict what they would lend to borrowers who were buying a new build property, and some pulled out of the market altogether. Nationwide specialist subsidiary The Mortgage Works pulled out of lending on new build flats across its buy-to-let range (though it will lend on new build houses). It said at the time that it felt it could not rely on valuations of new build flats, particularly in city centres where thousands of apartment blocks have been built and sold to buy-to-let investors.

Clearly The Mortgage Works made the right move at the right time, since new build flats have fallen in value faster than any other part of the property market, according to smartnewhomes.com, which says they have dropped by 17% in value in the last year alone. This has left many borrowers (especially landlords) finding themselves in negative equity.

Tightening up

Just two weeks ago HBOS announced a raft of changes to its mortgage proposition, including the tightening of its mortgage criteria on new build property.

All HBOS brands, which include Halifax, Bank of Scotland, Birmingham Midshires and Intelligent Finance, have reduced their maximum loan-to-value (LTV) criteria for new builds to 80% for residential mortgages (down from 90%) and to 65% for buy-to-let mortgages (down from 75%).

This means that any borrower buying a new build property will need at least 10% upfront, and buy- to-let investors will need at least 35% -- a huge deposit.

The lender said it is making the changes to bring its criteria in line with the market. Specifically this means being brought into line with conservative parent company, Lloyds Banking Group, which covers Lloyds TSB, Cheltenham & Gloucester and now the HBOS brands. The Lloyd’s Banking Group will offer up to 90% LTV on residential properties that are not new build, and up to 75% on buy-to-let.

So do the other major UK lenders have a different policy in terms of lending on new build, or do they treat it the same as other mortgage borrowing?

Northern Rock

Northern Rock will offer mortgages up to 70% LTV on residential new build flats. For new build houses it depends on the size of the loan. If you borrow £500,000 or less it will lend up to 85% LTV on a new build house. If you borrow over £500,000 the maximum LTV drops to 80%.

For new build buy-to-let mortgages Northern Rock will offer up to 70% on both houses and flats.

The lender doesn’t offer any mortgages (new build or not) at LTV ratios higher than 85% on residential and 70% on buy-to-let.

HSBC

On residential mortgages it offers up to 75% LTV on flats and houses. If the property isn’t new build the lender will offer up to 90% LTV.

Abbey

Abbey will offer mortgages up to 70% LTV for new build flats. For new build houses it requires a 20% deposit, lending up to a maximum of 80% LTV. On other non-new build properties it will lend up to 95% LTV.

Nationwide

Nationwide’s maximum LTV for new-build flats is 75%, and for new-build houses 90%. However the lender pointed out that it assesses all properties as though they have already been occupied and are being resold. In other words it ignores all discounts, incentives and cashbacks and looks at the "resale value”, based on comparable properties that have been sold.

This may mean that some new-build properties are valued as being below the purchase price. Where this happens applicants can have a copy of the valuation report, and then decide whether they want to either apply for a lower mortgage amount or renegotiate their purchase price.

Nationwide’s standard LTV ratios (for properties that are not new build) are 95% for existing customers and 85% for new customers.

The Mortgage Works

Nationwide subsidiary The Mortgage Works does not offer buy-to-let loans on new-build flats, but will lend on new-build houses. Like Nationwide, these are valued on a second-hand value basis, purely considered on what it would sell again for.

So, if you want a mortgage on a new build home, you can certainly find one. Most lenders offer all of their mainstream products to those buying new build properties. But the lower LTV restrictions will necessitate a bigger deposit, particularly if you are buying a flat.

Also remember that there is a reason why mortgage lenders require more upfront. If they see new build as more risky than other property (which they clearly do), perhaps you should apply the same caution when househunting.

Compare mortgages quickly and easily

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (8)

  • Dhahran2001
    Love rating 0
    Dhahran2001 said

    Do real people actually want to live in nice and new and neat and tidy boxes? What do savvy landlords believe? Old alternatives are likely to have higher ceilings!

    Report on 17 February 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 878
    MikeGG1 said

    So, lenders have finally realised that the new build premium evaporates as soon as someone moves in. They should never have been lending on that premium in the first place.

    Mortgage valuations should be the re-sale value and then buyers can decide whether they wish to pay the premium, or not, out of their own savings.

    There would then be no need for differential LTVs.

    Report on 17 February 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • lovandlight
    Love rating 0
    lovandlight said

    Surely the current across-the-board decreases in LTV offers from mortgage lenders simply reflect the likelihood of a continuing decline in house prices?

    After more than a decade of over-borrowing on cheap credit, always encouraged by the government and the banks, house prices reached a ridiculously over-priced level in 2007, so the market in now enduring the inevitable "correction" long forecast.

    I believe that the current levels of mortgage and credit card debt have yet to peak, and that the pain will continue for at least another five years or more, during which period reality might return to the market.

    Let's face it, binging on credit is no different from binging on alcohol. It makes you feel good at the time, but then comes the hangover.

    Perhaps it would be better all round for LTV ratios to keep on falling to a sensible level - perhaps even 50% (as it is the general norm in some Continental countries) - so that the expression "home ownership" begins to mean just that.

    Report on 17 February 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • colin106
    Love rating 0
    colin106 said

    Christina - draughty not drafty!

    Report on 17 February 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Waretobuy
    Love rating 0
    Waretobuy said

    The article is an excellent one, allthough it doesn't continue enough for me and put through an opinion on why.

    The reason lenders are doing this is very simple, and about time to. It does not mean that there will be a continued general decrease in property prices it means in a very straight forward manner; that if you bought a box on a shelf, the same as every other box on that shelf except the one at the end that can be seen from the shop window, your box is going to have be different in another way to sell. And the only thing that will make it different/desirable is the price.

    For comparison purposes look at cars, a brand new car not sold in high numbers and a bit more exclusive will retain it's value more than a fleet car, everybody knows that, and it is exactly the same scenario here.

    The golden rules when buying flats was to always get 'THE' flat on the development, with the additional parking space, or garage, or private entrance, or river facing view. They must have something to set them apart or they are all the same.

    Property prices may stabilise this year, but rest assured if you have a flat that is one of two hundred, it WILL still fall in price this year if you HAVE to sell it, IF anybody else is selling at the same time.

    Lastly, remember that when the market picks up, that new build flat you paid a premium for will now be located in the same area as at least two or three newer developments that will have appeared since, and yours will be compared with the ones that are four or five years older than it by surveyors and valuers.

    Good news it is not for owners/landlords, but it is the one piece of real honest accurate advice that you are going to receive in this current market. I valued and tried to sell many flats coming out of the last downturn and the questions from buyers were all the same. They are all alike, what is the difference? The answer more often than not was nothing, and unless they were cheaper, those didn't sell.

    Every single freehold house, or small discreet block sold every time and achieved very good money.

    If I were looking at new builds at the moment I'd remember this, and make sure that developers do have to sell, so get extra's, make them add an en-suite, upgrade the kitchen, give you an additional parking space, or one outside your door. Make sure if you buy, that you get the best deal you can, not just on price. Good luck!

    Report on 17 February 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • DP130132
    Love rating 20
    DP130132 said

    Go for somethng "established", rather than new. Some of the advantages can be any settlement, water leaks, bad window fitting, etc., etc.,

    will have become apparent, and probably cured. Curtain rails, pelmets, toilet/shower fittings, light fittings,lamp bulbs,soap holders, etc., will probably

    be already fitted.

    With luck, and good negotiating, you may get carpets and curtains.You will probably be able to assess how the estate/new area

    is developing, and you are not buying in a situation which could be a semi permanent not completed building site. "Extras" can be a massive hit on the credit cards of new buyers, at a time when least wanted.

    Report on 17 February 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Enzyme100
    Love rating 0
    Enzyme100 said

    I would rather go for the esablished place rather than new build. Most are poorly built, and the 10 year NHBC warrenty is not worth the paper it is writen on.

    Oh and Colin106 both draughty and drafty are the same, just different spelling versions. Most normal people would use drafty!

    Report on 18 February 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • 2ndtimebuyer
    Love rating 0
    2ndtimebuyer said

    Why the hell did RBS let me apply for an 85% LTV mortgage on a new build property in June 2009 when they knew full well that it would never go through. It totally stinks and banks need to be taken to task over it.

    The whole home buying process cost us significant amounts of money (in reservations/surveyors reports etc), not to mention the stress and lots of investment of our own time, only to be told at the last minute that RBS had downvalued the house by almost 20%. This was never going to go through as the developer had already reduced the house price by 18%. In addition, though the valuer said they had based their valuation on sales of similar houses in the area, when asked RBS couldn't produce evidence of those sales and self research of the area and various websites revealed that it was impossible to buy a similar house for the value RBS came up with.

    The only argument in RBS's favour is that although we gave our credit card details to RBS to pay for the vluation at the beginning of our application, the valuation fee has never been debited.

    Report on 17 September 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Virgin Money Credit Card MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.99% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV1