Why the NewBuy scheme isn't working

ReenaSewraz
by Lovemoney Staff ReenaSewraz on 03 May 2012  |  Comments 8 comments

Two months after launch, how are lenders behaving and is anyone actually using this Government-backed scheme?

Why the NewBuy scheme isn't working

When the NewBuy initiative was unveiled in March, NatWest, Nationwide and Barclays were the only three confirmed lenders prepared to offer mortgages at competitive rates to those with a small deposit.

Two months on, how has the scheme fared for buyers, builders and lenders? And how have the rates on offer changed?

Opening doors

The NewBuy scheme is the latest attempt from the Government to re-energise the housing market.

The initiative has been designed to perform two main functions: help people up the property ladder (especially first-time buyers) and to kick-start the building trade.

NewBuy gives homebuyers access to a mortgage even if they can only manage to save a 5%-10% deposit. This means the amount borrowed is larger (90%-95% LTV) posing a greater risk to the banks that are lending the money.

The banks that have participated in the scheme so far have been convinced to lend on this riskier loan-to-value ratio because of a special indemnity guarantee, funded jointly by the builders and Government of up to 9%, which will cover any losses to the bank should the buyer fall into financial problems or in the event of a major property crash.

The only qualifying criteria for this programme is that you have to be buying a property in England from one of the developers taking part in the scheme, it must be your primary home not an investment (i.e. not buy to let), you have to have full ownership (no shared equity or shared ownership) and the property can cost no more than £500,000.

NewBuy mortgages

So far Nationwide, NatWest, Barclays and (since April) Halifax have NewBuy mortgages on offer. Most of these are not readily available to view online as they are only available in branch or through an intermediary so we’ve gathered up all the deals available at the moment to see how they stack up compared to the launch rates.

Lender

Initial interest rate

Type and length of deal

Fee

Maximum property value

NatWest

4.79%

Two-year fixed

£499

£500,000

Halifax

5.99%

Two-year fixed

£999

£500,000

Halifax

6.39%

Two-year fixed

fee free

£500,000

Nationwide

5.79%

Three-year fixed

£900 or £400 for FTBs

£250,000

Barclays

6.09%

Three-year fixed

£999

£475,000

Nationwide

6.09%

Three-year fixed

fee free

£250,000

Nationwide

6.09%

Five-year fixed

£900 or £400 for FTBs

£250,000

NatWest

5.49%

Five-year fixed

£499

£500,000

Nationwide

6.29%

Five-year fixed

fee free

£250,000

Price hikes

It’s a shame that only two months on, lenders have quietly hiked their prices compared to what was on offer back in March when the scheme first launched.

Barclays has scrapped its 5% two-year and 5.89% four-year fixed rates for one more expensive option: a 6.09% three-year fixed rate. A spokesperson for Barclays told us the changes are a result of other lenders re-pricing.

NatWest has put its rates up by 0.5%. So instead of 4.29% and 4.99% the lender now offers the higher rates of 4.79% and 5.49% for a two- or five-year fixed mortgage respectively.

Nationwide has also raised the price of its five-year deals by 0.1% and only just reversed the decison to raise the price of their three-year deals by 0.2%; these remain competitive at 5.79% and 6.09% but still represent a 0.1% rise on the original launch price.

We will have to wait and see how Halifax behaves with its offers, but if the other three are anything to go by, we can expect to see a shift upwards once the fanfare of joining the NewBuy mortgage gang is over.

Is NewBuy a success?

It may be a bit early to be talking about the success of such a new scheme. No figures are available about the level of interest or the amount of people taking up the scheme (at least from anyone we contacted), but the price hikes beg the question of whether lenders are jeopardising the programme before it has even got going.

Steve Roche, Persimmon Homes’ group communications director (one of the developers on the NewBuy scheme) told us: “Initial interest in the scheme through our website was extremely positive and we were pleased that lenders were offering extremely competitive rates. However, we are concerned that as rates have risen to near 6% for the scheme, interest could be limited in the future. We remain supportive of the scheme and will watch with interest to see how lenders respond.”

Builders are starting to distrust the support of lenders and the lenders are doing as they please, but what about the buyers? Has anyone actually taken the plunge into this brave new world? Well, we know of at least one person who has.

Heena Rai moved into a new Bovis Home in Peterborough last month, becoming the first person in the UK to legally complete buying a house using the NewBuy mortgage scheme.  

The 27-year-old was keen to try the deal as she was tired of renting and wanted to own a property. Her experience of the deal is positive: pointing out how quick she was able to complete and reports that her mortgage is quite manageable.

So that’s one happy customer – but what about the thousands that this deal was meant to help?

Steve Turner, head of communications at the Home Builders Federation, who had a hand in designing the scheme, told us that they expect tens of thousands of sales hot off the heels of the first one last week. He warns that the programme is still in the very early stages of what will be a three- or four-year initiative and once more lenders come on board they anticipate more competitive rates.

More on mortgages:

The top 10 fixed rate mortgages

The hidden cost of buying a new build

Halifax unveils NewBuy 95% LTV mortgages

How to stand the best chance of getting a mortgage

Will borrowers with rented solar panels have trouble remortgaging?

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (8)

  • chrisscott666
    Love rating 3
    chrisscott666 said

    The reason it isn't working is its a total rip off, the houses are over priced putting new buyers straight into negative equality and the rates are extorniate from the banks, I relize they present a greater risk but just yesterday I got a buy to let at 3.4% and traditionally they are always higher than home loans, it's obviously a introductory offer and after a year it goes to 5% but that still less than these loans, there taking the poorest most vulnerable buyers and robbing them blind with a sceme dreamed up by house builders to shift more houses at greedy prices

    Report on 03 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • caz769
    Love rating 1
    caz769 said

    The houses in this scheme in our Area - Oxfordshire are so expensive and they all seem to be for 3 bed homes. My daughter and partner would love to set up a home but as they do not earn huge wages they'll never get the chance. The most they can get is £52K. Even with both sets of parents chipping in and fees etc, the cheapest property is over £100K. It isn't going to happen. Just have to keep playing the lottery and hoping :(

    Report on 03 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 64
    LandOfConfusion said

    From the article:

    "The NewBuy scheme is the latest attempt from the Government to re-energise the housing market."

    And

    @ caz769 said

    "The houses in this scheme in our Area - Oxfordshire are so expensive "

    In have to ask (again) why is the government meddling in the housing market? And why is it risking taxpayers' money in an attempt to price FTB'ers and young couples (like the above) out of the market?

    "the cheapest property is over £100K."

    I know how you feel. Here in the "outer metropolitan" area 1-bed flats in scumville sell for £126k. And even then it seems to be a Buy-To-Let only market, which is again mainly because both this and the last government have encouraged it's growth.

    Report on 03 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    Here we go again. If the government are inventing scams, this proves that house prices are too high. With the demise of the irresponsible interest only mortgages, and the general increases in mortgage rates, prices are getting ready to drop. Talk to any economist and they all refer to the house price bubble, and that means prices have one way to go, and a long way at that.

    Report on 03 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Happy Bunny
    Love rating 1
    Happy Bunny said

    Personally I feel this was never going to work across the board. I agree that it might help builders, but the general public. No. We need FTB to be able to afford the market so they can buy their first house and therefore move the chain along. If FTB can only afford new homes (and that is debatable) then the second hand market is in the hands of investors. Thank goodness for investors though - otherwise the market woud be truly stagnant!

    Report on 07 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 64
    LandOfConfusion said

    Happy Bunny said

    "We need FTB to be able to afford the market so they can buy their first house and therefore move the chain along. If FTB can only afford new homes (and that is debatable) then the second hand market is in the hands of investors."

    Absolutely.

    "Thank goodness for investors though"

    There was a piece on BBC news today about young couples renting in London who were being forced to move out on 2 weeks notice. It was because being in London the value of the rental had shot up and their landlords now wanted to capitalise on this.

    In effect everyone in the community, and that includes the renters, pay for the Olympics with those living in London paying the most. Now beingnpaid for by the community you might expect everyone to benefit equally but this isn't so. The landlords who have done nothing special and created no wealth end up benefiting massively from this while the having paid more than most for it not only get no direct benefit but actually lose out. Massively.

    So yes, thank goodness for 'investors'. If they weren't here then all that money might actually go back towards those that paid for it (the community) as opposed to those that haven't even lifted a finger.

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mel Ksham
    Love rating 0
    Mel Ksham said

    New Builds are still far too expensive, these schemes along with shared equity schemes I feel still favour the developers & are committing purchasers to paying over the odds for property. FTB I feel fall victim to being giving a helping hand by paying loaded rates & for overpriced property.

    Report on 14 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Hostageofthesystem
    Love rating 0
    Hostageofthesystem said

    I have to confess that I have been the recent victim of this hostage situation that is brewing in the UK over past several years. If it's not the government, then it's the lenders who screw you either way. My newbuy application was recently turned down by two lenders stating 'Insufficient credit score'. My score is 998 fyi!. Halifax did approve 80% LTV mortgage but refused to give 95% mortgage. It is obvious that the builders have overpriced their properties in the hope of recovering their newbuy contribution. Secondly the lenders know that the properties are overpriced and so are scared of lending upto 95% LTV because of fear of loosing out if the house goes in negative equity. So that's why I call it a hostage situation because on one hand builders are fooling around by hiking prices, and on the other hand lenders aren't ready to take the risk. As someone said before the interest rates are not low at all!! 6% for a such a fat mortgage is not a joke. This system is screwing us all and we are held hostage with little hope unless you have a dad or mum willing to lend you some fat cash (which unfortunately is not my case) hence the frustration. I think the Government should regulate house prices in wake of recession and should hold lenders to account where required.

    Report on 05 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).

Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4