Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » House prices

House price crashes are rarer than you think!

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 07 September 2010  |  Comments 25 comments

What goes up, must come down. Yet since the Fifties, house-price crashes have been surprisingly infrequent...

House price crashes are rarer than you think!

The recent house-price crash has left scars on many of the UK’s 17½ million homeowners.

After 12 years of rising prices between 1995 and 2007, many property gurus wrongly assumed that prices could only ever go up. However, the pin to burst this housing bubble arrived in the form of the credit crunch. The subsequent banking collapse, together with the deepest recession since the Thirties, sent house prices spiralling downwards.

After falling for more than 18 months, house prices pulled out of their slump and began rising again in the spring of 2009. However, the latest surveys indicate that the housing market is again faltering, raising the risk of a double-dip for house prices.

Housing crashes hardly ever happen

Thanks to the 2007-09 crash, the real risk of further house-price falls is firmly back in the public consciousness. Then again, history shows that declining house prices are, in fact, a fairly rare event -- in the post-war era, at least.

To find out what history tells us about the frequency and severity of house-price falls across the UK, let’s dig into the Halifax House Price Index (HPI) data, which go back to 1983:

Halifax House Price Index, 1983-2009

(All homes; seasonally adjusted)

Year

Average

price

Annual

change

Year

Average

price

Annual

change

1983

£31,621

N/A

1997

£69,657

5.4%

1984

£34,292

8.4%

1998

£73,286

5.2%

1985

£37,259

8.7%

1999

£81,596

11.3%

1986

£42,262

13.4%

2000

£86,095

5.5%

1987

£48,825

15.5%

2001

£96,337

11.9%

1988

£65,442

34.0%

2002

£121,138

25.7%

1989

£68,754

5.1%

2003

£140,687

16.1%

1990

£68,895

0.2%

2004

£161,742

15.0%

1991

£67,250

-2.4%

2005

£170,043

5.1%

1992

£61,643

-8.3%

2006

£187,250

10.1%

1993

£62,868

2.0%

2007

£197,388

5.4%

1994

£62,383

-0.8%

2008

£165,171

-16.3%

1995

£61,544

-1.3%

2009

£167,033

1.1%

1996

£66,094

7.4%

 

According to the UK’s biggest mortgage lender, house prices have declined nationally in only five years since 1983, most recently in 2008.

Although prices fell in four years in the early Nineties, this crash was nowhere near as steep or spectacular as the fallout from the credit crunch. Indeed, 2008 stands out in modern history as by far the worst year for house prices -- and the only double-digit yearly decline recorded by Halifax.

Thus, over the 26 years monitored by Halifax, house prices have risen 21 times -- a ‘success’ rate of 21/26, or 80.8%. In other words, yearly declines in house prices are a relatively infrequent event, happening on average only twice a decade.

Let’s go back to the Fifties

By turning to the Nationwide BS index, we can reach back into the Fifties for a better picture of the long-term trend in house prices, as my second table shows:

Nationwide BS House Price Index, 1952-2009

Year

Average

price

Annual

change

Year

Average

price

Annual

change

1952

1,891

N/A

1981

23,798

1.3%

1953

1,872

-1.0%

1982

25,580

7.5%

1954

1,853

-1.0%

1983

28,623

11.9%

1955

1,937

4.5%

1984

32,543

13.7%

1956

2,003

3.4%

1985

35,436

8.9%

1957

2,030

1.3%

1986

39,593

11.7%

1958

2,068

1.9%

1987

44,355

12.0%

1959

2,170

4.9%

1988

57,245

29.1%

1960

2,328

7.3%

1989

61,495

7.4%

1961

2,543

9.2%

1990

54,919

-10.7%

1962

2,673

5.1%

1991

53,635

-2.3%

1963

2,943

10.1%

1992

50,168

-6.5%

1964

3,185

8.2%

1993

51,050

1.8%

1965

3,418

7.3%

1994

52,114

2.1%

1966

3,586

4.9%

1995

50,930

-2.3%

1967

3,837

7.0%

1996

55,169

8.3%

1968

4,089

6.6%

1997

61,830

12.1%

1969

4,312

5.5%

1998

66,313

7.3%

1970

4,582

6.3%

1999

74,638

12.6%

1971

5,533

20.8%

2000

81,628

9.4%

1972

7,880

42.4%

2001

92,533

13.4%

1973

9,767

23.9%

2002

115,940

25.3%

1974

10,208

4.5%

2003

133,903

15.5%

1975

11,288

10.6%

2004

152,464

13.9%

1976

12,209

8.2%

2005

157,387

3.2%

1977

13,150

7.7%

2006

172,065

9.3%

1978

16,823

27.9%

2007

183,959

6.9%

1979

21,966

30.6%

2008

156,828

-14.7%

1980

23,497

7.0%

2009

162,116

3.4%

As you can see, after two slight falls in the early Fifties, house prices rose steadily from 1955 to 1989 -- an incredible 35-year streak. Then came the 1990-95 slide, followed by the bubble which finally popped in 2007.

According to Nationwide’s data, UK house prices have fallen just seven times in 57 years. With house prices rising 50 times out of 57, this gives a ‘success’ rate of 87.7% -- even higher than the 80.8% obtained from the Halifax data.

History can be a false friend

We’ve found that, on average, house prices drop in one or two years per decade, which is a very strong positive trend. Thus, anyone prepared to play a long game and ride out the occasional downturns should make money from property. Then again, if you get into trouble in the bad years, the gains of the good years can be wiped out, for example, by repossession.

John Fitzsimons looks at some simple ways to boost the value of your home.

For the record, Halifax’s data since 1983 generate average yearly growth of 6.6% in house prices. Since 1952, Nationwide has recorded average growth of 8.1%. However, were we to adjust for the very high inflation of the Seventies, these two figures would be much closer together.

Over long periods, when house prices rise faster than their long-term average, this increases the likelihood of ‘reversion to the mean’ -- in other words, a crash. Therefore, sustained future rises of more than, say, 6% to 7% a year would suggest further busts to come.

Finally, I would warn against getting too confident with these historical figures, because history can sometimes be a poor guide to the future. Following huge innovations in mortgage lending introduced in the Nineties and Noughties, the lending market-- and therefore the housing market -- led to reckless, risky loans.

Thus, now we’re back to sensible lending and national austerity measures, it could be many years before house prices start to boom again...

More:  Biggest drop in house prices since April 2009 | Bad news for landlords

At lovemoney.com, you can research all the best deals yourself using our online mortgage service, or speak directly to a whole-of-market, fee-free lovemoney.com broker. Call 0800 804 8045 or email mortgages@lovemoney.com for more help.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (25)

  • Harvey Jones
    Love rating 22
    Harvey Jones said

    Is this THE Cliff D'Arcy, house price bear par excellence?

    Harvey

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jonswatton
    Love rating 2
    jonswatton said

    Just bought by any chance Cliff ??

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • glads69
    Love rating 13
    glads69 said

    Damn, Harvey Jones & jonswatton, you took the words right out of my mouth....

    Cliff, your final sentence sounds so forlorn when what you are saying could be a good thing!

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Landlord
    Love rating 15
    Landlord said

    As a committed property investor AND investor in equities I can testify to the superior performance of property capital values plus rental yields. My properties have way outperformed my shares, even with the recent house price crash. Property certainly seems to be quite more reliable than shares and I am considering getting out of shares altogether and buying another couple of houses. Yes they are boring and require more day to day management but the long term returns are worth it. 

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • firstpastthepost
    Love rating 0
    firstpastthepost said

    As anyone noticed that the only time there have been drops in house prices excluding 2008 which was a world wide hit, was when we had extreme right wing conservative governments?

    Hold on tight homeowners here comes the next decade of falls

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ajrr1
    Love rating 11
    ajrr1 said

    firstpastthepost: your observation may be correct, but I would be interested to know why you think it's relevant (genuinely interested, absoultely no political agenda or preference here!). 

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • JD
    Love rating 3
    JD said

    firstpastthepost: We had the same problem in Australia in 88/89 under a labour government. And why do you discount 2008...what because Blairism doesn't support your questionable statement. A silly and ill informed comment.

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • drwho
    Love rating 0
    drwho said

    Your tables are a little 'cooked'. In 92 I sold a property for well under half it's value of two years earlier. I know many others that did the same, one even abandoned his house and left the country.

     I would suggest that your 'statistics' have been prepared by the same people who say the 1989 stockmarket crash didn't happen. Try getting the facts from those who were there.

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • TSK
    Love rating 5
    TSK said

    What Cliff does not mention is that house prices may have gone up through the decades but the value of the house has not altered. Price and value are two very different things. This is an important omission in an era of credit bubbles and QE. The way I look at it is that the value of the pound has been debased so that the value of £1 in 1952 is now £81 in 2009. House buying particularly since the 80's has been at the back of easy lending. In other words we have been buying houses with money that we didn't have. We indentured ourselves in a system where substantial part of the fruits of our labour (the tool through which wealth is created) for a long period of time went to the banks. the banks themselves are to all intents and purposes bankrupt and would not exist without direct and indirect taxpayer and central government support. This is wealth destruction on a massive scale.

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • miramoore
    Love rating 9
    miramoore said

    Unemployment, morgage restraints, inflation, and salaries stagnation are all going to affect the housing market negatively for a long time.

    The running cost of housing is going to rise. There may come a land tax soon.

    I foresee a very tough time ahead: a housing depression if not a crash. And people should be wary of "infinite growth": nothing can grow indefinetly (apart from the universe I'm told!).

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mick James
    Love rating 25
    Mick James said

    I can't see much value in monitoring a single variable across over very different epochs when so much has changed: employment patterns tenure, housebuilding, household formation, inflation--you name it.

    Even the "average" house will have changed radically Back in 1952 a "desirable" Victorian terrace would have been seen as a draughty ruin on a short lease requiring total modernisation. And so on. 

    I'd like to see real house prices graphed against real household wages

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Diamond Dave
    Love rating 3
    Diamond Dave said

    Im afraid this article is meaningless? The only true way to examine the property market is the same as you would any investment. Too state that we are NOT! in for a 2nd dip is naive beyond belief, when the only support for the property market is artificially low interest rates. Property, in the real world should be valued at 3.5 annual salary and we are still nowhere near these levels. 

    Warren Buffet would call the property market as would any fundamental investor as Over valued still.

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    Mick James - I agree: there's little point in using the non-inflation-adjusted figures in the tables provided by Cliff. The huge increases around 1973 and 1979 reflect the large inflation values then, not some boom in real values.

    I believe the stats show that people have been gradually devoting a larger and larger proportion of their income to housing, largely because they can afford to as overall national wealth has increased and the cost of living, such as for food, has dropped enormously as a proportion of people's income. Housing is seen as desireable and worth spending money on, geared with the availability of mortgage credit and a highly favourable tax regime for principal private residences since 1965.

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    This report is so full of holes, I can't be bothered to discuss them all.

    These tabled figures don't look correct. We have price crashes about once every 18 years. They crashed back in the early 70's, late 70's (shotened cycle due to massive inflation), the 90's in particular and now. You have not included inflation in your arguments, for example, prices declined 33% in the 90's, but in value terms 50% when inflation is considered as well.

    Your conclusion that houses make a reasonable percentage each year presumably is based on tadays prices, but these will collapse back, thus reducing the overall increase.

    From Aug 2007 and for 18 months, prices dropped 25% and at a rate

    that was twice as fast as any previous decline. The last 18 months

    prices have held their own, but only because interst rates were 0.5%. This fiddling with the economy cannot go on forever. The economic forces are in place. Prices will decine another25%, making 50% in total. The average price will revert to 90, 000GBP.

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 64
    LandOfConfusion said

    I have to agree with some of the above posters (TSK, Matchmade and in particular Nickpike). One thing I'd add however is that during crashes house prices have historically always intersected - and fallen though - the mean, thereby maintaining it (plus a little for growing living standards). During the latest phase of this crash it looked like that was going to happen again until... Bang! Labour stepped in with taxpayers' money and the BoE cut interest rates to the bone.

    At a fundamental level HP'es are still not sustainable. Where is the money (wealth) going to come from? A highly indebted nation? A highly indebted government? A central bank currently wrestling with stagflation?

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Hardtruth
    Love rating 66
    Hardtruth said

    Oh dear firstpastthepost not exactly the brightest button on the jacket are you. The historical data actually makes the point of how party politically independent the whole thing is and you made the opposite conclusion...Doh!

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • mwbell
    Love rating 1
    mwbell said

    TSK, Spot on. The fractional reserve banking system causes this, as the money supply increases the paper money in the system loses its buying power thus it takes more pieces of devalued paper to buy the same asset. but while this process takes place wages pensions and savings are all devalued = house prices rise 10% wages rise 5% Your getting poorer. Deflation has the opposite effect the shrinking of the money supply is like taking water out of the orange juice the paper money becomes stronger, so it takes less stronger paper to buy the same asset. Its all one big fraud, google "The money masters" whatch the vid. PS "Famous banking quotes" at the same site by very famous people from history are unbeleivable !!!

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • supasap
    Love rating 19
    supasap said

    I wouldn't call a drop of 16% in 2008 a crash......... I have known blue chip companies to lose more than this over weeks, seems to me we have never had crashes in UK housing just corrections but I believe we may be heading for a proper crash once deflation sets in ie a drop of about 30 to 50%........ it has happened in other countries and despite what we may think we are not unique in the UK, once people start selling assets en masse then the housing crash will happen

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • essexman
    Love rating 1
    essexman said

    one big problem with the analysis

    House prices - these indexes do not show prices only mortgage offers. The closest indexes come to prices is the Land registry - and they discount cash purchases not to skew the figures.

    With the high volume of cash purchases at the moment LR figures are a less reliable measure than normal.

    The focus on Halifax and Nationwide is because of volume and speed; mostly speed. They both probably understate prices during a rise and overstate prices during a fall.

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MouthyRob
    Love rating 14
    MouthyRob said

    Some corrections:

    Supasap: I'm not sure why we're talking about deflation when we can't even get inflation down to the BoE target rate...

    MWBell: Fractional reserve banking relates to the ratio of money banks have to hold in deposit relative to the amount they can lend out, the physical money supply you're talking about is controlled by the BoE. Deflation isn't a reduction in this money supply, it's a reduction in the price of goods/assets. (which sounds good but is generally condered a bad thing).

    LandofConfusion: I wouldn't be so sure of conviction in terms of plummeting house prices. We've all been led to believe we're hugely overstretched in debt (and maybe we are), but the IMF recently stated that the UK actually has a fair bit of debt headroom to go before we'd actually be in any sort of real trouble. Cuts are probably needed, but the reality is they won't affect the majority of the population.

    Report on 07 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 64
    LandOfConfusion said

    MouthyRob, you make some interesting points so let's have a look:

    Deflation: As you say to MWBell "[classical] Deflation isn't a reduction in this money supply, it's a reduction in the price of goods/assets." which is generally true but is it not also true that a reduction in the money supply can (and usually does) lead to deflation?

    (Getting a bit technical, the M4 measure shows an overall contraction of credit, which incidentally is one reason why the BoE is keeping IR's pinned at 0.5%. Contracting money supply = less money chasing same number of goods, a deflationary senario).

    Debt: The problem (as I see it) is that there is far too much of it and it is badly distributed. People (usually the ones with houses) have taken on shedloads of debt and it seems mostly done so though equity withdrawal. They are now poorly positioned to survive any new deflationary event or IR spike.

    Now obviously I could be wrong but neither of these factors would seem to support house prices and when you factor in government cuts (expenditure which allegedly added to our GDP(?!) ), things aren't looking so good.

    Report on 08 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • emmandkev
    Love rating 0
    emmandkev said

    In 1990 the average house price (based on Halifax's HIP) was 3.51 x the average UK salary (source HMRC).

    By 2008 the average house price had risen to 8.06 x the average UK salary (again source HMRC).

    NOW that is scary and to my mind something has to give. Either our sarl;ies are going to have to climb rapidly (yeah, right!) or house prices are going to have to fall or at best remain static for a long time to come.

    Certainly, those who have assumed that they can cash in on the capital appreciation of their home will have to think again.

    Report on 08 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LandOfConfusion
    Love rating 64
    LandOfConfusion said

    emmandkev,

    Judging by the BoE's actions, salaries will have to rise as inflation takes hold and the base rate remains pinned to the floor.Otherwise we'll see quite a few MP's offloading their BTL portfolios, which surely can't be good for the economy.

    Report on 09 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • meldrewreborn
    Love rating 44
    meldrewreborn said

    The fundamental driver behind high house prices is undersupply. Whether housing is owned or rented people have to live somewhere. We're tending to live longer, live in smaller groups and have net immigration - all these things are pushing up housing need. On the other hand we're simply not building enough new properties to meet either current new demand or to address previous years of under supply.

    Affordable housing, whether owned or rented, needs massively increased new building. Other products are becomming cheaper as time goes on and people are able to spend more of their incomes on rent or mortgages. So while there are short term issues impacting house prices at present I don't see house prices falling in the medium to long term unless house building is massively increased. And essentially that means easing up on planning controls for its the high price of zoned land that drives the selling price of new build.

    The current levelling off in house prices is disguising the fact that many people want to buy if only they could get a reasonably priced mortgage in the LTV they need. If lending conditions eventually relax there will be a huge boom in buying by those whose ambitions are currently frustrated.

    Report on 10 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • firstpastthepost
    Love rating 0
    firstpastthepost said

    Ajrr1 - the logic being that Government policies in those years led to falling house prices (self created recessions - self created because of conservative/monetarist polices). This Government will create the climate whereby it will be inevitable that house prices fall - low employment, low investment etc just as Thatcher/Major governments did.

    JD - 2008 was different because it was a world event, not one created by an individual governments policies. Blair can be blamed for many things but creating a world slump gives him more credit than he deserves.

    Finally Hardtruth - well what can I say to someone who uses a phrase from a cartoon show, other than keep watching it because you clearly shouldnt be testing yourself on anything more challenging particularly if you think the data is telling you what you think.

    Botom line is the article was saying house prices rise more than they fall - my point was they fell when government policies created a climate of deflation and retrenchment exactly what we can expect under this government.

    Report on 11 September 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable)

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV1