Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » House prices

The future of house prices

Neil Faulkner
by Lovemoney Staff Neil Faulkner on 21 May 2010  |  Comments 30 comments

We review the top 5 arguments for and against short-term house price growth

The future of house prices

By the simple measure I use for house prices – the long-term trend – prices are somewhat high now. But, if they remain at the same level, they'll be somewhat low in just two years, as I explained in Should I buy or carry on ranting?

For that reason, I don't think house prices are something homeowners need to worry about if they're taking a longer viewpoint.

But will there be some help for first-time buyers with another short-term drop in prices? I'll let you give your best guess on that. To help you, here are the leading arguments both for and against. Bear in mind these viewpoints are for average prices and that regional changes can be markedly different.

The bear case

1. Interest rates

John Fitzsimons looks at some simple ways to boost the value of your home.

Interest rates have a massive impact on house prices and I think most people would consider rapidly rising interest rates to be one of the most likely causes of a crash. Many of the bears (people who believe the market will fall in the short term) consider a crash inevitable, because interest rates can only go one way from here – up.

Whilst I agree rates can probably only go one way, I don't think that necessarily means they'll go all the way. They might stay low for such a long time that house prices, were they to stagnate, would have a soft landing. It's all about the long-term trend.

Just to stress, I'm not saying rates will stay low for a long time, I'm just pointing out that it's possible. High interest rates in the next few years are also possible.

2. Availability of credit

One of the main reasons commentators and readers are predicting more falls is that within a year the Bank of England is due to start removing support for banks. That means they'll have a shortage of cash to lend, and it seems unlikely that the banks will be ready to support themselves by then. Fewer borrowers will be able to get mortgages, so the demand for property will fall, and it would hardly be surprising if property prices followed.

However, a collapse in lending and house prices won't help the economy, so we must question whether the Bank would really remove support if it's still needed.

3. Supply and demand

The supply and demand argument contributes to both the bear and bull cases. (A bull is the opposite of a bear.) Here on the bear side, there's a report from RICs that sellers outweigh buyers and the gap is widening.

Related how-to guide

Sell your home

If you want to obtain the best possible price when selling your home, then these ideas should help.

I don't know if that's true but, with lenders saying they expect stagnation this year, that probably means they expect falls too. (He said with his cynical hat on. Lenders tend to big-up the housing market with optimistic forecasts and statements.) Let's not forget that lenders have an utterly abysmal track record with forecasts, however.

Some say that landlords will also sell up, and fast, largely because of more taxes and an increased-regulatory burden.

I think we should remember that landlords are just one part of the supply and demand equation. What's more, I read a report only in April that at least as many landlords want to buy more property.

4. The economy

From unemployment – and the prospect of more to come with Government spending cuts – to our overwhelming debt, our situation is probably worse than fragile. Everything is interconnected, so any further deterioration could easily lead to another fall in house prices.

5. House prices compared to incomes

When looking at wages to house prices, we're still paying way more for properties than the historical average. The assumption is that house prices are therefore far too high.

More on that in the bull case.

The bull case

1. Supply and demand

Related blog post

The bulls argue that there is a housing shortage and hence prices must rise. This is usually supported by quoting the Barker Report into housing and by forecasts that the population will rise from 60m to 80m over the next 40 years.

Personally, I think it's unwise to rely on this for short-term forecasts.

House prices fell recently despite those statistics and they could do so again. Those facts, assuming they're true, can be used more reliably to predict long-term patterns, not what's going to happen over 12-24 months.

2. House prices compared to incomes

Whilst the bears say prices are too high on this measure, the bulls say that dual-income households are more normal these days, which puts house prices on a fairer level.

3. Mortgage repayments

Another popular argument is that we can currently easily afford our monthly repayments, due to low interest rates.

The major weak point of this argument is that interest rates could easily rise. Human nature being what it is, many homeowners won't have been doing the sensible thing of saving for such a disaster.

4. Buyer confidence

It's been argued by some bulls that buyer confidence itself will lift prices and it's certainly true that us property crazy Brits and Northern Irish can get a little bit excited.

On the other hand, you don't hear many people these days who say they're not at all worried about the economy and our massive debt. I just don't get the sense of that much buyer confidence right now.

5. More mortgage lending

Finally, it's been claimed that mortgage lending has more than doubled since the bottom and it's believed that it'll continue to grow, supporting house prices.

However, you can see the sorts of conflicting data and reports that we're dealing with when you contrast that with the figures revealed in House prices are going to crash again. Remember that most reports will come from biased sources, which adds an extra layer of difficulty for making short-term forecasts.

More: Free online banking tool | Homeowners: Wave goodbye to HIPs and hello to £200 | You’re destroying the value of your home!

At lovemoney.com, you can research all the best deals using our online mortgage service, or speak directly to a whole-of-market, no-fee lovemoney.com broker. Call 0800 804 4045 or email mortgages@lovemoney.com for more help.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (30)

  • flannel
    Love rating 0
    flannel said

    Other bear indicators which may cause a flood of properties onto the market and thus lower prices:

    1) High CGT on BTLs, although introduction date unknown (prob. April 2011)

    2) Removal of HIPs

    Report on 21 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Neil Faulkner
    Love rating 32
    Neil Faulkner said

    Hi flannel. Thanks for your comment.

    I touched on your first point in my article, but not the second.

    I think the first will surely have an effect, but can't say how big.

    The effect of the second one would be fairly minimal I'd guess, as I can't imagine many people will have been put off selling because of HIPs. HIPs cost just a few hundred which is nothing compared to all the estate agent fees and the property value itself. As I wrote in another piece recently, most people think in percentages instead of pounds (even though that's often illogical):

    http://www.lovemoney.com/news/make-your-money-go-further/improve-your-finances/what-can-we-learn-from-victoria-beckham--elton-john-4878.aspx

    Neil

    Report on 21 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    I don't think an increase in CGT will flood the market - most landlords were living with 40% CGT as recently as 2008 anyway, so there will be very few people who will change their business plans because of this: we've barely got used to the 18% rate anyway!

    A more likely source of another crash will be further heavy job losses, which is likely from the public sector (and about time), coupled with a downturn in Europe and runaway inflation in the UK which requires an increase in interest rates. However moderate inflation will not necessarily be a bad thing as it will help to reduce the real level of private and government debt, though of course it will also reduce the value of cash savings and any capital embedded in your house if house prices stay static.

    Very few new houses are being built, which will help keep supply low. Prices in London will be supported by foreign buyers profiting from the cheap pound, but not elsewhere.

    On balance I think the market is most likely to drift lower or stay static for a year or three, and this will be no bad thing: give us all some stability and allow people to build up their savings and/or deposits.

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • stu531
    Love rating 9
    stu531 said

    Matchmade - "A more likely source of another crash will be further heavy job losses, which is likely from the public sector (and about time)"

    ... remember these are real people - many of which read LM as well. It's not really fair that public sector workers lose their jobs, whilst it was the banking sector at the root cause of it all, is it...?

    Back to the subject matter: I think the next few months will be very revealing either way. If the dollar gets stronger and stirling ever weaker due to the problems in Europe, there will be fair reason to raise interest rates. And, as there is less government spending, there will be less money going to the private sector on contracts: therefore, you'll see job losses there too. Not nice for anyone losing their job - don't forget that. All this will have an effect on house prices.

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • petepetrolhead
    Love rating 0
    petepetrolhead said

    I suspect one reason that the 2008 "crash" in house prices was not so bad as predicted by some is that many people declined to offer their houses for sale at a low price and didn't put them on the market. Certainly where I live, the number of properties for sale shrank to almost nothing. So far from there being more sellers than buyers, the situation was almost reversed, which helped stop prices plummeting.

    For this reason, I agree with matchmade that the market is much more likely to drift slowly downwards or stay static. Does this make me half bull/half bear? (Or maybe half man/half beast....).

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 600
    Mike10613 said

    Two things will mainly affect house prices, wages and unemployment. When we have more employment and wages start to rise with inflation house prices will rise. It wages are stagnant and unemployment grows; house prices will be stagnant and even drop in places. This ain't rocket science; it's common sense...

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nickpike
    Love rating 277
    nickpike said

    HPC wasn't so bad because of 0.5% interest rates.

    IRs have one way to go, and when they rise, prices will drop. There is nowhere near enough intrinsic value in pricing a house at 250k when it costs 70k to build. The rest is the kidology price of land.

    It's just a question of when. With inflation ballooning, it could be soon. Inflation is no blip. Ther's 200 billion reasons why inflation is in vogue.

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Luniversal
    Love rating 47
    Luniversal said

    Neil asks if he should "buy or carry on ranting".

    I vote for the latter. I enjoyed both his latest pieces.

    There hasn't been much of a crash in house prices yet, because HMG loaded the scales in favour of mortgagors and against us poor mugs who save. How long it can continue this rake's progress is another matter-- the financial markets may force interest costs off the floor. But governments always like to keep money cheap if it inflates away the repayment burden of their own borrowings, which are now dropsical.

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • DownTheBoozer
    Love rating 4
    DownTheBoozer said

    I think the key thing that will cause house prices to fall considerably is higher interest rates.

    We are in a desperate situation in this country with the national debt. The MPC and govt are hell bent on keeping rates low regardless of what inflation is doing - that is clear. Its that old trick of eroding your debt through inflation and debasing your currency.

    The only thing that will force the MPC and govts hand is if confidence in the gilt market erodes, we get a run on the pound and are forced to defend our currency through higher rates.

    This is the big gamble you take when buying property now. Will the UK limp along, manage to keep the bond vigilantes away and maintain low rates for 2-3 years or will they eat us for breakfast.

    My money is on the Bond vigilantes winning the game once the attention moves away from the European situation and clearly focussed on us!

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • MikeGG1
    Love rating 881
    MikeGG1 said

    We have a shortage of housing but it is predominantly in SE England. I can't see prices falling there much but elsewhere it is a different story.

    The SE is far too crowded already so we could do with some help in reducing the demand here. That could come in the form of cheaper housing elsewhere.

    More jobs elsewhere would also help but I don't think there will be the money to do that at the moment.

    Mike

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Mick James
    Love rating 25
    Mick James said

    Forgive me but I'm not entirely grasping how an increase in interest rates, a shortage of lending and a continued economic downturn counts towards "help for first-time buyers".

    OK so you might be able to get your first home for x% less but if the cost of servicing your mortgage triples, you need to find a vastly bigger deposit and jump through multiple hoops to get one and you lose your job, you're hardly winning, are you?

    Secure job prospects, real growth in wages and access to borrowing at reasonable rates are the only things likely to help first-time buyers, but unless something happens about supply then all these things will only feed HPI.

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Yiam Cross
    Love rating 0
    Yiam Cross said

    The only thread holding prices up is sellers still having a choice over whether or not to sell.

    As more & more people find themselves with little, if anything, left in the savings pot but more money going out, that choice is going to be taken away. If inflation continues to rise & interest rates follow while incomes stand still, shrink or even vanish, increasing pressure in the supply pipeline will very quickly dampen the market or possibly flood it.

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • creative
    Love rating 7
    creative said

    I AM FED UP with constant speculation - give it a rest, oops forgot you get paid for writing this stuff don'y you?

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MrRee
    Love rating 66
    MrRee said

    as I explained in Should I buy or carry on ranting?

    I would continue ranting if I were you ;-)

    Report on 25 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • peneth72
    Love rating 0
    peneth72 said

    I for one would love to move. I like moving house. However I live in a modest 3 bed semi, and although its cramped for the 5 of us who live there there is no way I could afford to move. The price increase to the next size up home is shocking so I'd rather stay put. I'm not paying £200 extra each month for the next 20 yrs so that the girls can have their own rooms.

    Unless we win the lottery we arn't moving.

    Report on 26 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Neil Faulkner
    Love rating 32
    Neil Faulkner said

    This piece isn't for you, creative, but many people do want to try to forecast property prices. My summary of the main arguments will help them to do that.

    Neil

    Report on 26 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    stu531: I'm perfectly well aware that pubilc sector workers are real people, and so are all the private-sector people who;'ve already lost their jobs because the private sector has already taken steps to control its costs. The fact is that the public sector is massively over-manned given our level of income (tax, mostly paid for the private sector to pay for the luxury of public services and the workers' generous pay and pensions). The UK Government borrows £1 in every £4 that it spends! Many of the public sector workers you are defending were only taken on in the first place because the UK's tax income was unduly flattered by massive bank profits in the mid-noughties. Now that tax income has collapsed with the recession, we clearly need to cut back on expenditure in the public sector, and that means job cuts. The banks may have "caused" the recession - and so did our demand for the money they lent out - but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't then cut our expenditure to match our income afterwards. We have to live within our means.

    nickpike: I'm a builder and there is no way you can build a house for £70K, not with all the new buildings regs and Section 106 taxes, legal fees and so on. For a "normal" 3-bed house sized 120m2, you're looking at £120K at least, plus £12K in S106, plus planning costs over the two years it takes to get planning permission, loan interest, professional fees and all the rest. In much of the South-east outside London £250K is a very fair price for a 3-bedder, especially if you include the low running and maintenance cost of new houses.

    Report on 26 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • starenterprise1
    Love rating 9
    starenterprise1 said

    Property is expensive, the pound is weakening further, first time buyers are non-existent, tax will rise, interest rates will rise by the end of the year in line with inflation. The pound will go up then thankfully. Property is going down with demand that is why the lenders are not lending easily, they know. Unemployment will rise in the short term, we wont have a crisis though, but we will get it together. CRASH!

    Report on 26 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jaymie
    Love rating 18
    jaymie said

    @creative: I agree with Neil here. If you're fed-up of speculation on house prices, why would you click on an article called "The future of house prices"? It's hardly an ambiguous heading!

    Report on 26 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • moneyspider
    Love rating 0
    moneyspider said

    As a nurse in the NHS with 30yrs service under my belt, i would like to ask matchmade where i can find the work that will pay me generously ?

    True, i have a pension scheme, for which i'll contribute to for another 10 yrs in order to receive my full entitlement ie; half my annual salary per annum. However, this part of my contract is under threat by my employers. I have never received a financial bonus for aims and targets being met. In fact i have never received a bonus at all...it doesn't work like that.

     I have had to be prudent...you can't afford to borrow a lot of money on most public sector pay. The majority of public sector employees work for a salary that most private sector would sniff their noses at. Or at least used to when the going was good.

    Indeed when i bought my own house 20 years ago, i had to stress to my mortgage lender that my income was my full-time salary. Mistakenly it had been assumed i worked part-time from the figure i had given.

    On top of that it would appear you want me to be grateful to you for providing the money to employ me through your taxes. I'm sure you haven't realised, but i pay taxes too.

    But i shall consider your opinion tonight as i work on my over-manned ward !??

    Report on 26 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • JRAY100
    Love rating 52
    JRAY100 said

    Inevitably and inexorably house prices will return to the norm of 3.5 x salary... one never knows when... the liquid nature of the stock market means that it can readjust to the norm very quickly... the nature of housing means that the reaction is much more sluggish... people do not really wish to accept that the party is over... property investments have been their dream... this is a judgement on our ability in being enterprising... why is it so difficult for people to even believe that they can 'make it' in the UK?

    Report on 26 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • philippasutton
    Love rating 10
    philippasutton said

    I noticed recently that the housing market here (NE) seemed to be very lively. I spoke to a surveyor who said they were very busy. Seemed a little odd, and then I factored in one more thing which hasn't been mentioned here.

    Everyone seems to be anticipating a rise in VAT - probably to 20%. Now you don't pay VAT on a house, but you DO pay it to your solicitor, your surveyor, your removals firm, the man who comes to fit the new satellite dish, the local team of trademen who fit the carpets, re-paint the blue bedroom pink and vice versa, the new bed linen, the change of address cards, the "welcome to our new home" party goods, the plants for the garden ...

    And that's before you've paid the cost of selling your old house - estate agents fees are just about to go up by 2.5%, as is the cost of cleaning it out, hiring a skip, paying the council to take away the almost-bust washing machine ...

    The cost of the actual move is just about to go up by at least 2.5%, and that's before all the rest of your living expenses rise too.

    I predict a month of frenetic activity as people try to get the job done before the Osborne effect hits the housing market.

    After that, the deluge.

    Report on 28 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • everybear1
    Love rating 2
    everybear1 said

    Surely it depends if we get real about the situation we are in. We will never have proper employment while we prop up housing the way we do. It makes living here so expensive and makes us uncompetative in the gobal village we live in. I own my own house but I know many who are living in rented rooms, who are on relatively stable jobs with reasonable pay. These young people feel this exclusion keenly and the country really cannot afford them to leave and take their skills elsewhere. Second home ownership should be so costly it should be banned and no homes should be owned by non citizens because this is a scarce and precious resource in this Country. Time for change.

    Report on 28 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • plebshadowofra
    Love rating 1
    plebshadowofra said

     Given that it is generally cheaper to rent, younger people should simply look into buying elsewhere and continue renting. UK market looks like an old-money/rich man's game right now. Similar to UK stocks maybe - there is better value elsewhere (emerging markets wrt stocks). If you really want to buy, then buy-to-let something small and manageable close to a city if the numbers are right for you.  

    It is ridiculous that a massive chunk of Joe Public's pay is required simply to rent a modest home and that one's entire annual pay cannot even cover the mortage interest on the same home.

    Report on 28 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • debtwagon
    Love rating 6
    debtwagon said

    matchmade, you do love to have a go at the public sector despite the fact that the whole situation we're in has been caused by greedy private-sector activity. And when they do lose their jobs, we'll spend public money on them anyway, via the job centre.

    Report on 29 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bubbie007
    Love rating 0
    bubbie007 said

    The simple reality is that every 'expert' has called the housing market wrong. Property in the UK was regarded as a money maker by many speculators and this market is now turning to normality where people buy houses to live in. There is still some further shake-out as amateur property speculators exit the market. Perhaps we can get back to a situation where a house is a long term asset (even if one moves home) and the intention is to pay the house off by age 50. What happens to property values in between is of academic interest only. The long term trend for housing is directly linked to the inflation is building costs and land shortage. For the UK that means 'up' and 'up'.

    Regarding affordability, young people in the UK needs to realise that it is foolhardy to expect a young person to own a property before the age of 30. The UK financial system that enabled young people to get into property in the past decade was flawed and not likely to be repeated in the next decade. Young people are going to have to rent for about ten years to build a deposit (and not waste it on cars and holidays) or stay with their parents - or get their parents to help with the deposits . For those of us on the cusp of our 50's - this is how we got into our homes. I was a professional engineer with a good job and bought my first home at 29 with a 25% deposit. I never borrowed against my home and used all my bonuses in the first 10 years to reduce my loan. 

    Report on 30 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    debitwagon: I am only "having a go" at the public sector because the country's current expenditure is clearly unsustainable. Perhaps you'd like to tell us how a £167 billion pound deficit can be maintained over the long term for the luxury of all these public services you think you're entitled to. The current crisis was caused by a combination of a financial market collapse *and* excessive expenditure on public services by government. The UK is living way, way beyond its means.

    Report on 31 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeS
    Love rating 0
    MikeS said

    Matchmade,

    Rarely have I hear such uninformed comment.

    The financial mess of this coutry was cause exclusively by the finacial sector chasing inflated bonus' without regard to the instability they were introducing into the system. The public sector are now being made the whipping boys of the recession, while the bonus culture returns to the city. Presumably you have your private healthcare, private schools for your children etc etc, otherwise you would be concerned at the savage cull of public sector staff & services. The debt has rocketted due to the then Governments attempts to support the economy - god knows where we would be if Cameron had been in power at that point, probably somewhere around Greece's level.

    I can only assume that you have never needed to use Public services, because only at that point do you truly appreciate them.

    Report on 31 May 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    MikeS - people will get tired of this debate, but as it happens, my fiancee works for the NHS and I don't have any private healthcare etc. Please keep your class prejudices private. You can blame bankers all you wish, but you're not dealing with the basic question: irrespective of who's to blame, the country's tax income has collapsed because of the recession, hundreds of thousands of private-sector jobs have been lost, the Government is spending £4 for every £3 it "earns", and has an annual deficit of £167 billion. How do you propose to deal with this situation?

    Report on 03 June 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • debtwagon
    Love rating 6
    debtwagon said

    matchmade, if your fiancee gets made redundant, will your response be "Bastards!" or "Sorry love, it's for the greater good"?

    A few suggestions: Cancel Trident for a start. Nationalise all of the banks. Bring all the electricity and gas companies back into public ownership under a single energy authority. Get the unemployed building roads and railways and other infrastructure. Abolish child benefit for the better off. Get out of Afghanistan and Iraq and wherever else we're poking our noses in.

    Report on 20 July 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3