Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » House prices

Your home is worth more if you vote Tory!

John Fitzsimons
by Lovemoney Staff John Fitzsimons on 22 April 2010  |  Comments 43 comments

Your home is worth £89,000 more if you choose to vote Tory over Labour.

Your home is worth more if you vote Tory!

It’s been a funny old election campaign so far. I had to pinch myself over the weekend when I saw the front page of a Sunday newspaper with the headline “Clegg almost as popular as Churchill”. After a bit of a false start, things are now moving apace.

The way you decide to cast your vote can come down to all sorts of factors. Perhaps you were brought up in a household that had only ever voted one way? Maybe you are going to base your vote on the leader debates? Perhaps you read each manifesto cover to cover (even I’m not that sad) and decide on that basis?

Or perhaps the value of your home plays a part...

Vote Tory for an expensive house

Property information website Zoopla has put together some fascinating research on the value of homes in the various constituencies of the three main parties, with some interesting results.

Buying your first house is a big step, but many first-time buyers make these classic mistakes

Perhaps conforming to certain stereotypes, if you live with a Conservative-controlled constituency, chances are your home will be worth a few bob. According to the study, if you tend to vote blue, your home will be worth on average £257,500, far and away the top of the tree.

This will likely not come as a great surprise when you consider the traditional image of the Conservative Party as the party of the moneyed classes, out to protect the status quo. A glance at the constituency map and where the Tories hold seats reinforces the fact that it’s no great surprise that their homes tend to be more expensive – vast swathes of the South are blue seats, with only the occasional red or yellow blotch.

In last month’s piece The street where homes cost £7m!, Kensington came out as the area with the biggest proliferation of mega-expensive homes, so it’s almost inevitable that it is a Tory seat.

What’s more, those Tory areas have done pretty well out of 13 years of New Labour – the value of the homes in these regions has jumped an incredible 179% on average since Blair and his gang first entered Downing Street.

  • Watch this video:

You’ll do ok if you vote Lib Dem

The second placed party are the Liberal Democrats, with average property prices of £228,880. While the party has just 62 seats, a number of them are in pretty affluent places, which really helps to bump up their average.

Related goal

Cut your mortgage costs and pay off your mortgage early

Find out how to cut the cost of your mortgage by hundreds of pounds a month and become mortgage-free years earlier.

For example, the Lib Dems hold the moneyed constituency of Richmond Park in West London, while areas such as Lewes on the South Coast, as well as all of Cornwall and parts of Devon represent places where many people would love to live, with all the benefits of living beside the sea.

As with Tory constituencies, properties in these areas have boomed price-wise since 1997, jumping an astonishing 190%, and have particularly flourished since the last election – an increase of more than 10%, far higher than either of the big two.

And in third place...

Way back in third place, with an average value of just £168,000, are the Labour constituencies.

Related blog post

That’s a massive 53% less than the Conservative areas, a huge difference. This is only emphasised when you consider that the total value of properties in Labour or Tory seats is the same at £1.9 trillion, despite Labour controlling 4.5 million more homes.

And while homes in Labour areas have seen similar gains to those in Tory areas (177% compared to 179%), properties in these areas remain almost 20% below the national average.

Sticking to stereotypes, this perhaps isn’t THAT surprising. Historically at least, the Labour Party has been the party of the working classes, those without yachts and acres of land.

There is also the North/South divide, with Northern England something of a Labour stronghold. It perhaps should not be a surprise to see that the majority of the 10 cheapest streets to buy a home are found within Labour areas.

I live next door to the PM...

The situation is even more pronounced if you live in the same constituency as any of the men who would be Prime Minister.

Recent question on this topic

If you happen to live in the Witney constituency, the home of David Cameron, then you enjoy frankly astronomical average house prices, with the typical property worth £289,686. What’s more, if you have lived there since 1997 you will have seen your property rise in value from £98,756 - that's an increase of almost £200,000, in a little over a decade.

If instead you live in Sheffield Hallam, the constituency of flavour of the month Nick Clegg, then your property will likely be worth in the region of £219,136, slightly less than the average Liberal Democrat constituency. What’s more, the town has seen very modest growth in the last five years, certainly by Lib Dem standards, of just over 5%.

While Gordon Brown’s constituency of Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath has seen sharp house price growth since the last election of almost 20%, it doesn’t stop him languishing in last place, with property values averaging £120,910, miles below not only the other leaders but even the typical Labour constituency values.

The end of boom and bust

It’s easy to jump to conclusions about the sort of people that vote for each party based on these results, but personally I’m a bit uneasy about doing that.

What is beyond question though is that they demonstrate clearly just how much property prices have boomed, across the country, since that day in May 1997 when the country agreed that things could indeed only get better.

Growth of around 200% in some constituencies is simply astonishing, and with that in mind it’s easy to see why some still hold out hope for a further correction that would make it far easier for first-time buyers to access the property ladder, and make things a little more realistic.

However, with house prices on the rise again, it seems to me that UK property prices will continue to confound logic (and gravity) for a little while longer at least.

More: The cost of voting | Letting agents are a waste of money!

Compare mortgages with lovemoney.com

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (43)

  • andybute
    Love rating 4
    andybute said

    Fairly typical. An inflammatory but ultimately misleading headline leads into a load of trite platitudes about the housing profiles of the voting country. Is this is tabloid journalism pandering to naive twentysomethings - I think it is. 

    It's not all about how much your house is worth - look where that got us last time! 

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • easygoing
    Love rating 156
    easygoing said

    An attention grabbing headline followed by an article stating the obvious. Homes are dearer where the rich folks live and cheaper where the poor folks are. Dreadful tabloid journalism worthy of the Daily Mail. If this site has to have credibility then you have to do better than this.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  5 loves
  • zexel
    Love rating 0
    zexel said

    Oh come on.... What an utter load of bollards.

    LV is getting rather desperate for page hits eh!?

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • c3menzies
    Love rating 14
    c3menzies said

    Hmmm - not good - must try harder - 0/10 - detention after school

    Write out 100 times "I must not write obvious, platitutinous rubbish with misleading headlines"

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • zexel
    Love rating 0
    zexel said

     @

    c3menzies

    "platitutinous"!

    Lovely...That was the word I was looking for instead of 'bollards'.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • wyndymiller
    Love rating 1
    wyndymiller said

    HMMM - An interesting headline but a total waste of time. What are you trying to say? If Gordon Brown moved South the property prices would decrease.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • DownTheBoozer
    Love rating 4
    DownTheBoozer said

    I agree. What a load of drivel.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • smashley113
    Love rating 0
    smashley113 said

    I am very disappointed by this headline and article.

    Misleading and then obvious.

    I expect more from this website.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • JingleBell
    Love rating 4
    JingleBell said

    Comparing growth in Camerons constituency over 13 years with growth in Clegg and Browns over 5 years ... how balanced.

    Shock horror, most people (most not all) vote based on whats good for them in particular and not on some higher moral level. Harldy need a load of factoids to establish that.

    Lets all vote SNP reagrdless of where we live... then we can send that silly twit back to where he belongs, rebuild Hadrians wall (a little further North I guess), and institute border controls to ensure we don't let him back again.

    Now there would be a survey worth doing... how many English people would vote for devolution... probably more than the total populations of Scotland and Wales.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • foolishsceptic
    Love rating 7
    foolishsceptic said

    Well Lovemoney/Fool better start to find some better journalists and publish some decent articles before it loses all readership. What a load of tosh!

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ajrr1
    Love rating 11
    ajrr1 said

    I agree the headline is incredibly misleading.

    The article makes a couple of interesting points, but they are more political/social than anything. Not really that relevant for this siter in my opinion.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • andyg73
    Love rating 0
    andyg73 said

    What a load of rubbish...

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • eLJay
    Love rating 76
    eLJay said

    Hmmm, know what your voting then!!!

    I often think you are mistaking an increase in actual value with the weakening of the pound and increase in overall costs - it's about time people thought about getting value and not how much their house is worth, we need to be competitive not expensive.

    I'll be open with you all, I won't be voting Tory (remember the poll tax), and Labour are now the same in different clothing (though them having to bend over for the unions is a good thing - remember them - they are there to protect workers rights), I may vote Lib or I may vote Monster Raving Loony (though I suspect we don't have a local candidate, one year they did have the better policies).

    It's actually about time it was reformed so you had a local and national level vote as you might not support your local candidate.

    Oh and in the rest of Europe they call Hung Parliaments a Coallition, and many of them are - so why is it such a bad thing, many of those countries work perfectly well as they aren't electing short sighted self interested buffoons.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nosbort
    Love rating 125
    nosbort said

    Actually the correct spelling is Platitudinous, however, it IS the correct word. This article demonstrates a larger problem with use of statistics without a brain.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nosbort
    Love rating 125
    nosbort said

    eLJay, in answer to the question in the last paragraph there is only one possible answer 'Italy'

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rjm23
    Love rating 2
    rjm23 said

    I can only agree with the other comments.

    I think beneath this there is amore serious concern above the volumw that LM is now producing as this leads to an awful lot of repitition and faily poor journalism.

    Is this driven by the requirements for advertising revenue?

    LM is being seriuosly left behind br Martins Money Saving Expert newsletter which comes once a week and always contains something good.

    Having been a longtime supporter and fan of the fool i am very close to hitting the unsubscribe button.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • stinkybeard
    Love rating 2
    stinkybeard said

    Yet another sensational headline followed by drivel. Getting fed up with this - up your game LV or I am unsubscribing.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • SevenPillars
    Love rating 70
    SevenPillars said

    All this merely shows is the north/south divide. The Tories traditionally win most of their seats in the south where house prices are also traditionally higher, while Labour has its core support in the less affluent north. The Tories have never done that well up north and in Scotland they are a rarity even in the more expensive areas. Things may well have changed a little more recently, especially for New Labour as they have stolen the tory clothes for most of the last 13 years in order to win seats in the Tory heartland.

    When it comes to house prices, people are obviously going to vote in their own self interest because they have been conned for the last 30 years that this is their big investment and even worse, their pension. Little thought has been given into how future generations are going to be able to afford them short of the banks re-introducing some nice, dodgy mortgage products which they specialised in during the boom years and are one of the main causes of the crisis that our blue rinse politicians couldn't see coming. Perhaps that is why the under 30's are more apathetic, questioning and have no trust in our political system and politicians than ever before.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Derbyscot
    Love rating 0
    Derbyscot said

    Agree totally with these criticisms. Very disappointing deterioration and agree that Martin's Money Saving Expert is setting the standard.

    Re so called Hung Parliament - Nosbort, please stop pedalling this drivel that PR is a failure exemplified by Italy. It works democratically all over the planet! And please note the hypocrites in Westminster insisted on PR in Scotland, N. Ireland and Wales but don't want it for themselves. And note a minority government is working just fine in Scotland!

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Donna Ferguson
    Love rating 130
    Donna Ferguson said

    Thanks very much for your comments. I understand your concerns and am sorry that so many of you felt the headline was misleading. That was not our intention and we will try to do better in the future.

    Regarding the comments about the content of the piece please bear in mind it was intended to be quite a light-hearted take at the election and house prices. While I accept what many of you are saying about statistics, I think it is quite a harmless piece, at the end of the day.

    However, I appreciate that many of you are unhappy about this article and I will take what you've said onboard. Thank you for letting us know.

    All the best

    Donna (Editor)

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • Hardtruth
    Love rating 66
    Hardtruth said

    My word the open-toe sandled, beardie, Guardian reading droids seem to be out in force today. Must eb the nice weather causing them to leave the doors unlocked.

    Look at Mr. Haughty "I am unsubscribing" stinkybeard...like he paid his money for the privilige, assuming he could get past the stitched up pockets on his trousers. Bye won't miss you. Then there's Mr Indignant "unions is a good thing" eLJay. Genius. Let's all get back to Life on Mars with union looney-toons running the asylum while the rest of us meander through the piled up waste in the streets, working our three days a week while wait for the IMF money to turn up.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Max878
    Love rating 37
    Max878 said

    When you post a good article, I say so and am happy to recommend it. That happens less and less frequently, and this one is drivel. If you've got nothing to say, then simply don't say it! You will be paid more attention because of it.

    Well done for the acknowledgement.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Hardtruth
    Love rating 66
    Hardtruth said

    Well said Donna, pity the stiffy droids are so easily wound up. From the vitriolic reactions it rather appears that JF touched on a raw nerve. Hilarious.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    The article was light hearted and the object is to inform, entertain and amuse. The inform bit has been lacking lately and the writers need to think carefully. the recycled articles haven't helped. I think if in doubt, amuse and make it very amusing.

    I'll add one little but of information. If you're buying a second hand car, avoid dealers; they are all Arfur Daleys. Go to a nice Conservative area, where they can afford to buy new and have their cars serviced and repaired regularly. I got a nice lot mileage car that way and it hasn't broken down in the 6 years I've had it. The mechanic who looks after it says it will last longer than me if I keep looking after it. I'll have to start looking after myself better! When I say a nice Conservative area, it could be a nicer Conservative area; I live in a Conservative area but went to one where they have more money and big posh houses. They probably have store cards and overdrafts but who cares as long as I get a good car. 

    I thought the local Liberal Democrat may make an effort this time to grab a council seat. Nick Clegg got some attention! The local candidate for the Lib Dems seems a little clueless and if he seems clueless compared to Conservative and Labour that must be bad. That's the council seat; the parliamentary candidate is more experienced but still has no chance. 

    They need a good slogan like "No taxation without proportional representation!". I'll be their spin doctor if they pay me more than Mandy. I did some file sharing this week. I sent an MP3 to China. They asked for the lyrics and so I got them off Myspace. I left a note for the singer and she replied, thanking me for promoting her in China. Mandy is such an idiot. 

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • richyrich
    Love rating 1
    richyrich said

    If my home is worth more then so is the one I might want to buy, so the winners are the estate agents on commission and mortgage providers.

    In our area, there are whopping great Conservative signs on all the fields and A4 sized Labour signs on the 3 bed semis. It would be interesting to know what proportion of the nations wealth is owned by Conservatives? Should my vote go to the people who own everything already? No, I don't think so.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • PartingtonJ
    Love rating 1
    PartingtonJ said

    I found the comments by others more interesting than the article itself! Since lovemoney.com was born from fool, the mailings have become more and more full of trivia. I suspect, but obviously don't know, that most subscribers have a financial interest and a brain. I'm beginning to feel flooded with emails containing mostly irrelevant to me stuff, and like others may well unsubscribe soon ... ...

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Luniversal
    Love rating 47
    Luniversal said

    The piece was a bit of fun which does not deserve all the brickbats. But in general I have to agree that lovemoney.com is becoming too spammy.

    I don't want four emails a day linked to the same items over and over again. Cut down the bombardment and concentrate on fewer and more meaty articles, please, or I too will confine myself to visiting the home page occasionally-- and if others feel the same way, you won't get as much traffic.

    PS: And please, not so much of the 'five cracking credit cards!!!' guff. Remember that many more of us are savers than borrowers-- and we're the victims of government policy you should be most concerned to enlist.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Savvy chic
    Love rating 20
    Savvy chic said

    It is not the way you vote which MAKES your house worth more. It is the reverse. People in expensive houses tend to vote Tory and people in cheap or Council houses tend to vote Labour. My constituency was Tory for yonks but, of late, has been lib-Dem. It's always a 2-horse race between them.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Donna Ferguson
    Love rating 130
    Donna Ferguson said

    Luniversal, thank you for your comment. I hear what you are saying and I think you have a point. We are working on this issue at the moment and hopefully things will improve soon.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Tron
    Love rating 4
    Tron said

    @ Luniversal - Hi thanks for your comments.

    In regards to the number of emails you receive, sorry if it feels like too many. You should find it fairly easy to control via the personal settings options. Take a look and give me a shout if anything is unclear.

    Secondly, you are quite right to suggest that we have a lot of users who are savers, and yes it is a rather depressing situation at present with interest rates the way they are. We do try to cater for all demographics, and with over a million users we do have to cover a fairly broad spectrum.

    Further more, there are plans in place to develop the email suite so that our updates will contain content that is specifically of interest to recipient. It is a pretty big job to achieve this, but work is underway.

    Thanks again for your comments.

    Best,

    Richard/Tron

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • charles125
    Love rating 53
    charles125 said

    This as usual glosses over the major issue. Affordability. How does a single earner manage a £1000 a month mortgage, and that's in the poorer areas?

    I don't know how married couples, even on two incomes manage to buy and furnish a house. It took myself and my wife 10 years to get carpets and furniture paid for, and these were the cheapest reasonably available, when house prices were more manageable in the late 1970s.

    A first step on the housing ladder is a complete pipedream for most couples nowadays, unless they both have VERY good jobs, or very rich parents.

    IF they do manage it, they will likely find extra costs crippling and if fuel, energy and food increase any more in price, are very likely to struggle desperately. If interest rates increase on mortgages, repossession is inevitable.

    I don't envy young or younger mortgagees........

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • AnturCynhyrfus
    Love rating 2
    AnturCynhyrfus said

    Donner, you say you understand our concerns, that you will take what we've said onboard and that things will improve soon, then you go an re-tweet the exact same article two hours later. Come on, please. Less of the spam.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Donna Ferguson
    Love rating 130
    Donna Ferguson said

    Hi AnturCynhyfus - I am innocent! :) Seriously, I haven't tweeted anything.... Maybe one of the team here did though. I will check. Thanks.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • eLJay
    Love rating 76
    eLJay said

    I hereby create the 'Modern Reform Party' the main principle to be working for the country and the individual following actual principles rather than money - neither left nor right wing - just the right thing.

    I think some more interesting Financial Articles maybe, more to do with Share Dealing or other niche Finance things the general public can't find off your advertisers is required (stop those hands wavering on the unsubscribe button).

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • essexfairy
    Love rating 0
    essexfairy said

    What a completely ridiculous article! If a person didn't actually bother to read the article you could drastically change someone's vote on nothing more than sensationialism and ill-thought out headlines.

    Perhaps we should all remember the way the recession affected this country in the 1980s under the Tories when hundreds of thousands of people were losing their homes. Is this really a chance we want to take now?

    Why not return to fact-based articles rather than the tosh that has been published lately. You will lose many subscribers (me included) if you do not change your ways ASAP.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • McCutcheon
    Love rating 6
    McCutcheon said

    The value of your house is not that important except to those who inherit your estate. Believe me, you can't eat bricks and mortar.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Vulcan
    Love rating 0
    Vulcan said

    As an ex-pat, I have to say that I find the whole issue of the election amusing. Concerning the article, however, it is misleading and suggests a political bias that LM should avoid.

    Many valid points have been made in this thread. Has money become the "One God" of the Brits? Sadly Britain is paying the penalty for allowing the financial service "industry" to predominate. Anyone not working in this area (I will not call it a profession" is made to feel inferior even to the extent that they should have lower expectations in their lives. Hard working people can hardly afford to live in Britain these days. Hmmm - that's the reason I'm an ex-pat and happy to be so.

    Report on 22 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • eLJay
    Love rating 76
    eLJay said

    Yay - Vote Greed!

    Hardtruth - now now - I never said the unions are good or bad - but I would prefer not to have a USA style 'sacked you just because we felt like it' situation. This government achieved that massive debt without the help of any union, that was entirely the corporate money grabbing non union old school tie types. You need to stop adding details of your own psychotic episodes onto the internet and actually read what has been typed by people.

    Report on 23 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Luniversal
    Love rating 47
    Luniversal said

    Donna/Richard: Many thanks for your prompt comebacks and advice.

    Best regards.

    Report on 23 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • liesarenocomfort
    Love rating 134
    liesarenocomfort said

    To John Fitzsimons,

    Don't be too downhearted. You know the old saying, no publicity is bad publicity (40 comments and counting - result!) and it's good to stir us all up once in a while, it shakes off the apathy!!

      

    Report on 23 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • John Fitzsimons
    Love rating 30
    John Fitzsimons said

    Hi guys

    Thanks for the comments and feedback. I intended for this piece to be fairly light-hearted, and hoped it would spark a little debate. However, I have clearly made something of a misjudgement, as rather than a debate it’s simply sparked irritation.

    I take your comments on board and will strive to avoid annoying you all again in future!

    Report on 23 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Hardtruth
    Love rating 66
    Hardtruth said

    eLJay, are you a space alien? What on earth are you talking about? All that huffing and guffing, three posts and I think there's a point somewhere in there still trying to get out. The thread is about as scrambled as the egg yoke rattling around inside your head.

    PS. JF, keep going, don't give up. It's not the droids' fault they have no fun in their lives and are impervious to the lighter side of life.

    Report on 23 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mullerman
    Love rating 5
    Mullerman said

    Nice retraction John! Affordable housing for my kids is what i want! (yes, so i can get rid of them).

    Report on 26 April 2010  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Virgin Money Credit Card MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.99% fee) Representative 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 17.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 17.9% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2