Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » House prices

What's the 'right' price of your house?

Neil Faulkner
by Lovemoney Staff Neil Faulkner on 17 June 2012  |  Comments 9 comments

We tell you what the right price of your house is, and how to get the best price in double quick time.

What's the 'right' price of your house?

Felicity Hannah's article Why house sellers are deluded? received lots of comments after she said she thought home sellers were pricing their homes too high. Many of you were debating what the “right” price of your home is.

There is the right price and the best price, and then there is how much a house is worth. These are three different things, but understanding them can help you to make better decisions, get faster results, and to sell at a price more favourable to you.

What is the right price of your home?

Some readers got the answer right in the comments section at the bottom of Felicity's article. To paraphrase them: the “right” price is what the buyer and seller agree to. All other prices don't lead to a transaction.

What your neighbour is selling his house for, what Nationwide says house prices are, what a potential buyer says you should be selling for – those things are irrelevant if the price isn't right for you too.

You can quickly establish the best price of your home

What is relevant – and where I can hopefully be a little more insightful for you – is that home sellers can find out the best price that buyers will pay for their homes much more quickly if they change their sales strategy.

The slow way to find the best price

The normal sales strategy is to price high and hope some offers come in. That's why Rightmove asking prices are tens of thousands higher than properties actually exchange for.

Estate agents are partly to blame for super-inflated asking prices. They convince you they can sell your property for more than anyone else, in order to win an exclusive contract with you – with expensive exit clauses.

Undoubtedly, some sellers really are deluded about what buyers will pay, as Felicity says. Others aren't bothered about selling quickly and can wait as long as it takes until buyers are prepared to pay their asking prices.

Properties aren't market stalls

I'd guess the main cause of high asking prices is that both sellers and estate agents get their negotiating ideas from car dealerships and market stalls.

Buyers visit markets, see what they like, haggle on price, and make a deal. Visiting the market is all part of the fun for the buyer. They already expect to get a bargain, which is why they want to go in the first place.

With car dealerships, the customer normally has a clear idea what the product is like before visiting. In other words, they're driven to go to the dealership because they already really want to buy the product.

Those techniques aren't appropriate when selling a home. Most people don't visit other people's homes for the fun of it and they don't just turn up to see what “wares” you've got. Nor do they know beforehand what the property is really like.

In other words, they have no pre-existing desire to own the property, or to visit the property, if the asking price is high.

Getting the best price – quickly

Remember, at this stage, all home buyers really have to go on, apart from a couple of blurry photos, is the price. They're looking for a bargain – not a hard bargainer.

Home buyers look at the asking prices on Rightmove. If they see it's thousands over their budget and over recent sales prices in the area, they'll skip over it. Many potential buyers won't even visit.

Potential buyers can't fall in love with your property unless they visit.

As a seller, then, you want as many people to come to your property as possible, so more can fall in love with it. That's your main goal, with negotiating techniques, sales pitches and all the other ideas on home selling being overrated distractions.

Rather than pricing high and putting customers off, you price low and encourage many more to visit – which they'll now do in double-quick time.

Worst-case scenario is you get no offers, or none above your low asking price. That's when buyers price the property far lower than you would like to. If you can afford to wait, at least you've quickly learned that the “right” price between you and a buyer won't be found. Try selling your property again later.

More likely, though, the many more viewers you receive will encourage a bidding war.

You'll notice where the bids level off. That's probably the typical price a customer would pay today. Like most auctions, you'll probably find that a couple of customers are determined to win, and they'll bid the price up even higher.

Probably neither of them would have visited if the asking price was high – and you couldn't have turned the sale into an auction between them.

Once the bidding is finished, you, the seller, can decide whether the best price is agreeable. If it isn't, and you can afford to wait, there is still no right price between you and any customer. Remember, there's no obligation to sell, even to the highest bidder.

This strategy works well in both a rising market and a falling one. I've sold properties during both in this way. One estate agent I used changed its entire strategy for all its customers off the success of mine, even though it was dead against it beforehand.

The worth of a home

The right price of a property is set by two people: the buyer and the seller. The best price of your property is found more quickly by encouraging an auction.

Estimating the financial worth of a property is much harder.

A property is worth all the renting costs you won't pay for the entire time you own, minus all the buying, mortgage and maintenance costs, plus, for the majority of people, the unmortgaged value of the property when you sell or die – minus the sale costs at the time.

Estimating the worth of a property is a whole article in itself. I'll have a stab at helping you do so soon.

More on buying and selling property:

RICS: House sales drop 40%

Mortgage rates are going up... and down

Buy to let doesn't add up

Why house sellers are deluded

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (9)

  • Felicity Hannah
    Love rating 10
    Felicity Hannah said

    This has been interesting, thanks. I think you've articulated the issue very clearly - if a property has an aspirational price rather than a realistic one then it simply won't get the footfall needed to find a seller.

    When we were looking for houses, we had several estate agents try to get us to visit properties priced far above our maximum. I think they wanted to use us to prove to their client that the price was wrong.

    Report on 18 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Per Andersson
    Love rating 0
    Per Andersson said

    Interesting and realistic - mostly. Yes, the right price is what a buyer and seller eventually agree on, but there is clearly an indicator of values based on what else is on your street, area etc.

    I am not an estate agent, but it isn't fair to state that all estate agents over-inflate prices. I think those days are long gone - if a house is over priced it is usually because the vendor doesn't take the estate agents advice and insists on the price being at 'x' rather than taking the estate agent's advice and experience.

    I have recently agreed on the sale of my own house. I had a very good idea of what mine was worth from looking at local values and what mine had to offer over similar houses on the market. When I appointed my agent, they recommended a 'guide price' in other words a lower to upper price range and this resulted in 16 veiwings in 4 weeks, 4 offers and a price that my purchaser and I were happy with.

    A good estate agent will be able to offer proper advice as to values and it is time that home owners stopped believing that house prices are higher than they are - remember the old saying - your house is only worth what someone is prepared to pay for it, not necessarily what you think it is worth.

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jrob0311
    Love rating 0
    jrob0311 said

    One issue is that the UK approach to property is not flexible or very innovative. When we lived in NZ we got used a variety of different strategies including auctions, closed and open tendering. Plus they use the Open Home approach which seems to be starting to appear over here.

    All of these approaches lend themselves the approach Neil describes. In some cases a property could be advertised at offer above $400K and go for $450 plus.

    I'm not sure if there are any legal barriers to using these approaches in the UK but if we sell our place in the future I would be tempted to (a) advertise privately; (b) run open homes; and (c) use a tendering process.

    J

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • AlanThomas
    Love rating 24
    AlanThomas said

    It's simply down to what someone is prepared to pay for your property (I or we) have inflated ideas of the value of our homes.

    The house next door to me is still on the market after 5 months, the old chap had died and requires a large amount of modernisation, The property will be going to auction next month with a reserve set at HALF the value (my valuation) of my house

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rbgos
    Love rating 81
    rbgos said

    The suggestion is closer to what typically happens in Scotland, where rather than having an "asking price", we have an "offers over" price. The final sale price is usually well over this value.

    In most cases, a closing date is set and all interested parties submit a sealed bid to the sellers' solicitor (who also acts as estate agent in the Scottish system). The highest bid gets the house, at the price they bid. A few years back, in some areas it was far from unusual for the selling price to be up to 1.5x the "offers over" price.

    Of course, you do get a few houses which are hard to sell, particularly in a weak market, and if there's a shortage of buyers we revert to the usual haggling process of negotiating towards a mutually agreeable price.

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Bobski
    Love rating 19
    Bobski said

    Isn’t it also down to what value is placed from the survey? Surely they (Surveyors) also have influence on property values since it’s usually on the advice they give that banks offer people loans?

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 362
    CuNNaXXa said

    I believe the surveyor values a property based on land value and cost to build, which is why it is a more realistic price, and often much lower than those of the Estate Agent.

    Remember that an Estate Agent will value your property for what they think they can get for it, because their commission or fixed fee is related to the selling or asking price (there is a difference, because even if you discount before completion, many fees are fixed to the original asking price).

    Also, while many agents will opt to go high on valuation, the opposite is also true, where an agent will undervalue your property, hoping for a quick sale, which will deliver them commission much sooner than if they used market value.

    (This is why it is vital to get a minimum of three independent valuations; two of my own valuations were within £10,000 of each other, while the third was a clear £30,000 cheaper, because the agent was hoping for a quick sale at my expense).

    The best guide is to see what other similar properties in your area have achieved. This will give you a starting point. Land Registry sold prices from the likes of Zoopla and Rightmove are freely available.

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    About half what they are now, like the collapse of prices in all the other zombie economies.

    Report on 19 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • andrewjameshowar
    Love rating 25
    andrewjameshowar said

    If estate agents were capable of adding any value to the sale process, they'd be willing to charge a % of what they achieve over a base vauation rather than the free gift of a fixed % of the selling price.

    Report on 26 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).

Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3