Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » House prices

How house prices changed around the world in 2012

lovemoney staff
by Lovemoney Staff lovemoney staff on 29 December 2012  |  Comments 14 comments

Find out how house prices changed around the world in 2012!

How house prices changed around the world in 2012

Since our housing bubble burst in the summer of 2007, prices have fallen back in most parts of the UK, with London bouncing back strongest.

In November 2012, the average UK home cost £160,879, according to the Halifax House Price Index. This figure is virtually unchanged compared to the average £161,017 recorded a year ago in November 2011.

As a result of steep falls in 2007/09, the average home today costs roughly the same as it did in July 2004. Thus, house prices in most parts of the UK have rolled back to where they were nearly 8½ years ago.

House prices around the world

We know that house prices have been weak in the UK since the arrival of the credit crunch, but how have they fared in other countries? To find out, I checked the latest global house-price survey produced by The Economist magazine. Here's what it reveals:

Where house prices have risen the most in 2012

Country 

% change

Austria

11

Hong Kong

6.4

Canada

5.4

Switzerland

4.6

New Zealand

3.3

Germany

2.5

Belgium

2.1

Singapore

1.9

France

1.3

Source: The Economist, 18/08/12

Where house prices have fallen in 2012

Country

% change

Ireland

-14.4

Spain

-8.3

Denmark

-6.0

Netherlands

-4.4

Sweden

-3.7

Italy

-3.4

Japan

-2.9

Britain

-2.6

Australia

-2.1

China

-1.4

South Africa

-1.3

United States

-0.7

Source: The Economist, 18/08/12

Global house prices in 2012

Nine countries experienced a rise in average house prices while 12 others saw a drop.

The best-performing property market over the last 12 months has been Austria, where prices rose by 11% on average. The surprising Germanic leader shows how subdued the rest of the world market has become as nations try to regain control of spiralling house prices.

In second place was Hong Kong – a 'tiger economy' of the Far East -- where prices rose by 6.4%. The pace of price rises in this part of the world has slowed to a more sustainable level compared to the 17.5% rise recorded in the last survey.

South Africa (-1.3%), China (-1.4%) and Sweden (-3.7%) have fallen out of the nations with rising house prices to join the list of those experience plummeting values. The fall for China might be a bit surprising for a growing economy, but is the result of conscious efforts by the Chinese Government to make house prices more realistic.

The biggest drops over the past 12 months were found in Ireland (-14.4%), Spain (-8.3%) and Denmark (-6%), all of which are going through painful economic contractions.

Ireland’s property market has been in free-fall since 2010 and the average property price today is half the value it was in 2007. From 1995 Irish property experienced a five-fold rise that peaked in 2007, so the market has had to fall from a great height and it looks like it still has some way to go even though the pace has dropped off compared to last year.

In contrast the pace of decline in Spain has gained momentum according to this year’s results, rising from a 5.5% fall to 8.3% this year. According to the Economist although prices have already fallen by 23% from their peak, they remain well above fair value and with massive unemployment, prices are expected to keep diving. 

Now let's see how house prices have fared since the credit crunch sent shockwaves through financial markets:

Where house prices have risen since 2007 

Country

% change

Hong Kong

63.6

Austria

23.1

Singapore

21.1

Switzerland

20.9

China

17.8

Canada

17.8

Belgium

13.2

Australia

9.8

South Africa

7.8

Germany

7.0

Sweden

6.5

France

0.9

Source: The Economist, 18/08/12

Where house prices have fallen since 2007 

Country

% change

Ireland

-49.8

United States

-27.8

Spain

-22.4

Denmark

-19.2

Japan

-13.1

Britain

-10.2

Netherlands

-10.1

Italy

-9.4

New Zealand

-2.3

Source: The Economist, 18/08/12

Global house prices since 2007

There are 12 gainers and nine losers in these tables. As you can see, this second table is broadly similar to the first: again, Hong Kong and Austria lead the way for rising values, with Ireland and Spain high up for falling prices.

Prices in Hong Kong seem unstoppable, up nearly two thirds (63.6%) in five years. Austria’s success is also impressive, with prices up well over a fifth (23.1%) since 2007. Singapore (21.1%), Switzerland (20.9%), China (17.8%) and Canada (17.8%) follow with sizeable increases in property value. However, set against a struggling world economy, these countries could face problems to come, with emerging property bubbles pumped ready to burst.

Europe's two biggest economies, Germany and France, have seen prices rise modestly in the past five years, up 7% and 0.9% respectively.

The three worst-performing markets since 2007 are those of Ireland (-49.8%), the USA (-27.8%) and Spain (-22.4%). All of these markets were massively overvalued at their peaks and have since come crashing back down. In Dublin and certain US cities, prices for top-end properties have more than halved, clearly showing how insanely high they climbed in the Noughties.

The USA has seen prices fall significantly and as a result more than four million have lost their homes. Currently the property market is 19% below ‘fair value’ but The Economist indicates the free-fall may come to end soon as house sales have picked up, repossessions are down and mortgage finance remains cheap. Property prices only fell 0.7% this year compared to 5.9% last year.

According to the wise heads at The Economist, Britain’s price fall of 10.2% was rather ‘modest’ and Europe has been ‘cushioned’ from worse effects by low interest rates. London and the south east were pinpointed as propping up Britain with 47% of residential transactions taking place here in 2011. London is the only region in the UK to regain property value to pre-credit crunch levels.

What next?

Overall the tone of the report was positive.

The Economist said that: "A big dose of gravity has hit residential-property markets around the world" and these "earthbound prices are returning many markets to “fair value”".

But the report revealed that housing is now around or below its fair value in only eight of the 21 countries surveyed, so there is still a long journey ahead for some nations.

More on house prices:

Why house prices won't recover until 2024

Rightmove: north-south divide in property asking prices continues

What to do when a home survey goes wrong

How rows with your neighbours could hurt your house price

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (14)

  • Brixton Dave
    Love rating 4
    Brixton Dave said

    Not sure how your comparatives stand up in inner London. I live in a seedy street in Brixton where I was lucky enough to buy a 4 bedroom house for £51,000 in 1985 (just after the riot of that year). The Zoopla website suggests that similar houses start at £360,000 right now. Moreover 2 bedroom flats in converted houses are about £250,000.

    At the time I bought my house was earning £13,000 p.a. which as average for a technician type job (or even a low to middle ranking council bureaucrat).

    If property prices relate to wages & salaries, the average punter in Brixton must now be on £130,000+. I don't believe it! Logic dictates property should go down - especially if the government stops subsidising the Rachman tendency, as they are promising to do.

    Report on 29 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Meanmachine2
    Love rating 37
    Meanmachine2 said

    The house roll back prices do not seem to apply to Cornwall. Where do they get these statistics?

    A house valued at £96000 in 1997 was worth about £250000 in 2004 & has now dropped back from a peak in 2008 to a value of about £340000.

    Report on 29 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • yautong
    Love rating 0
    yautong said

    Hong Prices are only now what they were in 1997/98. They plummeted circa 65% (yes, a fall of 65%!) from then until August 2003 and have now recovered. Bit of a roller coaster if you bought at the peak in 1997, great if you bought in 2003.

    Report on 30 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Luniversal
    Love rating 47
    Luniversal said

    Notice the difference between English-speaking Canada and Australia on the upside, and the USA and UK on the, er. slide.

    That's the difference between house prices in countries which retained firm and far-sighted regulation of their banks, and those which thought that 'market forces', 'free enterprise', 'the need to have global leaders in banking' and suchlike dogmas ought to matter more than responsible lending policies, capital ratios and care for the interests of domestic customers.

    In Canada and Australia the banks knew their place and the property market did not become their prey.

    Report on 30 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • gonfishin
    Love rating 11
    gonfishin said

    How have exchange rates been equalised (or have they?) in these headline percentages?

    If for example the UK drop has been based solely on sterling price change, then it's hardly a valid comparison - especially for someone intending to sell up in UK and move to a Eurozone country - or vice versa,

    AND it would be nice to see some original thought in some of these blogs - instead of just a bunch of unconnected statistics grabbed from elsewhere and strung together without serious evaluation or explanation.

    While it's possible that UK house prices will continue to slide over a long period - as they did in the decade up to 1997/8, I think it's far more likely that inflation will result in their real cost decreasing but their cash price stabilising and then heading back upward.

    In the shorter term, a signinficant rise in UK mortgage defaults will inevitably depress prices.

    However, sitting on cash and waiting for the crash before buying is I believe a very dangerous and misguided strategy - cash is losing it's value, rents are rising and "you gotta live somewhere"!

    Report on 30 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • miramoore
    Love rating 9
    miramoore said

    Excellent article albeit a bit slim on analysis...

    I agree with the final verdict: house prices in the UK will probably return to a "sane" value in 5 years time. By "sane" I mean values based on a realistic earnings-per-year ratio.

    Where properties are going to be a real investment, keeping up with inflation and adding to capital invested, is a bit of a guessing game... but I put my money on Capital cities around the world... such as London, Berlin, Paris, New Dehli, Moscow, Rio de Janeiro, Caracas, Buenos Aires etc...

    We are living in wonderland... littered with landmines!

    Report on 30 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • yautong
    Love rating 0
    yautong said

    typo corrected! - Hong Kong Prices are only now what they were in 1997/98. They plummeted circa 65% (yes, a fall of 65%!) from then until August 2003 and have now recovered. Bit of a roller coaster if you bought at the peak in 1997, great if you bought in 2003.

    Report on 31 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • houstonstewart
    Love rating 24
    houstonstewart said

    Oh, good 'ol Cliff, never one to miss an opportunity to talk down the UK housing market. He leads us in with some interesting reflections on the world's housing markets, only as a surreptitious excuse to deliver his pulpit, drum banging chant of get out of the housing market. All to support his personal decision taken a number of years ago but the market still grew and he lost out (even in a continued depressed market) but would still have us believe his is the righteous course and we all should follow suit.

    His justification: another pundit supports the view of talking down the market. However before you give to much weight to that analysis you may want to balance those opinions by reading LoveMoney's own distribution yesterday where Neil Faulkner's article 'What 2012 has in store for house prices' showed that not one 'expert' had a got a single prediction (including their own euphemistic 'mid-year corrections') right in the last 5 years!

    So Cliff true to his usual journalistic form doesn't let the facts he doesn't like, to get in the way of a story that he can use to support his own personal aim.

    I think it's clear what will make Cliff and fellow soothsayers a Happy New Year (seemingly this year or any year), a UK housing market meltdown - just be careful what you wish for and who's advice you follow!

    Report on 02 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 600
    Mike10613 said

    I think we can expect prices to fall for the next 5 years but not all prices. Prices are tied to incomes and mortgage availability. For those on 100K plus neither is a problem and so the prices at the top end of the market will be stable or even go up. Typical (as opposed to average) prices for a 3 bed semi or a back street terrace will continue to drop. The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer; as always... I personally think it's a good time to invest in equities, in 5 years move to property and at the beginning of the next recession - buy gold...

    Report on 02 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • msmoneywise
    Love rating 27
    msmoneywise said

    @Mike10613 - beginning of the next recession? We are still in a recession in the UK, or have I missed something? Did the UK economy recover and I didn't notice?

    If you want to invest in gold, better buy now. Who knows where the gold price will be in 5 years. Probably unaffordable for most of us, that is where. But you are totally correct in one prediction: the rich will get richer and the poorer will get poorer, as always. It does not need an economic pundit to predict this. No matter which government is in power, this is always the case. Labour was expert at engineering this, but they learned from the Conservative government they took over from. The Coalition has not the guts or the vision to do much else. Whichever way we look at it, we are living in a country that is teetering on the edge of financial disaster.

    Report on 21 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Rentingisbest?
    Love rating 0
    Rentingisbest? said

    Can someone set my mind at ease please, my rent has gone up by 15% since 2009 which was the date the economist article quoted was written in 2009.

    Thats two years out of date

    I have no idea how house prices have moved since then is they were static then the economist figure would be 1.289/1.15=112.01

    So implying house prices are now 12.1% overvalued?

    In 2008 I negotiated a cut in rent as findaproperty indicated rents were lower than when I moved in , the same study now indicates I am still about 5% less then the current rental market.

    Nobody takes housing benefit where I live ; ex local in posh part of battersea

    I will buy eventually but these figures seem to indicate the bottom is near?

    http://www.economist.com/node/15179388?subjectid=2764524&story_id=15179388

    Report on 22 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Nickolarge
    Love rating 4
    Nickolarge said

    I didn't see any mention of where UK house prices currently sit on the "fair value" scale. I'm pretty sure they are still way too high.

    That means that unless UK prices have an ability to continually defy gravity we still have some way to go in a downward direction. I don't see an upturn coming any time soon in the average family's economic situation, nor do I see lenders becoming keen to lend to ordinary customers.

    Most folk who can't see this start with the "property prices always rise" mantra and fail to understand that that is only true in the long term as is the case with almost every other commodity. The housing market in the UK is only maintaining artificially high values because those not forced to sell stubbornly stick to the price they believe their property should be worth, even when they get no viewings, let alone offers. Sales still go through because there will always be those who have to buy now and have no choice but to pay the current price. And, of course, many of those will think that now is the time to buy in the mistaken belief that they might "miss out" if they don't get on the ladder now.

    For the rest of us, house prices are still way too high.

    Report on 30 December 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Meanmachine2
    Love rating 37
    Meanmachine2 said

    I thought I saw a report last week that Spanish house prices had fallen by 60% & in fact some banks were trying to unload them at 80% discount.

    Report on 30 December 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 653
    electricblue said

    Another survey using average figures and which has zero real-world information. Even in depressed economies there are property hot spots which the wealthy can afford and which will always command premium prices and there will always be areas with a bad reputation (deserved or not) which always lag way behind in values. Stagnation of property values in some parts of the USA comes on top of a 75% depreciation in value which has meant level house prices at a pitiful value for the last couple of years. Local and regional factors can suddenly raise property values as in a home owned by my USA business partner which has appreciated 20% in this past year because a new Super WalMart has been built locally - but the house is still only worth a third of what it sold for new six years ago. Ireland, Spain and even China have vast property developments now barely worth the cost of bulldozing them to the ground and I saw the same thing in Denver in the USA, along with more beggars on the streets than I have ever seen elsewhere in my life. It's all one big global mess and one more silly survey adds no clarity whatsoever.

    Report on 30 December 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse