Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » House prices

It's cheaper to buy property than rent!

Robert Powell
by Lovemoney Staff Robert Powell on 11 March 2011  |  Comments 10 comments

It's now cheaper to buy a property than rent - or is it? Robert Powell assesses the options...

It's cheaper to buy property than rent!

You’re throwing money away by renting.

This simple sentence is the mantra of the proud homeowner and scourge of the tenant. But if new research is to be believed then it may well be correct.

According to the property site Zoopla, renting a home now costs an average of 10.5% more than paying the interest on a mortgage for a comparable property. The research also shows that renting is now more expensive than owing in 80% of Britain’s towns and cities.

So as a renter myself, does this mean I should start looking around for my first property?

Let’s take a closer look at the figures...

Buy! Buy! Buy!

Zoopla has compiled a list of the top 50 locations where buying beats renting. Zoopla has based its figures on the average asking price for a two bedroom flat in the 50 largest cities and towns in the UK and compared it to an interest-only mortgage at 5% per annum on a similar property. Comparing these stats gives a rent vs. buy percentage and the higher the number, the worse off you are by renting.

Here are the top five locations where Zoopla claims it’s cheaper to buy than rent:

Rank

Location

Average asking price

Average monthly rent

Rent vs. Buy*

1

Milton Keynes

£132,919

£785

42%

2

Walsall

£89,683

£514

38%

3

Birmingham

£129,350

£725

35%

4

Reading

£184,592

£1,030

34%

5

Derby

£105,537

£557

27%

*Variance between average monthly rent and average monthly cost of 5% p.a. interest-only mortgage.

Source: Zoopla.co.uk

You can view the full list, with all 50 cities/towns, here.

The Zoopla stats show that renters in Milton Keynes are left £2,772 a year worse off than the owners of similar sized properties. The website’s research also shows that 12 of the 50 largest cities and towns have average rents that exceed interest-only mortgage payments by over 20%.

Even London has cheaper interest-only mortgage payments than rent. Zoopla puts the average rent for a two bedroom property in the capital at £2,252 per month – meaning buyers stand to save £4,656 annually compared to renters.

John Fitzsimons looks at some simple ways to boost the value of your home.

So as a London tenant myself, should I be heading down the estate agents in search of my dream home?

Is it really the time to buy?

For me – even with these Zoopla figures – definitely not! Here’s why...

Firstly, the buyer figures are based on an interest-only mortgage, meaning you won’t actually be paying off any of your debt when you shell out every month. So when you reach the end of your mortgage term, your lender will present you with a bill for the outstanding amount that you initially borrowed to buy your house. Fine if property prices increase; but you can never – especially in the current climate – guarantee that.

In fact, many people are predicting that property prices will fall or at least stagnate over the coming year. This makes interest-only mortgages a definite no-go area and ushers in the looming prospect of negative equity for first-time buyers looking to get onto the property ladder with a high LTV mortgage.

What the Zoopla stats also fail to take into account is the practicality of first time buyers actually managing to get a mortgage in the first place. Realistically, most first time buyers won’t have a large enough deposit to take anything less than a 90% LTV mortgage (and there are a few around now – read More mortgages for smaller deposits to find out more).

But to get hold of such a deal you’ll probably be looking at interest rates of around 6%. The Zoopla figures are based on a 5% deal; jack this up a percentage point and renting becomes cheaper in 78% of the 50 locations studied (not my words, the words of Zoopla’s Nicholas Leeming). And that’s before you even factor in the maintenance and insurance costs attached to owning your own home.

Even if you can get a 5% deal, you’ll still be hit by higher interest rates if the Bank of England base rate rises.

Suddenly I’m feeling fairly positive about renting!

Perfect storm

Renters looking at getting on the housing ladder are currently stuck in something of a perfect storm.

As I’ve outlined above, the current economic climate means it’s definitely not the greatest time to be thinking about buying your first home. The shadow of the recent property bubble is also still hanging heavy over many first-time buyers as they glance up a rung on the ladder and see home owners stuck in their first property, held back by price crashes and negative equity, blocking up properties that would usually be available to them.

Rob Powell hits the streets to get your views on five of the biggest property myths facing tenants.

So these first-time buyers are forced into the rental sector – which is by many accounts blossoming as buy-to-let mortgages boom and rents rise as a result of increasing demand, inflation and tax hikes. While these rent hikes are perfectly acceptable under the current market conditions, they’re still bad news for temporary-renters looking to save up for a deposit.

And it’s not just landlords expanding their portfolios who are contributing to the booming rental sector. Many people who are looking to move up the property ladder but are reluctant to drop their price to the current market level for fear of low or negative equity are also moving into the rental sector. This adds to the misery for first-time buyers as properties that would usually be available to them are taken out of the market.

The future

Last week, Barclays reported that mortgages are actually at their most affordable rate in ten years. This is all well and good but if affordable properties aren’t available, deposits continue to be sucked up in rising rents, interest rates are hiked and property prices fall – the future for first-time buyers will continue to look grim.

The recent introduction of a 120% mortgage from Lloyds and the return of a 90% mortgage from Northern Rock seems to – symbolically at least – point to a ‘hair of the dog’ solution for our current property mess. But even if you can find an appropriate property and stump up a deposit, these high LTV deals are really only practical for those who are determined to stay put for a long time in order to ride out any possibility of negative equity. And with the economy and jobs market still so fragile, can anyone really guarantee this?

What do you think?

Are renters like me just throwing money away? Is buying cheaper than renting? Or is owning your own property over-rated nowadays?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment box below.

More: Get a marvellous mortgage | The cheapest mortgages on the market | Top 10 property websites  

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (10)

  • hulmeisred
    Love rating 5
    hulmeisred said

    I am renting and I have a significant amount of savings which I hope to be able to buy a house outright - but am about £40k short to buy the type of house I want. I will close this gap over the next 2 years (If houses come down, it may well be quicker than 2 years).

    I earn just over an "Average" salary...so how can I save £20k a year and live any kind of life? - the answer is return from my capital. And this is never taken into account by these people who spout that buying is cheaper than renting.

    If I buy a house now - with a small mortgage to make up the £40k gap...not only am I now paying interest on that amount, my capital now no longer makes me any return. I figure it would take me around 7 years to pay off that £40k (assuming the bank would lend over this type of short-term period). I also have a significant risk to my capital as I fully expect house prices to be lower in 2 years than now.

    I have spent many an hour using Excel spreadsheets, trying to make my personal situation stack up, but I simply can not make buying now a more financially viable option then renting. I want to buy - I want to settle, I have a wife and 2 kids - but it just make's no financial sense at the moment.

    The only way I can make buying look more financially appealing than renting, is if I plug in a 10%year on year HPI for the next 2-3 years. If that happens I will have made the wrong decision in renting - but think I should be probably fairly safe!

    Report on 11 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • ains
    Love rating 4
    ains said

    Bought my house at the peak of the market, current mortgage repayments are 50% of the equivalent rental and the house has increased in value by more than the interest payments over the last 3 years.

    The point is there are always exceptions, the long term value an security of purchasing and owning your own home often surpas smaller financial gains and losses over the shorter term.

    Location and demand are critical to long term profitability. Prior to home ownership renting rooms and cheaper flats in less desirable areas as well as curtailing spending , are key to saving that all important deposit.

    Report on 11 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Poorpensioner
    Love rating 36
    Poorpensioner said

    Posting in reverse order is a mistake!

    Now you read the answer before the question; the subsequent comments before the original posting.

    It has made it far more difficult to follow.

    Please revert to showing postings in the order of posting.

    Report on 11 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • VoucherBuddy
    Love rating 1
    VoucherBuddy said

    I guess it depends whether you're buying for the short or long term. I may be wrong but you've got to look at the housing price rise trends over the last century, it'll tell you that house prices run in a cycle of rise and fall and they're quite predictable maybe apart from the war years.

    If you can afford it and manage to actually get a mortgage deal then I don't think you can lose long term. The arguments for rental against buy depend on your circumstances at the time and need to be thought through carefully.

    James @ http://www.voucherbuddy.co.uk

    Report on 11 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • IPINLive
    Love rating 13
    IPINLive said

    As has been said, each individuals situation is going to be different, so a ballpark "it's better to buy" or "it's better to rent" doesn't work either way. It surprises me still the number of people that get caught out not realising what an interest only mortgage is and being shocked that they can't afford it when the interest only period runs out.

    The reality is that mortgages (both availability and the LTV rates) are in an unusual state at the moment. The banks need to build up loans and appear to be showing improved business, and the government are pushing for more lending to boost the market. Meanwhile the public are picking up on this and figures improve for a few weeks, only to drop shortly after.

    Regulation needs to be considered on lending before the banks continue to control house prices artificially - it will result in a tough time for a relatively short time, but in the end it should bring the market back to some reasonable level of sustainability.

    Report on 11 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • evelynindrefach@yahoo.co.uk
    Love rating 1
    evelynindrefach@yahoo.co.uk said

    I live in Swansea and keep abreast with property prices. I would dispute the findings of your source Zoopla.co.uk as they are quite frankly ridiculous. Cardiff property prices are far higher than Swansea and the figures quoted seem to suggest that Swansea flats are not far off the prices in the Reading area???? If these figures are wrong then how can the rest of their figures be trusted?.

    If your article is based on this particular source, how can the public take it seriously?

    Regards Evelyn Sanders

    Report on 11 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • RocketSteve
    Love rating 30
    RocketSteve said

    One thing about paying an interest only mortgage is that over the 25 or 35 year term the real cost will fall based on the value of money in the future, whereas rents will increase over that time. So in 25 years time your rent could be 4 or more times higher than the interest only payment as that sum will still be the interest accrued on the inital amount borrowed....

    And anyone with two brain cells to rub together will be maxing out their ISA allowance to save up and pay off the mortgage. Again with an increased numerical salary based on inflationary effects should make it easier and easier the closer the term date approaches.

    Report on 11 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • hulmeisred
    Love rating 5
    hulmeisred said

    As I posted earlier I am a renter and can not make buying stack up against renting. Renting is a no brainer for me from a financial perspective at the moment.

    However, If you were to checkpoint 2 people in 2036 (i.e 25 years from now) both living in similar properties, 1 who has rented for that entire period and 1 who has bought, I'd agree there was a good chance that the buyer would have accumulated more wealth than the renter(Albeit mostly in the bricks/mortar)

    But as with a lot of things in life, timing and personal circumstances are important. If I rent and save up for the next 2 years and then buy the family home in cash in 2 years time, I am very very confident that I will have significantly greater wealth in 25 years time than if I went out now and bought a house with a mortgage. My calculations show an advantage of renting somewhere in the region of between £30k and £70k. (depending on what house prices do)

    Why is buying now so bad for me?

    a) Putting my money into a house, means that my money no longer generates an income

    b) I would be paying interest to the bank

    c) I expect House prices to fall by at least 10% over the next 2 years (conservative estimate). This means if I buy a £250k home now, it would 25k of value.

    Report on 11 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • msmoneywise
    Love rating 27
    msmoneywise said

    Poorpensioner, I agree. Posting in reverse order makes it really confusing to follow posts and I (having an average, orderly mind) prefer to read the question before the answer!

    I got out of the property market in 2010 and have put away the equity from the sale of my main home waiting for property prices to fall. Since I now live abroad and own my home outright, I am not caught in the interest dilemma. I will buy, at the right time and price. Meanwhile, my son rents and will continue to do so, because London prices are still too high for me to help him buy there.

    Your individual circumstances will determine which is the best option for you, buying or renting.

    Report on 11 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LastChip
    Love rating 92
    LastChip said

    There's lots of ifs and maybes with an article like this. It's certainly far from straight forward and will depend to a large extent on the way in which you wish to lead your life.

    For me, there was never any question, buying was the way to go. But that's not based purely on financial reasoning.

    Surely, a home is not just about money. It's about security, it's about freedom, it's about all sorts of immeasurable issues, that are not purely financial.

    The author says: "Firstly, the buyer figures are based on an interest-only mortgage, meaning you won’t actually be paying off any of your debt when you shell out every month."

    Nor will you own a property after renting all your life. Presumably, Zoopla used this comparison as the fairest way to get like for like. However, I concede, an owner will have to provide for maintenance costs in addition to the mortgage.

    Do you really want to be finding rent, when you are no longer able to work? Let me tell you, I know several people that are approaching retirement, and the one issue they all have in common, is worrying about how they are going to pay their rent. And it's only ever going to go up!

    There are many folk that will admit to being thrown out of rented accommodation at short notice, through no fault of their own. That happens rarely in owned property, though one can always point to exceptions to any normally perceived rules.

    Personally, I don't want to have to seek permission, every time I want to hang something on the wall. But do that in properly managed rented accommodation, and you'll end up with a bill.

    As someone who has lived a few years on this planet now, let me assure the younger readers, there really is more to life than money. Sure, it plays a hugely important role in your lifestyle, but don't fall into the accountancy trap; knowing the cost of everything and the value of nothing!

    Note to lovemoney: I have to agree with comments below, reverse posting is a retrograde step. In this part of the world, we read left to right, top to bottom! As you're using a content management system, it should be a simple job to put it back to as before.

    Report on 13 March 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).

Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV1