Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Home improvements

How I saved thousands on my home extension

Donna Ferguson
by Lovemoney Staff Donna Ferguson on 01 October 2012  |  Comments 11 comments

If you're planning to take advantage of the relaxed planning permission rules and build a home extension, make sure you follow these tips.

How I saved thousands on my home extension

The Government recently announced a month-long consultation on whether homeowners should be allowed to build extensions of up to 25 feet (double the current permitted size) without planning permission, for an ‘emergency’ period of one year only.

The coalition claims the proposal will boost house building and revive the economy – no doubt they’re hoping it might win a few votes with wealthy, middle-class property-owners, too.

Unfortunately, Lib Dem party members don’t agree, voting overwhelmingly against the move at their conference last week. Many fear that if the planned changes do go ahead, it will lead to conflict with neighbours and huge, unsightly additions to buildings springing up everywhere.

I can see their point. After all, if the current restrictions limiting the size of extensions (without planning permission) aren’t there for a good reason, why isn’t the Government planning to reform the law permanently?

Getting planning permission

Furthermore, although it is time-consuming, I don’t think it’s difficult to get planning permission for large extensions at the moment – as long as your plans don’t have a negative impact on your neighbours or the environment. And I’m speaking from experience here. Last year, I managed to get planning permission for a 30m extension to my north London flat, despite living in a conservation area and having no permitted development rights.

Still, I can’t deny it was stressful. I wrote the successful application myself, which took a lot of time, effort and research. It cost me £150 in fees, and took eight tense weeks. And that’s a relatively quick turnaround – if the application goes to the planning committee, or is turned down and you appeal, the process can easily take months or even years.

So yes, if you are thinking of building a large extension, being able to forgo all the bureaucratic red tape involved with getting planning permission will definitely save you stress, hassle, money and time. Here’s how to do it cheaply:

Choose a problem-fixing builder

You need a builder who can solve problems cheaply and quickly, rather than asking you what to do when. Let’s face it, you probably won’t have a clue.

I interviewed a number of builders for the job, and when I say interviewed, I actually asked them interview-type questions like: ‘How would you approach this problem?’ or ‘How do you plan to minimise the disruption during this stage?’. I cannot tell you how good the builder I eventually chose was at solving problems. I’d come home, and he’d say: "Unfortunately, there’s this completely unforeseeable, potentially extremely expensive major complication... but don’t worry, I’ve already worked around it using this complex, little-known and very cheap method.”

OK, so I'm paraphrasing, but you get the idea.

Keep the neighbours onside

Our elderly neighbour had five conifers in his back garden and when the building officer saw them, he insisted we increase the depth of our foundations dramatically. This would have cost us thousands of pounds extra. But when our neighbour found out about this, he very kindly offered to cut down all his trees – just to save us money!

We were flabbergasted. We had consulted him throughout the planning process and tried to be considerate throughout, but I think it was the kindness and respect our builder had shown him over the garden wall that truly won him over. Which leads me nicely onto my next point...

Hire trustworthy tradespeople who you can get on with

As I explained in How I saved £1200 on my new boiler, dealing with recommended independent tradesmen can be a lot cheaper than dealing with a big firm, and you have a closer, more direct relationship with them which makes it easier to sort problems out.

Plus, if you get a word-of-mouth recommendation, their personal reputation (effectively, their livelihood) is at stake and they are often prepared to go the extra mile as a result.

Even if their quote isn’t the cheapest, I’d recommend going with the tradesperson you instinctively trust most to do a good job – it’s likely you will save hundreds of pounds in the long run.

Keep on top of your finances

I opened a bank account just for spending on the extension, then used the lovemoney.com MoneyTrack service to see what I was spending money on easily as it divides your spending into categories. Every few days, I also updated our budget for various parts of the build, our savings account balances and all our building spending into a shared spreadsheet.

This allowed me to make informed decisions when faced with a potentially costly dilemma. We also took out the market-leading 0% credit card so we could keep our savings in our ISAs for as long as possible, pocketing the interest on the ISA while paying nothing on our debt.

Be on your guard

One mistake I made was panicking because the floorboard or bathroom I liked was on sale for a limited time only. In fact, it turned out it was discounted pretty permanently in various sales throughout the year.

Happily, I’d only put down deposits and not paid in full, so I could choose which ‘sale’ price I paid at the point of delivery. You just need to make sure you check all the current prices before you pay in full. You also have to be on your guard about measurements. It might seem obvious, but a mistake here can literally cost you a fortune!

Have you extended the size of your home? Was it a stressful experience? What would you do differently? Do you plan to take advantage of the Government's planning changes? Let us know your thoughts in the comment box below

More on home improvements:

How I saved £1200 on my new boiler

How to get planning permission

Best ways to pay for home improvements

Home extensions increase property value by up to 23%.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (11)

  • RichardSowler
    Love rating 17
    RichardSowler said

    You were extremely well organised, clear-thinking, efficient - and, on the planning permission, lucky.

    I (or to be precise a family trust) had an awful experience trying to get planning permission for a demolish-and-rebuild-in the-same-style project in a conservation area. Despite engineers' evidence that the original building was subsiding and incapable of being preserved, the Conservation Officer simply would not agree to the proposal, despite our having support from the Housing and Public Health Officers. We spent nearly £30,000 on architects and planning consultants fees and got nowhere. The development would have shown a profit of some £600,000 had it gone ahead, so it seemed worth the expenditure at the time. All I can add is "beware the High Peak Borough Council" on planning

    Report on 01 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • russbiker
    Love rating 57
    russbiker said

    I get on very well with my neighbours, but I think if one of them asked me to cut down any trees just to convenience their extension, I'd advise them of a very hot place they could go to!

    Report on 01 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • diana6
    Love rating 3
    diana6 said

    Donna

    Any chance you can let us know who your builders are. We are also looking / planning an extension and recommendations are always a good way forward.

    Report on 01 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • coloratura
    Love rating 62
    coloratura said

    Things that will stop me building the extension I would like to build:-

    (1) 20@ VAT on the build. A real reduction in this would mean more people would have work done. Just allowing people to do bigger extensions will not necessarily encourage them to build as it will cost them more money and thus even more in taxes.

    (2) The fact that there is no real recompense if the builder goes off with your money having not finished the job or having finished it badly. A recent TV programme told the story of a Solicitor who had gone through all the checks and had a Contract with the builder and she still lost £36,000 - the builder had gone to ground of course.

    It's about time the law was really toughened up on builders who do this (they just set up another company in a different name and even if you go to Court they don't pay up). Very very rarely is one of them imprisoned. Time for a builders register I think. Of course there are registers but the bad builders are clever and will even claim to be members. Lets have a proper, legal register (with teeth) with home telephone numbers, addresses etc.

    The good, honest builders won't object to this as they will get more work and keep a good reputation throughout the trade thus leading to even more work.

    Let the TV be allowed to name the good builders in our areas so we can all use them and ignore the others (as well as naming the bad ones of course). It could be a "Public Serrvice" announcement.

    Not everybody has time to become full time investigators (although to do none would be stupid) and trying to "save thousands" can sometimes cost thousands.

    Report on 01 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sludgeguts
    Love rating 56
    sludgeguts said

    @ coloratura, I agree. With huge expenditure like this, the public should have some protection against the wide boys.

    I'm going through the process at the moment & using my Brother-in law so should be OK, however, I understand that I still have to pay some fees to the council for their inspector - so here's an idea, I give the council the lion's share of the money (maybe 10% less as my 'leverage'), they get the interest of my money during the process (by way of additional fee). They then inspect the build at various stages - it would only take a few moments to see the footings are the right depth, cavities are insulated etc - and they sign off that stage & give the builder a cheque for the work completed (builders would also have to register with councils).

    At completion, the work is signed off & the builder gets the final amount.

    The council inspector goes around with the customer to agree on the finish & agree a snagging list (say a couple of weeks after completion).

    The council then have a list of builders in the area & know exactly how each of them perform.

    Sadly, as it stands, trading standards & local council will not recommend or even hint at half decent traders - but when things go wrong, TS say you should go to them first.

    win-win for builders.

    Report on 01 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • develyn
    Love rating 7
    develyn said

    Dear Sludgeguts (what a name!) Trading standards officers have introduced a scheme called Buy with Confidence. They vet local tradesmen and if they are satisfied that they are up to standard they can display the Buy with Confidence logo. I can see a some of these on Which? Local for my area.

    Report on 01 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • oldhenry
    Love rating 274
    oldhenry said

    Well I reckon it is the Building Control that stops buildings being extended , not planners. Get rid of the endless stupid numbing regulations that get added to each year. Labour added a load , Cameron get shut of them.

    The real reason building has slowed down is that people have NO money. It is all being taken in taxes. Petrol, wines, VAT all well up on 2009. Also th eextension will need to be heated , at great cost. I would not comtemplate extending now but would like to make my house smaller! Who can afford to heat their home properly? In the 1980s I extended my then home and did the building work myself, al passed by the Council. I did teh plumbing and electrics too. Now you need endless approvals for something so simple as wiring your house. Pathetic , but just what government loves, control of teh population

    Report on 02 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • SiGl26
    Love rating 26
    SiGl26 said

    Funny how getting planning permission often seems to take weeks or even months...

    A decision must be made by your local planning committee within 4 weeks of an application being submitted. Failure to do so means you can bypass the local council and go direct to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS).

    Found this out when the developer seeking permission on a plot of backland behind my house went direct to PINS after the planning committee deferred its decision over Xmas pending a site visit...

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • SiGl26
    Love rating 26
    SiGl26 said

    Have to agree with OldHenry about Building Regs - we're talking about one's own home here, so if I want to take the risk of having no handrails on stairs, or limited means of egress from a 3rd floor room, why shouldn't I be allowed to accept it?

    And don't get me started on the ludicrous requirement for Part P certification of electrical installations in bathrooms and kitchens; why was I suddenly more at risk after April 1 2007 than I was before it? Of course stuff has to be done safely but being forced to pay a tradesman to do so is plain wrong...

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    The endless changes to the building regulations are partly about forcing people to build more insulation and fuel-efficiency into the fabric of buildings, but partly it seems for endless tinkering to keep the writers of building regs and an army of consultants in work, and to remove all risk for the general public by banning them from doing most DIY task (Part P being a notorious example).

    The same goes with gas regulation - it used to be common for heating engineers to be Corgi-registered, but the fees and testing has increased enormously, so most don't bother and just employ someone who is registered to test the system at the end of the job.

    The article doesn't mention that most councils will be imposing the new Community Infrastructure Levy on extensions as well as new homes. CIL is based on the square meters of extra floor space and can be varied from area to area, depending on house prices, so in Wimbledon and parts of Watford for example, Housebuilding and Renovating Magazine has worked out that it will cost about £60,000 in CIL taxes just to build a fairly ordinary 4-bed house.

    People's enthusiasm for extensions are going to wane rapidly when they realise they have to spend thousands of pounds in CIL tax to the council. If you are planning an extension, check the plans for CIL in your area and get moving, as councils see CIL as a lucrative moneypot, just as many have been milking the new housebuilding industry for S106 "contributions" and Affordable Homes for years. In my area, if I get planning permission to build 5 new houses, I have to give 2 of them away to a housing association as social housing, and pay about £15,000 per house in S106 tax. I then have to try and make some kind of return on the three remaining houses for private sale, whilst being obliged to tell prospective buyers that they may be living next door to some benefit-scrounging scroats or Family from Hell selected for them by a housing association.

    Report on 05 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • kiaora1
    Love rating 0
    kiaora1 said

    CIL is a way yo provide local authorities with more cash to waste rather than forcing them to find efficiencies. Worst still they collect the money upfront from a developer but they do not have to provide any specific infrastructure for his development.

    In any case facilities , schooling/ rubbish collection, only come in to play once property is occupied So why developers have to pay upfront ?!

    This will kill off development and will cost '000 of jobs and push prices higher - CIL COST MIN 10% of build cost . Once new build go up in price old stock will follow

    This a new sneaky tax introduced and must be challenged.

    Report on 07 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3