Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Buy to let investments

How to evict bad tenants

ReenaSewraz
by Lovemoney Staff ReenaSewraz on 10 July 2012  |  Comments 16 comments

Saddled with tenants who can't or won't pay the rent? Find out how to get rid and get your property back.

How to evict bad tenants

Renting out a property can be a lucrative investment, but it can also come with a lot of costly problems for a landlord if they end up with the wrong tenants.

Rent arrears, broken tenancy agreements and property damage are just some of the reasons a landlord may feel the need to evict a tenant that turns out to be a bad apple. Unfortunately, the property law which dictates what a landlord must do to get tenants out can be costly, time consuming, and confusing.

Rent arrears

According to the latest survey by the National Landlords Association of its members, 45% of landlords dealt with cases of arrears over the last 12 months and a typical portfolio landlord has four tenants that are in arrears with an average £2,326 owed.

Falling behind with payments can pose big problems to landlords who use the money to keep up with mortgage repayments and if this situation persists there is a risk of repossession.

So what can you do if you are a landlord faced with problem tenants?

Try talking first

The first step if a tenant is late with the rent or stops paying altogether is to discuss what is happening and attempt to reach an arrangement.

According to the latest Tenant Arrears Tracker by Templeton LPA there were on average 94,000 tenants in England and Wales in severe arrears in the first three month of 2012. Clearly large numbers of renters are struggling to pay the bills. The rising cost of living or a recent job loss may be knocking a tenant’s ability to keep up with rent payments.

Chris Norris, Head of Policy at the National Landlords Association, suggests landlords work with their tenants to come to a short-term solution such as reduced rent or a repayment plan making sure to keep a written record of anything agreed. Landlords could also help by advising tenants of any benefits they may be entitled to, given their situation.

Getting to the root of the problem could be less stressful than starting legal action but landlords may not be able to allow such leeway for a long time based on their own deteriorating situation.

The Housing Act 1988

If your tenants don’t sort out their financial difficulties and continue to miss rent payments, you will be entitled to bring legal action against them to remove them from the property. In order to get the process underway you will need to serve one of two notices under the Housing Act 1988.

Section 8 notice

If your tenants are still within the fixed term of their Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) agreement (typically between six and 12 months) then you need to serve them with a Section 8 notice which deals with breaches of contract.

To serve these papers a landlord must have good reason like continually late rent payments, non-payment, or generally breaking the terms of the tenancy (like sub-letting). These are called grounds and there are 17 you could use. Citing a few may give you a stronger case should this come to court.

Ground 8 for example relates to rent arrears. This section states that a Section 8 notice can only be served to tenants once a certain amount is unpaid which is determined by the cycle they normally pay the rent (i.e. weekly, monthly, bi-annually, yearly). So if rent is usually paid monthly at least two months’ rent needs to be owed before the notice can be issued.The average rent in the UK is currently around £712 so this means a landlord must be owed at least £1,424 on average before being able to seek help.

Depending on the grounds used to serve the tenants you need to give a certain period of notice before starting court action, which is usually either two weeks or two months. If successful this route can give a landlord a possession order plus a money order to get the rent owed.

Section 21 notice

The other option for landlords is the Section 21 notice which entitles a landlord to take back possession of a property at the end of a fixed term agreement or during the periodic tenancy (where the contract has not been renewed but the tenant still remains living the property on a rolling contract). You don't need to state any reason, but must give two months' notice.

You can serve a section 21 notice at any time during the fixed tenancy or periodic tenancy, but it does not take effect until the fixed term of an agreement has come to an end and two months’ notice has been given. That could mean an agonising wait if tenants have a 12 month agreement and have acted up at the beginning of the term. A Section 8 notice may be more appropriate here.

Court

Once a landlord has served a valid Section 21 notice or Section 8 notice, they can apply to the court to start proceedings as soon as the notice expires. The tenant is not required to vacate the property until there is a court order requiring them to do so. But should the courts rule in your favour you are well on your way.  

What if they don’t leave?

The final hurdle faced by landlords who try to do things properly is when tenants just won’t leave. Even when served with a possession order from a court some tenants refuse to move on.

If this is the case when the notice of possession expires, you can serve them with a notice to seek possession which means you will be going to the courts to get them evicted. Finally if the courts again decide in your favour they will provide a date for the tenants to vacate the property by and this can be the time you call on the bailiffs for help.

Try getting someone else to do it

As you can see, getting tenants evicted can be a lengthy process (sometimes three to six months) that is delayed by incorrect paperwork or even tenants fighting back. For some this may be too much to bear alone, but there are numerous companies that can help do all the groundwork so you don’t have to. This will cost you somewhere in the region of £1,000, which will get the required notices served, a court hearing for a possession order and should it be necessary pay for the bailiffs to come in.

For me this seems like a small price to pay to ensure you regain possession of the property but if you have a large portfolio then it makes sense to try and figure out the procedures for yourself to prepare for any more future problems!

More stories on renting:

Landlords – pick the right tenant

Tenants: Know your rights

How to rent out your home

Ask these questions before you rent!

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (16)

  • meldrewreborn
    Love rating 46
    meldrewreborn said

    And make sure you take every action to get your money back including through the courts. If you don't get the tenants credit history impacted then you just invite them to do the same to some other hapless landlord. There are those who are serial rent defaulters - landlords need to look out for each other.

    Report on 10 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • BGM
    Love rating 7
    BGM said

    where do landlords stand legally if there is no contract in place?

    Report on 11 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Stargazer
    Love rating 11
    Stargazer said

    The simplest solution is, of course, to reach an agreement with your tenants. Failing that, the advice I've had is that it's definitely preferable to go down the Section 21 route if you're having persistent problems with tenants unless it's a long time before their current lease ends and you really need to evict them.

    It's not unknown for tenants to stop paying rent, for example, wait until the landlord goes to court to get possession under a Section 8 notice and pay just enough rent at the last minute to halt the proceedings. The process for Section 21 is generally much simpler and doesn't usually require the landlord to attend court. Additionally, a properly served Section 21 notice can't be contested whereas a Section 8 notice can.

    Report on 11 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • scchin
    Love rating 0
    scchin said

    The law should change to look after landlords too. They keep getting penalised for everything, and there are far too many rougue tenants around.

    Report on 11 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • deryck23
    Love rating 10
    deryck23 said

    The position is Scotland is broadly similar but the rules and procedures have different names etc due to different legislation

    Also in Scotland, and I think in England, it is a criminal offence to try to short circuit the courts by trying to use hassle to get them to leave. Talking with them and trying to reach agreement in leiu of court is of course perfectly legitimate and can often be the best route

    BUt a word of warning, many say it is wise to continue down the formal court route at the same time - agreements may be reached but broken and then you are several months behind if you wait to start then. Even with an eviction order you can still reach agreement rather than bailiffs (do you still have them inEngland?) or Sheriff Officers in Scotland

    deryck

    deryck

    Report on 11 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • time2go
    Love rating 66
    time2go said

    BGM - if the tenant is in your property, paying rent on a regular basis, it is likely they have a periodic assured shorthold tenancy (monthly tenancy if rent is paid every month, weekly tenancy if paid every week etc). Same rules apply regarding notice. It really depends when they moved in, I am assuming it was recently (within the last 15 years or so!!!).

    Check this link out:

    http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/downloads_and_tools/tenancy_checker

    ( I won't even ask why there has never been a written contract, I'm sure there are good reasons!)

    Meldrewreborn - Totally agree with you. Although, it will result in some court costs that you will never recover, even if you do not instruct a lawyer.

    Report on 11 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • naterbox
    Love rating 12
    naterbox said

    I rent out a property which is about to be subject to a compulsory purchase order. The complete area is being re-generated. The tenant is on a rolling contract which was originally for a 12 month period. The tenant has told me that once I've issued her with a Notice to Quit giving her 2 months notice, she needs a letter from telling her to quit the premises within 28 days. Is this correct? Will I still need a court order?

    She does periodically have problems paying the rent, but manages to gradually pay off the arrears. The council want the property back by 31/3/2013. I suspect she'll stop paying the rent altogether as the date approaches.

    She's said she won't move out until the bulldozers are knocking on the door.

    Does anyone on here have any constructive advice for me please?

    Report on 11 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • time2go
    Love rating 66
    time2go said

    Naterbox - She may be looking for a Court Order , particularly if she is looking for the council to rehouse her, that's because she needs to demonstrate that she is not 'intentionally homeless'...... but if there is a CPO then she could justifiably argue she is not intentionally homeless.

    You may want to 'warn' her that if she is in arrears and the Local Authority becomes aware of this then they may argue that she is intentionally homeless (i.e. if the reason you are asking her to leave is because of rent arrears and not the CPO) then the Local Authority may well argue they have no duty to rehouse (they are nearly always looking for a get out). May be this will help her realise that you can't live somewhere for free ??? and she will stump up the money???

    Good luck

    Report on 11 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • naterbox
    Love rating 12
    naterbox said

    Thank you time2go, that's really useful.

    She was hoping I'd buy one of the leaseholder flats on the redevelopment, and she'd be able to move into that, but I'm a reluctant landlord and have no desire to buy another property. Admitted I'll miss the rent, and there are no investments which will give me anything like the return on my capital. Anyone know of any viable'get rich quick' schemes where my investment isn't at risk? I suspect under my mattress is as good as anywhere at the moment.

    Report on 11 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • yocoxy
    Love rating 137
    yocoxy said

    It's great to see some constructive discussion without the interjection of "All landlords are evil and it's all the Government's fault" that often occurs here from the regular posters. This forum would be much more useful if it were always this way.

    I echo the point that it's worth using court action to ensure there's something on the record for tenants who wilfully don't pay. I am in a process using Money Claim Online which is the new version of the small claims court to chase some ex tenants who did a moonlight flit owing a month's rent and leaving me with a £3000 bill to make the place habitable again.

    I recovered the rent from their deposit and I'm claiming less than £2000 since I accept that some redecoration is normal. This costs only £80 (the fees are a sliding scale starting at £35). Even though there's a slim chance that they'll settle even after a court order, I think it's a reasonable investment to ensure that they've got judgements against them to warn future landlords.

    Report on 12 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • yocoxy
    Love rating 137
    yocoxy said

    I should also mention that the letting agent, the local Martin&co franchise has been very helpful in tracing the tenant to the new address, sending them warning letters and coaching me in the MoneyClaim process.

    Agents generally get a bad press but as a landlord with only two properties and a full time job, I've found their services very good value for money.

    Report on 12 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • time2go
    Love rating 66
    time2go said

    yocoxy, - If you have the correct references (your agent should be able to give you this, copy of passport, bank statements, wage slips etc) you can always use 'enquiry agents' -aka PI's, detectives etc . As with any type of 'Agent' some are better than others, use due diligence before instructing them, tell them how much you are willing to spend on their fees etc etc

    The main thing is to know where the tenants live or work before starting your claim - if you can't serve the claim form on them then there is no point.

    If you know they are working, where they work etc and they are reluctant to pay you can always ask the court for an 'Attachment of Earnings Order' - most people don't want their employer knowing about their non-payment of rent maybe this will push them in the right direction.

    It also helps if you can identify if they have the money to pay their debt!

    Report on 12 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • time2go
    Love rating 66
    time2go said

    yocoxy, in my opinion I would always claim the amount on the estimates, don't try to guess how much the court will knock of your claim. If you claim the highest amount and the tenant is particularly belligerent, discourteous to the court, you may find the reduction will be less.

    For those thinking of inflating the estimates, this is normally spotted by the court and you will be the unreasonable landlord and you may not recover as much as you could.

    Report on 12 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • tuttogallo
    Love rating 82
    tuttogallo said

    naterbox. If you don't like being a landord and you don't want to risk your capital, you only have the option of savings accounts. Make sure you don't hold more than £85,00 with any one institution and use your annual cash ISA allownace to the full.

    Sorry, there is no such thing as "get rich quick", only get rich slow and remember, if an investment looks too good to be true, it probably is.

    Report on 16 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • BGM
    Love rating 7
    BGM said

    time2go - don't even get me started on the no-contract thing, it's something stupid that a landlord has done with his property in the building where i am owner occupier. The tenant is terrible and there were no background checks done either.. police called numerous times etc.

    I think we have it sorted now though, shame the police had to get involved.. but landlord is looking at some serious trouble currently for what the tenant has been up to.. i'll say no more!! :D

    Report on 18 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • sailability
    Love rating 0
    sailability said

    sailability

    Please can someone advise me. I put my property in the hands of an agent in Wales when I moved abroad. The agent has rented the property without takeing a bond. The tenant is on social payments which the agent has received but the tenant hasnt been paying his share which the agent didnt advise me. The agent also didnt pay me for over a year and I had to chase him for my money. He had previously used my email address but gave the excuse that he couldnt contact me! Twice I gave him my bank details and still he didnt bank my money. I then many months ago told the agent that I wanted him to go to the courts to get the tenant out and to recover the arrears via the court. He has told me the tenant cant pay so whats the point. I wanted to sell the property and have waited months for the agent to give the tenat notice. The agent moved the tenant to another property but the tenant has left furniture and much rubbish behind. The agent has tried to get me to pay 300 pounds for the removal of this and another 200 pounds for cleaning the property. Please can someone advise me on the course of action I can take.

    Report on 22 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2