Landlords - cash in on record rents!
Rents and demand are on the rise, while mortgage rates continue to fall. It's an exciting time to be a landlord!
Follow this topic
Knowledge » Buy to let investments
Rents and demand are on the rise, while mortgage rates continue to fall. It's an exciting time to be a landlord!
1Great time to be a landlord but do not forget to get your tenants credit checked to avoid bad tenants with bad records and related expenses...http://www.cncsearches.co.uk/services.asp
Love 0 loves
126
8Has this country become so obsessed with money that we have forgotten that houses are places to live, family homes, retirement homes, starter homes...HOMES!
They are HOMES, not investments! The 'assured shorthold tenancy' deprives tenants of the freedom to live in their HOME without fear of eviction. So probably more than 99% of all tenants in this country can be evicted from their home for absolutely no reason! That is not a good feeling to have at the back of your mind 24/7.
Being forced to rent because prices were allowed to rise so uncontrollably by Gordon "I wont let house prices get out of control" Brown is bad enough, but being forced to rent under such a biased tenancy agreement reminds me of Serfdom in the middle ages.
Do you feel proud exalting the virtues of making money from such a one-sided system which more and more people find themselves trapped in, unable to afford to save for a deposit due to the ever increasing rent demands of the landlords?
If this continues we will return to the days of lords (landlords) and peasants (tenants). Melodramatic, maybe, but what else would you call it when 1% of the people own 99% of the land and property and have the power that goes with that ownership?
Scary time ahead...
Love 6 loves
39House ownership these days is apparently a business just like any other, the amount of people with large portfolios of rental property is scary... The problem is there is nothing to prevent them from doing it. Got to have somewhere to put all the EU migrants you know.
Love 1 love
4I totally agree with DaveRoach and find it highly irresponsible of you to promote the increase of rents to make a quick buck.
I'm sure those already struggling with rising bills will agree with me in saying that the cost of living does not need to be increased further. If money gets too tight people will have no choice but to borrow or become homeless. I appreciate the economics - demand exceeding supply hence driving up price - but it really doesn't ned any help from you lot.
I always thought that LoveMoney was about advising people how to get out of debt not encouraging profiteering to force them into it. At least in a few months time you and all the landlords you have advised can feel proud of making a few extra pounds of profit. Sadly most families will have become poorer or even worse, homeless. Well done LoveMoney. (slow clap)
Love 4 loves
600The days of Lords and peasants or toffs and oiks has already returned. Having ruined most investments that load of bankers need something to invest in. Property is seen as 'safe as houses' but is it? People can only be screwed so much and with rising energy prices, rising petrol prices, rising rents and rising taxes - something must give. You need to be thrifty and frugal to survive the onslaught led by Cameron - it favours the rich, not the poor or the middle classes and certainly not the old or disabled.
Love 1 love
33LM's people are reporters, not kingmakers. They tell the news, not create it (capaigning against media power is a whole other kettle of fish, and a whole other forum)
Don't gib at them for reporting the news as is - warts and all. Most other news services wouldn't bother.
I for one like to know that when my landlord puts up the rent, and I have to do likewise to my sub-tenant; it's not altogether a 'lets screw more money out of you' but some of 'my costs have gone up. have to pass them on'
Love 0 loves
8@ mambach:
I agree they don't make the news, but irresponsible reporting (ramping) of BTL and income from property is one of the reasons our(UK) residential property is so expensive today.
The trouble is, most other news services DO report the same sensational rubbish.
The article clearly states rents are rising and landlords costs (i.e. mortgage rates) are falling, so it is 'lets screw more money out of you'
What we need in this country is a proper correction in residential property prices combined with much tighter regulation on BTL's so that the 1000's of families trapped between extortionate rents and extortionate house prices can live with a little more security.
All high rents do is take money from the wider economy (shops, pubs, cinemas etc etc) and put it into the hands of the landlords.
It looks like 86% of the landlords surveyed are going to get a wake up call soon. With the second half of the recession/depression well under way households will be squeezed further and there will be no more money for these high rents so people will share or move back with parents, demand will fall, landlords will sell up and the market will correct. It started in 2007, but the government pulled out every weapon they had to stop it, but all they have done is postpone the inevitable. It might take a few more years, but prices will correct, amateur landlords with poor (or no) business models will go bankrupt and the whole cycle will start again.
Love 1 love
80I really don't know what the big ho ha is.. when we wanted to buy our first home in 1978 we had to save hard and make sacrifices to get the 10% deposit and make sure we could afford the repayments - and that meant giving up going out and NOT having holidays or the latest in thing. Today the youngest don't have any concept of the future, don't want to learn to save and don't want to give up anything in fact they want more up to date useless gadgets than ever before - you can't have both, either make sacrifices and get that home or continue wasting money on rubbish - to me it is that simple.
Love 1 love
22What most of these new landlords don't realise is that tenants don't always behave like model tenants, if your rents are too high they oftern can't pay them, they can cause anti-social behaviour and you could be liable for the damage they cause to others, they don't lave when you want them to and they leave a mess when they do - haveing worked for a large housing provider for years I am well aware of all these things. New landlords need to realise that all these things are a business risk that you have to take account of when calculating what your proift is going to be
Love 0 loves
8@ onthecomputer
I earn £30k+, my wife works part time earning about £10K. the rest of the time she looks after the children. we are in our thirties. we don't go out except for the odd birthday celebration, we don't have iphones, my laptop is a 5yr old piece of rubbish my company were going to throw out, we live very frugally, save water, turn the heating down etc etc. and despite saving what we can each month, tax, rent, food and transport costs eat up nearly all of our income. I agree some young people wont sacrifice anything, but I HAVE and it really pisses me off when someone like you tells me how many sacrifices you made and how I need to do the same then I'll be able to afford a house.
In 1978 an average house cost £15k, average wage was about £5k. 3x salary ergo affordable. you did well. today average house price £165, my (above average) salary £30k. 5.5x salary ergo NOT affordable even if you scrimp, save and go without.
You and others of your generation did very well out of the high inflation of the 70's, 80's and 90's. It is not the same today, so you can't even start to compare.
Love 1 love
80@ DaveRoach and people like you piss me off telling the world how hard done by you are- my advice - then don't have children till you can afford them. One can only give an example or comment on what they see i.e kids of today. I was married 14 years before we had children I am an older parent - so don't get on your high horse. Not everyone is going to live the same and make the same sacrifices. Maybe you should have bought a house before you decided to have children - then you would not be paying dead rent - each to their own but don't become angry at me because we have achieved what you do not have and so wish. No one is asking you to live my life but it sounds as if you are unhappy with yours :-)
Btw yours would be 40 x 3 (your wife's salary included) and maybe if you had started out in a flat before kids you would have managed to get on the property ladder.
Also there is no comparison as you say - in my days of having children all we had was child benefit, no nursery vouchers, no child/working tax credit -ZILCH - so who is the one better off? You have to decide what is important to you and don't be so angry at those who have achieved what you desire.
I have no more to say as the whole thing is going off topic but try not to be angry!
Love 2 loves
600I remember inflation at 20% and interest rates at 12% and higher. Would you want to be in Buy to Let with a tracker at that interest rate. You could make a killing with property going up in price at a better rate than you were paying in interest; but could you keep on paying it at that interest rate? Buy to let is risky if you have mortgage and if you expect rents to cover your mortgage; it is way too risky.
Love 0 loves
8@ onthecomputer. I am not angry at you for your achievements. You were born at a very different time and like your peers you have done very well out of the deal. I merely resent being told I can afford to buy a house if I make sacrifices. Even at 3x40k you are still only looking at 120K, nowhere near the 160 average. I have sacrificed a lot, but I refuse to risk the health of my wife and children by delaying starting our family until we can afford to buy a house. Getting slightly back on topic I would be very happy to rent all my life if the default tenancy agreement in this country offered greater security of tenure to tenants.
I don't want any sympathy from anyone, I did buy a house a few years ago, but after we had children we made a sacrifice to give them a better education. We sold up to rent in a better area so they would get into a better school. In that area house prices are slightly above average as is our combined wage, but prices are still way too high and BTL and government policy are the major contributors to the excessive prices rises.
As for the elusive property ladder, it was replaced by a treadmill in the early 90's.
In a low wage inflation era (such as we are in now) there is no ladder. In the 70's and 80's wages were going up in double digits some years, greatly eroding the debt you had secured on your house, hence in a few years you had a lot of equity to help you move up the 'ladder'. Today with wage rises of 2% if you're lucky that debt is not eroded nearly so quickly hence a 25 year treadmill, and little chance to move up the 'ladder'
Back on topic. @Mike10613 agreed, BTL is a very risky business, especially for the 1000's of accidental landlords out there who have no business model, but are unable to sell because they want too much for their house.
Checking out rightmove: properties near me are being offered for rent at around 5% gross yield. According to the major indices house prices are falling (already down 4% yoy) so only another 1% and that's a years gross profit gone. If I was in BTL I would have got out in 2007, but it is still not too late as prices have only just started falling. get out now before they hit double digit negative again. Or if you really do think its a good time to invest, go for it, but please think of the families living in your property who will likely lose their home when your business hit the wall as prices fall and interest rates rise.
About the main article:
"Landlords - cash in on record rents!" is a call to landlords to cash in. (irresponsible ramping)
"Landlords cash in on record rents" is reporting a story/survey.
John, please consider removing the hyphen and the exclamation mark, they really do ruin an otherwise reasonable article even if some of the stats are hard to believe.
Love 0 loves
270
51I recall the '70's very well.....trying to raise a family with 26% inflation, 15% mortgage rates and feeling nostalgic about the "low" 8% on mortgages that had been the norm when we got married. It's tough in a different way, today, but no tougher than it was then
Love 3 loves
23I find this article deeply depressing. Expect to see the wave of "homeless families" headlines hit the tabloids shortly.
Love 1 love
3No doubt there are a lot of good Landlords, unfortunately with all the 'Buy to Lets' around no one has any chance of actually buying a property as a home.
I'm not normally vindictive but i really hope these people know what they're doing to the ordinary people of this country.
When we bought our property in the 1970's (1979 in fact) we had to save up the deposit and then still wait until a mortgage came along. Waiting in a queue of other people for 2 years in some cases. None of this just go to the Bank, give them you wage slip or whatever and then Hey Presto! you have a mortgage.
As others have said we had to wait to have children as most of us lived with parents as even finding a property to rent within our price range was difficult; we weren't all on huge wages!
Plus only Child Benefit. Nothing like the hand-outs of today.
Don't forget, also, that during the 1970's a lot of people were out of work due to Strikes all over the place. Unfortunately, that's part of the History that this generation forget about. They only remember how 'cheap' the houses were but not how much MOST people earned, if they earned at all.
I'd just say i'd like to be on 30K plus my partner earning 10K!
Buying to Let Properties is now getting out of hand in my opinion. It's generated a Society (partly anyway as Greed has been a part of life for a while) of only thinking what you can make; it doesn't matter if the houses you're knocking down are safe and sturdy.
To make money they have to come down making this country into one great big Housing Estate where all the houses look the same and no character. But what the Hell?
That's what it's all about! Making Money.
Not a nice feeling really for most of us who are used to Community Spirit.
But that's Progress, they say!!
Love 0 loves
Sign in or register to post a reply.
Loading your results...
| Credit card company |
Balance transfers rate and period | Representative APR |
Apply now |
|---|---|---|---|
Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa |
0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) | Representative 18.9% APR (variable) | Apply |
| Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply). | |||
| Be the first to review this product | |||
NatWest Platinum MasterCard |
0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) | Representative 18.9% APR (variable) | Apply |
| Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable). | |||
| Be the first to review this product | |||
Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard |
0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) | Representative 18.9% APR (variable) | Apply |
| Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable). | |||
| Be the first to review this product | |||