Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Buy to let investments

Landlords - cash in on record rents!

John Fitzsimons
by Lovemoney Staff John Fitzsimons on 14 June 2011  |  Comments 18 comments

Rents and demand are on the rise, while mortgage rates continue to fall. It's an exciting time to be a landlord!

The vast majority of landlords are looking to at least maintain the size of their portfolios, if not increase them, as rents continue to rise to new record levels.

Expanding portfolios

A new survey of landlords has demonstrated just how positive they are about their chances of making money from property. LSL Property Services’ poll revealed that 49% of landlords see now as a good time to invest, with just 1% of landlords believing it is now a smart move to reduce the size of their portfolios.

Indeed, a whopping 86% of landlords plan to either maintain or expand their portfolios over the next 12 months.

So while demand to buy property stalls to a near standstill in the residential sector, those buying investment properties cannot complete quick enough.

Related how-to guide

Become a buy-to-let landlord

How to pick the right property, get the right mortgage, take out the right insurance, choose the right letting agent and most importantly, unravel all that red tape!

And it’s the growth in rents which is a big factor in these expansion plans.

Another new record

It seems like every couple of months we hear that rents have reached another new record high. And April was no different, with LSL reporting rents had hit an average of £692 a month, a growth of 0.8% from March.

According to the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, 42% more surveyors reported rents rose rather than fell in the three months to April. It also suggested that rents in some areas have now risen so sharply that homes which were previously affordable are now out of reach for many. So would-be buyers are not only being priced out of purchasing property, but in some areas they can’t even afford to rent either!

Perhaps unsurprisingly, London is the worst hit area. In 2010 rents rose by a frankly ridiculous 19.1% according to Cluttons, while this year it forecasts rents will rise a further 8-10%.

Generation Rent

Rents continue to rise due to the vast levels of demand the private rented sector is currently trying to meet.

More than half (52%) of landlords surveyed by LSL reported a growth in demand for their properties in the last quarter, with 68% of them forecasting this to increase further over the next year.

Indeed, as we explained in How to be the perfect tenant, there are now around nine applicants for every rental vacancy in the UK, an incredible level of competition. And it’s not all down to choice, preferring the flexibility of the rental market over the constraints of buying a property.

Related blog post

A recent report by Halifax declared that half of us believe we will be a nation of renters within a generation, with two thirds of 20-45 year old non-homeowners saying they have no prospect of ever owning their own home.

There are a number of reasons for this, both actual and perceived, including borrowers believing lenders reject everyone so there’s no point in applying (a remarkable 67% of those surveyed by Halifax). Of course things are not quite as bad as that, but it’s still pretty tough for many borrowers to access mortgage finance. And so long as that remains the case, it’s unsurprising that many will prefer to take their chances with the private rental sector.

Improving mortgages

Just to add to the current attractiveness of the rental sector for landlords, there has been a steady stream of enticing new mortgages launched by specialist lenders in recent weeks.

Platform has moved to cut interest rates on its buy-to-let deals by as much as 0.2%, while also launching new tracker deals with no early repayment charges – a useful feature for landlords concerned about the prospect of base rate rising quicker than expected.

Elsewhere, Coventry Building Society has also revamped its buy-to-let range, with two new five-year fixed rates. I particularly like the deal at 5.99% as it has a much more palatable fee (just £250 compared to £2,999) and also comes with no early repayment charges, again offering landlords an escape route if a five-year deal doesn’t look like the smartest bet a couple of years down the line.

Meanwhile, Skipton Building Society has been busy, unveiling a new suite of tracker mortgages, as well as loosening up its lending criteria. For example, the mutual’s buy-to-let deals are now available to first-time landlords along with more experienced borrowers, as well as on the purchase of new-build homes (though not flats). Meanwhile, the minimum eligible income for the main applicant has been cut from £30,000 to £20,000 per annum.

The mortgages still have some way to go, particularly when you consider the astronomical fees demanded, but the buy-to-let market looks set to have a productive future.

Lender

Term

Interest rate

Maximum LTV

Fee

BM Solutions

Two-year fixed

3.79%

60%

3% of advance

Skipton BS

Two-year fixed

3.99%

70%

£2,495

The Mortgage Works

Two-year fixed

4.99%

80%

3.5% of advance

Northern Rock

Three-year fixed

4.59%

60%

3.5% of advance

Nottingham BS

Three-year fixed

5.19%

75%

£1,599

BM Solutions

Five-year fixed

5.39%

75%

3% of advance

Coventry BS

Five-year fixed

5.99%

75%

£250

Clydesdale Bank

Five-year fixed

6.49%

80%

£999

Skipton BS

Two-year tracker

3.24% (base rate + 2.74%)

60%

£1,240

Godiva Mortgages

Two-year capped tracker

3.59%  (base rate + 3.09%). Capped at 5.59%.

65%

£1,249

Market Harborough BS

Two-year tracker

4.25% (base rate + 3.75%)

70%

£845

BM Solutions

Two-year tracker

4.05% (base rate + 3.65%)

75%

2% of advance

Bank of China

Lifetime tracker

3.88% (base rate + 3.38%)

75%

£1,895

Godiva Mortgages

Lifetime variable

3.99%

65%

£1,249

Woolwich

Lifetime tracker

3.99% (base rate + 3.49%)

60%

1.50% of advance

Clydesdale Bank

Lifetime tracker

4.99% (base rate + 4.49%)

80%

£999

More: Beware this £26m property fraud | The only PPI worth buying

Use lovemoney.com's innovative new mortgage tool now to find the best mortgage for you online

At lovemoney.com, you can research all the best deals yourself using our online mortgage service, or speak directly to a whole-of-market, fee-free lovemoney.com broker. Call 0800 804 8045 or email mortgages@lovemoney.com for more help.

This article aims to give information, not advice. Always do your own research and/or seek out advice from an FSA-regulated broker (such as one of our brokers here at lovemoney.com), before acting on anything contained in this article. 

Finally, we tend to only give the initial rate of a deal in our articles, but any deal which lasts for a shorter period than your mortgage term may revert to the lender's standard variable rate or a tracker rate when the deal ends. Before you take out a deal, you should always try to find out from your lender what its standard variable rate is and how it will be determined in the future. Make sure you take all this information into account when comparing different deals.

Your home or property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (18)

  • Manny
    Love rating 1
    Manny said

    Great time to be a landlord but do not forget to get your tenants credit checked to avoid bad tenants with bad records and related expenses...http://www.cncsearches.co.uk/services.asp

    Report on 15 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nosbort
    Love rating 126
    nosbort said

    I'm really getting Peed off about these auto-play video clips, get rid of the damned things. I don't want some banal music and talking every time I open a page or refresh it. I am QUITE CAPABLE of hitting play if I want to listen.

    Report on 16 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • DaveRoach
    Love rating 8
    DaveRoach said

    Has this country become so obsessed with money that we have forgotten that houses are places to live, family homes, retirement homes, starter homes...HOMES!

    They are HOMES, not investments! The 'assured shorthold tenancy' deprives tenants of the freedom to live in their HOME without fear of eviction. So probably more than 99% of all tenants in this country can be evicted from their home for absolutely no reason! That is not a good feeling to have at the back of your mind 24/7.

    Being forced to rent because prices were allowed to rise so uncontrollably by Gordon "I wont let house prices get out of control" Brown is bad enough, but being forced to rent under such a biased tenancy agreement reminds me of Serfdom in the middle ages.

    Do you feel proud exalting the virtues of making money from such a one-sided system which more and more people find themselves trapped in, unable to afford to save for a deposit due to the ever increasing rent demands of the landlords?

    If this continues we will return to the days of lords (landlords) and peasants (tenants). Melodramatic, maybe, but what else would you call it when 1% of the people own 99% of the land and property and have the power that goes with that ownership?

    Scary time ahead...

    Report on 16 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  6 loves
  • jamiecfc1
    Love rating 39
    jamiecfc1 said

    House ownership these days is apparently a business just like any other, the amount of people with large portfolios of rental property is scary... The problem is there is nothing to prevent them from doing it. Got to have somewhere to put all the EU migrants you know.

    Report on 16 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • ScoobyM
    Love rating 4
    ScoobyM said

    I totally agree with DaveRoach and find it highly irresponsible of you to promote the increase of rents to make a quick buck.

    I'm sure those already struggling with rising bills will agree with me in saying that the cost of living does not need to be increased further. If money gets too tight people will have no choice but to borrow or become homeless. I appreciate the economics - demand exceeding supply hence driving up price - but it really doesn't ned any help from you lot.

    I always thought that LoveMoney was about advising people how to get out of debt not encouraging profiteering to force them into it. At least in a few months time you and all the landlords you have advised can feel proud of making a few extra pounds of profit. Sadly most families will have become poorer or even worse, homeless. Well done LoveMoney. (slow clap)

    Report on 16 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 600
    Mike10613 said

    The days of Lords and peasants or toffs and oiks has already returned. Having ruined most investments that load of bankers need something to invest in. Property is seen as 'safe as houses' but is it? People can only be screwed so much and with rising energy prices, rising petrol prices, rising rents and rising taxes - something must give. You need to be thrifty and frugal to survive the onslaught led by Cameron - it favours the rich, not the poor or the middle classes and certainly not the old or disabled.

    Report on 16 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • mambach
    Love rating 33
    mambach said

    LM's people are reporters, not kingmakers. They tell the news, not create it (capaigning against media power is a whole other kettle of fish, and a whole other forum)

    Don't gib at them for reporting the news as is - warts and all. Most other news services wouldn't bother.

    I for one like to know that when my landlord puts up the rent, and I have to do likewise to my sub-tenant; it's not altogether a 'lets screw more money out of you' but some of 'my costs have gone up. have to pass them on'

    Report on 16 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • DaveRoach
    Love rating 8
    DaveRoach said

    @ mambach:

    I agree they don't make the news, but irresponsible reporting (ramping) of BTL and income from property is one of the reasons our(UK) residential property is so expensive today.

    The trouble is, most other news services DO report the same sensational rubbish.

    The article clearly states rents are rising and landlords costs (i.e. mortgage rates) are falling, so it is 'lets screw more money out of you'

    What we need in this country is a proper correction in residential property prices combined with much tighter regulation on BTL's so that the 1000's of families trapped between extortionate rents and extortionate house prices can live with a little more security.

    All high rents do is take money from the wider economy (shops, pubs, cinemas etc etc) and put it into the hands of the landlords.

    It looks like 86% of the landlords surveyed are going to get a wake up call soon. With the second half of the recession/depression well under way households will be squeezed further and there will be no more money for these high rents so people will share or move back with parents, demand will fall, landlords will sell up and the market will correct. It started in 2007, but the government pulled out every weapon they had to stop it, but all they have done is postpone the inevitable. It might take a few more years, but prices will correct, amateur landlords with poor (or no) business models will go bankrupt and the whole cycle will start again.

    Report on 16 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • onthecomputer
    Love rating 80
    onthecomputer said

    I really don't know what the big ho ha is.. when we wanted to buy our first home in 1978 we had to save hard and make sacrifices to get the 10% deposit and make sure we could afford the repayments - and that meant giving up going out and NOT having holidays or the latest in thing. Today the youngest don't have any concept of the future, don't want to learn to save and don't want to give up anything in fact they want more up to date useless gadgets than ever before - you can't have both, either make sacrifices and get that home or continue wasting money on rubbish - to me it is that simple.

    Report on 17 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • petitemisschief
    Love rating 22
    petitemisschief said

    What most of these new landlords don't realise is that tenants don't always behave like model tenants, if your rents are too high they oftern can't pay them, they can cause anti-social behaviour and you could be liable for the damage they cause to others, they don't lave when you want them to and they leave a mess when they do - haveing worked for a large housing provider for years I am well aware of all these things. New landlords need to realise that all these things are a business risk that you have to take account of when calculating what your proift is going to be

    Report on 17 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • DaveRoach
    Love rating 8
    DaveRoach said

    @ onthecomputer

    I earn £30k+, my wife works part time earning about £10K. the rest of the time she looks after the children. we are in our thirties. we don't go out except for the odd birthday celebration, we don't have iphones, my laptop is a 5yr old piece of rubbish my company were going to throw out, we live very frugally, save water, turn the heating down etc etc. and despite saving what we can each month, tax, rent, food and transport costs eat up nearly all of our income. I agree some young people wont sacrifice anything, but I HAVE and it really pisses me off when someone like you tells me how many sacrifices you made and how I need to do the same then I'll be able to afford a house.

    In 1978 an average house cost £15k, average wage was about £5k. 3x salary ergo affordable. you did well. today average house price £165, my (above average) salary £30k. 5.5x salary ergo NOT affordable even if you scrimp, save and go without.

    You and others of your generation did very well out of the high inflation of the 70's, 80's and 90's. It is not the same today, so you can't even start to compare.

    Report on 17 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • onthecomputer
    Love rating 80
    onthecomputer said

    @ DaveRoach and people like you piss me off telling the world how hard done by you are- my advice - then don't have children till you can afford them. One can only give an example or comment on what they see i.e kids of today. I was married 14 years before we had children I am an older parent - so don't get on your high horse. Not everyone is going to live the same and make the same sacrifices. Maybe you should have bought a house before you decided to have children - then you would not be paying dead rent - each to their own but don't become angry at me because we have achieved what you do not have and so wish. No one is asking you to live my life but it sounds as if you are unhappy with yours :-)

    Btw yours would be 40 x 3 (your wife's salary included) and maybe if you had started out in a flat before kids you would have managed to get on the property ladder.

    Also there is no comparison as you say - in my days of having children all we had was child benefit, no nursery vouchers, no child/working tax credit -ZILCH - so who is the one better off? You have to decide what is important to you and don't be so angry at those who have achieved what you desire.

    I have no more to say as the whole thing is going off topic but try not to be angry!

    Report on 17 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 600
    Mike10613 said

    I remember inflation at 20% and interest rates at 12% and higher. Would you want to be in Buy to Let with a tracker at that interest rate. You could make a killing with property going up in price at a better rate than you were paying in interest; but could you keep on paying it at that interest rate? Buy to let is risky if you have mortgage and if you expect rents to cover your mortgage; it is way too risky.

    Report on 17 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • DaveRoach
    Love rating 8
    DaveRoach said

    @ onthecomputer. I am not angry at you for your achievements. You were born at a very different time and like your peers you have done very well out of the deal. I merely resent being told I can afford to buy a house if I make sacrifices. Even at 3x40k you are still only looking at 120K, nowhere near the 160 average. I have sacrificed a lot, but I refuse to risk the health of my wife and children by delaying starting our family until we can afford to buy a house. Getting slightly back on topic I would be very happy to rent all my life if the default tenancy agreement in this country offered greater security of tenure to tenants.

    I don't want any sympathy from anyone, I did buy a house a few years ago, but after we had children we made a sacrifice to give them a better education. We sold up to rent in a better area so they would get into a better school. In that area house prices are slightly above average as is our combined wage, but prices are still way too high and BTL and government policy are the major contributors to the excessive prices rises.

    As for the elusive property ladder, it was replaced by a treadmill in the early 90's.

    In a low wage inflation era (such as we are in now) there is no ladder. In the 70's and 80's wages were going up in double digits some years, greatly eroding the debt you had secured on your house, hence in a few years you had a lot of equity to help you move up the 'ladder'. Today with wage rises of 2% if you're lucky that debt is not eroded nearly so quickly hence a 25 year treadmill, and little chance to move up the 'ladder'

    Back on topic. @Mike10613 agreed, BTL is a very risky business, especially for the 1000's of accidental landlords out there who have no business model, but are unable to sell because they want too much for their house.

    Checking out rightmove: properties near me are being offered for rent at around 5% gross yield. According to the major indices house prices are falling (already down 4% yoy) so only another 1% and that's a years gross profit gone. If I was in BTL I would have got out in 2007, but it is still not too late as prices have only just started falling. get out now before they hit double digit negative again. Or if you really do think its a good time to invest, go for it, but please think of the families living in your property who will likely lose their home when your business hit the wall as prices fall and interest rates rise.

    About the main article:

    "Landlords - cash in on record rents!" is a call to landlords to cash in. (irresponsible ramping)

    "Landlords cash in on record rents" is reporting a story/survey.

    John, please consider removing the hyphen and the exclamation mark, they really do ruin an otherwise reasonable article even if some of the stats are hard to believe.

    Report on 17 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/8253607/Buy-to-let-increasing-numbers-of-tenants-defaulting-on-rent.html

    Report on 17 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Ben Hall
    Love rating 51
    Ben Hall said

    I recall the '70's very well.....trying to raise a family with 26% inflation, 15% mortgage rates and feeling nostalgic about the "low" 8% on mortgages that had been the norm when we got married. It's tough in a different way, today, but no tougher than it was then

    Report on 19 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • Chuckwallah
    Love rating 23
    Chuckwallah said

    I find this article deeply depressing. Expect to see the wave of "homeless families" headlines hit the tabloids shortly.

    Report on 20 June 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • jeanius430
    Love rating 3
    jeanius430 said

    No doubt there are a lot of good Landlords, unfortunately with all the 'Buy to Lets' around no one has any chance of actually buying a property as a home.

    I'm not normally vindictive but i really hope these people know what they're doing to the ordinary people of this country.

    When we bought our property in the 1970's (1979 in fact) we had to save up the deposit and then still wait until a mortgage came along. Waiting in a queue of other people for 2 years in some cases. None of this just go to the Bank, give them you wage slip or whatever and then Hey Presto! you have a mortgage.

    As others have said we had to wait to have children as most of us lived with parents as even finding a property to rent within our price range was difficult; we weren't all on huge wages!

    Plus only Child Benefit. Nothing like the hand-outs of today.

    Don't forget, also, that during the 1970's a lot of people were out of work due to Strikes all over the place. Unfortunately, that's part of the History that this generation forget about. They only remember how 'cheap' the houses were but not how much MOST people earned, if they earned at all.

    I'd just say i'd like to be on 30K plus my partner earning 10K!

    Buying to Let Properties is now getting out of hand in my opinion. It's generated a Society (partly anyway as Greed has been a part of life for a while) of only thinking what you can make; it doesn't matter if the houses you're knocking down are safe and sturdy.

    To make money they have to come down making this country into one great big Housing Estate where all the houses look the same and no character. But what the Hell?

    That's what it's all about! Making Money.

    Not a nice feeling really for most of us who are used to Community Spirit.

    But that's Progress, they say!!

    Report on 19 August 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).

Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4