Love to be the one to Make good property decisions?

Then register for free and get exclusive, personalised benefits that will help you achieve all your money goals.

Join the lovemoney.com experience

Register Now

Confused?

Why Register?

Buy--to-let mortgage rates in 2009

Published 23 January 2009 in Make good property decisions

How's the buy-to-let mortgage market shaping up in 2009?

Over the past year, landlords have been hugely affected by the credit crunch with lenders drastically tightening criteria.

So what does 2009 hold for landlords?

Arrears and repossessions

According to the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML), buy-to-let arrears have overtaken general arrears for the first time ever, with 1.58% of all buy-to-let mortgages in arrears at the last count.

Repossessions were also up and look set to continue rising. The CML forecast for 2009 said that the number of repossessions could hit 75,000 and it predicted that ‘a sizeable share is expected to be buy-to-let mortgages’.

Why are landlords struggling so much?

When a landlord comes to end of a deal, like a fixed rate, they do not have the same choice of deals available. The number of buy-to-let mortgages has been decimated, dropping 93% in the last 18 months according to Moneyfacts to just over 250.

In addition lenders have tightened criteria, most notably the maximum loan-to-value (LTV) ratios they will lend to. Back in 2007, it was common to get a buy-to-let mortgage at 85% LTV or even 90% -- in other words with a deposit (or equity stake) of just 10% or 15% of the property price. Now landlords need at least 20% in order to even qualify for a deal -- and even then it will not be cheap.

What about minimum rental income?

When a lender works out if you can afford a buy-to-let mortgage they do not base it on your income, since that could be going to pay off a residential mortgage (on your home). With buy-to-let, the expected rental income for tenants should be sufficient to repay the monthly mortgage -- and then some. The extra needed is to give you a buffer against void periods in between tenants or maintenance costs.

Two years ago a lender would offer you a deal if your expected rental income (as determined by a valuer) covered 110% of your monthly mortgage repayments. Now this has risen to an average of 125% or 130%. And many of the lenders which had reduced the buffer you needed on rental income have gone bust.

This means existing landlords looking to remortgage in 2009 might find that their rental income does not stack up anymore. If this is the case they will either have to increase their rent (which may be impossible), or go on to their lender’s default Standard Variable Rate. This is likely to be much more expensive – indeed, too expensive for some.

Perhaps if landlords were able to remortgage onto more affordable deals, arrears wouldn’t have risen so dramatically over the past years.

Then again, if arrears hadn’t risen, landlords would probably have been able to get more affordable deals today.

Either way you look at it, it’s bad news for buy-to-let borrowers.

Any good news?

Decreases in Base Rate have meant that any borrowers on a tracker mortgage have seen their repayments fall, as will have many borrowers who had been forced to go onto their lender’s SVR. Fixed rates are also slowly coming down.

The Mortgage Works this week launched a new range starting at 3.49% for a one-year fixed rate and 4.49% for a two-year deal, and its rates are competitive. Before you get too excited both of these deals do come with high fees of up to 3.5% of the loan amount respectively. Ouch!

However, the lender offers different rate and fee combinations, so if a high fee doesn’t suit you there are other choices. Its two-year fixed rates are listed below (up to 70% LTV), illustrating how you can choose a rate/fee combination to suit your needs.

The Mortgage Works two-year fixed rate buy to let mortgages up to 70% LTV:

RateFee
4.49% 3.50% of loan amount (min £595)
4.99% 2.50% of loan amount (min £595)
5.49% 1.50% of loan amount (min £595)
5.99% 0.50% of loan amount (min £595)
6.24% Fee-free

Other low rate options come from BM Solutions, which has a two-year tracker mortgage at 4.69% with a 1.5% fee available up to 60% loan to value.

And Cheltenham & Gloucester is offering a two-year fixed rate at 4.99% with an arrangement fee of 2.5% of the loan, available up to 60% LTV. Plus it has a three-year tracker at 4.69% up to 60% LTV (or 4.99% up to 75% LTV) with a 2.5% fee.

High LTV borrowing

Buy-to-let borrowers with less than 20% equity or deposit will not find any new deals available to them, but there is one deal at 80% LTV.

Sister lenders Yorkshire and Clydesdale Bank have a five-year fixed rate on offer at 7.24% with a fee of £999. No, it isn’t a good rate but it’s the only one I could find for those needing to borrow at this level. If you know of any others, please let us know.

Top tips for buy-to-let landlords

  • Overpay your mortgage if you can, as it could help get your LTV ratio down and open up more deals to you
  • Your lender’s SVR may or may not offer good value. Do shop around to make sure there isn’t a better deal available if you are coming to the end of a deal.
  • Visit a broker as the best deals on the market are currently via intermediary-only lenders.

Use our award-winning mortgage service to find a new buy-to-let mortgage!

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Share this lovemoney.com content on any of the social networks and utilities below by simply clicking the site of your choice.

  • You can subscribe to all lovemoney.com articles via our RSS feed.

Comments

kaff26 said

  • 0 recommendations

"...go on to their lender’s default Standard Variable Rate. This is likely to be much more expensive..."

Really?? It seems that currently most lenders' SVRs are far cheaper than their best BTL deals. The way I see it if you get switched onto an SVR then you are looking good!

Johdav said

  • 0 recommendations

My Lender didn't want to know me 3 months ago when I came off a fix 5% deal to their SVR 7.2% now they contact me as the SVR has dropped to 4.2% and still falling. Their best rate they could offer was 4.5% plus fees. Can't wait to my other deals expire in 3 months. Happy days

JamesW01 said

  • 0 recommendations

Looking today, LloydsTSB will go up to 75% LTV (new build 65%), and will include part of your own income as well as rental income depending on how much you want to borrow. Fee 2.5%.

C1tyChime said

  • 0 recommendations

Johday

What a lucky escape, and your rents still qualify to cover your mortgage repayments.

Next big story this year not covered in the article will be margin calls. Lenders asking Landlords to top up the equity level to the agreed amount (check your small print).

Average BTL mortgages were running at 66% LTV. Take away from the 34% equity level the 20% house price fall to date and you're left with about 14% equity (or roughly 60% less equity than there was about 14 months ago.

With prices falling at about 2% per month the remaining equity is likely to have vanished by July.

The minimum equity requirement is usually 15%.

Hope most BTLers have 15% of their portfolio value tucked away in cash because they're going to need it in the summer.

Ouch.

Suange said

  • 0 recommendations

This maybe an obvious bit of maths, but why would anybody want pay fees to The Mortgage Works? If you divide the % fee by the 2 years of the deal and add to the deal rate, they all come out at 6.24% anyway!

I guess it just makes the rental coverage look better if you pay a fee up front, but don't go thinking the deal is any better for it! Sneaky pricing trick on their part I think...

Swarbs said

  • 0 recommendations

C1tyChime - I doubt too many lenders will try that - most BTL landlords simply wouldn't be able / willing to pay it anyway. And I doubt lenders are keen to repossess more houses and chalk up even more losses when they go for a song at auction: that would be effectively joining the queue to be the next bank to be nationalised due to lack of capital.

soconnel said

  • 0 recommendations

C1tyChime - I think you are being mislead by the media - prices have not dropped by 20% and certainly are not dropping by 2% / month

vthommo said

  • 0 recommendations

I agree with citychime that BTL mortgagees need to be careful of their equity and be aware that lenders will make margin calls. A slightly different situation - as UK expats we took advantage of favourable interest rates in Japan to re-mortgage and have been severely stung by the fall of the pound. And yes the lender has called in equity, meaning we now have all our savings deposited with them (admittedly in an account earning fair interest) and we have had to assign life policies to them as well. It is all in the fine print and we are bound to act to prevent defaulting on the mortgage.

AgentBrian said

  • 0 recommendations

Don't forget that if you add the fee to the mortgage as is common practice you will be paying even more interest, probably for ever.

DARCEY52 said

  • 0 recommendations

Vthommo - As someone in a similar position to you, I don't agree you can make a fair comparison with foreign currency loans - yes, the principle is the same, but anyone taking out such a loan should be very much aware of the currency exchange risk involved. Once the exchange rate moves, the value of the house (in the loan currency) changes - its black and white.

For normal domestic loans, whilst it may be so that contractually banks can make margin calls based on valuations, it would be fairly suicidal of them to do this in practice. How can market value even be assessed in the current market? My overall impression is that there is so much fear of buying right now, that no-one iwill unless they can get it for a greatly discounted price because the seller has to sell. Understandably, sellers who don't have to sell won't settle for what they see is a discounted price - so no sale - does that make the buyer's 'trying it on' price more of a market price then the seller's preferred price?

To start making margin calls now is in no-ones interests, least of all the banks (particularly given the pressure from government to avoid defaults) - it would only add to the risk of financial distress leading to default. Interest rates are now at record lows, making it easier than ever to service mortgages, which at the end of the day SHOULD be the most important issue.

This last point is one that this website should place more emphasis on. Its all very well going on about property value movements if ur an investor going for capital growth, but when we are talking about people's home, it really shouldn't make any difference. Buyers should be looking to pay off their loan and should be more concerned about their ability OVER TIME to make repayments than the future value. Home-owners should be rejoicing in these times of lower interest rates (& paying the principle back quicker now while they can) and yet all we get is this doom and gloom about the property market and values.

There seem to be 2 problems that have prevented this (particularly in the US market):

1. borrowing on equity against your home for personal consumption - which is just crazy stuff before you are retired - you are just blowing most your pension.

2. getting caught out with these 'honeymoon' style loans when the discounted period expires and you are forced to shift lendors, at which point yes, market values are important. Its great for MF to go on about all the cheap HM-style loans and how u should switch from one to another every year to take advantage of them - I appreciate for most people every penny counts, but when ur talking about something as fundamentally important as your home, which should as riskfree a venture as possible, sometimes cheaper is more expensive in the long run.

Maybe MF should devote some 'saftey' tips on buying houses instead of wasting so much ink on 'spreading the recssion' (which only gets worse the more we talk it up) which they have been doing with the property market for at least the last 5 years (or whenever it was Cliff sold his house).

Oh, but I forgot, silly me. They only want you to buy shares - which are of course a far safer place for your money, with all those clever fatcat EO's running things - even if that means you rent for the rest of your life....

kazman6 said

  • 0 recommendations

I bought a btl in October last year on an IO mortgage with the mortgage works. It is a tracker at .1%below base rate. They wrote to me this am to confirm that my payrate has dropped to 1.49%, so no collar yet! Maybe it will drop into negative interest rate the way the boe is going. As someone who remembers 15% rates it seems unbelievable. Thing is should i be overpaying, or saving the money in order to pay off a chunk later.

Or should I spend it on the basis that it may help us out of recession lol.

  • 0 recommendations

I would be cautious with your laughter Kazman6. Mortgage Works are obviously making a serious loss lending to you at those rates - something they won't be able to do forever. If they don't go bust first, they'll either need to make a margin call on landlords like yourself to reduce the loan values or ensure they make up for things once you revert to their SVR.

I would strongly advise all landlords to hang on to their spare cash as you are going to need it!

  • 0 recommendations

Also a word on house prices themselves - the main motivator for BTLers.

We all know first time buyers are priced out (even at these low rates) - the banks just don't want to lend at former loan to value ratios.

And now, new BTLers are priced out too - and I mean totally. Only a mad man would entertain a new BTL investment now when they are forced on to rates in excess of 6% and rentals looking like they are falling (and that’s assuming the mad man can come up with the 20-30% equity in the first place).

So the question is. With FTBs and new BTLers effectively out of the game, what will drive prices higher from here?

I appreciate that existing BTLers have been given a reprieve (with Bank rate and SVRs that have come down) and might think they are looking pretty right now but they should be cautious. The best case situation they can hope for is that house prices stabilise in late 2009. And OK, if they do, what’s likely to happen then? Its likely to be coupled with a return to inflation (something the govt desperately wants) and subsequent rises in BOE bank rate (something the govt, perhaps might not be so keen on but they will come under pressure to do) – which won’t be good for house prices.

I’m sorry guys but for me, the medium/long term prospect for house prices remains bleak. Be prepared to hold them investments for at least 7 years if you are dreaming of substantial returns from here. The govt and BOE may save your bacon in the short term, but they certainly aren’t going to make you rich.

JimboT1 said

  • 0 recommendations

Just got a letter from Mortage Express telling me that when current fixed rate deal comes to an end they will not offer a new one and please take my mortgage elsewhere. Not a good way to stimulate their business when I have been a good customer with no arrears.

kazman6 said

  • 0 recommendations

wow, somehthing to think about there then. I do have enough cash to cover margin calls if they happen. Does this mean u cant go onto svr? The main purpose of btl was for income now, planning to keep for 10 years so hope there will be some cg by then. do i mean cg growth anyway. ps can anyone tell me what str means, i think mew must be borrowing more equity on your own property but i am a bit confused by all the jargon i confess.

matchmade said

  • 0 recommendations

JimboT1: I have never heard of such a mortgage deal - invariably when a fixed rate offer ends, you are moved onto a tracker or the SVR. So what sort of mortgage deal are you on, and are you sure you've got your facts correct here?

  • 0 recommendations

Use gains to reduce LTV so as to be able to secure a better deal next time?

I am no expert and if I'm honest know very little but surely you would be better to keep gains to use to pay high fees on next BTL mortgage

than reducing your LTV and thus increasing your tax liability and still having to pay the fees.

Am I rught here?

mickgjames said

  • 0 recommendations

"Margin calls" on BTL mortgages seem to be a complete urban myth.

No-one has come up with a single example of such a clause in anyBTL agreement, let alone all or most of them. But financial journalists now seem to believe they are commonplace!

The only support for this theory is if you believe that any subsequent change in the conditions stated in the mortgage offer letter--such as the LTV would constitute a breach of the mortgage agreement--clearly nonsense.

Note that if lenders did have this power it would apply equally to all borrowers who experienced a drop in LTV and not just landlords.

To sum up: the reason most people are unaware of this "next big story" is because it's not going to happen.

kazman6 said

  • 0 recommendations

HI all, I read my mortgage offer and general legal info on this today. I cannot see a clause specific to ltv ratios although im not a lawyer. Unless the mortgage is in arrears I cant see that it would be in their interest to do so.

Also I'm sure you are right and it would apply to all borrowers, not just btl.

Anyway, it wont hurt to keep some cash available, and to save the difference in an ISA. Chatters100 you make an interesting point about paying off mortgage. Surely it would be better to save it somewhere, especially at 1.49%.

Although I dohave a small mortgage on my own house, on a fixed rate so maybe better to put any overpayments that way.

armarda said

  • 0 recommendations

but kasman6 is an ISA a good plan? Moneyweek this week are saying Britain could go the same way as Iceland - a real possibility. So can anyone advise a safe alternative to an ISA at the moment? I agree setting some cash aside is a good plan - but barring the mattress, where to keep it?

  • 0 recommendations

I'm running a pretty healthy month-on-month surplus at the moment since my lender (bless 'em) has passed on recent rate cuts in their SVR, which is what I'm on at the moment.

I'm stashing the cash in the offset account I run against the mortgage on the house I live in - it gives the best post-tax return I can find (much better than paying down the BTL, esp since all the BTL interest cost is tax-free). I reason that keeping the money in cash will give me the most flexibility when it comes time to use it. I could put it toward LTV reduction when I next want a fixed-rate deal or I could use it to pay whatever daft fees they might want or I could leave it where it is or I could use it as a cushion if (when!) rates turn upwards if I can't get a fixed rate deal to protect me from that.

ps81 said

  • 0 recommendations

JimboT1: I'm with Mortgage Express too.. on a 3 yr fixed @ 5.35% 'interest only' deal, which will be expiring in May 09. I've spoken to them a few months ago about my situation after this deal expires. They said, 'after your deal expires, you'll automatically be moved to our BTL SVR rate, which is always 1.75% above BoE base rate.' Now, this means my rate would reduce to 3.25%, assuming BoE rates remain the same, saving me a significant amount of money...even better if the rates fall further, which is very very likely considering the current state of economy...

However, for further peace of mind, i would suggest speaking to customer service team to confirm my point.

Iniq said

  • 0 recommendations

Why do you and so many people call it "Buy to let"?

If you mean "Borrow to let", why not simply say so?

Furthermore, a 93% decrease is not "decimation", it is "devastation".

Quote:

"... The number of buy-to-let mortgages has been decimated, dropping 93% in the last 18 months ..."

WRONG! Decimation implies a decrease of exactly 10%. If you actually mean devastation, why not say so instead of trying to show off by using long words which you do not actually understand?

JimboT1 said

  • 0 recommendations

Apologies for shocking anyone. On contacting them I was told a transfer to SVR was the option and this is good news at moment as ps81 wrote.

My first one expires summer next year so i hope ststus quo lasts re base rate.

However securing an alternative is v difficult for LTV above 60% as the number of lenders has shrunk markedly.

doms001 said

  • 0 recommendations

Sorry to join this conversation a bit late, i notice that there are a couple of comments regarding Mortgage express, i too have one of these mortgages and have also received a letter telling me to take my business elsewhere... Obviously that's not how they put it and you need not worry, they're offering anyone locked into a fixed rate agreement a fee-free opportunity to get out. This is because they are part of Bradford and Bingley, who have had their mortgage assets nationalised. They need to liquidise as many assets as possible and are no longer interested in vast profit margins to satisfy shareholders. Also, as the government are putting pressure on such financial institutions to pass on savings to borrowers, it would look a little hyprocritical to allow B&B to make much money in such instances. As several people have pointed out, SVR's at present are often better than the 'deals' offered by the banks (as if you'd expect the banks to give you a good deal) and I will certainly be sticking with mine, i suspect that i will be considerably better off by sticking with them.

At the very least, I would be surprised if the end of this year saw anything over the 5.35% which you and I are on at present.

If nothing else, the british government has a skill for losing money, i think i'd rather owe their banks than anyone else???

  • 0 recommendations

I think Citychime is not a BTL landlord(iam not either). there are a few raoming the posts on TMF spreading doom and gloom and talking rubbish.

Citychime mentions 2 percent falls as a constant, that goes t show what a fool he is. It's the median over time that is important. if we listened to city chime house prices will then at some point drop to zero. What a numpty !

  • 0 recommendations

Darcy52

Glad you too noticed Cliff D'Arcy's attempts to talk down the housing market since his flight to the rented sector in 2005.

I think Cliff is quite keen on 99 prices ! But as I have told him before he does himself, TMF and journalism no favours with blatant bias.

Guess you can do this when you are a shareholder in TMF.

  • 0 recommendations

Why do you and so many people call it "Buy to let"?

If you mean "Borrow to let", why not simply say so?

Furthermore, a 93% decrease is not "decimation", it is "devastation".

Quote:

"... The number of buy-to-let mortgages has been decimated, dropping 93% in the last 18 months ..."

WRONG! Decimation implies a decrease of exactly 10%. If you actually mean devastation, why not say so instead of trying to show off by using long words which you do not actually understand?

This post was so odd it made me laugh, hardly objective, i think a splen must have burst.

I am sure it will come as a great relief to Col Custer and his men on their celestial cloud they were not decimated but devastated.

Honestly get a life mate !

davidgpa said

  • 0 recommendations

Staintunerider, it's called Buy to Let because that's what it is, buying a property in order to let it out instead of living in it.

I agree with your comment about decimated, yet another example of the misuse of English.

Join the conversation

Please sign in or register to add a comment or recommend.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Typical
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard Platinum with 16 Month BT Visa

0% for 16 months
(2.9% fee)
Typical 16.9% APR (variable) Apply

Virgin Money Credit Card MasterCard

0% for 14 months
(2.98% fee)
Typical 16.6% APR (variable) Apply

Egg Visa

0% until 1st Oct 2011
(3% fee)
Typical 17.9% APR (variable) Apply
W3C  Thank you for using The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse