Love to be the one to Make good property decisions?

Then register for free and get exclusive, personalised benefits that will help you achieve all your money goals.

Join the lovemoney.com experience

Register Now

Confused?

Why Register?

Watch out for these hidden fees!

Published 7 March 2010 in Make good property decisions

Be on your guard when buying or selling a property for these secret fees and commissions!

It's not often you hear of any professional body calling for more regulation. Normally they complain about 'red tape' and 'bureaucracy', and are happier when they’re left alone to make as much money as possible with as little protection for the consumer as possible. That’s business.

However, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), is calling for more regulation in the property market, and makes it clear that there are some areas of the market where there is simply nowhere near enough.

Last week it released the results and recommendations of a year-long project into fees and commissions received for all sorts of professional services related to property, including service charges, property valuation fees, home information packs and insurance.

The report revealed a large gap between the protection we have and the protection we need as leaseholders, tenants and homeowners, particularly with regards to transparency of costs.

Worryingly, it also found that in some areas there is either no regulation or just voluntary regulation, and that many customers appear to have no idea that this is the case.

Here are its recommendations, along with tips on what you can do to try and reduce your costs:

Insurance

We get a lot of insurance pushed on us by our estate agent and insurance broker, whether we buy or rent a property.

RICS wants to see greater emphasis made on making customers aware of the remuneration all brokers receive from the transaction.

RICS also called on the regulator, the Financial Services Authority, to review the advice given to customers, particularly because there is often a conflict of interest for brokers who, while arranging the insurance, are acting on behalf of both the insurer and the policyholder, whose interests are often opposed.

What you should do

Before arranging insurance, ask what commission, fees or other payments will be received. With home insurance, for example, it’s not unusual to be paying 25% commission. If you show your outrage, you might be able to get them to cut it down to 10%.

It’ll probably be cheaper not to go through your estate agent or lender when buying insurance, and you’re not obliged to, so you should also compare prices elsewhere. You can do that through lovemoney.com’s insurance service.)

Service charges in leasehold properties

RICS was scathing of the hotchpotch of legislation that is supposed to safeguard leaseholders and tenants.

How to arrange a mortgage over the internet

The trade body questioned the fact that companies within the same group provide different services, such as both installing equipment and arranging insurance. According to RICS, this implies that managing agents are not shopping around for the best deals, which will be costing leaseholders and tenants money.

Furthermore, it found that service charges were difficult to challenge, because we don’t have access to the evidence we need. Typically, leaseholders have to take it to a tribunal without evidence, at our own expense, which can be considerable.

The staggering thing is that there is no regulation in this area protecting you from lazy or unscrupulous managing agents and landlords!

What you should do

The report says: “Each party should be under no illusion about the service that has been agreed, who will provide that service, what the cost will be and who is paid what.” These are questions you should satisfy yourself before moving into such a property. You want to know a breakdown of what the costs are and where they come from.

RICs would likely also recommend that leaseholders and tenants look into whether the managing agent or landlord is signed up to its code of conduct. Recognised consumer codes of conduct are, since May 2008, legally binding.

HIPs and Energy Performance Certificates

RICS found that there are two areas of concern with these additions to the sales process.

Firstly, many consumers aren’t likely to know that they don’t have to buy their home information pack or greenness certificate through their estate agent, because they won’t have sold a house for many years and may be out-of-the-loop on how it all works. RICS wants agents to make this clear.

It also wants agents to tell you what they get out of it. It mentions a case of a £100 home information pack referral fee from an agent to a solicitor that was not disclosed to the seller. RICS is calling for this to be revealed upfront.

What you should do

Estate agents sometimes tie you in by offering to refund your home information pack fee if you eventually sell through them. If you’re not totally confident that they will be the ones to sell your property, consider buying the pack separately, as it’s much cheaper.

Valuation fees

RICS takes up the issue that the charge for valuation fees can be £400 when the cost to the mortgage lender is just £140, which means they’re getting a staggering reward for referring you to their partners. This cannot be fair, when the valuation is for the lender’s benefit, not the buyer’s. RICS also felt that buyers should be made aware they’re not the beneficiaries of this ‘service’!

Unfortunately, the FSA’s guidance on drawing up mortgage Key Facts documents for consumers just ‘suggests’ that valuation fees are included. Consequently, no information is given.

RICS is calling for fees and commissions to be appropriate and reflect the extra level of service provided. As valuation fees are for the lenders’ benefit, there is no extra service provided - so I interpret that recommendation as meaning we should just be charged the cost.

What you should do

Perhaps try asking your lender to write to you explaining what their costs of the valuation are and what its fees and commissions are. Insist politely but firmly that, as this is entirely for their benefit, they should not profit from it.

More: Save £10,000 on your energy bill | The phantom rental property scam

At lovemoney.com, you can search for all the best deals using our online mortgage service, or speak directly to a no-fee, whole-of-market lovemoney.com broker. Please call 0800 804 4045 or email mortgages@lovemoney.com for more help.

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Share this lovemoney.com content on any of the social networks and utilities below by simply clicking the site of your choice.

  • You can subscribe to all lovemoney.com articles via our RSS feed.

Comments

Avatar

tia rhymes said

  • 0 recommendations

Valuation direct from the bank is much mch cheaper as getting it sorted via a broker!  you will save your self alot.  We paid double for valuation via broker.  Wish we had known this earlier.  People in the market will fleece if you let on you are green!

Avatar

cj63 said

  • 0 recommendations

The biggest rip off with leasehold properties is the building insurance. I am currently involed in two cases where the premium has been inflated.

One is a flat owned by a relative that the managing agent has used a company basd outside of the UK to insure the properties through a UK broker. The directors of the non uk company are directors and ex directors of the managing agent and the difference between the premium charged by the Uk broker and the non uk company is in excess of £7k. They manage approx 700 sites making this a £5million profit for the non uk company for the directors/ex directors of the managing agents. I have had written confirmation from the uk broker proving the above.

The second one is a flat that I own where the freehold was sold and the freeholder decided to insure the properties without reference to the managing agent and their premium was just under £7k more. I have two insurance certificates covering approx the same period (6 weeks dif) which proves this. I am a director of my Residents Management Company and we are currently taking advice from solicitors.

This seems to be a common problem which both dodgy management companies and freeholders are using to cream excess profits and no one seems to regulate.

Management Companies seem to be able to set themselves up with no requirment to be authorised leaving them free to rip leaseholders off.

Avatar

MK22 said

  • 0 recommendations

Is this the same lovemoney that a few weeks ago was telling us how hard done by buy-to-let owners/landlords were and how less regulation was needed?

Avatar
  • 0 recommendations

Hi MK22

"Is this the same lovemoney that a few weeks ago was telling us how hard done by buy-to-let owners/landlords were and how less regulation was needed?"

I didn't write that piece and seem to have missed the article altogether, so I can't comment on it.

If I was to read that article, maybe I'd disagree with it. I have no idea, because I just have your one sentence to go by. However, we writers don't all have one voice. We're allowed to express our own opinions.

Regards

Neil

Avatar
  • 0 recommendations

I think MK22 is referring to this piece by Christina Jordan, another lovemoney.com writer: Government puts the boot into landlords again!

Join the conversation

Please sign in or register to add a comment or recommend.

Our top deals

Provider & account name AER/Gross Interest paid Apply
now

ING Direct (UK)
Savings Account

2.75% /
2.72%
Monthly Apply

Sainsbury's Finance
Easy Saver

2.70% /
2.70%
Anniversary Apply

Chelsea BS
e-Saver Reward

2.60% /
2.57%
Monthly Apply
W3C  Thank you for using Three Kings