Where a packet of cigarettes will soon cost £50

Rosalind Kent
by Lovemoney Staff Rosalind Kent on 08 May 2012  |  Comments 20 comments

Would an astronomical rise in the cost of cigarettes make you give up? One nation hopes so, and it putting it to the test.

Where a packet of cigarettes will soon cost £50

You might be forgiven for thinking the title is a typo.  But, if you live in New Zealand this might become a reality as the government considers increasing the cost of a packet of cigarettes to NZ$100 (around £50).

This drastic proposal aims to eradicate smoking completely by 2025. Would it work over here?

A brief history of price hikes

Cigarette prices have rocketed in the UK over the last few years, and in the latest budget George Osborne added another 37p to a pack of 20, taking the average price to £7.36p. Friends who smoke fondly remember the days, around ten years ago, when you could buy a pack for about £3.

However, despite general anger at the massive price hikes, most agree that it has helped them to give up. Experts believe that price increases and taxation are the only factors that have any real impact on the attitude of smokers.

But the hardcore of ‘addicted’ smokers aren’t going to let a little thing like money stand in the way of their habit, are they?

What if the UK copies New Zealand?

The vast majority of people quite simply could not afford to spend an amount like £50 on a single packet of cigarettes – it is quite a chunk out of the weekly household budget!

The chances are that cigarettes will just be sold on the black market and become as expensive and illicit as any other drug. Will it really help the government if they are no longer able to collect the revenue from huge taxes on tobacco?

As we highlighted last month, the cigarette black market cost the nation an incredible £12.2 billion in lost tax revenues in the four tax years up to  2009/10.

What are the real costs of smoking?

It’s not rocket science: giving up the cigarettes will have positive effects on both your health and your finances. Take a look at the cold, hard figures.

If you smoke a pack of 20 a day at £7.36p per pack, you will spend £51.52 a week.

That’s a scary £2,686.40 a year!

So the immediate savings from giving up are obvious. But, there are other fringe benefits to quitting that will have a positive impact on your finances.

Saving on life insurance

Unsurprisingly, smokers pay higher premiums on their life insurance than non-smokers. A 30-year-old smoker can expect to pay a third more than a non-smoker and a 50-year-old could pay up to twice as much as their non-smoking counterparts!

So, if I was a smoker, as a 30-year-old female looking to buy life insurance from a provider like Aviva, I could expect to pay a monthly premium of £10.03. This equates to £120.36 a year.

As a non-smoker, my premium would be £6.51 equating to £78.12 a year.

That is a saving of £42.24 a year. It may not sound like much, but if you assume a cover term of 25 years, that is a total saving of £1,056!

You can shop around for the best deal using our life insurance engine.

Other insurance savings

Remember, it’s not just life insurance that will be cheaper! You can also make considerable savings with things like critical illness cover, private medical insurance and mortgage endowments if you are a non-smoker! Savings galore!

Are you classed as a smoker?

Whether you smoke one cigarette a week, have the occasional puff on a cigar, or are a 50 a day addict, if you have used tobacco within the last 12 months you are classed as a smoker for health insurance purposes. Strictly speaking you should not have used any nicotine replacement products during this period either!

Insurance providers run spot-checks on the medical histories of about 20% of applicants to try to catch cheats out. If you are being less than truthful then the insurance company may not pay out at all, or pay a much reduced sum.

Will my premiums go down straight away if I give up?

Research conducted by Sainsbury’s Finance last year showed that around 3.3 million ex-smokers in the UK are paying approximately £316m more for life insurance premiums than they need to. This is simply because they have failed to tell their insurer they have given up!

But, even if you tell your insurer as soon as you drop your final fag end into a designated smoking receptacle, will they immediately drop the premium?

The Association of British Insurers states that best practice is for the company to look into your medical profile, often seeking a report from your doctor. If there are health concerns you may be asked to have further investigative tests, such as chest x-rays. Your age and the value of your policy will also be considered.

If you want help quitting order a free quit kit from the NHS, or speak to your GP.

More on tax:

Why all taxes must rise by 16%!

Tax amnesty for eBay traders and electricians

Ten ways to avoid Capital Gains Tax

HMRC: new PAYE system to ensure you ALWAYS pay the right tax

Tax and benefit changes for 2012/13

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (20)

  • buywhenhigh
    Love rating 54
    buywhenhigh said

    Speaking as an X-smoker who gave up 15 years ago I think the high levels of tax on ciggies is despicable.

    Giving up smoking is really hard, and many people cannot do it.

    So the governments of the world are just raping these poor sods for more and more money. They are going to die 10 - 15 years earlier on average, saving tens of thousands in pensions etc so why take the piss on taxing them stupid levels on fags!!

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 362
    CuNNaXXa said

    I gave up smoking some five years ago, but even then I was getting duty free tobacco, either directly or through friends. I even found a company in Spain that was prepared to ship in plain packaging an outer of Old Holborn.

    Quite simply, if you force the price up, one of two things will happen. Either people will give up, or they will find an alternative source that is cheaper. It will also mean that enterprising individuals will capitalise on the Black Market.

    As with all knee jerk actions, they don't think the entire policy through. Also, they may threaten legal action against those flouting customs and excise, but if they are unable to enforce their laws, they might as well give up.

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Basia02a
    Love rating 43
    Basia02a said

    Sorry to disagree buywhenhigh - but how can saving lives be despicable?

    However I do believe that these rises have limited effect in the South because so many people buy their cigarettes illegally,originating from the continent.

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    That will be interesting when tobacco costs more than marijuana...

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • the general
    Love rating 1
    the general said

    I know several smokers - none of them use UK sourced tobacco. Sensible taxation will bring in far more revenue than the smokers cost the NHS. The do gooders should look at foreign abuse of the NHS through health tourism rather than taking away a civil liberty.

    I am a non smoker BTW.

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • vulcanite
    Love rating 31
    vulcanite said

    There is a simple answer, grow your own, it is not illegal for your own use, however there are some drawbacks. Unless one is skilled in curing the leaf, the levels of nicotine may be unexpectedly high, and this will cause problems with flatulence amongst other things. There are areas situated in the bowel wall called Nicotinic Acetylcholine receptors, and excessive nicotine will bind to them and cause high levels of movement of the bowel wall. If you happen to be entertaining a lady friend, she may be unimpressed by your apparent desire to imitate a V1 taking off. Perhaps when smoking finally becomes illegal, we shall see the rise of the fart police going about their business.

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • duncanw
    Love rating 1
    duncanw said

    i`m an ex pat who lives in spain and it`s becoming like england,smoking bans,more tax on tobacco etc,2years ago you could buy a 50gram pack of golden virginia for 3.50euros,now it`s 6.75!!!! and a packet of 20 has gone from 2.20 to 4.20 in the same time!!! still cheaper than england but if you roll your own you pay a fortune for things like ciggie papers,90cents a pack,and filters,1.40 a pack!!!

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Steviebaby1959
    Love rating 28
    Steviebaby1959 said

    Yeah, but, let's keep things in perspective here, New Zealand has an estimated population of approximately 4.4 million, the UK, 66 million, and counting. Their Gov't takes approx. 35% tax duty of the standard price. In Britian the Gov't takes a cut of Duty + VAT of approx. 90%, they need to reduce this nation's Trillion pound deficit, fight wars, and pay Banker's Bonuses, and subsequently cannot afford to increase prices to such extremes as to close this cash cow.

    In New Zealand they have factory made packs of 25 cigarettes, we don't, I purchase 20 Superkings, and only smoke half a cigarette at a time, subsequently, I therefore spend 5.40 and make 40 fags out of the purchase, which would last me 3 days. I have also obtained pouched tobacco for rolling my own, which of course is still cheaper, so, at the end of the day, I won't quit as I'll always find a lower price for it, and it's not difficult to do.

    On average, a Roll Your Own cigarette contains around 0.5 grams of tobacco. A factory made one contains around 0.7 grams, consequently, by switching to RYO, a smoker can save around 20 to 30 percent more cigarettes for their money than if they smoked factory made ones.

    I hardly think that Britain will increase prices to such a ludicrous amount, after all, you need tobacco to smoke spliffs, and MP's will be furious to have to pay through the nose to carry on their alleged partying habits........LOL

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Chunky
    Love rating 20
    Chunky said

    When I was in Latvia in 2006, a packet of 20 local cigarettes cost 37p and Western varieties 80p.

    Report on 08 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • yocoxy
    Love rating 132
    yocoxy said

    Smokers die early so saving pensions? I'm not convinced that there's a benefit there that outweighs the huge cost to the NHS due to the slow decline and long painful death that most suffer as a consequence.

    Higher taxes means fewer smokers and those that continue to smoke pay more to offset the lost revenue from the quitters. Sounds like a good outcome for those that quit, tax payers and the country in general. As for those that don't quit, they've only got themselves to blame.

    One other thought. How many smokers are officially living below the mythical "poverty line"? Food parcel handouts are on the increase, many bleating that they can't stretch their benefits to buy food... After they've bought their fags, paid the cable TV fees and collectively paid 3 or 4 mobile phone contracts per household..

    The sooner benefits are paid in food vouchers the better. That'll cut smoking rates overnight.

    Report on 09 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • raba9
    Love rating 16
    raba9 said

    Sounds like a good excuse to make a lot more trips to France. Always a good day out and, by the way Basia02a, perfectly legal. It's called free movement of goods. The savings on the ciggies pays for the tunnel, so the savings on the wine, etc is not just pure profit but also not subject to ridiculous binge drinking controls. Bring it on!

    Report on 09 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Keb1980
    Love rating 0
    Keb1980 said

    Ok, my figures may be a little out of date here as the last time I had such a discussion with my friends was quite a while ago, BUT:

    The cost of smoking related illnesses to the NHS is approx. £1.7bn [so let's round it up to £2bn]

    The tax revenue from the tobacco industry [not including income tax from the workers, business generated from advertising etc] is around £10.3bn

    Where will the £8bn difference come from? I suppose we could tax the super rich [because THAT is working so well these days] or make more cuts to the NHS, education, military, stop the state pension all together, etc.

    Then we can move on to alcohol [costing the NHS about £3bn]... and so on.

    If we target these revenue streams like this, we won't need to worry about the bill to the NHS because there won't be one, at least not as we know it and how many people are going to die when hospitals start looking at long term care as too much of a cost to bear? Sin taxes contribute a lot more than they cost, in a purely financial sense, so consider what we would need to sacrifice before you start chipping away at them.

    Is it fair? No, but honestly, when was the last time life was fair?

    I'm a non-smoker btw. I just benefit from those that do :)

    Report on 09 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Basia02a
    Love rating 43
    Basia02a said

    Yes Raba9 - what I was referring to was the purchase of cigs on the continent and then the Resale of these in the UK without payment of duty - smuggling I think it is called. I believe this is illegal. I dont believe that the many smokers who live around the tunnel are popping over and buying there, but there are poeple who do this as a business. In fact I know this is so.

    However the money surely is not the issue here. I am in my fifties and never smoked, but know people who were smokers and are now dead because of it.

    Report on 09 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • littlewears
    Love rating 1
    littlewears said

    As a young schoolboy I bought 5 Woodbines for 7 1/2d (that's pre 1971 coinage) - equivalent to just over two pence today. In the Royal Navy we got free cigarettes (or rolling or pipe tobacco).

    I had to give up 5 years ago because of arterial blood clots which resulted in half a leg being amputated. I still long for a fag though - a large portion of my life has gone. J.

    Report on 09 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    All the figures quoting how much the government makes from taxes on cigarettes are skewed. If people don't spend on cigs they will spend on something else and ultimately taxes are paid. Just as drug dealers still pay tax on their shiny Range Rovers and BMW's there is only ever a certain stage at which taxes are avoided. I don't see any defence of smoking being valid on any level, whatever the tax implications. I still think there should be a luxury VAT rate of 35% on certain items which only seem essential to those on huge incomes and those on benefits - like 50" plus Plasma TV's and IPhones. Exempt any items made in the EC from this tax and feed a percentage back into tax cuts for those running UK manufacturing businesses.

    Report on 11 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • dmhzx
    Love rating 26
    dmhzx said

    And when everyone gives up and the taxes stop coming in and the government realise that smokers were paying at least ten times in tax as they were taking out of the NHS, and they all live longer and other leong term illnesses kick in, and they draw their pensions for even longer, I suppose we'll ALL be rejoicing whe the standard rate of tax hits 40p to makeup the shortfall.

    And we're even paying these people to give up smoking, and giving their doctors a bonus.

    trying to stop peole from smoking is not only an appalling interference on fredoms, it will prove to be an economic disaster that makes the banks indiscretions pale into insignificance,

    Though of course it is heresy to say any of this.

    Report on 12 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • logical_one
    Love rating 46
    logical_one said

    There is a demand to control others nowadays as vicious as any political or religious dogma could be.

    We need to start questioning why people cannot be left alone to decide what they want to do without so much control and interference from the state. In terms of health, smoking is no different to drinking alochol or contact sports or riding a bike. All these activities are shown to make their proponents more vulnerable to injury/illness which the NHS covers so why pick on smokers?

    One point for smoking and against alcohol is that alcohol has caused violence, anti-social behaviour, other serious crimes and even murder where smoking has a calming influence. I DO NOT SMOKE but this is out of choice, my choice, not because of some "politically correct" or tax sucking ideology forced down my throat.

    My message is live and let live. If people wish to risk smoking, climbing mountains, scrambler bike racing, over eating, sailing or rowing round the world...that is their choice!

    Report on 12 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • silkycat
    Love rating 37
    silkycat said

    If there is real tax benefit in smoking why have successive governments spent money on anti-smoking publicity and legislation. Surely government should be encouraging everyone to take up smoking and pay off the deficit early!

    That's obviously nonsense. As has been said they money spent on cigs. would be spent on other things and generate VAT income and potentially boost UK jobs. As a bonus we'd ALL be healthier and I wouldn't spend my summer cooped up inside pubs to avoid the smokers sitting out in the sun enjoying themselves.

    But then they'll also be putting themselves at greater risk of skin cancer too.

    If you smokers all give up you'll feel a lot better, have more cash for important items and there won't be any black market.

    Report on 13 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • MikeB55
    Love rating 6
    MikeB55 said

    Tobacco is a drug. Tobacco addicts will to resort to crime to pay for their addiction.

    Report on 13 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • steady45
    Love rating 2
    steady45 said

    Always thought we lived in a free country , obviously I was wrong If people wish to smoke who are we to tell them they should not , if anything drinking is worse smokers don,t go out and cause trouble, get in to fights, kill people or cause mayhem at A.E every weekend .

    Report on 20 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2