Taxman under fire over small firm crackdown

Simon Ward
by Lovemoney Staff Simon Ward on 03 January 2012  |  Comments 15 comments

HMRC has been criticised for a project to check up on the tax returns of up to 20,000 small businesses.

Taxman under fire over small firm crackdown

There has been anger at a new project launched by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to conduct spot checks on small businesses.

From April, HMRC plans to check the tax returns of up to 20,000 firms and inspect their tax paperwork.

Any firm unable to back up their tax return faces a fine of up to £3,000.

The Business Records Checks (BRC) project has already been piloted in eight areas. It was launched as part of the Government’s £900 million scheme to crack down on tax avoidance and evasion.

HMRC reportedly estimates that underpayment of tax by small- and medium-sized companies accounted for up to 50% of the UK’s ‘lost’ tax revenue.

But the crackdown has faced criticism from both Conservative and Labour MPs, particularly in light of claims that HMRC is owed up to £25.5 billion by large companies.

Following the widespread criticism, HMRC says it will hold a “strategic review” of the BRC project. It admitted that “the project would have benefited from more detailed consultation with tax professionals at an earlier stage.”

Goldman Sachs claim goes to court

Campaign group UK Uncut Legal Action served legal papers in the High Court against HMRC just before Christmas. The group wants a declaration that an agreement to allow a bill for unpaid tax on bonuses at Goldman Sachs to be waived was unlawful.

HMRC is also set to pursue individuals and companies it suspects of not registering to pay VAT.

It says that only 841 of a suspected 40,000 targets had come forward by 22 December as part of an amnesty that ended on 31 December.

However, in another blow to the beleaguered organisation, it emerged last week that almost two-thirds of VAT fines issued to small businesses by HMRC were found to be incorrect on appeal.

More: How to cut your tax bill | HMRC declares war on tax-dodging landlords

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (15)

  • pthep
    Love rating 7
    pthep said

    At £3000 per SME it will have to issue TWO MILLION fines just to make up the amount that Vodafone were let off - why not concentrate manpower on worthwhile targets?

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  4 loves
  • GaryDean
    Love rating 76
    GaryDean said

    While the very big boys continue to absolutely cream us through rising costs such as insurance, utilities & fuel etc. etc. etc. we now get put under the spotlight by the government that is supposed to protect our legitimate interests. All the while the big players continue to award themselves with fat pay cheques, bonuses & the like & continue to devise ways of avoiding billions in tax. What kind of decrepit society has this become. This is economic slavery & oppression pure & simple. This is economic totalitarianism. The new Big Brother wickedly disguising itself under the label 'Democracy'. Further proof that democracy has become a word that justifies political wrongdoing & illegitimate control.

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • jamiecfc1
    Love rating 42
    jamiecfc1 said

    Simple really, they're short on funds due to the recession/dodgy deals so they're trying to make up the difference in dubious fines which will no doubt be imposed without consultation or discussion and then will be a bugger to get retracted when it transpires they've been imposed in error. Actually having said that what some people try to get away with for "record keeping" is laughable and it's always been that you can be fined for "failing to keep proper records" so in most cases it's long overdue. Blimey I almost agreed with HMRC, I think I need a lie down.

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • driver67
    Love rating 26
    driver67 said

    Having had an investigation five years ago, and treated worse than a criminal (I had NO 'rights' at all) I can say it was one of the worst experiences of my life. We ended up having to pay £3000 for some things we (allegedly) owed, and our adviser said we got off lightly! Does this mean our accountants are in fact incompetent? I don't think they are - I think the stuff was just trumped up and we were so worn down we paid up. Problem is we are an easy target.

    Why WAS Toad-a-phone let off anyway? Someone with the right handshake perhaps...?

    (Nicely summed up, Gary Dean, btw)

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • mjgfool
    Love rating 9
    mjgfool said

    If HMRC and the government did not waste our money on IT systems that don't work maybe they would have a system which could be used to collect taxes that are due and not to spend time thinking up new ways of hounding people and companies who are trying to make a living in an economy severely damaged by one of the companies for whom the income tax due on bonuses seems to have been waived. Adding insult to injury is an unexpected skill HMRC seems to have developed

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 626
    Mike10613 said

    Some people fiddle their expenses, some people dodge tax and then some people fiddle their benefit claims. What does this say about morality in Britain today? Maybe, if the fiddles at the top were stopped it would shame those farther down the pecking order?

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • finnol49
    Love rating 27
    finnol49 said

    Pity the Greek government isn't cracking down on their businesses like HMRC are. I bet if all taxes were collected that were due, the Greeks wouldn't have a debt problem. Maybe if the Greeks monitored all mobile phone calls like in the US, they'd have a pretty good idea of how much business is being done & therefore how much tax should be paid.

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • laplennerie
    Love rating 20
    laplennerie said

    Typical of this Government. Let big corperations off their tax dues and pick on the easy targets. There is no equity in this administration as it succours to its paymasters - banks, corperations and tax exiles. This Government has the morale attitude of the last Italian PM - Berlescconi and his side kicks.

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • jonbrad70
    Love rating 1
    jonbrad70 said

    I'm going to have to wind my business up due to the fact that work we have done is not being paid for because the courts are fairly powerless to enforce payment and the state run bank which supposedly looks after our finances will not lend us money to shore up liquidity. I have a relatively small tax bill which is outstanding, but quite frankly they can go and whistle for that.

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • RichardG
    Love rating 3
    RichardG said

    Any moron should realise it is easier to collect taxes from bigger avoiders - so spend the this money on Vodaphone and their buddies. As an aside I hope all you Vodaphone users are moving to the opposition.

    I think Lovemoney should publish a list of the companies we think are avoiders so we can make an informed choice before doing business with them. How about showing the percentage of tax (related to earnings) they pay for the last five years. I think you might see Boots has dropped to paying 3% tax on its total earnings due to the dubious use of interest payments to lower their tax bill. This loophole should be removed. See the links below which explain the Boots issue.

    http://www.tpweek.com/Article/2739590/How-debt-financing-cut-Boots-tax-bill-by-80-million.html

    http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23893906-alliance-boots-sets-itself-for-strong-results.do

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • MK22
    Love rating 169
    MK22 said

    The tax system is too complex, hence allowing firms who can afford expensive lawyers the opportunity to reduce their tax bill. Make it simple. How about removing all exemptions, reducing the tax rate, but levying it on gross income? You could do the same for personal taxation. Think of the money the Government could then save by not requiring so many civil servants in HMRC.

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • Burtonman
    Love rating 6
    Burtonman said

    Both Simon Ward and the writers of the first ten comments above should consider the comments of MK22, because he (or she) is the only one who understands the problem. The last (Labour) government made the tax system so complex that clever tax lawyers, specialising in a very precise area (such as mobile phones), are able to run rings around the HMRC inspectors (who, after all, are jacks of all trades and masters of none).

    Ten years ago a retired tax inspector commented to me that the tax system was now far too complicated and he felt that it wanted tearing up and starting again. As MK22 implies, until that happens big corporations will continue to get away with murder and it will be the little businesses who pay.

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • coloratura
    Love rating 81
    coloratura said

    I agree with the above - the tax system is far roo complicated and it is just as easy to overpay than to underpay.

    As someone who was written to by a "Higher Compliance Office" 2/3 years ago and had my accounts checked (due to a slight error in filling in the form - easy enough to do) it is a frightening experience even if you are not guilty of anything and since that day I have tended to overestimate what I owe e.g. have not claimed for expenses that I possibly could have done. Over the years this will mean that I will have overpaid by quite a large amount. I did, by the way, find a year where I had actually paid too much tax but they said that it was "out of time" whereas, had I underpaid, it was not "out of time" (a bit unfair I think).

    I do not see why, if M.P.'s don't have to provide receipts for expenses, small businesses/self-employed can't be given an "expense allowance". If they use it too much they will lose money and if they don't they will save money and then just base the tax on the actual gross income. It is to the tax offices benefit to have these very complicated forms that are easy to make a mistake on and as they can then impose "fines" for any errors. Also it makes it harder for the non-tax experts to know if what they are told is correct.

    Small businesses and the self-employed want to stay in business so cheating the tax office isn't to their benefit - no businesses in their right minds (or very few) deliberately want to cheat the tax office as getting caught has grave consequences and personally I like to sleep at night but it is so easy to make a mistake on the complicated forms without wishing to.

    M.P.'s - make tax forms easy then you will have no mistakes and save money by not having to employ so many staff. It will also be much easier and less costly to see who the cheats are as well.

    Report on 03 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • Ripped off
    Love rating 17
    Ripped off said

    This is all very well, but the inland revenue are every bit as if not more so, crooked than those they suspect and accuse of being so.

    I hae first hand experience of the underhanded tactics used by the IR when as a victim I would not give in and provide the ticks in the right box for them. The IR went on a decade of a fishing trip with me trying to stitch me up or catch me out. All they found in fact was that I had been over paying tax, due mainly to my accountants mistakes.

    The inland R after many years eventually admitted the whole fiasco was a pointless waste of time.

    for almost 10 years of hassle they offered me less than £150 in compensation. Claiming it was public money and they could not hand it out willy nilly.

    They even refused to pay my accountants bill which ran into the tens of thousands. That bill 100% had been caused by the IR. who had deliberatly sent us on one wild goose chase after another hunting for paper from years past, in the hope I would find it easier to just give in and admit what they were trying to stitch me up with, giving them, the ticks they needed to gain their targets.

    Once the IR admitted they made mistakes, to avoid compensating or, even just paying the costs they had caused The IR again used the clap trap about the money they have is public money. I pointed out that they never seem short of public money when they are paying out for The house of commons speaker to tart up his free flat, MP's expenses, Royal Weddings or first class flights for Cameron and his cronnies to name but a few area's where money is wasted that otherwise could be saved.

    What this country needs is a general strike by all the self employed. The whole place would grind to a halt over night. The self employed standing alone in their corner shop, have no voice or human rights against these shysters.

    All the self employed should all stand together united if these shysters come knocking.

    That might just make the government and its pension chasing pen pushers who live in their cosy everything excessively paid for safe jobs, realise just who, really funds their pay packets and for head's of the IR ( hundreds of them ) their lavish life style and fat cat pension.

    Maybe the IR might then realise that the real back bone of this country or, the people who really create the wealth etc. is not them, it is the very people they are planning to harras and squeeze even more.

    Those people the self employed are those Cameron and the IR should now be thanking for working upto 18 - 20 hours a day 7 days a week. Don't forget the self employed live or die based on what they create, they have no ( for example ) paid sick days to fiddle like the IR and government staff do.

    My advice if the IR come knocking forget your accountant and instead get together with others who are targeted.

    Fight the IR shysters united. from my experience what the IR take advantage of is the fact as a self employed person you are "one" whereas they have an office full of mates ready to join in on the kill.

    Use the internet to tell others you are being picked on and join forces to fight united. If in doubt always remeber the excuse MP's offered when it came to light they had been robbing the tax payers for years, what was it???? oh yes, they had made a mistake. Yeh right.

    Talking of MP's and benefits in kind.....

    Well we all know the one about the defence sec and his mate but....

    Imagine a first class holiday in Burma for you your wife and all your work mates enough, to fill a chartered BA plane. Yes you all travel first class, no duty free searches or, hours in checkin Q's or hands up and shoes off at security. Even your lift backwards and forwards to the airport's are paid for.

    Ok this has to be a benefit in kind doesn't it ??????

    Yes thats right, what would the IR revenue say if you or I, put this lot down as a business expense!!!

    Well for the answer we need to ask William Haig because he has just go away with it.

    William his wife, and all his work mates have just enjoyed all this at tax payers expense, and the whole thing will not cost William his wife or, any of his mates a penny.

    Instead each and everyone of us as tax payers are paying for Williams group holiday yes we pay for the lot, the trip will not go on Williams tax return as a benefit in kind to be taxed. and defo it will never used as an excuse to open an IR investigation as it would if we tried the same stunt.

    and, Cameron says we are all in to together !!!! wow are we?

    Report on 04 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  7 loves
  • tindeanboy17
    Love rating 7
    tindeanboy17 said

    They hang the man and flog the woman

    That steal the goose from off the common,

    But let the greater criminal loose

    That steal the common from the goose...

    Report on 05 January 2012  |  Love thisLove  4 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 31Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 31 months (2.99% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: Assumed borrowing of £1,200 for 1 year, at a Purchase Rate of 18.9% (variable), representative 18.9% APR (variable). Credit available subject to status. A Balance Transfer fee of 3.5% will be applied, then reduced to 2.99% by a refund (terms and conditions apply). Plus an additional £20 fee refund on balance transfers over £2000.

Barclaycard 30Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 30 months (2.89% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: Assumed borrowing of £1,200 for 1 year, at a Purchase Rate of 18.9% (variable), representative 18.9% APR (variable). Credit available subject to status. A Balance Transfer fee of 3.5% will be applied, then reduced to 2.89% by a refund (terms and conditions apply). Plus an additional £20 fee refund on balance transfers over £2000.

MBNA 30Mth Platinum Credit Card Visa

0% for 30 months (2.89% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: Assumed borrowing of £1,200 for 1 year, at a Purchase Rate of 18.9% (variable), representative 18.9% APR (variable). Credit available subject to status.
W3C  Thank you for using One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest