HMRC declares war on tax-dodging landlords

John Fitzsimons
by Lovemoney Staff John Fitzsimons on 09 November 2011  |  Comments 11 comments

Northern landlords, Scottish scrap dealers and self-employed workers in the South East are all coming under scrutiny from the taxman.

HMRC declares war on tax-dodging landlords

The taxman has announced it is to crack down on landlords skipping out on their taxpaying responsibilities, with new taskforces launched to identify offenders.

HM Revenue & Customs has launched a number of separate specialist taskforces this year, each targeting specific areas where the taxman believes it is missing out on revenue. Indeed, just last week a team was launched to investigate wealthy overseas property owners to ensure it isn’t missing out on any tax revenue.

And now landlords have come under the taxman’s gaze.

Tax-dodging Northern landlords

However, it’s not all landlords that HMRC reckons have been on the fiddle.

No, the new taskforce will be specifically looking at landlords in the North West of England and North Wales, and only those or own or rent out more than three properties. Quite why it's landlords in the North West and North Wales that are most likely to be underpaying their tax is unclear. But it's reassuring to see.

Paying too much tax

After all, landlords do enjoy a number of tax benefits not open to the rest of us, even though research suggests they don’t take advantage of all of them.

Earlier this year, buy-to-let lender Paragon surveyed landlords on which expenses they deduct from their income tax. And while the majority knew they could include things like mortgage interest (87% of respondents), insurance (92%) and repairs and maintenance (95%), there were a number of other areas where landlords were footing the bill unnecessarily.

For example, just 41% knew they could claim back their outlay on energy efficiency improvements, 45% knew they could claim for advertising the properties, and 49% knew they could claim back travel costs associated with visiting the property.

For more on the tax benefits of being a landlord, check out Landlords are paying too much tax. You should also check out the excellent landlord tax guide (PDF) from Paragon.

Tax hikes for landlords

Despite these financial incentives for landlords, their tax situation may still be somewhat taxing.

After all, not only do some landlords now have the taxman breathing down their necks, but also potential new taxes to take into account.

As we highlighted last month, the government wants to scrap tax breaks for second home owners, in order to bring down council tax levels for everyone. And it’s not just the wealthy that will suffer as a result of this change, but landlords too.

For more on the damage this tax revamp could do to landlords’ pockets, read Landlords could be hit by covert tax hikes.

Not just landlords

It’s not just landlords that HMRC is targeting with this new batch of taskforces. In addition, scrap metal dealers in Scotland will come under scrutiny, as the taxman has identified a high risk of tax evasion within the trade.

On top of that, taskforces will look into self-employed construction traders (again in the North West or North Wales) who suppress sales or over-claim expenses, Scottish fast food outlets, and the underpayment of corporation tax, income tax (via self-assessment), PAYE and VAT in the South East.

I like this targeted approach, identifying areas where there is clear evidence that tax evasion has taken place, tracking down the guilty parties and (hopefully) extracting the money they owe.

The taxman is planning to have nine taskforces in action across 2011/12, with more teams launched in 2012/13. It hopes that this approach will help it to claw back around £7 billion each year by 2014/15. The government put £900 million aside during the spending review to put towards tackling tax evasion, avoidance and fraud.

What happens if you’re caught

The taxman is certainly talking tough when it comes to tax evasion, stating that these taskforces will “come down hard and fast” on those people it finds to have avoided paying the correct amount of tax.

Should you be identified as a guilty party, you’ll get whacked with a sizeable fine, and possibly even face prosecution. Clearly, the authorities mean business on this one.

More: Wine drinkers set to pay more tax | VAT hits the poor hardest

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (11)

  • MalcG
    Love rating 3
    MalcG said

    Amazing. The head man at HMRC lets Vodafone and others off with BILLIONS and they then think chasing individuals is fair game, and worthwhile. Has anyone else read what a shambles his performance a the select committee was? Double standards - how to encourage people to be fair.

    Report on 09 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  3 loves
  • onthecomputer
    Love rating 79
    onthecomputer said

    When is someone going to declare war on Theresa May - surely what she did is far more cause for concern that a few fiddling tax?

    Report on 09 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • laplennerie
    Love rating 20
    laplennerie said

    One area they will not touch or dare go near is Irish Travellers sites. I went on a tax course some years ago and they stated that if you are caught out then you get a visit. I said unless you live on a traveller camp - admission 'no' they will not as they fear being assualted. I have a site near me - they employ eastern europeans, house them on pitches which are supposed to be for travellers (county council will not touch these eastern europeans as they are treated as guests/freinds of the travellers), pay no national insurance, employers contributions etc. We should all be like this until the law and Government treats everyone equally in the Uk which it does not.

    TB

    Report on 09 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Pedros143
    Love rating 7
    Pedros143 said

    I agree with "laplennerie".. Just visit some of the traveller sites in the south of England.

    How can you afford a top of the range Range Rover or Mercedes on benefits. The smell of burning copper wire lingers for ages, but no-one seems to have the guts to deal with it.. soft targets first seems to be the order of the day!!! Our law enforcement personnel are becoming a parody of third world enforcers.

    Report on 09 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • coloratura
    Love rating 62
    coloratura said

    I agree with the above re: travellers and soft targets.

    As a self-employed person myself I tend to overpay tax rather than risk getting it wrong but nobody ever mentions this and there will certainly be no "task forces" looking into how to rebate tax to those that have overpaid which, through fear, I think many people do. Where there is any doubt about what to claim it is just easier to bias things towards HMRC, especially for sole traders who are busy running their day to day businesses as well as doing the accounts.....no clever accountants to find loopholes for us.

    Looking forward to my next tax rebate ? I can't ever remember receiving one.

    Report on 10 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jamiecfc1
    Love rating 39
    jamiecfc1 said

    Anyone who insists on being called "Dave" has to be viewed with suspicion as has been proven with Dave Hartnett, HMRC dodgy-dealer-in-chief. The simple fact of the matter is that because successive governments have pushed the economy down the khazi dear old HMRC isn't getting the tax revenues it expected to, even with a VAT hike, so it's looking for "easy targets" - viz the campaign to extract taxes from doctors, offshore bank accounts, plumbers, private tutors... Plus it needs an excuse to use the software that several squillions of taxpayers money was wasted on. Expect to see a lot of accusations, nasty letters, lengthy squabbles, and who knows maybe £3.50 in back tax collected..

    Report on 10 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • plumage
    Love rating 0
    plumage said

    Generally landlords charge properties out at a rough guide of 5% of the property value, then they have lots of expenses on top of that and a lot more hassle than simply putting their money in the building society. I use a letting agent and they generally take 8-12 % of the income, then there are repairs and service charges to pay on apartments insurance etc. Landlords are not doing it out of the goodness of their hearts. Admittedly some landlords are horrible- but then I think there are more bad tenants than bad landlords. Among the worst tenants are students some of whom have not been house trained before they move out from their parents' They often have lots of parties and generally trash wherever they live- consequently students of whatever type have to put up with the worst properties. I do not rent out to students or DSS (for which read long term unemployed or unemployable- why are they moving?) only to professionals- in other words to couples who intend to make the place a home not just a crash pad, and who treat it accordingly.

    Report on 10 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Wahvad
    Love rating 0
    Wahvad said

    An 8-12% letting agent fee is no excuse not to pay your taxes - landlords (though not society including homeowners living in places where owner occupation shared with thoughtless tenants) benefit from lax laws and little or no regulation. They need to pay taxes and be regulated like any other business, tax dodge whether its landlords or self-employed plumbers need to be pressed with the full force of the law.

    Report on 10 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • selfsufficient
    Love rating 0
    selfsufficient said

    The only landlords that HMRC does not know about are those not using letting agencies - but even then, they can tell the houses are being rented. There is probably a lot more to gain looking at what the top 1000 most powerful people in the country do tax-wise - Top politicians and businessman. There must be millions on tax avoidance at that level !

    Report on 12 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • tommsmithz
    Love rating 1
    tommsmithz said

    I wonder when HMRC will tax benefit claimants who keep Housing Benefit. Keeping Housing Benefit is currently an income that doesn't attract taxation also allowing the claimant Unemployment Benefit.

    If HMRC where to tax kept housing benefit, and then the Government refused to pay claimants who had an income, then Landlords might actually get paid. I unfortunately will not take benefit claimants as the costs have been so high. I've actually left a property empty than take a benefit claimant, which I feel is wrong for all. There are good Benefit Claimants but one still ends up subsidising good ones.

    The Government also needs to create Legislation to make Tenants responsible and fine them, just like bad landlords are fined. The Deposit Protection Service makes it Law to fine the Landlord 3 x deposit if not protected, why not fine Tenants 3 x rent if they do not perform their duties? Although I have great tenants now it's been a learning process and I honestly wished I hadn't made the effort of self employment.

    Report on 12 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Ripped off
    Love rating 17
    Ripped off said

    All this in an evenly balanced world is one thing. if only !!!

    But from my experience now on the otherside of a 8 year tax investigation where it appears my name was simply pulled from a tax office lucky dip bag to be investigated.

    I endured 8 years of a lets dig and see from these government shysters they call tax inspectors.

    A few years in and it was clear the government shysters were simply fishing in the dark. They had nothing other than their own jealous spite that was hidden behind rigged rules giving them at all times, the upper hand to demand, smerk and bully.

    They simply made it up as they went along. After several years, one of the tax shyster knowing he was getting nowhere even offered to shut the whole thing down "if" I would admit to fiddling something and then, pay a 5 figure sum in settlement. He also told me if I did not accept his offer, I would face many more years of hassament until, I did admit what they were trying to pin on me because he said, they had all the time in the world and would unless, I gave in, keep going, and keep running up accountants bills asking loads of pointless questions.

    I refused his off the record offer, and five years further down the line the shysters had to conceed and admit that in fact, in contrast to my not paying enough in tax, I had in fact, been paying substantially more in tax than I ever needed. This mainly was due to failings by my accountants who had failed to claim proper allowances.

    This resulted in, after eight year of hell, a huge tax refund.

    The bottom line the inland revenue never had any reason other than their own jealous spite to investigate me. The revenue wasted tens of thousand of pounds in man hours digging for something that wasn't their. They found nothing, so they simply created something instead to pin on me.

    At the end of it all, all they offered me was £150 in compensation for 8 years of hassle and hell. The reason they only gave me £150 they say is because it is public money.

    Odd thing is, when it comes to MP's on the fiddle, first class flights for govenment staff and the royals or, a whole host of others milking the system at every corner. Then there never seems to be any shortage of public money to go round.

    To date the revenue, are even still trying to duck out of paying my accountants bills that they ran up over the 8 years. What the revenue should now do, is hold the tax shysters to account and if, as they say, they don't want to use public money. The tax shysters themselves or their managers should be made accountable for their actions and then made to pay the bills they pointlessly ran up from their own pockets.

    So before this bunch of government shysters ( the revenue ) start harrsing private landlords the government first want to get some tight controls on this bunch of target chasers because from my direct experience, what they cannot find honestly they make up, then hide behind rigged rules to enforce what they make up.

    Report on 12 November 2011  |  Love thisLove  3 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse