Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Mobile phones

Mobile networks using small print to raise prices on fixed tariffs

Emma Lunn
by Lovemoney Staff Emma Lunn on 17 July 2012  |  Comments 12 comments

Mobile phone networks are cashing in by using the small print in contracts to raise the costs of what should be fixed rate tariffs.

Mobile networks using small print to raise prices on fixed tariffs

Mobile users might assume that committing to a tariff for a certain period of time will mean the cost of that tariff can’t rise – but they’re wrong.

Consumer group Which? has investigated networks using clauses hidden in the small-print to legally hike prices while customers are in contract. It reckons that the price hikes could be costing consumers up to £90 million a year.

Unsurprisingly it also found that most people (70%) didn’t realise prices could increase during a contract period.

Which? has launched a campaign, Fixed Means Fixed, calling for an end to price increases on fixed mobile phone contracts, arguing they should stay the same price from start to finish of the contract.

The guilty parties

Last week Three became the latest mobile operator to use this tactic when the price hikes announced in May took effect. Three has increased its ‘fixed' prices by 3.6% which will affect more than one million customers, including those with mobile broadband.

On a £30 monthly plan, this represents a £1.08 monthly or £12.96 annual increase. The cost of calls and data outside the plan or on pay-as-you-go will not rise.

Contract small print states that “inflation-linked price rises” are allowed and Three has used this clause and March’s 3.6% rise in the Retail Price Index to up prices.

Under the terms of the contract, the increase means customers cannot leave their contract early if they don’t like it – they just have to lump it.

Orange and T-Mobile

Orange and T-Mobile have both also used contract small print to hike fixed contract prices in the past year.

Orange raised prices by 4.34% in January and T-Mobile by 3.7% in May, respectively.

They also pointed to the small print to ban contracted customers from switching without charge. Regulator Ofcom ruled Orange was within its rights to do so, following widespread anger.

Vodafone

Last October Vodafone announced it was “simplifying” bills. By “simplifying” it really meant putting prices up.

The network started rounding bills up to the nearest 50p. So customers that normally paid £24.57 or £31.65 a month would pay £25 and £32 respectively.

Although Vodafone promised that no one would pay more than an extra 49p each month or £5.88 a year, the price hikes didn’t go down well. And you can see why: Vodafone has about 19 million customers in the UK and if each paid an extra £5.88 a year it adds up to an extra £55.8m for Vodafone.

Complaints

While complaining to networks about in-contract price hikes has proved fruitless so far, Which? has submitted a formal complaint to Ofcom, asking the regulator to urgently investigate this issue and rule that ‘fixed means fixed'.

Which? says it wants the price and all other aspects of fixed deals to remain the same for the contract period when consumers are also tied-in. If there is a chance that prices may rise, operators must be more upfront about this in their advertising and allow people to switch providers without penalty.

Shopping around

Whether you’re affected by in-contract price hikes or not, it’s a good idea to shop around when your existing mobile contract comes to an end. New deals are coming on to the market all the time and generally offer inclusive minutes, texts and data/internet as well as the latest smartphone in many cases.

Take half an hour to go through your old mobile bills and work out how much you are actually using your phone each month and for what.

You’ll be able to save money if you opt for a SIM-only deal and continue to use your existing handset. Back in April I wrote about how switching to a SIM-only deal saved me £234 on my annual bill.

Check out lovemoney.com's new mobile phone and tariff comparison centre to search the market for the best deal for you.

More on mobiles:

What really happens when your mobile phone is stolen

O2 wallet: send money to friends and shop using your mobile phone

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (12)

  • alanowens
    Love rating 0
    alanowens said

    This just happened to me on 3, and I'm not happy about it.

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • windlesham1
    Love rating 14
    windlesham1 said

    You need a large hadron collider just to read the small print on a mobile phone contract! They are allowed to get away with this because they have friends in high places.

    Welcome to treasure island where everything is over priced,and the rich pay no taxes

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • yocoxy
    Love rating 132
    yocoxy said

    Yawn. Blame the Government, blame the rich. Same old, same old.

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Bobski
    Love rating 19
    Bobski said

    Nearest 50p for £24.57 or £31.65

    Should be £24.50 and £31.50

    Rounding the bills UP is just greed.

    Im on a capped tariff with no lock in. The only downside is you dont tend to get many discounts on SIM free phones when it comes to buying a new one.

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • easygoing
    Love rating 156
    easygoing said

    yocoxy - and your point is. Didn't add much to the debate did it.

    Everything comes with reams of small print these days or 'terms and conditions' as they like to say. These are deliberately made long winded and complex in the knowledge that the average 'non-nerd' will either not have time to devour them all or not understand them. Most of what is written could be made more obvious and concise but that would defeat the object wouldn't it?

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jamiecfc1
    Love rating 39
    jamiecfc1 said

    I'm also on 3 and the note I got from them was along the lines of "it's in the contract so don't bother ringing us to complain". Which I thought was a great thing to do, if you want to lose customers. To be fair to 3 I've been with them for 8 years ever since Orange tried to charge me for using my phone to ring the same number twice simultaneously for 2 hours. Aside from 3's annoying use of overseas call centres they've been OK, however come renewal time I will be shopping around. Would suggest others do the same thing.

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • culluding-fool
    Love rating 49
    culluding-fool said

    My Orange contract went up shortly after I entered it. I'm not happy about it but can't see that I can do anything about it. I use a tiny fraction of my call and text message allowance. It's a two year contract and now my phone battery is dying rapidly but it has just gone past the one year warranty, so I will probably have to pay for that myself, although I doubt I can afford it at the moment. I could be stuck in a phone contract I can't use. I believe warranties should be at least the length of the contract so that the end user isn't left paying a contract that can't be used. This happened to me before, I was with T-mobile for Internet broadband and moved house to an area where T-mobile didn't have any signal at all. T-mobile expected me to continue paying the contract which was now useless to me. They didn't seem to understand that I don't choose to live somewhere based around myobile phone signal. Anyway, I stopped paying and they are still chasing me three years later, despite me telling them that I refuse to pay and to take it to court.

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Skintsod
    Love rating 32
    Skintsod said

    I would imagine that any company which failed to provide the service they were charging for would have voided the contract due to their non-performance. I wouldn't enter into any contract which contains a clause which says you have to pay us but we don't have to provide any goods or services. Having seen the astonishing scammy attitude of mobile phone operators I decided that I would never sign a contract with any of them until they changed their ways. I use a simple pre-paid service for brief calls and my landline or Skype for the longer ones. I do sympathise with those who find contracts a necessity for business purposes, but if you have tied up yourself to a term contract for social use then you've chosen to put your head on the block.

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • environmentaljan
    Love rating 8
    environmentaljan said

    There are clear rules about Fair Terms and Conditions which used to be enforced by Trading Standards officers. However many Local Authorities no longer take complaints and just refer you to consumer direct - which is also closing

    Report on 23 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jegwe
    Love rating 20
    jegwe said

    Israel made unbreakable fixed term mobile phone contracts illegal over a year ago. Perhaps it is time that we caught up.

    Report on 24 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    The Chinese execute fraudulent company directors, should we also 'catch up' with them? People need to decide whether government should interfere with every aspect of their lives or have a light touch and let the public and consumer pressure bring errant companies to book, with the law only interfering in serious fraud cases. If you are to sign a contract then read the damn thing, is that so difficult for people to get their heads around?

    Report on 29 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • leah AKA global leah
    Love rating 21
    leah AKA global leah said

    I am actually happy that there are no complaints regarding o2, because I have been with them for quite a few years now, started off with 2 sims only, now my partner is still on that, and I have been on contract with them nearly 18mths. Whenever I have a query, I would go online first, and always managed to chat to someone there, and get the problem resolved right away.

    My latest query was that I wanted to know whether it was possible to upgrade my phone sooner rather than at the end of my contract in December, the guy was ever so friendly, looked through and told me that I can upgrade in October. I have been using the data quite a bit as well as I have been expecting an email from someone, so I enquired about the added bolt on, I got that sorted out right away, as well as my monthly price went from £40 to £36. And to top the whole query, because my phone was playing up so I couldn't go online with it, he tried to help me to get me back online, THEN told me that because the guarantee on my phone is the same length of my contract, I am still under guarantee, and if I cannot resolve my data problem, take my phone to the nearest o2 shop and they will replace it for me if they cannot solve it either.

    I canNOT diss o2 for their help at all, especially when it comes to their prices or them being helpful.

    Report on 30 July 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4