Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Landline phones

Directory enquiries: the true cost of calling 118 numbers

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 02 October 2012  |  Comments 22 comments

We look at how much it really costs you if you call a 118 directory enquiry number.

Directory enquiries: the true cost of calling 118 numbers

From 1957 to 2003, British landline callers wanting directory enquiries could dial only one number: 192.

Ten years ago, in 2002, this all changed when telecom regulator Oftel (now Ofcom) opened up the directory-enquiries market to competition. Very soon, more than 200 different providers were competing to capture callers seeking numbers.

In theory, ended 192's monopoly by opening up its closed shop to competition should have brought down prices and improved customer service. In fact, a decade later, the cost of dialling directory enquiries is a growing national scandal.

Let's take a look at the true cost of calling a 188 directory enquiries number.

The great 118 rip-off

Thanks to their multi-million-pound advertising budgets, two companies now control almost the entire market for 118 calls. These are The Number (118 118) and BT (118 500). The clear market leader is 118 118, best known for its awful adverts featuring two moustachioed athletes, who are clearly lookalikes of long-distance runner David Bedford.

Quite frankly, the charges levied by these companies and almost all other 118 providers are outrageous, thanks to these four rip-offs:

  1. Connection charge: Just being connected to a 118 service could cost you roughly 50p.
  2. Per-minute fee: For every minute or part-minute you spend finding a number, you'll pay upwards of £1.
  3. Call connection: If you agree to allow the 118 operator to connect your call, then you'll continue to pay sky-high per-minute charges until your call ends. Three years ago, one customer complained to Ofcom after paying over £350 for a single 118-connected call.
  4. Calling from mobiles: 118 calls from landlines are expensive, but from mobiles, they are astronomically overpriced. In fact, it would probably be cheaper to call the Curiosity rover currently exploring Mars than to call a 118 number from your mobile!

118 calls compared

Here's a head-to-head comparison of the two leading 118 services, The Number and BT:

Provider

Connection

charge

Per-minute

fee

Cost of

first minute

 

118 118

The Number

38p

£1.59

£1.97

118 500

BT

62p

£1.69

£2.31

As you can see, calling these two services for up to a minute costs between £1.97 and £2.31. Any extra minutes are then billed at £1.59 or £1.69, making these calls extortionately high-priced.

Note that on 24 August 2003, the day it was abolished, the 192 service charged 40p to find a number. Now, rival 118 services cost upwards of £2 for a one-minute call -- and far more if calls are dragged out, connected onwards or not made from landlines.

Once again, deregulation has utterly failed the British public, as Oftel and its successor Ofcom have presided over a five-fold increase in the cost of calling directory enquiries. Well done, regulators!

Always use a free alternative

I reckon that, with up to 200 million yearly calls to 118 providers, we Brits waste as much as £400 million a year on this calling con. How can we stamp out this scam?

The simple answer is to boycott these services completely. Instead, try dialling 0800 118 FREE (0800 118 3733). This is a free, ad-based service for landline users provided by The Number (also the operator of 118 118).

Even better, if you have an Internet-connected device (such as a PC, Mac, laptop, smartphone or tablet PC), then use Google or similar search engines to find missing numbers

By working together to shun 118 calls, we Brits can stamp out this rip-off for good.

More on phones:

Post Office freezes broadband and home phone prices until October 2013

Orange announces landline telephone price rises

BT to raise prices by up to 5.9%

How to call 0845 and 0870 numbers for free!

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (22)

  • Iamcoldsteve
    Love rating 308
    Iamcoldsteve said

    I have never rung one of these rip off number lookup companies.

    It is so easy to look the number up on-line, is 'free' and is probably quicker than one minute.

    If I search using my phone, I can just dial the number just by pressing on it on the screen.

    So, it easier, cheaper, quicker and more convenient to use a smart phone / computer.

    I don't know how these companies stay in business....

    Report on 03 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • Soruk
    Love rating 8
    Soruk said

    Several years ago Channel 4 (I think) did a programme on these numbers.

    Apparently, the most requested number back then was National Rail Enquiries. (For the one or 2 of you who don't know, it's 08457 48 49 50).

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Basia02a
    Love rating 43
    Basia02a said

    Of Course in the old old days of BT I seem to recall they didn't charge at all!

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Supercal
    Love rating 3
    Supercal said

    Surely only someone without a computer would not just look it up free on bt.com?

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Meduza78
    Love rating 17
    Meduza78 said

    agree with lamcoldsteve. i have noticed those adverts for 118 with those two funny men, which i did not find funny at all. someone certainly must pay for the massive advert campaign, i.e. the customers of these services. but i have NEVER used their services and always prefer to find the number on my own via internet or a phone directory. i had no idea what these directory companies charge for their services and this article made my jaw dropped. also i do not understand how they stay in the business but, apparently, they do. some people are just too lazy to search the number on their own and simply dial the number - they can afford it, i guess. high business people, other rich people, company employers, where the company pays all the bills... and people not knowing what it will cost them on their monthly bill. i expect they will stop using this service at once when they learn this rip off.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • charles125
    Love rating 53
    charles125 said

    It is possible to find the cost of all 118 service numbers, but you'll need your wits about you as there is a charge letter for each number in one BT document which then has to cross-referenced to a different table in another BT document. Seems to be very deliberate to make transparency of charges very difficult. Both tables are of course in notably small print.

    Some make a fixed charge, some make a charge per minute, and some make a combination of a fixed charge and a charge per minute. All of course cost the landline connection charge.

    Some 118 companies do charge considerably (as in very much) less than 118 118 or 118 500 but you'll have your work cut out to find out given how wretchedly and absurdly complicated it all is.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • russbiker
    Love rating 57
    russbiker said

    Just use bt.com - whole of directory enquiries is there for free.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • msmoneywise
    Love rating 27
    msmoneywise said

    To add insult to injury, government agencies like HMRC and DWP use these numbers all the time!! They are given a special rate, but it still adds up to hundreds of thousands of £s a year!! And guess who pays?? We taxpayers do!

    @Basia02a, yes it was free to call directory enquiries. Then they introduced a charge, but it was still free to call from a pay phone, now they charge wherever you call from. Another privatisation disaster, that's all.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • fenemore
    Love rating 205
    fenemore said

    Yes - I too remember when these calls were free - or at least, included in the line-rental.

    As others have already mentioned - it is SO easy to find the number you want on-line, there should NEVER be a need to call any of these rip-off numbers. It was classic Labour though - just like PFI hospitals. Brain-dead MPs, none of whom have EVER "worked" for a living, or held down any sort of job in the commercial world, dreampt up the catastrophe which is the current system. A benefit to customers? I think we all know the answer to that.

    I have a friend who works as a maintenance man for a PFI hospital in Worcestershire - he tells me the biggest cost of maintenance consumables is DUCT TAPE - to keep the building from falling apart.

    Stop politicians from meddling in things about which they know s*d all.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    BT = utter rip-off merchants. They always have been. Probably part of the culture from when they were nationalised and we were ripped-off even then. I remember 30 years ago they charged 50 GBP to connect a phone, which entailed connecting a couple of wires, and if you attempted to do it yourself, you were threatened with fines. I find numbers from the BT site on the internet, and it's free.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 599
    Mike10613 said

    The whole telecommunications system is a mess. The privatisation of services has led to higher prices. I was asked by a student on pay as you go mobile what happened to all her credit, £5 went in 24 hours. She thought calls in this country would be as cheap as in China! She called China for 1p a minute, texts to her friends were 12p a minute. They was because the airwaves were auctioned off to the highest bidders for 20 billion pounds. It seem 4G might be auctioned too.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • katchytitle
    Love rating 0
    katchytitle said

    just use saynoto0870.com or google from your smart phone. Why does anyone actually use directory enquiries anymore? These just seems like a tax on the elderly and technological luddites. Its not as if 118 500 or 118 118 is the only option? If people choose to not look for other cheaper options when they are available isn't that their fault? You can't legislate for stupidity!

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    Usual inaccurate moaning from Mike based on his Chinese 'friend' and his total lack of knowledge on the subject. The UK has some of the lowest international calling rates in the world and just a little effort will get incredibly low rates. I pay less than a tenth of what I used to do in phone bills 15 years ago and I now have customers all round the world rather than just in the UK. I was on Skype to an Australian customer for over an hour this morning and all included in my Skype package. Since privatisation, communication costs in the UK have plummeted and continue to do so. The biggest rip-offs come from that legacy of public ownership, BT. I can do direct comparisons with the USA, France and Germany and the UK is cheapest for phone and internet by a mile, both landline and mobile.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • celticlass
    Love rating 9
    celticlass said

    local libraries have a section with all directories too

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • StephenIzzy
    Love rating 4
    StephenIzzy said

    Or go to www.bt.com ,, on their web page you can search for numbers there.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • StephenIzzy
    Love rating 4
    StephenIzzy said

    Right hand side (find a number) you don't need the above account log in to use it either .

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • driver67
    Love rating 22
    driver67 said

    AS a telephone engineer of 40+ years I've seen a lot of changes, not many of them positive for the customer, other than technological improvements which would have happened without privatization anyway - just as STD did. As several correspondents rightly state, DQ was free until just before privatization. Incidentally, as someone who used to site on 151, we had 15 seconds to answer a call... or else the boss wanted to know why (he did weekly stats) Then of course you would talk to an ENGINEER who had done the job. Has anyone noticed improvements over the last 25 years in that area...?

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • g0nqk
    Love rating 7
    g0nqk said

    As another telephone engineer from the 70s I have made a similar observation. When I worked on maintenance most faults were cleared the same day that they were reported. I we had a fault a day old we were embarrassed, if we had them 3 days old we got our bums kicked! Now when I report a fault on my broadband connection they piddle around with it for 3 days or so, trying to blame it on me, and then tell me they can't make an appointment to fix it less than 3 days in advance! The British public seem to have very short memories. Frankly the service we get from the privatized telecommunications industry is scandalous.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • marram
    Love rating 46
    marram said

    @g0nqk - I remember when the phones were run by the Post Office! (Post Office Telecommunications, if my memory serves me right.)

    Anyway, the truth is that the state-owned services were excellent - it's only since they've been messed about with and told to make big profits for shareholders that things have gone downhill. Plus, the ethics of customer service have gone out of the window in favour of working less 'unsocial' hours.

    But back to the point, I personally always look numbers up online if I need to. I would NEVER pay to find out a number.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    70's BT engineers drove around in Marina vans. I think they should stop wearing their rose tinted specs. There are now plenty of communication choices at a fraction of the cost we used to pay in real terms. I used to get line faults all the time in the 70's and 80's as did pretty much everyone else I know. I haven't had problems with a phone line in the last 15 years or so. Pretty soon we won't even need land lines. I have a very good memory and BT service was always a joke.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • PoohBah
    Love rating 18
    PoohBah said

    We used to dial DIR for directory enquiries; I can't find when it changed to 192. I understand the rot set in when cold-calling salesmen found it quicker to phone 192 than look up long lists of numbers in the paper directories, and BT (as Post Office Telephones had then become) decided that something had to be done to prevent the service being inundated. Now it's just a rip-off.

    It's easy to knock the telephone service of 40 years ago and more, but technology has moved on a lot: the systems are inherently more robust than they were, and capacity has increased enormously - when did you last hear the "equipment engaged" tone (alternate long and short beeps)?

    Never forget that it was the Post Office Research boys at Dollis Hill who built Colossus, the first fully programmable computer.

    Report on 04 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • matchmade
    Love rating 38
    matchmade said

    Thanks to Cliff D'Arcy for writing such an angry and campaigning article, with which I agree entirely. The telecoms industry and the regulators in particular should be ashamed of themselves.

    As regards people's comments, I'm sorry but Saynoto0870 is *not* a panacea: it can help, but frequently the numbers listed are out of date. Some firms like Birmingham Midshires are very diligent about cancelling all their landlines and forcing you to use 0845. Fortunately my TalkTalk landline gives me 0845 and 0870 numbers for free, but calling from my mobile or a Virgin Media landline is utterly extortionate.

    I also find it can be hard finding a good proportion of numbers on the internet - businesses move and don't update their websites, and listing websites are frequently out of date. Even the Yellow Pages is not what it was, whilst Thomson is hopeless. I absolutely hate the new small-format phone books from BT and Yell - they are tiny compared to the old large books, and to my tired 50-year-old eyes, virtually illegible. I tried complaining to Yell and was told "we've had no complaints", with the implication that I'm some sort of weirdo because I can't read their products . . .

    Report on 05 October 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 25Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 25 months (2.4% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.5% to 2.4% (T&Cs apply)

Halifax BT 25 Month MasterCard

0% for 25 months (2.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 19.0% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV4