Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Gas and electricity

How to avoid the next big energy price rise

Neil Faulkner
by Lovemoney Staff Neil Faulkner on 15 May 2012  |  Comments 11 comments

British Gas profits are up 200% over nine years, thanks to massive price increases. Read how to avoid the coming £100 winter energy price rise.

How to avoid the next big energy price rise

You may have read that British Gas has been preparing the ground for an increase in energy prices once again. 

Reports suggest our bills are set to go up by as much as £100, just in time for winter. But,as I'll explain shortly, you can avoid all of this increase if you act fast. 

British Gas blames rising costs

British Gas is partly blaming a 15% rise in wholesale gas prices. The “wholesale gas price” is what energy suppliers pay for the gas that they sell on to us customers. 

That's not to say they're actually buying any gas at today's higher wholesale prices, however. The big suppliers can and do order extra gas years in advance, when prices are cheaper. 

None of them reveal precisely when they buy gas, or the price they have actually paid. This means we won't ever know if British Gas really needs to pay an extra 15%, or if it's using that as an excuse. 

Our bills shouldn't rise 15%

The good news is that our household energy bills shouldn't go up by 15%. 

Wholesale gas prices are just one cost that suppliers face. They also have to buy wholesale electricity, and pay for infrastructure, staff and offices. So a 15% increase in wholesale gas prices may only be, say, a 5% increase in its overall costs. 

Indeed, while £100 is an awful lot of money, that's still an increase of less than 15% to or energy bills. 

We're paying to rapidly boost British Gas' profits

That doesn't mean British Gas and its owner, Centrica, aren't profiteering. Far, far from it. 

The long-term record of rising profits paints a clear picture: 

British Gas' profits and Centrica shareholders' dividends*

3-year period

BG Residential profits

Centrica dividends per share

2009-2011

£1.86bn

42.5p

2006-2008

£1.05bn

33.7p

2003-2005

£633m

22.5p

*A “dividend” is income paid to shareholders from company profits. A rapidly rising dividend over many years, such as shown in this table, is demonstrative of a business that is quickly increasing its profits. Don't think that, because the dividend is measured in pence, it means it is insignificant! 

The staggering rise in profits shown in the above table speaks for itself. Remember, “profit” is the amount of money the company makes for itself and its shareholders, after it has paid for investment and wholesale energy costs. 

You can't argue that the profits, which are up 200% in nine years, are due to winning more customers. In 2001 British Gas Residential had 18.8m residential energy customer accounts, but in 2011 just 15.9m. 

Centrica shareholders have clearly done very well from what I see as a distinct lack of competition in the industry. Both Centrica's dividends and share price have massively outstripped inflation. The share price has more than doubled, up 2.3 times since the beginning of 2003. 

How to avoid the coming price increases

Fixed deals currently look well priced, and will help you to avoid any chain reaction of winter increases that British Gas is preparing to set in motion. 

EDF Energy's Blue +Price Promise tariff is the cheapest for many customers, beating even the cheapest variable tariffs. The tariff's average bill was around £1,050 in the few sample tests I conducted. It is fixed until September 2013. 

EDF Energy says this tariff has no tie-ins or cancellation fees and it promises to tell you if another supplier is cheaper. This is a confident move. It could be a sign the supplier also thinks energy prices are rising. 

Sainsbury's Energy and first:utility offer fixed tariffs that are just £20 to £30 more expensive. These are fixed till June 2013 and September 2013 respectively. 

Don't expect fixes to remain this cheap for long. Customers are starting to worry about higher prices, so you need to compare and switch gas and electricity supplier quickly before everyone else has the same idea. 

However, check your cancellation charges before switching. Most tariffs have early cancellation penalties if you switch within a specified period, which is usually 12-14 months. 

More: Five gas and electricity rip-offs |  The cheapest balance transfer card around

?

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (11)

  • jamiecfc1
    Love rating 39
    jamiecfc1 said

    As we all know by now all energy companies (and fuel companies, come to that) work outside the realms of any semblance of transparency. Only they will know whether this "15%" (nice round figure) is truth or fiction, but a big hint would come from looking at their fat balance sheets (and shareholders). Thatcher's privatisation of utility companies was a dire move for the average punter - essential supplies (water, gas, electricity) should NEVER be in the hands of private companies. Expect it to get worse in years to come. Rip off Britain indeed.

    Report on 15 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • gonfishin
    Love rating 11
    gonfishin said

    Well said Jamiecfc1!

    But not only are our utilities in the private hands of huge corporates - most of them are not even British!

    Day by day I see the UK looking more and more like a third world country - roads and pavements collapsing, streetlights turned off to save money (although in Herts it's costing us £5m to implement this stupidity!), electricity supplies at risk as a result of policy vaccillation over many years, no significant gas and liquid fuel reserves, prices rising, currency devalued, money printed and virtually given to the banks who then lend it reluctantly but at grossly inflated interest rates, the rich getting richer, the poor getting poorer, a political elite apparently remote from it all and corruption clearly rife in politics, the police and the press.

    Water is in the most unbelievable mess. Here we are in a relatively small country that receives more than it's fair share of rainfall - and yet it seems there's no way of moving water from areas with excess to those allegedly in drought. And the response from the responsible Ministry? Surprise surprise - nothing about fixing the problem despite the clear need for useful infrastructure projects to creat jobs and growth - just "there may be standpipes in the South-East if we have a hot summer" (some chance!)

    I vote we get started on North South water pipe - far more useful and a lot cheaper than some stoopid high speed train bought from the Germans!.....

    It seems our country has been run by a bunch of buffoons for as long as I can remember - and that's a long time - right back to the days before Harold Macmillan told us we'd "never had it do good" in the 1950s.... I'm beginning think he was right!

    Report on 15 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • moreteavicar
    Love rating 23
    moreteavicar said

    What is there to stop us buying in advance by adding a few hundred or even a few thousand units when we submit our meter readings online, and thereby locking in at a cheaper tariff...?

    Report on 15 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • ronat42
    Love rating 62
    ronat42 said

    Sorry moreteavicar, they've already sussed that one. I think you'd find it difficult to get away with it.

    The country may well have been run by buffoons for a lot of our recent history, mainly voted in by people who believed their promises of something for nothing. They were also responsible for employing more buffoons to run our national assets in such a bad way as to make it necessary to sell them. Unfortunately, the new owners, particularly the railways, promptly sold off all of the assets (totally undervalued by the gov't) and awarded themselves nice dividends for being so clever and they are now mainly owned by shareholders who are only interested in profit. We are also expected to bail them out when they fail.

    All in all I think we should all have been better off if the government had kept the nationalised industries and just taxed us to subsidise them. We should at least have been able to point the finger of blame at the people responsible for poor service. Instead, all they did was to spend the proceeds and forget to stop spending when it all ran out. Hence our current position.

    Report on 15 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • OorWullie
    Love rating 38
    OorWullie said

    Currently all gas units across the UK are being fortified but for what reason and why is this being kept from public knowledge. Do the government know something that it is afraid to divulge? This is probably why the cost of gas is rising. Notice the recent move by the Icelanders who threw out the government and nationalised the banks yet this received no mention in the media; why? Is the government afraid that the move may spread?

    Report on 15 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • moreteavicar
    Love rating 23
    moreteavicar said

    Not sure they have ronat42... not that I want to divulge too much. They are only too happy for customers to overpay a bill.. and it's hard to disprove that getting a digit wrong in your reading was anything other than an accident, as it was for me... but yes, if you happen to be silly enough to let in a meter reader, you will at least have a refund to look forward to.

    Report on 15 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • moreteavicar
    Love rating 23
    moreteavicar said

    And why not buy shares in your utility company - enough shares so that the dividend return matches your bills!!

    Report on 15 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • DaveDB
    Love rating 14
    DaveDB said

    It would be nice if Neil Faulkner didn't have dress up figures to make his point, lets have some salient ones...

    Here are a few...Centrica profits fell 30% in 2011 because of higher gas prices and amounted to £52.00 per domestic customer... not exactly a rip-off! Domestic profits were only 22% of total company profits. The dividend in 2022 was 15.4p which amounts to app. 5% on the present (lower) share price of £3.10 so investors and pension funds were not sharing in any "staggering profits".

    The chancellor is probably quite happy to receive the £750million tax paid in 2011.

    Report on 16 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Neil Faulkner
    Love rating 32
    Neil Faulkner said

    Businesses will never move in a smooth direction, DaveDB, that's why my figures average profits and dividends across several years, and compare them to similar periods earlier on. This is much more revealing than your 2011 snapshot, as Benjamin Graham and every other respected and successful fundamental investor or businessman would agree.

    "Centrica profits fell 30% in 2011 because of higher gas prices and amounted to £52.00 per domestic customer... not exactly a rip-off!"

    I can understand why think that about profit per customer. I had anticipated that someone would make a point along those lines, but unfortunately there was no space for me in my article to explain in very plain English for the average reader, who doesn't understand investing, why your point isn't correct.

    Firstly, we shouldn't take your figure of £52 for the reason I just gave -- it is a single-year figure and we should take the average over several years. However, I don't know the three-year average per person off the top of my head* and it's not worth looking up, so for arguments sake we'll use your £52 figure anyway.

    Consider why the profit figure per person is so low. For years, BG and Centrica have been buying companies and assets left, right and centre in order to make their business even stronger and to integrate profitable entities to the group. (Of course, Centrica always says that it's investing for the UK's future energy needs! How selfless of them.)

    When it spends money on those things, it doesn't have to declare that money as profits. Nevertheless, the business is getting better and more valuable, and the shareholder is benefitting. Hence, despite such an apparently small profit margin per customer, they have doubled the dividend and more than doubled the share price over nine years.

    Indeed, BG has been spending far more on investing in assets and businesses than it has been keeping as profit, which disguises its success. In the long run, those assets are likely to be even more valuable to BG than the profits themselves.

    The point is that BG customers are not just paying for its profits, but for its expansion, empire building and moat-digging too. That is more secret. It's also too complicated for my article, but, really, the trend in profits makes my point clearly enough: that BG can't keep telling us every year that prices rises are not at all about increasing profits.

    Neil

    *You can't simply average the three-year profits between the 15.9m accounts mentioned in my article, because many customers will hold more than one account.

    Report on 17 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • joannakd
    Love rating 9
    joannakd said

    Centrica is a huge company made up of various subsidiaries. The article is too generalistic. Is BG the subsidiary making the money ? What about other parts of the business ? What about the meter exchange programme over the next decade ? Who is paying for that (even though it's 'free' for us) ?

    Report on 17 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Neil Faulkner
    Love rating 32
    Neil Faulkner said

    Thanks joannakd.

    I think I was pretty clear, but sorry you didn't think so.

    Where I wrote BG in the article, I meant BG, and where I wrote Centrica, I meant Centrica. So when I wrote about profits and called them "BG Residential's profits", that's what they were.

    On your question about meters and the rest, I don't think there's any need for me to go into each of the infrastructure or other projects that BG (or Centrica) are doing in order to elaborate on the point my article was making. It would also require quite a lengthy essay, I expect.

    Neil

    Report on 17 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3