Follow this topicFollow this topic Knowledge » Gas and electricity

Gas costs, not green measures, to blame for energy prices

Simon Ward
by Lovemoney Staff Simon Ward on 15 December 2011  |  Comments 10 comments

A new report into the impact of low carbon measures on energy bills says they have only accounted for 16% of recent price rises.

Gas costs, not green measures, to blame for energy prices

A new report by Government advisors says that wholesale gas prices are to blame for rising energy bills, not so-called environmental policy costs.

The Committee on Climate Change (CCC) has analysed the impact of meeting the Government’s carbon reduction targets on energy bills.

It looked at dual fuel bills where customers use gas for heating and electricity for power. It found that the average bill had increased by £455 per household over the past six years, from £605 in 2004 to £1,060 in 2010.

Of this increase, it says that £380 is due to a combination of wholesale gas prices and supplier costs, increasing transmission and distribution costs, and increases in VAT.

The remaining £75 was due to low carbon initiatives, with £30 to support investment in low carbon power generation and £45 for funding energy efficiency schemes for homes.

Electricity customers to be hardest hit

However, the CCC forecasts a £110 increase in bills by 2020, with £100 of that to support investment in low-carbon power and £10 to support energy efficiency in homes. It also predicts that £15 per household will be needed to support investment in the power grid.

Households that use electric heating are likely to be hit harder by low carbon measures, but households that don’t use gas or electricity for heating are likely to face the same increases as dual fuel customers.

In November, the Department of Energy and Climate Change estimated that low carbon measures would increase electricity costs by 27% by 2020.

Can these increases be offset?

The CCC suggests a number of initiatives could actually result in energy bills remaining roughly the same as they are today in ten years’ time. It recommends replacing boilers with modern, fuel efficient models, more insulation, more efficient use of heating controls and replacing lights and appliances with newer, more efficient models.

Consumer body Consumer Focus said it agreed with the findings of the report. But it argued that limiting the impact of low carbon costs on future energy bills through greater energy efficiency was “a pretty steep mountain to climb”.

It called for extra Government funding for energy efficiency measures, increased funding for schemes for households affected by fuel poverty and greater transparency from energy companies. It also said that new competition in the energy market would help lower prices.

The Government is due to launch its Green Deal in October 2012, offering loans and subsidies to help make homes more energy efficient.

But Consumer Focus is urging people, particularly those over 70 or receiving benefits, to take advantage of current grants and subsidies on offer. You can find out more about these at the Energy Saving Trust's website

Friends of the Earth called for the Government to investigate the ‘Big Six’ energy companies and “their role in keeping the UK hooked on expensive fossil fuels”.

Industry regulator Ofgem recently published a series of proposals aimed at simplifying bills and tariffs for energy customers.

Want to switch suppliers? Use lovemoney.com's gas and electricity tool to compare tariffs.

More: Energy complaints soar following price rises | Government slashes feed-in tariff benefits

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (10)

  • Basia02a
    Love rating 43
    Basia02a said

    I am very cautious about the newish condensing boilers which are very efficient, but cost a lot more to run. A friend had one of the first in a new house. Apart from the fact that it broke down at least once a year, often twice she was lucky in that she took out a maintenance contract for £250 - far in excess of any fuel savings she made. Also as a rule they may only last for 10 years ( I know several people who have had to buy new boilers, because the old ones were unrepairable after 10 years). Also the last two winters a lot of people we knew had boilers that stopped working when it was really cold - great. The external condensing pipe froze up in the extreme cold, thereby stopping the boiler from working.

    Are these costs taken into account when comparing say optimistically £50 of fuel savings a year, against a £300 maintenance contract and a new £3000 boiler every 10 years?

    Report on 15 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • grahamft
    Love rating 10
    grahamft said

    Condensing boilers should not be more expensive to run: greater efficiency = less gas used for the same heat output. Better still are the MCHP (Micro Combined Heat and Power) boilers, which, although more expensive and larger, use the residual heat to generate electricity, which qualifies for FITS payments.

    Reliability certainly was a problem with the earlier models but should not now be so, so long as you buy a brand with a good reliability track-record. A 10 year life=span should be considered a minimum.

    Freezing condensate pipes should be a thing of the past: installers now connect the condensate outlet to a convenient waste pipe rather than venting it outside.

    Rather than take out a maintenance contract, consider putting away the amount you would pay in premiums each month into an interest earning savings account. Our experience over the past 20 odd years is that the amount we have paid to support our [admittedly unreliable] system has almost exactly equalled the amount we have paid in premiums. Most households would be expected to do much better.

    Report on 15 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • paintitblack
    Love rating 0
    paintitblack said

    Although they forecast a £110 increase by 2020, how much do they think increases in fossil fuel prices will add to the bills?

    Report on 15 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nickpike
    Love rating 270
    nickpike said

    Have you seen how much CO2 we produce compared to China, India, The USA and Russia.

    Next to nothing.

    Report on 15 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • rpb
    Love rating 26
    rpb said

    @nickpike: Indeed, China and the US produce a lot more CO2, but they are also much bigger countries with much larger populations. The US produce about twice the emissions per head that the UK does. And even though we're not doing *too* badly at per capita CO2 emissions (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita), it's a bit blinkered to imply that just because others pollute more we don't need to bother to reduce our emissions any further. We need to take a global approach but also to play our part.

    When you really look at the huge level of pollution humans create, in terms of CO2, black carbon, industrial pollution of waterways and the oceans, and on and on, it's shocking that we've reached this stage with no-one calling a halt to it, and it's only the threat of global climate change that has prodded us to to *anything* about the damage we've been doing to our world.

    Report on 16 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Basia02a
    Love rating 43
    Basia02a said

    Just to put the UK Co2 contribution in perspective. It would take about two weeks for the new power stations coming online in China to replace the UKs emissions

    I remain sceptical about Condensing boilers as I dont know anyone with one who has not had a problem - grahamft included. Often there is no convenient waste pipe when they are fitted.

    It took 10 years for the revelation that they only last 10 years. lets wait for another 10 years and see if the ones around now last longer. My boiler is 14 years old I believe. At the last service (its first) the engineeer told me 'to be honest these last forever and don't need much servicing'.

    Report on 16 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Mike10613
    Love rating 600
    Mike10613 said

    "A new report by Government advisors says that wholesale gas prices are to blame for rising energy bills, not so-called environmental policy costs."

    To quote Mandy Rice-Davis, they would say that wouldn't they!

    Report on 19 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • tranwell
    Love rating 1
    tranwell said

    See how cleverly they look at a long period back to 2004. The green energy costs have only recently kicked in so its percentage is low over that period but if we were to look at its share of the current and future price increases, it would tell a very different story. It is pure spin from the Department of Energy and Climate change.

    Report on 19 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • oldhenry
    Love rating 267
    oldhenry said

    If you belive that you will belive anything! Who do you think pays people 41p a unit to generate electricty on their roof when it is worth a fraction of that ? Why do rich landowners suddenly install windfarms on their land? because it is tax free and subsidised by us lot.

    The Chinese, from whom we buy many of our goods now, build coal power stations because they are reliable and cheap. We buy their goods which are made using caol powered electricty yet we do not see the green loonies rioting about boycotting these nasty Chinese goods made with harmfully generated electricty , do we?

    No hypocrisly rules. The people of UK are being scarificed in the name of green energy, people will die through this and the green lobby love it, especially those making a lot of money, with blood on it.

    Report on 19 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • tuttogallo
    Love rating 75
    tuttogallo said

    I used to work as a home energy adviser and my advice (based on my figures) was not to replace an existing (functioning) boiler with a more efficient one, because the savings over the ten year life of the new boiler are less than its cost.

    The new high efficienncy boilers do have a life of about ten years, whereas my Potterton Neataheat profile (70% efficient) is over 20 years old and still going strong. This would never happen with a modern condensing boiler. I made sure that it had treated water (Fernox) from day1.

    The modern high efficiency boilers are like formula 1 racing cars and the old boilers are like a family car. So the former have many more parts, work in a much more complicated way, the parts are more expensive, fault diagnosis is more difficult etc etc etc

    Insulation is a better way of reducing heating costs and it has no moving parts. However, improved insulation needs good heating controls in order to save money efficiently.

    Report on 19 December 2011  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).

Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV2