How to speed up your broadband

Alison Hunt
by Lovemoney Staff Alison Hunt on 31 July 2009  |  Comments 32 comments

Many of us are getting less than half the broadband speed we're paying for. Don't let your ISP get away with it.

If you've ever switched on your computer in the evening to find your internet connection is sluggish, there could be a good reason. Broadband has been in the news yet again - this time concerning the fact Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are being economical with the truth regarding average speeds.

According to the Office of National Statistics, a whopping 56% of all UK households had a broadband connection in 2008. But according to Ofcom's latest study, around half of us are receiving less than half the speed we're paying for.

Average speed just 4.1Mbps

According to the Ofcom study, the average broadband speed in the UK in April 2009 was found to be 4.1Mbps while it was advertised as being up to 8Mbps.

In the study group, fewer than one in ten (9%) of users on 8Mbps packages received anything over 6Mbps. What's more, rather shockingly, 19% were receiving 2Mbps or less. Yikes.

Isn't 2Mbps fast enough?

Now you may be wondering what all the fuss is about. Anyone still on dial-up can tell you that 2Mbps is certainly fast enough for a bit of surfing and emailing.

But this isn't the point - if you pay for a service you expect to receive that service - and an up to 8Mbps deal should not leave one in five of us languishing with a 2Mbps connection. With increasing numbers of us using our computers for bandwidth-sapping applications such as downloading music and video files, a fast connection is vital.

Who is getting this mythical 8Mbps broadband speed?

Well, in a word, no-one. Bafflingly, OfCom revealed that it is impossible for users to receive the top speed as some capacity is reserved for technical reasons. The maximum achievable in practice is therefore 7.2Mbps, not 8Mbps.

So why don't they just say that then?

Heroes and Villains

So which ISPs sped ahead and which dawdled behind in Ofcom's tests?

ISP and package

Average speed

AOL Broadband (up to 8Mbits)

3.3 to 3.9Mbit/s

BT (up to 8Mbits)

3.8 to 4.2Mbit/s

O2 (up to 8Mbits)

4.1 to 5.1Mbit/s

Orange (up to 8Mbits)

3.8 to 4.5Mbit/s

Plusnet (up to 8Mbits)

3.8 to 4.9Mbit/s

Sky (up to 8Mbits)

4.0 to 4.7Mbit/s

Talk Talk (up to 8Mbits)

3.8 to 4.6Mbit/s

Tiscali (up to 8Mbits)

3.2 to 3.7Mbit/s

Virgin Media (up to 10Mbits)

8.1 to 8.7Mbit/

As you can see Virgin Media's cable broadband won hands down, with its customers achieving speeds of 81-87% of that advertised.

Tiscali, on the other hand proved to be one of the most dismal performers, with customers tested having received a meagre 40-46% of what they paid for.

And interestingly, the top performing non-cable ISPs included O2 and Sky, who also won awards in Broadbandchoices,co.uk's customer satisfaction survey.

Personally, I find this all quite annoying. Broadband may not be the biggest bill households have to cover, but it's still significant and we deserve to get good value for money. If a service says "up to 8Mbps", that's what we should receive - or we should be classed as being on a slower speed and put on a cheaper package.

So what can we do to improve our broadband speed?

The study found that there are a number of factors that influence the connection speed we will achieve that unfortunately we have no control over.

People who live in rural areas, for example, will typically suffer slower speeds compared to urban customers. And customers living further away from the telephone exchange will also receive slower connection speeds compared with those living close by.

If uprooting your home doesn't appeal, one solution is to look into whether you can get a cable connection. Around half of UK households apparently have access to cable broadband which can offer a faster and more reliable service.

But there are a few things we can do for ourselves - check out these tips from Broadbandchoices,co.uk.

  • Test your speed

First things first, find out the speed you are actually getting by using this speed checker.

  • Call your ISP

If you're not happy, give your ISP a call and tell them - there may be something they can do to help.

  • Reposition your router

If you've got your wireless router hidden away in a cupboard upstairs you could be in for a treat. The signal they give out is significantly affected by obstructions such as doors and walls, as well as sources of interference - wireless devices like cordless phones being top culprits. Move it to a location with as few obstructions between it and the computer as possible, and you may find a boost in connection speed.

  • Disable iPlayer and 4OnDemand

If you've ever used P2P software such as the BBC's iPlayer, ensure you disable them when not in use - or they'll run in the background slowing the computer, as well as using up any download allowances.

  • Don't surf at rush hour

If you want a quicker connection don't surf when everyone else is. Traffic tends to peak between 8pm-10pm. Daytime or late at night are best.

  • Switch provider

Finally, if you're still not happy it may be time to switch to a different provider. Even if you can't be offered a faster connection (due to your proximity to the telephone exchange etc) you could be paying less for the speed you're getting. Try out this comparison calculator and find out more from Ofcom's Advice guide.

So find out the speed you're getting from your ISP and, if you can't improve it, call them up and find out what they'll do regarding connection and crucially, the price. There's enough competition in the broadband market - it's about time providers started fighting for our business.

Search for a cheaper broadband provider in association with lovemoney.com

More: Save £110 with a broadband bundle | Britain's best broadband providers

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (32)

  • RichardPR
    Love rating 0
    RichardPR said

    I get mine from Virgin, the service is solid and rarely breaks down. When there is a fault, reporting it is easy and you'll often find that the engineers are already at work.

    I have also (contrary to most peoples opinions) had top notch customer service. I've always used Apple Computers and this has never been a problem when it comes to getting legible technical help.

    Btw currently unemployed & not affiliated to Virgin. :-)

    Report on 31 July 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Glynderi
    Love rating 1
    Glynderi said

    This is one of those non-stories. All the points made - both in the article and by the ONS are well-known and refer to aspects of broadband delivery that users can do little about.

    The point about relocating a wireless router is valid, although much less so if your router isn't wireless. My connections to my 4 pcs are all hard-wired. I learnt a long time ago the wireless connectivity is less than perfect.

    Large numbers of us do not live in a cable area and many of us live outside of London, so switching providers often simply means changing bill providers as BT still controls the local loop. I can walk to our exchange in 25 mins, but the service I receive from PlusNet gives me 3.4Mbs. BT would need to fibre up our town and that's years away. PlusNet can do little about the infrastructure.

    As for customer service PlusNet, as all the annual surveys show, give good service. I fancy BT's Option 3 with its extra line/number, red-hot router and wifi PAYG out & about, but as I've had to deal with them for several friends, I don't think I could stand their appalling, India-based support lines.

    What the Government needs to do is pull its finger out and see that we all get 50Mbs at least. But, seeing as they've put us all in hock, we'll have to dream.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • aki2403
    Love rating 0
    aki2403 said

    I'm with virgin

    media, and as Richard said have found them very reliable, I've only ever had one problem with the

    service, and that was because of local thugs ripping everything out of

    one of the green phone boxes (they came out and started work on it the same day).

    I pay out for the 10Mb package, and using speedtest.net I get an actual download speed of 9.91Mb (http://www.speedtest.net/result/530806939.png)

    In the past I've had orange broadband (as it was free with my

    mobile contract), but had horrendous service issues, terrible download

    speeds (we're talking less than a quarter of the stated) and none

    exsistent customer service when complaining about a fault. Which

    triggered my move to virgin media, a move I made some three years ago,

    and have not once regretted.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • CaptainFlak
    Love rating 32
    CaptainFlak said

    I am also on Virgin and subscribe to the up to 10 mbps service, using broadband choices speed test I regularly get nine point something speeds and have on occasion exceeded 10 mbps (I think the record was 11.4). I play onlne poker and if the number of disconnects experienced by other players in comparison to mine is anything to go by then the reliability is very high as well. Because of this I haven't been attracted to "free broadband" from SKY or Orange, both of which I can have, but of course I'll use these as a bargaining tool when my current Virgin discount ends.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jaymie
    Love rating 18
    jaymie said

    4.1mbps IS 'up to' 8mbps!

    I hope Virgin really are better now. When they were ntl: they were next to useless. The UBR (Universal Broadband Router - through which the area's cable modems used to run) used to fall over a few times every month, putting customers out of action for several hours. If it's now easy to report and engineers are on the case, good for them.

    I'm on ASDL with PlusNet and had just one problem, which the engineers correctly diagnosed and promptly advised me what to do.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • LateDeveloper
    Love rating 22
    LateDeveloper said

    I am with Virgin too, however what these reports neglect to say is that a lot of ISP's do network shaping on traffic. The reprt also neglects things like bandwidth reductions and speed limitations at various times.

    Although the speed of the net is given, that is usually the maximum speed, and VM say they will maintain that speed to within 10% of the top speed, other ISP's give upper and lower limits, which is why everyone needs to read the fine print(as with any financial based product), I do believe BT state a lower figure.

    Traffic shaping can reduce bandwidth down by half the stated speed and is usually at a time when the ISP cannot be contacted, or by the time you get through their tecnical support process, the speed magically increases.

    VM are no exception to this rule, and it is always best to make a record of the speed(if you are able) and to look to see if there are any faults within your region, again most paeople do not know how to.

    With any of these speeds, most people do not even know what they are looking at, mixing up between bits and Bytes, bits is what an ISP provides, Bytes is usually displayed as the download speed (bits/8).

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Pennyinvestor
    Love rating 3
    Pennyinvestor said

    I just wasted 15 mins of my life registering for the speed tester download only to find in only works with Micros**t enabled computers.

    You could have saved me the effort.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • chrisjmiller
    Love rating 1
    chrisjmiller said

    My ADSL connection reports 7.6Mb download and 0.4Mb upload - I'm with Nildram (aka Pipex, aka Tiscali, soon to be TalkTalk ...). Real life download speeds are about 6Mb. ADSL is theoretically capable of 8Mb/s, but that is download + upload speed and the various communication protocols introduce overheads, so 6-7Mb is about the best speed you'll ever see with this technology. Why anyone would need 24Mb (equivalent to streaming 5 hi-def videos simultaneously 24 hours a day) is beyond my simple comprehension.

    I live in the country, but only 400m from my local exchange, plus I used to have a (new) business ISDN line, so the cabling (should be) shiny and new.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • JohnW
    Love rating 26
    JohnW said

    A case of a lot of people saying a lot of what they know little about. Whilst I agree you should get what you pay for, the throughput speeds on the internet are beyond the control of your ISP. They can provide the connectivity to the internet at the speed advertised but the speed you actually get depends on the rest of the internet and the server you are accessing.

    There are two aspects to your connection speed to your ISP which are often confused and misunderstood.

    First there is the technical access speed on your link to the local exchange, you will be able to see this in the control panel of your router. In my case I am about 3 miles from the exchange and my connect speed is over 7mbps. This speed will depend on how far you are from the exchange and the quality of your wiring, including internal wiring in your home, if you have more the one phone handset connected you will reduce the speed and for every telephone handset connected your speed will go down.

    Secondly there is the throughput speed of the network, this not only depends on your technical access speed which will be the maximum you can get, but also the speed through the internet and the speed the server can actually deliver what you have requested. You can use a speed tester, but this only gives you the result into that server. As servers get busier they get slower. If you access a server in the USA for example you may go through several providers to get there each with thier own congestion and restrictions.

    You can work out using various tools where the problems are, but this does require a little technical knowledge.

    Tests made a few minutes ago show my technicall access to be 7.648mbps but tests into speedtest.net give me results between 4 and 6.3mbps. File downloads are always slower than a speedtest. My provider is BT as in the rural areas you get BT connections whoever you sign up with.

    So what are you paying your ISP for, the link from your home to the exchange, the link to some other point or the speed of service from another provider that they have no control over?

    I do think they need to be clearer about what is actually being provided, but be aware quality costs money and supplying guaranteed faster speeds will put up internet rates, You are getting what you pay for, it is just not clear what you are paying for.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Lion113
    Love rating 0
    Lion113 said

    Just been checking my Virgin Media broadband connection. I pay for 'Up to 1 Mbits/sec' Your excellent checker has just given me the result:  Average download speed 0.13 Mb/s and upload speed 0.06 Mb/s. This is a good day with relatively fast speeds.  This is not Virgin's fault. I am in a rural location and Virgin use the leaky ancient copper which the GPO laid many years ago for some of the 10 km to the exchange.  I can in no way fault Virgin, their customer service is excellent but this is their slowest package. I might add that I got a connection through BT internet which was the same speed and that took eighteen months to get a connection at all to replace the 0.003 Mb/s dial up so I am satisfied. So lets not shame the ISPs when a great deal of their speed loss is due to an ancient telephone infrastructure. The campaign should switch to the vast investment needed in the telephone network.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jayprime
    Love rating 1
    jayprime said

    I have been with Virgin for several years, first on 'Dial-up' then I 'upgraded' to Broadband, allegedly 'up to 8Mbps'.

    During June and July I ran the Speed checker 39 times, sometimes in the morning (9AM or later), sometimes early afternoon, sometimes mid to late evening.

    12 times it was less than 200Kbps, including one occasion when it reached the dizzy low of 17.6Kbps, 19 times it was between 201 and 510Kbps, once between 510 and I000Kbps, 7 times between 1000Kbps and a peak of 6650, which was at 09.47 in the morning.

    Whenever I have contacted Virgin I have been told "There must be something wrong with your computer" - basically saying we couldn't care less!

    I am currently researching to see if any of the rest of the shower are any better, to see if it's worthwhile changing.

    Oh, by the way, in May BT 'upgraded' our phone lines, which is why I'm quoting June and July!

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • ian4c
    Love rating 2
    ian4c said

    How would any of you like to have my sort of broadband. I am with TT and my speed is around 750bps! Terrible. Live on the outskirts of Exmouth Devon

    One day I guess a fibre optic cable will be provided but by then I will probably pushing up the daisies!

    So, all of you with fast connections thank yourself as lucky.

    Ian

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • no_politician
    Love rating 0
    no_politician said

    The kit at the exchanges is paid for by phone calls and broadband users. Fair enough.

    BUT, the wire that runs from the exchange to your house belongs to BT and they charge separately for it, regardless of who you pay the 11 quid, (or thereabouts), a month to.

    This wire was installed by by the Post Office in the year dot, and much of it has never been replaced.

    This is money for old rope, (literaly!), for BT.

    Do the sums, roughly 130 quid a year to maintain a length of wire! Why?

    It is about time that BT ploughed some of this easy money back into the system and replaced the wire with fibre optics, but of course to do this requires digitising the analog phone system, which they do not want to do.

    They try to run the service like the trains. That is, to expect the passengers to pay upfront for the new service in the hope they will get it right.

    Whereas what should happen is, that BT should replace all the wire with Fibre Optics and then recoup their costs from the monthly line charge, and as I see it, 130 quid a year should be more than enough!

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • eftpotrm
    Love rating 4
    eftpotrm said

    Another Virgin customer here, but less impressed. BBC iPlayer and YouTube are currently all but unusable, even if I'm nowhere near the capacity. With the iPlayer you can see it's starting fine on the high quality, then failing so dropping back to the lower service - which then becomes unusable so it drops down to the next one, and so on - yet I get fine numbers on the speed testers. If they aren't deliberately throttling the connection then there's an odd problem that looks very like throttling...

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • twojags
    Love rating 0
    twojags said

    I seem to get the national average of 4.1Mbs from PlusNet who I rate very highly even if they are bit more expensive than some ISP's. It seems to me that broadband service providers might just as well say "up to 24 Mbs" when selling their product so why not base services on a minimum download speed e.g. 2 Mbs and upwards for 95% of the time?

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • montevarchi
    Love rating 0
    montevarchi said

    No problem with my ISP (Zen), they give as much as they can. My problem is with BT who can only offer 2Mbs from the exchange. I always feel marginalised by the fact that people in the larger areas have the option of cable whilst we are stuck with an antiquated service from one of the crapiest companies in the land.

    Bring on the revolution they promised three weeks ago, though they will probably ignore us and concentrate on the cities.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nosbort
    Love rating 130
    nosbort said

    Of course you also need to read the smallprint, almost all ISPs have a 'fair usage policy and in it they reserver the right to reduce the speed provided if they decide that you are using too much. BT have teams of people who monitor BT customers usage and throttle the speed if they detect that you are using the connection to carry VoIP to other carriers, they also, along with others, throttle the connection at certain times if you use iPlayer or 4-OD. BT also charge for the free callerID in the TPS if you bypass their Voice service by using VoIP.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • SarahJay
    Love rating 0
    SarahJay said

    I am also with Virgin, and up til earlier this year I was only signed up to their minimum rate of "up to 2Mbs". Then I got a letter from them saying the price on that service was increasing. A quick look at the website showed that actually they've done away with that service and are effectively charging me for their new 'minimum' of up to 4Mbs.

    However, according to a recent BBC report, speeds above 2Mbs are currently impossible in my post code area. Pointing this out to Virgin, I am told they are 'working on that'.

    I'm not holding my breath. What are the chances of any kind of refund do you think?!

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • bubzyg
    Love rating 0
    bubzyg said

    Moving your router wont affect your connection speed one bit. the connection speed is determined by the router and the exchange. rewiring the house so that your router isnt struggling to compete with all the interference from your internal wiring will probably make a difference ( on a standard copper land line with a BT "NTE", try taking the front plate off the two screws on the front cover, if you have wiring connected to that just try the router in the test socket in the back) if that works then consider whether or not you need the internal wiring. be careful if you have any sort of alarm plugged into your telephone system as this will likely trigger it. Also the time of day wont affect your connection speed, only the data download rate as broadband is effectively a "shared service" with a number of users per "card" and a maximum data throughput that is shared between them, this doesnt mean however that if you currently recieve 4mb/s that you will get 8mb/s at 3.00am, just that you will be likely to realise the potential of that 4mb/s.

    another point that people seem to miss is that you pay for 8megabit broadband. at its MAXIMUM download rate you wouldnt recieve more than 1 megaBYTE of data per second as 8 bits = 1 byte. this seems to be a big stumbling point for many people.

    just a few points but ones worth making in my opinion. broadband is new(ish) technology running in many cases on a copper infrastructure that was never designed for digital data. i would hazard that 90-100% of telephone exchanges are digital now, analogue went out many years ago. check out NGA for more info on fibre.

    - bubzy

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • gordonbanks42
    Love rating 11
    gordonbanks42 said

    I pay Be* a little over £20 a month for 22Mbps and get about 21Mbps. I am a very happy camper. I notice that they weren't listed in the article. Too obscure perhaps. Russian-sounding support people, but quite intelligible and very helpful and competent.

    If you want to know what on earth I do with such a fast connection, it's to make sure that the uploading and downloading that needs to get done overnight gets done overnight, and doesn't spill over into the daytime, when I need decent response times for IP phone and such like.

    And no, I don't live inside the local exchange...

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • redechan
    Love rating 0
    redechan said

    I live in a house with two feet thick stone walls and would like to be able to use a laptop if possible in any part of the house I choose. We have two computers each wired from a ADSL router. Does anyone here have experience of the "through the normal electricity wires" type connection? - I think it is a sort of plug you just plug into any socket where you want connection. We also live half a mile from our local (very rural) exchange and, on checking, our speed is about 2-3mbs on average. We pay BT for 8mbs and another problem is that when I apply to TalkTalk or any other ISP I am told that I am not eligible for any of their bundles because of my location.

    Report on 02 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • nosbort
    Love rating 130
    nosbort said

    Redechan, I have used a couple of the through the wires ethernet connectors, they work well and will connect reliably. On the ADSL speed, the one thing that may make a difference is a filtered socket, this isolates the ADSL from the house wiring and will help if you have a number of extinsions. As you are probably going to use the through the wires ethernet the location of the router will not be a problem.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • boltondave
    Love rating 0
    boltondave said

    Surely, unless you're getting absolutely terrible interference or your walls are made of metal, moving your wireless router won't make any difference. A home wireless set-up will usually either operate at 11Mbps or 54Mbps. Now, you'd need some serious problems to lower those to the comparative trickle of around 4Mbps that's coming out of the 'phone socket.

    One thing that can make a difference is to scan what channels your neighbours are using and set your kit as far from their channels as possible. The channels overlap slightly and this can cause a lot of dropped packets.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • UpHillAllTheWay
    Love rating 38
    UpHillAllTheWay said

    For general browsing, as long as you have more than a meg or two, the local interface speed doesn't seem to make that much difference. If I do a Google search, some time is taken up with my transmission to Google, some time is used for Google's mainframe to do the search, and some time to get the results back to me - yet the entire operation is as near instantaneous as I could want.

    If I click a link to another site, I may well have to wait 5 seconds for the screen to refresh. Clearly, this isn't a problem in my local speed, as my local line works quickly with Google.

    If I go on Youtube, some videos download at streaming speed - in other words, the video is never interrupted while the data download catches up; other videos download painfully slowly, and can be viwed only in 5-second bursts,with 10-second gaps while the next short section is downloaded. The only acceptable way of viewing them is to allow lots of time for them to download completely, then view them. None of that is dependent on my local interface - it's good enough for the videos that are supplied at an acceptable rate.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • jaymie
    Love rating 18
    jaymie said

    Here's a broadband speed tester. I think this is actually provided by PlusNet.

    This should work on all systems, I believe.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Iniq
    Love rating 27
    Iniq said

    Why are you and OFCOM whingeing?

    UP TO 8MB means UP TO ... just that. Not "You will get 8MB" or "We promise you 8MB". Plain straightforward English. All "up to ..." means is that it certainly won't be greater than 8MB, and it could be far less. So no untruthfulness or deception there.

    Many people might like higher downlaod speeds, but that is a differeent issue from arguing about the wording of advertisements.

    A far more legitimate complaint about advertising - and on on which, oddly, OFCOM refuses to act, is the blatant lie "Unlimited downloads". NO ONE offers unlimited downloads. They are all subject to small print "fair usage" terms. Not that this is at all unreasonable; truly unlimited downloads would be impractical, and the "fair usage" terms usually are reasonable fair.

    But "subject to fair usage" means that they are not unlimited, and to describe them as such is not merely deceitful, it is clearly and blatantly untrue. Why on Earth doesn'r OFCM or the Advertising Standards Authority crack down on the use of this completely untruthful statement?     

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • OzsWorld
    Love rating 22
    OzsWorld said

    I have to say that as a Virgin Media customer, I've only ever had 1 issue in the past 2 years of using their broadband. They recently upgraded their 2MBits users to 10MBits without charge and I can't recommend them highly enough when it comes to speed (and accurate speed).

    One thing that attracted me to Virgin wasn't the speed or the company reputation, it was the fact that I didn't have to fork out £11 a month for a BT landline (as Virgin Broadband is Cable) so no BT line required. From a savings point of view - pretty good I thought.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • EndowmentVictim
    Love rating 0
    EndowmentVictim said

    I just checked my screen - I am reading this lot at 5.0 mbps (tha's mega BITS, not bytes, per second of course), and I get mine from Telecom Plus, the Utility Warehouse, which I recommend, and which does not appear in your list. It's very adequate, with little downtime. Good price, too. Cheers, EV.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • Dampflok
    Love rating 22
    Dampflok said

    Please excuse me if this has been said already.

    Every paket of data received has start and stop bits (which is why no-one can get a true 8mb/s.

    Signals are often delayed in transit so that can have an adverse effect on your 'speed'.

    At busy times your ISP may add further delays as there is never 1 router at their end for every customer.

    There has to be a minimum signal to moise rataio to gat high speed. The further you are from the exchange, the less that ratio is so packets may get corrupted and have to be re-sent. I live just beyond the old maximum distance over which one could receive broadband, yet I still get 3mb/s - I am impressed and not compaining.)

    I paid for a 0.5mb/s link (with Demon interent) since when the have increased the speed twice.

    Most ISPs say 'up to' 8mb/s so they are not misleading the public.

    Incidentally, increasing a home or office cable network from 10mb/s to 100 usually only doubels teh speed (or so I read in a quality computer magazine).

    If you take in all these things (and others) it is a wonder teh speeds aren't even slower.

    Chris.

    Report on 03 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • lagunamad
    Love rating 0
    lagunamad said

    Re: redechan's query about using the mains for transmitting ethernet around the house using the mains. We have a stone house built in 1909, last rewired in 1975, and the system works perfectly. We have Advent adaptors from PC World (but these are now expensive) and a Cisco Linksys adapter which has 3 sockets and they all work happily together. If you Google on 'home plug' you will find there are several manufacturers and quite a competitive market.

    Report on 04 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • noomsybaby
    Love rating 0
    noomsybaby said

    My 2p some practical advise for getting the best connection speeds if you have ADSL broadband (ie not virgin)

    Things to uderstand about ADSL technology.

    It was developed to use higher frequencies down your copper phone line so that it can co-exist with your analogue phone; this is why you need those filters. The length of the line between your house and the exchange is the main factor in limiting your speed. Being copper cable pairs which are bundled in 100/300 pair cables there is cross interference from external factors as well as the other cables. This is most noticable late at night when more people are using it hence you may notice you connection become less reliable / slower at night. (note this is in addition to the fact more people using the bandwith at the exchange / ISP connection will also slow your internet experience)

    Helpful hints

    1 - Filters, without these in the correct place you will suffer a bit drop in connection speed. Depending on your wiring will affect how and where to place these.

    Scenario 1 - Phone line + router + phone in same socket (no fixed extension wiring in back of NTE socket). Put filter in phone socket and connect router and phone to filter.

    Scenario 2 - Phone line + router + phone +extension wiring / sky box in same socket (no fixed extension wiring in back of NTE socket). Put filter into NTE socket, phone /extension lead into filter and router into filter. Ensure that any other phones/extension leads are connected into the filter and they will not need filters on them(this will drop your signal)

    Scenario 3 - Phone Line + router + phone + hard wired extensions in the NTE socket. You will need a filter on every extension socket in use (i.e. has the router or a phone attached). For best performance try to have the router attached to the master socket (the one with the split faceplate) as there will be less signal loss. Ensure that all the extensions have been wired correctly and use good quality cable as these can drag the signal down.

    I have seen a friends internet from bt dropped to 0.5m due to an incorrectly placed filter, I repositioned filters and line speed increaded to 5M

    Wireless

    Choose your channel wisley !

    You've spotted that the world and there wife in your neighbourhood are all using the same default channel as you (how ? download netstumbler and see what chanels wireless are being used.) and have decided to change yours to another to reduce interference. Your default is set at 6 (for example) and you have a choice of 1-11, what do you pick ? you think 5 sounds good ? nope bad choice. Due to the bizzare way the wirless channels are spread out there is an overlap !!! The channel nuber is the centre channel, so it is best to to stick to one of three non overlapping settings, 1, 6, 11

    Check what you are getting.

    Logon to your router and check the statistics of your line. The default password and login are normally supplied with the router either on the router or int the documantation. Check for your line speed and noise margin. line speed tells you what speed the router negotiated and noise margin tells you how much interference tolereance is currently available. the lower the noise margin the more suceptible to interuptions. 7.0 + is ok, 6-7 you will start experiencing interuptions, 5.9 or lower you internet connection will stall/become unuseable.

    If your noise is low rebooting you router either through web interface or power cycle will cause it to resync at the best rate for the current line conditions *NOTE* current, that is why you may find a router you turn on first thing in the morning and is fast crawls by night time, check those stats and reboot if necessary, some routers will automatically resync, others will not (sky ) I have rebooted my sky late at night and leave router on permanently, have only had to reboot since discovering this about three times in the 18 months i have had sky (when the router has locked up for antoher reason)

    Hope this helps

    Neil

    BTW i have sky max package, was quote 2m, get 6m stable (7m if rebooted in morning see above) 

    Cust service ok

    Report on 05 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • noomsybaby
    Love rating 0
    noomsybaby said

    some usefull websites for more info tips

    Note no affiliation just sites i have found helpful

    http://www.samknows.com/

    Wealth of info including exchange searches, check who provides services, estimated speed for postcode.

    http://www.skyuser.co.uk/

    Wealth of info for sky broadbad users and other sky stuff as well.

    http://www.stumbler.net/

    Use this program to check all wireless routers in you area to help select best channel, diagnose wireless signal quality.

    Regards

    Neil

    Report on 05 August 2009  |  Love thisLove  0 loves

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (2.98% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.9% to 2.98% (T&Cs apply).

Barclaycard 26Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 26 months (2.47% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee reduced from 3.5% to 2.47% (T&Cs apply)

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels