Broadband speeds: broadband providers are lying to us

Cliff D'Arcy
by Lovemoney Staff Cliff D'Arcy on 23 May 2012  |  Comments 17 comments

The broadband watchdog has accused some providers of failing to be honest about speeds.

Broadband speeds: broadband providers are lying to us

According to the latest statistics, there are nearly 53 million internet users in the UK, out of a population of 62 million. Just about everyone in Britain between the ages of 12 and 82 is online.

But many of us don't get a fair deal when it comes to our broadband packages. Last week telecommunications regulator Ofcom ordered providers to be more open and honest when providing information about broadband speeds.

How's my speed?

In December 2008, the Voluntary Code of Practice on Broadband Speeds was introduced to inform consumers of their likely maximum speed before signing up to a broadband service. This wasn't as effective as hoped, so a strengthened Code came into force in July 2011.

As well as other conditions, the new Code requires internet service providers (ISPs) to give estimated speeds in the form of a range as early as possible in their sales processes. All of the UK's largest ISPs have signed up to the Code, which covers 95% of broadband users.

For cable services (such as those provided by Virgin Media), the Code allows a single speed to be quoted, rather than a range. This is because cable speeds are not affected by the quality and length of copper telephone lines, which means more certainty about download and upload speeds for cable users.

Speed checks

In order to check if ISPs were following the rules, Ofcom organised 1,369 'mystery shopping' enquiries, both online and by telephone. These took place between 17 December 2011 and 19 January 2012.

This mystery-shopping exercise revealed that compliance with the Code has improved, but further work is also needed. Ofcom found that in 93% of telephone enquiries made by mystery shoppers, a speed estimate was given to consumers by providers. Almost three-quarters (72%) of the time, this estimate was given as a range.

In other words, only one in 14 calls (7%) failed to adhere to the Code, which is a pretty good result for what is a voluntary industry Code.

Could do better

Then again, Ofcom did find some weaknesses in sales processes.

For instance, some sales agents had to be prompted by mystery shoppers before they provided speed estimates. The Code requires that this information be 'volunteered as early as possible in the sales process', so some ISPs were not properly compliant with the Code.

Overall, unprompted speed estimates were given to the mystery shoppers in nearly three-fifths (59%) of mystery-shopping calls. Then again, this estimate masks a wide range of results, as the following table shows:

ISP

Unprompted

pass rate

ISP

Unprompted

pass rate

Karoo

76%

UK average

59%

Sky

72%

BT Total Broadband

48%

Plusnet

67%

TalkTalk

47%

As you can see, with a score of 76%, Karoo was the ISP most likely to give callers an estimated speed without prompting. Sky came second in this test (72%), followed by Yorkshire-based Plusnet (67%).

At the other end of the scale, with a pass rate of 47%, TalkTalk did terribly by providing unprompted speed estimates less than half of the time. BT -- the UK's biggest broadband provider -- hardly did better, thanks to a pass rate of 48%.

In other words, TalkTalk and BT failed to meet the Code in more than half of cases, which leaves enormous room for improvement. After a warning from Ofcom, both ISPs have agreed to amend their staff training and sales processes.

To try to ensure information on broadband speeds reaches consumers, Ofcom is talking with ISPs to improve the disclosure provided by their call-centre staff. Also, the watchdog is reminding ISPs that their sales agents must offer speed estimates as early in conversations as possible.

In addition, Ofcom is updating its consumer guides on choosing a broadband provider and broadband speeds. This will help consumers to ask the right questions before signing up to a new service or switching. The regulator will review the Code again in 2013 -- including another mystery-shopping exercise -- to find out if ISPs have cleaned up their acts.

What should you do?

Claudio Pollack, Ofcom’s consumer group director, said, "It is vital that as the choice of broadband services expands, UK consumers get the best possible information when choosing a broadband provider. Our mystery shopping shows that, while consumer information about broadband speeds has improved in important areas, there is still more to be done."

He adds, "We are working with internet providers to improve information that consumers receive when they sign up to a new service and will continue to monitor this area closely."

In other words, until the Code is mandatory, it's up to consumers to make sure that ISPs give us honest information on broadband speeds.

So when you're shopping around for a better broadband deal (whether online or by phone), the first thing you should ask for is a proper speed estimate. If your actual speeds turn out to be significantly below that estimate, then you have the right to cancel a contract without penalty.

Remember, you can compare broadband packages with the Ofcom-accredited price-comparison site BroadbandChoices.

More on broadband:

Pay £2.49 a month for broadband

BT launches phone and broadband deal for £3.50 a month

How Richard Branson and Usain Bolt tricked me

Third of homes suffer slow broadband speeds

Enjoyed this? Show it some love

Twitter
General

Comments (17)

  • r
    Love rating 67
    r said

    I'm surprised that Virgin Broadband (not cable) is not on there at the bottom end. With a price increase in June bringing the BB rental to over £20 a month for 1.2Mb if I'm lucky and daily disconnections, a CS that's almost impossible to reach (multiple choice to the nth degree) . . . wasn't Virgin considered?

    r.

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  0 loves
  • PDB11
    Love rating 72
    PDB11 said

    It seems to me that speed - how high it is, how soon they tell you about it, how badly it might be affected by your local loop - is seldom of prime importance. Some users - playing some online games, or watching a lot of streaming video, for example - really will see the difference between 8 Mbps and 12 Mbps.

    But for many, such as myself, who just view web pages, send and receive e-mails, and maybe download the odd music track, it is not particularly important whether it is 2Mbps or 20Mbps. More important are things like customer service and ease of use of some of the features.

    For example, here in Germany I'm on a contract with O2. I was advised to pick them because I'm here for a year, and (I was told) they are the only provider who doesn't have two-year minimum contract term. O2 have a lot of technical things that I might want to change (including the password on my wireless router) inaccessible behind a dumbed down user interface. So: my most important reason for choosing them and my most important reason for disliking them, and neither has anything to do with speed.

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Justkeepgoing
    Love rating 28
    Justkeepgoing said

    One other problem with broadband is transparency on the amount of data used. I have a BT broadband connection with a 10GB monthly limit. Yes I can see my data usage graph updated each day but where is the breakdown of sessional use? The reason I query this is that I tend to run close to my limit each month and I do access the Internet frequently, but I rarely download video files or use iPlayer. I never use Facebook or other social networks, so how do I use that much data?

    I do quite often use a 3 mobile mifi mobile data connection exclusively for a week or more when my pattern of usage is similar but the data used would equate to about 2GB per month or less. The mobile connection also shows exact usage per session.

    My presumption is that BT would be unwilling to provide accurate data use figures as they can charge for additional usage based on their judgement.

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • HxMoney1
    Love rating 1
    HxMoney1 said

    I agree with Justkeepgoing. I've moved house, kept the same provider. My old package was 2Gig per month download limit, my new is 10Gig per month. We used to hit the download limit from time to time on the old package, but with the new package we hit it every month even though our habits are the same.

    Seems to me they just want me to buy more download Gig's at extra cost. Nice trick guys! Are you going to mug my granny as well? What a rip off...

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • thedelboy
    Love rating 1
    thedelboy said

    I have been with Virgin for 4 years for telephone BB and tv, bb has never worked properly so after over 3 years I cancelled both tv and bb , they promised that they would look into why I was charged for BB but not recieving it properly, got offered 3 months free telephone service charge ! I would leave but need a phone line for carelink! and bt want a £100 just for reconecting a line that is already here !

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • GaryDean
    Love rating 56
    GaryDean said

    The business world has always been morally & ethically corrupt. It's just so much more blatant now as the barriers are being pushed back further & further. I don't think it's just the broadband providers who are lying to us but just about every provider of life's essentials from supermarket chains to utilities companies to garage services.

    Show me an honest mechanic & I'll show you an honest politician or journalist. They do exist but are few & far between as the money god takes a stronger grip on men's hearts & souls.

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    @GaryDean

    Get a grip. Most people are honest, pleasant and just want the best for their families. You clearly know nothing of the the business world so either go to some remote island where you can live off your own resources or pick specific issues and highlight them. Most business in the world is done by small businesses and the ethics of a few large companies don't taint the majority of honest people out there.

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • GaryDean
    Love rating 56
    GaryDean said

    electricblue, yes most people are decent & honest & another look at my post will reveal that I'm not refering to the small hardworking business people. Indeed I run my own small business. It is more the corporate level I am refering to. Although like a lot of people I have been bitten a few times by the smaller dubious mechanic. Also, I do believe in the corporate world most people are decent. However when one considers the various issues that have been highlighted of late it is clear to see that honesty has become somewhat of a casualty. The environment has become more vicious that it used to be. My wife grew up under communism. Most people were decent. Most police officers were decent. But people operating in such an environment are often forced to act in ways that they would not even consider were the circumstances different. When it comes to protecting ones livelihood or job very few will measure what they do by a moral or ethical yardstick.

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    Almost every manufactured household product has passed through some 'large corporation', everyday brands we take for granted are big business. In any level of business or politics MOST people are honest and I think it is only an age of better communication for the masses which might give the impression that things are getting less moral but I don't believe that for an instant.

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • CuNNaXXa
    Love rating 362
    CuNNaXXa said

    Watch or listen to any advert, and you can hear the lies.

    Autoglass... Our technicians are trained to the highest standards.

    What is a standard? It is an agreed level that is considered passable, so how do you get a higher standard? Maybe you could say, 'beyond the standard', but Autoglass don't use that phrase.

    Also, how comes Gavin has only just become 31. For many years Gavin, 30, technician for Autoglass, stayed at 30.

    That is only just one example.

    Salesmen and women are trained to always promote the best a product has to offer, while ignoring the worst a product has to offer. They even lie, just to get a sale.

    Never trust anyone who is on commission or bonus for selling, because greed dictates that they will say anything to earn their money.

    Oh, and not all chips become cracks, and most insurers now charge an excess for chip repair, so it is not free anymore.

    Wonga make borrowing money cool, when the reality is that it is painfully expensive.

    Tesco are price dropping, even though core products have gone up by as much as 40% (two packs on 500g mince used to be £5, but are now £7 for two).

    How did the human race survive before Activia or Yakult?

    Sky TV has channels showing essential viewing? Why is it essential. Will we die if we don't watch Sky Atlantic?

    If it is for sale, there is a con behind it somewhere.

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • OorWullie
    Love rating 38
    OorWullie said

    A few years ago there was a problem was the speed of the Internet but not today. Currently I am with BT and previously with TalkTalk who bought out Tiscali which I was with and over those recent years the speed of the Internet has been as fast as I would desire and I cannot see how anyone would wish it to be faster. My current download with BT in a rural area is 8GB and BT is about to upgrade the line to make it faster; okay, but is there any real need for a faster system? If I have a complaint it would be about the monthly cost; I have a BB and telephone package which currently costs around £40 monthly and this is with the full priced line rental which BT offers cheaper which is an option I will take when the timing is right. Its BB package and line rental operated on different time scales and hence the hesitancy. Three years ago for the same package with Tiscali cost £25 so a hike-up of £15 in three years. Other than this, no problem.

    Report on 23 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • MK22
    Love rating 142
    MK22 said

    One thing we have to accept about electricblue is with the colourful name and the rose coloured spectacles, electricblue does cover the entire spectrum. What of, I leave to others...

    Report on 24 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • r
    Love rating 67
    r said

    @MK22

    I usually enjoy @electricblue's outspokenness and I think his (or her) views are generally correct even if they are loud. We should all realise by now that business - small and large firms that are making things, selling things, exporting things or services - are THE source of wealth of this country and, in turn, provide the employment that we all need. The public sector is not wealth-producing. It is a financial drain on our society. That is not the same as saying that it is not needed - it is. Any government that creates public sector jobs is not producing wealth for the country - those jobs have to be paid for by the small and large firms - known as the Private Sector.

    It seems to me that there are a lot of people on here that want to "take" more than to "produce" and don't understand - or don't want to understand - the basic principles of wealth and financial management. Without the Private Sector, we cannot afford essential things such as the NHS and Schools.

    So, this is what @electricblue seems to support and so do I. What we do need, though, is a government that will look after Team GB and manage our accounts properly. This is what we have been missing for over 20 years . . . and, maybe, a lot, lot longer than that.

    r.

    Report on 24 May 2012  |  Love thisLove  2 loves
  • easygoing
    Love rating 156
    easygoing said

    @MK22, you may chose to agree with electricblue's opinions but that doesn't make them right any more than mine or those of anyone else. As I vowed never again to comment on his pontifications I shall go no further.

    Report on 04 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Snotmee
    Love rating 8
    Snotmee said

    I have recently renewed my BT Total Broadband contract. I am in a very rural location. They gave me an estimate of 2Mb (unsolicited since I already knew what line speed to expect). I am Synchronising at around 7.9Mb and my download speed is over 6Mb consistently when I can be bothered to check it.

    I don't really see the point of service providers being forced to supply estimates as they will simply take the safe option and provide an unrealisticly low estimate as BT have done in this case.

    Report on 04 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • electricblue
    Love rating 643
    electricblue said

    Doesn't Ronseal do what it says on the tin then? Does Andrex scratch your bum?

    I sell specialist manufactured products and they are the best of their kind in the world. I don't need to lie or exaggerate what my products do, they speak for themselves.

    Not all salesmen lie, whether on commission or otherwise. Some industries do have few morals and the broadband and telecoms suppliers (with some notable exceptions - I'm with Primus) seem to be particularly devious - but everyone on the planet is a consumer and to constantly assume that anyone who has a product to sell is a liar is not only stupid, the assumption will make you paranoid and unable to appreciate anything good about humanity.

    Report on 05 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love
  • Stargazer
    Love rating 11
    Stargazer said

    When I recently changed broadband provider I went through the entire process online and was automatically given a speed estimate. Isn't that what most people do these days anyway, so is the question of whether a human on the other end of the phone gives you an unsolicited speed estimate becoming increasingly irrelevant? Or maybe I'm missing something here?

    Incidentally, the migration process was extremely straightforward and I get a faster speed for less than half what I was paying (I changed as a result of a price hike). I even managed to get a MAC code the same day from a notoriously difficult provider - because the people employed to attempt to retain customers were busy and I got transferred automatically to someone who didn't usually deal with migrations but was actually helpful!

    Report on 06 June 2012  |  Love thisLove  1 love

Post a comment

Sign in or register to post a reply.

Our top deals

Credit card
company
Balance transfers rate and period Representative
APR
Apply
now

Barclaycard 27Mth Platinum Visa

0% for 27 months (3.5% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.9% PA (variable). BT fee is reduced from 3.9% to 3.5% (T&Cs apply).

NatWest Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).

Royal Bank of Scotland Platinum MasterCard

0% for 26 months (2.65% fee) Representative 18.9% APR (variable) Apply
Representative example: assumed borrowing of £1,200, representative 18.9% APR (variable). Purchase rate 18.95% PA (variable).
W3C  Thank you for using CGWEBLIV3